Essential Research: 52-48 to Labor; YouGov: 51-49 to Coalition

The gap narrows in the latest Essential Research poll, which also finds strong support for a clean energy target.

This week’s reading of the Essential Research fortnight rolling average records an unusually solid two-point move in favour of the Coalition on two-party preferred, reducing Labor’s lead to 52-48. Nothing in The Guardian’s report on primary votes, so those will have to wait until later in the day. What we do have in the report is that 65% support a clean energy target, 74% back support for renewable energy and “a majority” support Labor’s goal of 50% renewable energy by 2030. Sixty-one per cent say the government is not doing enough “to ensure affordable, reliable and clean energy” (down from 71% in February), with only 15% saying it is doing enough (steady). Forty-two per cent say Tony Abbott should remain in parliament (down a point since April), with 30% saying he should remain (down two).

The fortnightly YouGov poll maintains the usual peculiarities of the series, most notably a headline two-party figure showing the Coalition with a lead of 51-49, based on low primary votes for the major parties and a strong flow of One Nation preferences to the Coalition (two-thirds, along with 27% of Greens preferences and half of the remainder). With preference flows like those of the 2016 election, Labor would come out about 52.5-47.5 ahead. The primary votes are Coalition 34% (steady), Labor 32% (down one), Greens 11% (steady) and One Nation 11% (up two). The poll also found 67% had voted in the same-sex marriage survey, of whom 61% voted yes and 35% no. The remainder, including the 20% still likely to vote, broke 54% to 28% in favour. Thirty per cent said companies declaring their support for same-sex marriage gave them a more favourable view of their brand, compared with 20% less favourable and 46% no difference.

Other findings: 37% thought the Constitution should be changed to allow dual citizens to run for parliament, with 45% opposed; 56% favoured stricter gun laws, compared with 7% for less strict and 34% for “remain about the same”; and 42% would deem it a bad thing if the government dropped its clean energy targets for 2020, compared with 32% for good thing. Asked to pick out of a list of 16 most important issues for the next election, health came out tops on 44% (though this was down five since August), with unemployment, living standards and the economy next placed on 30% each.

Note also that a Queensland state results from Newspoll came out overnight, which you can read about here.

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

1,690 comments on “Essential Research: 52-48 to Labor; YouGov: 51-49 to Coalition”

Comments Page 3 of 34
1 2 3 4 34
  1. Citizen @9:46AM.

    That unit should be very popular with conservatives across the mnation. None of these namby pamby solar cells.

    Some might not check the publication date: 1 April 2017.

  2. BarackObama: I’m grateful to @SenJohnMcCain for his lifetime of service to our country. Congratulations, John, on receiving this year’s Liberty Medal.

  3. Turnbull. Is a genius. Households are going to save $2.00 per week on energy costs. That will help many householders. They can put the savings towards mortgage repayments. You know it makes sense.

  4. Confessions @ #104 Tuesday, October 17th, 2017 – 9:27 am

    BK:

    Energy Policy: Australia To Be Entirely Powered By Tony Abbott’s Bullsh*t By 2020

    There has been an update. “Energy Policy Target for 2020 Delivered 3 Years Ahead of Schedule.”

  5. Bishop replied:

    Not one person has raised that possibility with me, not one of my colleagues has raised that as an option or something they are considering … Not one person has raised with me any suggestion that there would be a change of leader, there is support for Malcolm Turnbull.”

    Why would anyone think she would tell the truth until she’s sure of her future position?

  6. DT readers today won’t learn much of Turnbull’s grand energy plan. It has been swamped by multiple articles on Lisa Wilkinson quitting channel 9.

  7. Not politics, but….HUGE!!!!!!!!

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/science/2017-10-17/colliding-stars-revealed-by-gravitational-waves-and-light/9053750

    Consider that a couple of years ago we couldn’t see in this spectrum. Now we can, and we can relate observations to data collected differently. Science, it is grand.

    Although on the bad news front, a big raft of plastic waste appears to be washing up on Ningaloo Reef at the moment. 1st word is its 100km long. 🙁

  8. Lewis

    In standing in the way of renewables, Turnbull is standing in the way of the technological progress and innovation he championed in the lead up to the last federal election.

    That’s been the most interesting dynamic of the energy debate – it is human ingenuity through the rapid development of battery technology that poses the biggest threat to the fossil fuel industry.

    People who will never march to save the planet get this; they recognise human development when they see it and they instinctively recognise the energy transition as being as much a challenge of technology as of politics.

    A prime minister standing in the way of that sort of development is not just holding a dud hand, he’s actually slowing up the game for all of us.

  9. [BK
    I’m surprised home peat-fired energy sources were not recommended in the Turnbull/Abbott policy.
    ]

    I was going to reply suggesting sh!t as a potential fuel, but I see the Shovel has beat me to it. 🙂

  10. Labor is formulating its response, but so far has been pretty clear in rejecting the government’s plan. The theme which appears to be emerging is from Mark Butler’s press conference this morning:

    What the announcements that are set for this morning do make very clear is that Malcolm Turnbull’s capitulation to Tony Abbott’s radical right wing agenda for Australia is now utterly complete.”

    The Greens are also meeting this morning and have drawn a a conclusion along the same lines.

  11. I heard a snippet of Julie Bishop talking to Fran Kelly this morning and when asked how the new energy policy would deliver the savings she was simply HOPELESS!

  12. Laura Jayes
    (@ljayes)
    Energy Minister @JoshFrydenberg has been applauded by party room as he explained the Govt energy plan @SkyNewsAust

  13. imacca

    When people look at their jewellery they can now ponder the mind boggling conditions in which the gold/silver/platinum was created and the journey it took to reach them.

  14. interesting
    nickharmsen: On the face of it, sounds like the feds are about to adopt an Energy Security Target, like @JayWeatherill’s govt has proposed.
    nickharmsen: Here’s an explanation of how it works: pic.twitter.com/4txGyHXUNp

    nickharmsen: The net effect is the same as a Clean Energy Target. To incentivise investment in new dispatchable generation.

  15. Lizzie

    I dont think Abbott has much support anymore amongst the frontbench. Cormann, Dutton etc are apparently furious with him.

    That leaves the backbenchers as potential ministers (Hastie, Abetz, Andrews etc). Thats concerning.

  16. dave @ #125 Tuesday, October 17th, 2017 – 10:25 am

    BK @ #119 Tuesday, October 17th, 2017 – 10:21 am

    I heard a snippet of Julie Bishop talking to Fran Kelly this morning and when asked how the new energy policy would deliver the savings she was simply HOPELESS!

    Situation normal.

    Mes Amis.

    Ms Julie Bishop may be all you say and more.

    However

    Her shoes, gloves and accessories are top of the line.

    👠👢 🥊 💎

    I have had to mention this previously – when will yewse lot learn ❓

  17. lukehgomes: Might not be a good idea for Joyce to be in the chamber when the decision is handed down, says Anne Twomey pic.twitter.com/zq6ECAkCQ1

  18. LeeLinChinSBS: Don’t worry, I won’t be joining @TheTodayShow. If they can’t afford Lisa, then they sure as hell can’t afford me.

  19. Yabba88 – Essential always seems to have these little feints towards the Libs and then reverts to norm. It is very noticeable, to me, anyway.

  20. [victoria
    Guytaur

    Any idea when decision maybe handed down?]

    shellbell was saying that they usually give 24-48 hours notice.

  21. Energy Minister @JoshFrydenberg has been applauded by party room as he explained the Govt energy plan @SkyNewsAust

    If the Liberal Party room likes the plan, it must be crap.

  22. Mercury‏ @themercurycomau 15m15 minutes ago

    Liberal MP for Lyons Mark Shelton has been elected the 39th speaker of the Tasmanian House of Assembly. #politas

  23. lizzie @ #40 Tuesday, October 17th, 2017 – 8:23 am

    frednk

    Yes, I imagine shaving every day is a bore. But stubble is prickly and not kissable. Rasps the skin, too.

    Hmmmm it has its uses!
    When youngest granddaughter was just a few months old, she discovered my stubble while I was holding her. She must have had an itchy scalp as she then proceeded to have a good scratch. And repeated it several times. 🙂
    Babies can be smart.

  24. Good morning all,

    I would bet my bottom dollar Abbott and a few others in the coalition party rooms will not be happy with the continued ” recognition” of renewerables as a power source despite how little Turnbull and Frydenberg are proposing.

    Abbott sees this issue just as he saw it in 2009. A defining and stark contrast to Turnbull. He will continue to push for less and less renewerables. Nothing Turnbull offers will satisfy Abbott and it will be interesting to see who else will announce this policy is still not enough.

    Turnbull will have a long hard fight on his hands in his own party room even before he has to fight labor.

    Cheers.

  25. Doyley @11:06 “Turnbull will have a long hard fight on his hands in his own party room even before he has to fight labor.”

    Not so sure, if there was cheering in the party room at the announcement of the policy as has been reported. The only ones sulking would be those who believe we need to do something about climate change, and they have no influence.

  26. Nice comment on the guardian live site about energy policy:

    The N.E.G. is a P.O.S.

    Still not much fine detail about the NEG available, but who would have ever thought we would look back on Finkel’s coal-friendly CET and consider it a “lost opportunity”?

  27. P1

    The only good thing to come of it is that the LNP are going to be out of government for a long long time.

    Xenophon could be the leader of a new right opposition party in a decade.

  28. Steve777…..”The only ones sulking would be those who believe we need to do something about climate change, and they have no influence.”

    But they do. It only takes four of them to have a spine, cross the floor and vote it down,or have a “late” lunch with a little bit too much red wine and don’t turn up in the house and the govt doesn’t have the numbers and the govt would fall.

    The RWNJ’s will crap themselves if they went to an election now. Wipeout territory.

  29. Sonar

    I think we are finding out the “moderate” Liberal is a myth. Unless that means they are moderate in outlook not policy and won’t fight the right.

  30. The truth is out there!

    [In between the party room meetings, One Nation senator Malcolm Roberts has been spreading his gems of wisdom amongst the Canberra press gallery.

    Despite his leader claiming the credit;

    Pauline Hanson @PaulineHansonOz
    Good to see the Gov plans to scrap RET & CET like One Nation has been suggesting. About time they joined us in the 21st century. -PH #auspol
    5:22 AM – Oct 17, 2017
    55 55 Replies 29 29 Retweets 83 83 likes

    Roberts is not a fan.

    Now they are not telling everyone that they are actually putting the RET on steroids before they give it the kiss of death. So we are going to have an increase in power prices even more dramatic than we were expecting and then they are going to kill it off. So the government tells us they are going to cut power prices by $115 a year. What they are not telling us is how much power prices will increase until that occurs. So we will see $115 less than what it will be. But what it will be is frightening.”

    It must have looked good when he practiced it in the mirror, so Roberts then presents a letter from Malcolm Turnbull, which was written after he sent him “a copy of the Moran report, which was a critique of the Finkel report.” You may have missed the Moran report, but don’t worry, it was published on this climate sceptics blog.

    The Finkel report is a highly destructive blueprint for this country and the Moran report tears it to shreds, absolutely destroys it. The Finkel report is based on lies. And the Turnbull government is now continuing to tells lies about climate and it raises more questions, how the hell are they are going to comply with the Paris Accord without renewables, so what are they going to do? They need to come clean, we have got three words into the vocabulary of this country. We have affordability into the energy debate, due to our work, reliability into the energy debate due to our work, we have security into the energy debate, due to our work and we’re going to introduce a fourth word–truth. Because I have been pursuing the CSIRO for the last 12 months and they have not got what they claim they had. And I’ll be talking more about that in the next few weeks.”

    So there you have it. The master of empirical evidence, who apparently couldn’t work out an email address, or fully understand his citizenship history has the climate debate sorted. Obviously there is no need to continue with this today, we can all go home.]

    https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2017/oct/17/coalitions-energy-policy-is-here-now-for-the-sell-politics-live

  31. “…It only takes four of them to have a spine, cross the floor and vote it down”

    Crossing the floor would be a career-ending move, not to mention deprivation of post-retirement sinecures. This lot have tolerated the trashing of climate and energy policy for 8 years (and counting), were happy to pretent that the risible Direct Inaction was a serious attempt to reduce emissions and, in another area, caved on the absurd fake plebiscite when there was much less at stake.

    Four Government MPs who both believe we need to do something about climate change and who also have a spine? I don’t think so.

Comments Page 3 of 34
1 2 3 4 34

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *