Ipsos: 52-48 to Labor

A better result for the Coalition from the latest Ipsos poll, although it adds to a picture of deteriorating personal approval for Scott Morrison.

The latest monthly Ipsos poll for the Fairfax papers is better for the Coalition than the last, recording Labor’s two-party lead at 52-48 on previous election preferences and 53-47 on respondent-allocated preferences, compared with 55-45 for both last time. The Coalition is up two points on the primary vote to 37%, with Labor down one to 34% and the Greens down two to 13%.

Despite the Coalition’s improvement on voting intention, Scott Morrison is down two on approval to 48% and up three on disapproval to 36%, while Bill Shorten is respectively down one to 40% and two to 47%. Morrison’s lead on preferred prime minister is 47-35, little changed on the 48-35 result last time.

The poll also finds 46% support a reduction in immigration from Muslim countries, compared with 14% for increased and 35% for left unchanged; and that 47% believe the government’s first objective in energy policy should be to reduce prices, compared with 39% for reducing carbon emissions. The poll was conducted Wednesday to Saturday from a sample of 1200.

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

672 comments on “Ipsos: 52-48 to Labor”

Comments Page 4 of 14
1 3 4 5 14
  1. This IPSOS’s focus on ‘Muslim immigration = bad’ sounds like a racist dog-whistle to me. What about banning Brits, after all they are the ones most likely to commit crimes.

  2. Aunt Mavis

    Guys mob are really not doing themselves any favours to winning the election.

    No wonder Labor are so confident they are more worried about fighting the Greens than the Liberals in the state election.

  3. Trump’s unhinging becomes even more unhinged!

    President Trump derided retired Adm. William H. McRaven as a “Hillary Clinton fan” and an “Obama backer” and suggested that the venerated former head of U.S. Special Operations Command should have apprehended Osama bin Laden faster.

    The comments, which the president made in an interview with Chris Wallace on “Fox News Sunday,” represent the latest point of tension between Trump and a group of retired general officers who have criticized the commander in chief publicly for his handling of national security and military matters.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-suggests-venerated-navy-seal-commander-should-have-found-bin-laden-faster/2018/11/18/363aff2a-eb53-11e8-9236-bb94154151d2_story.html?utm_term=.44e8f377e11e

  4. Saw the following this morning:

    ‘I first heard of the place in, I think, 1951or 1954 at an election meeting in West Geelong town hall addressed by Robert Menzies. Menzies was still complaining that the Labor government had refused to accept a fully developed base there from the US at the end of WW2.’

    Are we now in an undeclared or undescribed or side-lettered defence alliance with PNG?

  5. AL

    Here in Forest Hill both the Labor and Liberal candidates have preferenced an independent #2 above the Greens. As part of his ‘platform’ this independent supports abolishing the Safe Schools program. The independent has preferenced Lab over Lib. Apparently, he lives in Frankston, is involved in building and nominated 30 minutes before the close of nominations.

    Though Lib Lab preferences will not be distributed it sends a message who Labor regards as ‘the enemy’.

    Both Lab & Lib candidates also ran with the excuse that they had no say in the htv; it was down to HO.

    As the Lib incumbent holds the seat on a margin of 4.8%, his votes will be crucial in deciding the outcome when preferences are distributed.

  6. Peg

    The Greens seem to think that it is rational for the Greens to have an open season on Labor for three years and then come crawling back for political hugs and kisses during an election campaign.

    BTW, when are you lot going to clean yourselves up?

    You’re filthy.

  7. Pegasus
    “Though Lib Lab preferences will not be distributed it sends a message who Labor regards as ‘the enemy’.”

    Do you think it might result in the Green party reflecting on their behavior?

    Same same to you.

  8. Peg
    Maybe the Greens should focus on a Safe Greens Program to protect young Greens workers from their so-called elders and betters?

  9. @strom_m tweets

    For everyone just discovering the limits of #neoliberalism, I give you @PaulWellerHQ in 1985.

    “Come take a walk upon these hills
    And see how monetarism kills
    Whole communities, even families
    There’s nothing left, so they’ve all gone away”.

  10. Went to bed last night before seeing Nath’s reply … citing a personal tie fetish …

    Nice attempt at deflection, Nath, but no points there.

    You might think conflating two completely separate spheres of responsibility is ‘good media’ just like the Telegraph does, but few here will not see through it.

    BTW – have you contacted Lucy and asked if you can see Mal’s tie collection? The family’s personal stylist might be able to give you some tips on how to knot a tie without choking 😆

  11. B

    I feel your love.

    In Forest Hill it was the Labor candidate who initiated a meeting with the Greens candidate to exhort him to help him.

  12. There was some speculation that the next election will be fought over power prices, not emissions.

    This is incorrect.

    Similarly to some vested interests trying to fight the election on negative gearing.

    They can try. But they will fail.

    Same as for debt and deficit, or Unions BOO, or Shorten’s popularity. All of these are mere sideshows.

    The next election will be fought on competence and stability. Or at least it would be fought on that if the side playing defence had even a skerrick of either. Unless Labor implodes the next election has already been fought and lost. This mob of dickheads only survived last time because enough fools still bought the myth that Trumble could provide competence and stability, but only just barely enough for them to scrape home. Those dopes won’t be fooled again. Especially when FauxMo is doing such a bang up job of reminding them how foolish they were.

    So of course the Fairfax hacks can’t even drag themselves to try and pretend that the Coalition is anywhere near as competitive as this poll is indicating. This mob are too much of an embarrassment even for them to further embarrass themselves for.

  13. Boerwar says:
    Monday, November 19, 2018 at 8:56 am
    Saw the following this morning:

    ‘I first heard of the place in, I think, 1951or 1954 at an election meeting in West Geelong town hall addressed by Robert Menzies. Menzies was still complaining that the Labor government had refused to accept a fully developed base there from the US at the end of WW2.’

    Are we now in an undeclared or undescribed or side-lettered defence alliance with PNG?

    It’s a neo-colonial extension of US-Australian territory for military purposes, though not for others.

  14. I suppose we are going to see a veritable flood of Greens’ sanctimony, bombast and hypocrisy here for the next week. Even though there is a dedicated Victorian election thread.

  15. ‘fess,
    Next election, with the new measures in Florida allowing more people to vote, that 10000 vote difference may be eradicated. 🙂

  16. I think this is a train wreck campaign debate we are seeing on News 24 with Jon Faine between AG and Shadow on News 24 for the Liberals

  17. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/nov/19/labor-to-face-pressure-on-environment-policies-after-embarrassing-stuff-up

    The faux balance bullshit language of ’embarrassing stuff up’ disgracefully used here tells you exactly how far out of the race the government is.

    When I see a headline saying Labor has made and embarrassing stuff up on environment policy I naturally assumed they must have got their sums horribly wrong, or decided to pay for a coal plant, or just declared carbon dioxide benign plant food.

    That would be a stuff up.

    But no. It’s just some eye glazing argy bargy over if some minor matter was previously approved at some internal forum such that it will be on the agenda at another internal forum.

    Of course our brave media must find something, anything, to bash Labor for (cause balance), but this is the best they can come up with.

    Morrison and Frydenberg in their limitless idiocy are STILL doubling down on the Jerusalem Brainfart, but some minor disagreement on the minutes of an internal policy discussion in Labor is an embarrassing stuff up.

    Right there is all you need to know. Labor actually has a policy development process. The Coalition have brainfarts. They’re an ex government.

  18. guytaur,
    You love making gross generalisations. Maybe you should be less one-eyed and acknowledge that sometimes, even if only rarely, the Murdoch media makes the correct call. It’s not always a case of, because it’s in the Murdoch media, ipso facto it must be wrong.

  19. Cat

    Maybe just sometimes you can admit that the Murdoch media should be ignored totally.

    You know they will always put it in the worst possible way to attack any progressive idea no matter from which party.

    Thats all I was saying. It was the only point Pegasus was making in pointing out that attack on Labor by the same media outlet.

    That was it.

    Remembering this is a paper that openly campaigns for the LNP as stated by their editor. Crikey did a whole series of articles on the same.

  20. Ratsak

    Here is the equivalence for Frydenberg:

    1 He gutted marine parks
    2 He gutted the EPBC Act
    3 He delivered no energy policy
    4. He delivered no emissions policy
    5. He increased sovereign risk in the energy investment space
    6. He delivered a half dead Reef
    7. He increased list of vulnerable and endangered species. He achieved the world’s first global warming extinction.
    8. He increased emissions in transport space
    9. He delivered record hot temperatures
    10. He delivered record low rainfall
    11. He turned tens of thousands of farmers into Global Warming beggars.
    12. He enabled Kosciusko National Park to be turned into a horse paddock.

  21. Goodness me.This from the Rupertarium leapt out. It’s almost as if a Labor win is a given 😆
    .
    .
    “Senate chaos to thwart Labor
    Simon Benson
    Bill Shorten may not be able to form a majority bloc with the Greens in the Senate to pass legislation.”

  22. You don’t have to sell me on the idea Josh is as useless as tits on a bill. Even for a Liberal his utter uselessness is astonishing.

    I used to go on about how ridiculous it was that Trumble was considered leadership material in complete denial of the utter absence of evidence of public policy success.

    Well Frydenberg is an even greater example. At least Trumble had the incandescent bulb ban as a policy win he could point to. Josh has absolutely nothing in his column. He’s leadership material because we’re told he’s leadership material.

    Abbott drunk and asleep in his office during a vote is a more substantial figure than Frydenberg could dream of being.

  23. @GreenJ tweets

    An element in this of the world of orthodox mid-life politics grappling with the young people and their internets. https://twitter.com/JoshButler/status/1064286013617397760

    @joshbutler tweets

    I’m really interested to see what regular voters think of posts like these – considering several of the screenshotted ‘vile’ tweets are clearly stupid ironic shitposts, and the one about porn is commenting directly on a Q&A special about porn https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/state-election/greens-mps-staffer-offers-to-quit-over-vile-tweets/news-story/e09e0f4023aaa810ca5f0acb7af3ffb9

  24. Here’s one leg of the Coalition’s election bullshittery. Brought to you by that honest chap Aussie John. It’s going to be worse than a zombie apocalypse…………..apparently
    .
    .
    Labor’s property policy a ‘nuclear bomb’, says Aussie John

    DIRE WARNING Federal Labor’s negative gearing reforms would be a “nuclear bomb” for the Australian property market which could tip Australia into recession, Aussie Home Loans founder John Symond says.
    https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/business/labors-negative-gearing-policy-a-nuclear-bomb-says-aussie-john-symond/news-story/acef8cbffd8a69588f0c81e4e746c45d

  25. C@t:

    Yep, things are slowly changing.

    One of the most significant, if little noticed, outcomes from last week’s US midterm elections was the success of attempts to strip politicians of their power to game the electoral system.

    Voters in Michigan, Colorado and Missouri overwhelmingly supported initiatives to create independent redistricting commissions. This will move their systems closer to that used in Australia and all other industrialised democracies. Voters in Ohio decided to do the same thing in May, and voters in Utah may as well (election results are still being counted there).

    “One thing we heard loud and clear at this election is that the American public hate gerrymandering and want to take the power to draw lines away from politicians and give it to the people,” Daley says.

    “We are now in an amazing position to reform what has been a cancer on our politics.”

    https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/a-cancer-on-democracy-the-battle-to-end-gerrymandering-in-america-20181116-p50gdk.html

  26. From the Wronski site, October 18th…

    “Urban will be taking a break to undergo coronary bypass surgery. He looks forward to returning to writing as soon as possible.”

  27. An exclusive poll for The West Australian shows the Liberal Party’s primary support in WA down by 14 percentage points from the 2016 election.

    In 2016, then-prime minister Malcolm Turnbull secured almost 46 per cent of the primary vote in WA.

    In the poll of 474 voters taken last week this had fallen to just 32 per cent under new PM Scott Morrison.

    If repeated at the next election, which is expected to be held by May, it would be the worst Liberal Party result in WA since 1969.

    https://thewest.com.au/politics/federal-politics/five-seats-at-risk-as-wa-female-voters-desert-liberals-ng-b881024623z

  28. ratsak (AnonBlock)
    Monday, November 19th, 2018 – 9:25 am
    Comment #173

    [Morrison and Frydenberg in their limitless idiocy are STILL doubling down on the Jerusalem Brainfart, but some minor disagreement on the minutes of an internal policy discussion in Labor is an embarrassing stuff up.]

    I wonder would the following apply to Messrs. Morrison and Frydenberg.

  29. An interesting option for Theresa May if it’s true that the DUP has withdrawn “confidence and supply”.

    She could make an offer to the SNP to apply the same Northern Ireland EU market measures to Scotland and return powers to Holyrood recently removed by Westminster.

    This would give both Scotland and England what they voted for in the EU referendum. 🙂

  30. From that WA poll article. There has been little comment so far on the Sophomore Effect.

    If it is anything what Anne Aly is getting…

    “The poll is in line with internal polling The West Australian understands has been recently conducted by the Labor Party in its marginal electorate of Cowan, held by Anne Aly.

    Dr Aly took the seat at the 2016 election with a 5.2 per cent swing, giving her a margin of 0.7 per cent.

    Some within the Liberal Party believe the Government should target Cowan to offset likely losses in other parts of the country.

    But the ALP polling this month suggests Dr Aly has increased her margin by five percentage points.

    The Liberal Party’s primary vote in Cowan is understood to have plummeted by 15 percentage points.

  31. swamprat @ #192 Monday, November 19th, 2018 – 6:18 am

    An interesting option for Theresa May if it’s true that the DUP has withdrawn “confidence and supply”.

    She could make an offer to the SNP to apply the same Northern Ireland EU market measures to Scotland and return powers to Holyrood recently removed by Westminster.

    This would give both Scotland and England what they voted for in the EU referendum. 🙂

    Which would then create a hard border between Scotland and England, which is exactly what Ireland is trying to avoid.

  32. BiGD

    ‘Which would then create a hard border between Scotland and England, which is exactly what Ireland is trying to avoid.’

    The problem would be with all the Sassenachs on the wrong side of the border.

  33. That WA poll is pretty damning of the Liberal Party.

    It is apparent that women have given up on the Libs and the allegedly poor treatment of Julie Bishop by the “Pricktocracy”that rules in the Libs is a major turnoff to women generally. Primary votes in the low 30s and sinking is a major existential threat to the Libs.

    This is shaping up as one of the major issues for the next election.

Comments Page 4 of 14
1 3 4 5 14

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *