As reported here in early May, British-based market research giant YouGov has entered the Australian federal polling game, in conjunction with Australian communications agency Fifty Acres. After reporting attitudinal polling on a fortnightly basis over recent months, the pollster has produced its first set of voting intention numbers, which are exclusively related below.
First though, a few points about methodology. The poll is conducted through an online panel, similar to Essential Research, and indeed an increasingly dominant share of public opinion polls internationally. The polling is conducted fortnightly from Thursday to Tuesday from a sample of a bit over 1000 respondents (1125 in the case of the latest survey), drawn from its pool of survey volunteers.
With respect to voting intention, respondents are presented with a mock ballot paper featuring (together with party logos) Coalition options that vary by state, Labor, the Greens, One Nation, Nick Xenophon Team, Katter’s Australian Party, a generic option for “Christian parties”, and “other/independent”. The results are weighted not just by age, gender and region, which is standard in Australian polling, but also by education and past vote. The latter two are common in Britain but, as far as I’m aware, unique in Australia. Needless to say, this leads to two-party preferred results based on respondent allocation, rather than results from previous elections.
The results for this week’s poll are distinctive in the narrowness of the two-party preferred, with Labor’s lead at 51-49, and low primary votes for both major parties, which come in at 34% for Labor and 33% for the Coalition. Results for the minor parties are Greens 12%, One Nation 7%, Christian parties 4%, Nick Xenophon Team 3%, Katter’s Australian Party 1% and other/independent 6%.
The first thing to be noted is that Labor would record a much stronger lead of 54-46 if preferences were distributed as per the 2016 result, rather than respondent allocation. However, such is the size of the non-major party vote that this would be heavily dependent on preference flows remaining stable despite some fairly dramatic changes in vote share. The second point is that the Greens are two to three points higher than the recent form of Newspoll and Essential Research, although not Ipsos. One Nation and the Nick Xenophon Team respectively come in at 7% and 3%, which would be fairly typical coming from Essential Research, but the combined vote of 11% for everyone else is around double the equivalent figure from Newspoll and Essential Research over the past two months.
For the regular attitudinal questions, this fortnight’s poll focuses on Donald Trump, with findings that 58% consider him “erratic” and a third “unhinged” (not sure if the one response here precludes the other, or if we should combine them to conclude that nearly everybody considers him unstable or worse); that 47% think his presidency threatens to destabilise the world; that 44% feel he won’t last long; and that 52% think his use of Twitter not suitable for a world leader. The poll also records 52% saying Australia is “ready to be fully powered by renewables”, 47% considering climate change a threat to the economy, and 51% supporting the inclusion of clean coal in a clean energy target.
NOTE: Separate to this one, I have a new post that takes a detailed look at the census results.
Miranda Devine is an odious slime.
‘Miranda Devine is an odious slime’
It’s a reflection of the state of our media that she has the platform of ‘major’ newspapers to air her views.
Didn’t she also used to ‘work’ for Fairfax?
Pell may end up getting a judge only trial due to concerns around getting a fair trial, which I accept as reasonable, as did Rayney in WA.
If I was on the jury Pell would need to be worried, I’d go into the jury room with a very dim view of him, be skeptical of any evidence he gave and be overly willing to accept evidence against him. Basically he’d be up against it getting a “not guilty” out of me.
https://www.crikey.com.au/2017/06/29/pynes-apology-is-no-use-its-time-to-hit-abbott-at-his-weakest-point/
($)
You’re all far too kind to Miranda.
limited through mixed @ #201 Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 1:26 pm
Be careful, the odious slime might sue you!
grimace @ #204 Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 1:38 pm
You should appraise the evidence of ALL parties with a sceptical mind.
Sums up my view 😆
MickKime: @JamColley Murdoch press – “Without fear or favour, we will distract you with rivers of effluent.”
Tell me America’s not f****d!
https://www.facebook.com/NRA/videos/1605896562755373/?autoplay_reason=all_page_organic_allowed&video_container_type=0&video_creator_product_type=2&app_id=119211728144504&live_video_guests=0
There is a media pack of 12, with cameras, currently waiting for Abbott to leave the Centre for Independent Studies on Macquarie Street.
I wonder if he can possibly leave the building without being tempted to lambast his own party?
Maybe its not too nice of me, but it is, in my view, appropriate that Pell should suffer extended anxiety, pressure and grief, since he has deliberately inflicted anxiety, pressure and grief upon so many. It couldn’t happen to a more deserving carbuncle on the backside of humanity. A truly repellent individual.
Abbott actually complimented Bill Shorten and labor for their continued bipartisanship on national security and also said labor was stronger than the Turnbull government re China.
“The enemy of my enemy .. ” sort of thing.
Cheers.
I agree everyone should be entitled to get a fair trial, so let me just say I am delighted Mr George Pell has an opportunity to clear his name in court.
Bemused
I would enjoy Devine taking me on at the courts.
She is a nasty cretinous odious excuse for a human being.
Bring it on.
MikeCarlton01: Oh dear. I very much fear this will tip poor, poor Gerard “Gollum” Henderson right off the planet. smh.com.au/national/cardi… via @smh
GerardHendersen: I’ve cancelled all future media commitments for the next six months to recover. Thanks for your concern, Mike. twitter.com/MikeCarlton01/…
Meanwhile the governor of the RBA has effectivel endorsed the opposite of recent government policy.
‘How times have changed. Today, the wage-price spiral is dead and gone. The economy is facing what the Reserve Bank governor calls “a crisis of low pay”.’
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-29/rba-governor-philip-lowe-goes-marxist/8662228
George Pell should not need to consult doctors about whether he is fit to travel.
He should be happy for the effect of the trip to be determined by the god that he claims to have faith in.
My favorite recent typo was in an add for a couch — “No stain of tears.”
Criminal trials are there for people to clear their names.
Judge alone is risky as crown only needs to convince one person. Plus there may be a right of appeal firm an acquittal which there is not from a jury acquittal.
MF
I fear Pell’s god helps those who help themselves.
Seth
You’d think that Newman would just keep hiding in a weed patch somewhere.
The idea of him giving useful political advice is ludicrous.
socrates @ #221 Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 2:15 pm
Especially those who have been proven to have helped themselves to innocent children.
limited through mixed @ #215 Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 2:01 pm
I was more concerned that the slime might sue you.
Lizzie
What about libraries that have stocked the Pell book.
The library I manage has several copies of said tome.
We will not withdraw our copies.
shellbell @ #220 Thursday, June 29, 2017 at 2:13 pm
There was discussion of Jury vs Judge alone trials on ABC Melbourne this morning and it was stated that in Victoria, unlike NSW, they don’t have Judge alone trials. I assume this was with reference to criminal trials as civil certainly do have Judge alone.
But FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!! Bemused.
Oops “not there for people to clear their names”
Ahhh Zoomie – somebody-or-other’s law says that if you make a comment about typos you are doomed to make one yourself. Try ad with one d. But yes, I’d prefer my second-hand couches to have no stains, no tears (rhymes with bears) and no stains of tears (rhymes with beers).
Victoria is the last place in Oz where there are juries for many civil trials
Shelbell
Yes there is defamation law for reputation.
Lizzie
I like that one enough to print it and put in on the ‘fridge.
But Shellbell, in a sense your first version was right. One of the functions of a crim trial is that a not guilty verdict officially clears the accused’s name. Though it often leaves people with a lingering doubt.
guytaur @ #231 Thursday, June 29th, 2017 – 2:40 pm
However I believe stating an honestly held opinion on a matter of public interest is explicitly listed as a legitimate defence.
CTar1
Oh goody. I hoped it might find an appreciative reader. 🙂
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/jun/29/indonesian-boy-wrongfully-jailed-in-wa-adult-prison-for-people-smuggling-has-conviction-overturned
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-06-29/george-pells-charging-and-what-it-means-for-the-church-kennedy/8663554
:large
Andrews replies to ScoMo’s threat on the fracking ban.
In short: frack off (a quote!)
beneltham: Major win for robo-debt campaigners: Centrelink says it has no plans to use robo-debt system to target pensioners theguardian.com/australia-news…
https://twitter.com/beneltham/status/880272330731044869
Congratulations to Linda Burney MP and all others involved.
Hewson lets fly at Abbott, Howard and Pyne.
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/john-hewson-first-rule-of-politics-is-to-show-you-can-govern-yourselves-20170629-gx0xu8.html
Full text of the Court of Appeal decision re the 13-y-o crewmember is already up on AustLII: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/wa/WASCA/2017/122.html Very long and technical. As Kevin would say, wonk factor 5, but this is for legal wonks not political ones. Not even sure whether I will plow through the whole thing
Guytaur
I still don’t trust them.
Lizzie
Frequent visitors to my place know that looking at my ‘fridge door tells them my thoughts on current politics. {grin}
Lizzie
I can understand that. Even if that victory is true it does nothing to help the unemployed students or others hit by the robodebt. So still work to do.
LisaMillar: Expecting to hear from Cardinal Pell in 90 minutes in Rome. We’ll be there twitter.com/davidsciasci/s…
Jacka A Randa
That may be the effect but it is not the purpose and the difference matters.
The rule is that the crown/police should only ever prosecute on the basis it has formed the view that there are reasonable prospects of conviction. It should not proceed on the basis that it has no view and leave it to the courts/juries to decide.
MarkDiStef: This is some amazing vision from 2004: Tony Abbott grilled by Tony Jones about his encounters with Cardinal Pell pic.twitter.com/4zeMP43PNc
https://twitter.com/markdistef/status/880290484408561664
http://insidestory.org.au/adding-fuel-to-the-abbott-conundrum
Shellbell, Stated another way, both the investigating police, and the Victorian DPP’s officers have decided, based on evidence collected, that it is likely that Pell is guilty, and that a jury can be convinced of that. They believe the complainants, and they do not believe Pell. That is why they believe that ‘there are reasonable prospects of conviction’.