The BludgerTrack poll aggregate records a further narrowing in Labor’s lead this week on the back of weaker numbers from Essential Research, which provide the only new data point other than the Galaxy poll from Western Australia, which has no bearing on the national total. On the seat projection, the Coalition gains one in Victoria and three in ever-volatile Queensland, but loses one in Western Australia courtesy of Galaxy. Labor’s relative softness in Victoria, where a swing is actually now recorded in favour of the Coalition, was noted by me yesterday in an article for Crikey. This was based on calculations made before the latest numbers were added, which have caused Labor’s two-party total there to weaken still further – no doubt a tad excessively. I’m also not entirely confident about the extent to which the Greens are recorded as having fallen, since the trendline has dipped below any of the individual data points, which sometimes happens when there’s a sudden change. In other words, they’re down, but probably not by quite that much. No new results for leadership ratings this week.
BludgerTrack: 52.4-47.6 to Labor
Essential Research’s recent results have driven an improvement in the Coalition’s poll trend position, most evidently in Victoria.
I got the “chicken salt on chips” urgh
Question I got 50%.. No way!
Monica L:
Yes Labor seem to have a more targetted direct approach for connecting with voters.
Cud chewer
😖
cud chewer
That’s another question i.e., religion, that renders the ‘ordinary’ thingy pretty dodgy, I reckon.
I scored a “Broome pearl” rating 🙂
That was meant to be
😀 cud chewer
Beat you Cud 🙂
poroti
What is the Broome pearl rating?
Anyone get below 30%?
I think Barney got 25%
cud chewer @ #902 Saturday, August 5th, 2017 – 6:06 pm
Phwwwwwwwwwwwwjthwat.bing.doodle.shit.
Agree.
Chicken salt’s not moi. Evah.
Fess
Bill Maher Extra = sheet. Glad I didn’t listen/watch earlier.
Gunna hit the sack soon, and try to finish Rommel. Just up to the good part where he is somewhat implicated in the plot to assassinate Hitler, despite, apparently, being totally oblivious to it.
It was the 3-bedroom house was did it.
was = what
As you were.
Right, I’m off too, and going as well. Just checked out who was being interviewed on Insiders tomorrow, and as it’s Dean Smith, don’t think I’ll bother.
Monica Lynagh
8% So extremely ‘ordinary’. As it said at the start of the Quiz.
“Are you an “ordinary” Australian?
If you answer YES to all 12 questions, you’re one of the rare “ordinary” Australians.
(There are only 5,782 of you.)”
Night Kezza and Monica.
fess
Thanks for posting up the Real Time link. The kids second letter was hysterical.
poroti
Sorry, just caught your post. Blessed if I can understand why if there are only 5,782 of you, that you’re one of the rare ‘ordinary’ Australians. Perhaps my understanding of ordinary is lacking, as I don’t compute rare as representative of ordinary.
Maybe it’s my warped mind, as after a long time working in mental health (now there’s an oxymoron), whenever someone said they just wanted to be normal, I’d reply “You find normal, bring ’em in, as I’ve never seen it”.
Night ‘fess.
Catch you bludgers later.
mikeh:
I also enjoyed ‘Obama’ reciting Trump comments.
Monica Lynagh
I am not one of the 5,782 , those are who would be in the “ordinary” category in all 12 questions. So I suppose lower scores = more “ordinary” . Which means of course when pollies talk about “ordinary” Australians they talk about a group of SFA people due to people fitting into so many different categories.
Ordinary I assume means the mode across all 12 qustions
Seeing as Trump got into a twitter war with Nordstroms over the store dropping Ivanka’s clothing line during an actual intelligence briefing, this shouldn’t come as a surprise.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/the-fight-over-trumps-afghan-policy-has-become-an-argument-over-the-meaning-of-america-first/2017/08/04/f2790c80-785f-11e7-8f39-eeb7d3a2d304_story.html?hpid=hp_hp-top-table-main_mcmaster-214pm-variant%3Ahomepage%2Fstory&utm_term=.194212f9f40b
25%
kezza2 @ #892 Saturday, August 5th, 2017 – 4:02 pm
I copy/pasted as I went.
I didn’t copy the significant amount of demographic questions, I was worried the post wouldn’t upload as it was.
Question @ #895 Saturday, August 5th, 2017 – 4:03 pm
I did. I wanted to do a federal poll so that I could see the format they used with the Logo’s. I took a screen shot of it but could not post it directly.
cud chewer @ #897 Saturday, August 5th, 2017 – 4:04 pm
Without checking the number, it’s approximately right based on the census. 30% put no religion, others like Muslim adding up to 12% seems about right.
poroti
…So I suppose lower scores = more “ordinary” .
It’s the other way around. The higher the score the more “ordinary”, in the sense that the respondent more closely resembles the largest group for any class.
I think the only answer I gave that place me among the largest group was the one on religious affiliation. In every other case, I was not ordinary, but the information did not say just how far the ordinary I am.
briefly:
Do you not speak English in your home?
Re that YouGov list (thanks for posting grimace, very interesting to see), asking Pref PM after the question about what a PM should resign over is silly.
briefly
I re did it and took more notice of whether I part of the largest group and turns out I mostly was. 8/12 . So it looks lower odds for scoring more “ordinary” and so “You are as unique as a Broome pearl.” 🙂
Is the beast alive?
The beast is as far as I know
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-05/vladimir-putin-strips-down-yet-again-for-fishing-hunting-trip/8778174
No wonder Trump loves him so much 😀
[grimace
Questions from You Gov:
…
8. Generally speaking, do you think too many issues are being proposed for referendums, not enough, or it is about right?
Not enough issues are being proposed for referendums, and the people should be allowed to vote directly on more issues
The current balance is about right
Too many issues are being proposed for referendums, and Parliament should make more decisions itself
Don’t know
…]
Thanks grimace,
This question stood out as being strange.
It seems the to me that the people writing the question don’t understand the difference between a referendum and a plebiscite.
[briefly
25%]
Welcome to the club. 🙂
33%
test
Fulvio Sammut @ #941 Saturday, August 5th, 2017 – 11:29 pm
FAIL
Fifity-farking-eight percent ordinary! I’m not happy with that. Must start teaching the boy espanol.
if I answer as married, I get 75%.
I guess 75% is actually quite an unlikely outcome!
confessions
briefly:
Do you not speak English in your home?
..oh, plus that one too.
(Usually, I mutter to myself….unintelligibly)
Was that an echo I heard in here….
poroti
“You are as unique as a Broome pearl.”
…you must be a highly cultured bludger… 🙂
I redid the quiz, took down the proportions and calculated the probability that someone responded 12/12 yes: 8.69 x10^-6
That is versus 0/12 yes: 0.000387
Evaluating the rest would be more involved, and I could also probably (in both senses of the word) deduce each of your specific answers based on your responses, given the variation in the truth probabilities.. but it’s getting late 🙂
Night all!
No surprise –
http://edition.cnn.com/2017/08/04/politics/trump-supporters-optimism-wear-off/index.html