We finally have a new player in the post-election opinion poll game, with Ipsos making its return for the Fairfax papers. It’s come in slightly lower for Labor than Newspoll and Essential Research, recording a 51-49 lead, although I don’t know at this stage if that’s previous election or respondent-allocated preferences (UPDATE: It’s both), since Ipsos provides both. The primary votes retain Ipsos’s pre-election peculiarity in coming in high for the Greens, at 16% compared with 10.2% at the election, and others, at 18% compared with 13%. That only leaves room for 36% for the Coalition and 30% for Labor, compared with 42.0% and 34.7% at the election. We are told that Malcolm Turnbull now has equal approval and disapproval ratings, and that Bill Shorten’s net rating is minus eight, though not the exact numbers (UPDATE: 45% apiece for Turnbull; 37% and 53% for Shorten, which I’d call a net rating of minus sixteen). Turnbull’s lead as preferred prime minister is 51-30, which unlike the other measures is better for him than pre-election. The poll was conducted Thursday to Saturday from a sample of 1403.
UPDATE (Essential Research): The Coalition has picked up a point in the Essential Research survey for the second week in a row, so that the pollster concurs with Ipsos in recording a Labor lead of 51-49. The primary votes are Coalition 39% (up one), Labor 36% (down one), Greens 9% (down one), One Nation 7% (up one) and Nick Xenophon Team 3% (steady). Other questions find 79% saying social class exists in Australia, versus 10% who say it doesn’t; 51% rating themselves middle class, 31% working class and 3% upper class; 52% perceiving the Liberal Party as mainly representing an upper class few purport to be a part of, compared with 17% for middle class and 3% for working class; 41% saying Labor mainly represents the working class, versus 16% for the middle class and 7% for the upper class; 31% saying One Nation mainly represented the working class, versus 7% for the middle class and 3% for the upper class; and a general recognition that the Greens didn’t reflect class one way or the other. A question gauging the importance of a range of issue priorities suggests that national security and the budget deficit rate less strongly now than they did in August.
Gee George Brandis QC SC is up in the Senate stated that the matter was wound up to save money that might of been paid out to litigation Barristers and his winding up of the matter saved the Govmint hundreds of millions of dollars.
Ummmmm how much was it again that Geroge Brandis QC SC cost the Government when he defended the matter of Dreyfus seeking to see his diary content.
The Nationals are feeling their oats
The National tail has often wagged the Liberal dog in the Coalition over the years. I can recall for example a kerfuffle over the devaluation of the Australian dollar back in McMahon’s time (before the national currency became a plaything of international speculators). The Nats (then the Country Party) got their devaluation. McMahon was widely riduculed for giving in.
Brandis giving a pretty terrible defence.
“People were spending too long trying to work out the right answer, and I got impatient and decided the wrong answer now now better than waiting a few months for the right answer.”
That does not cut it.
‘So Turnbull will get a gold medal every time he passes 1 piece of legislation according to the ABC. How low the standards have become for a government just doing what is their everyday job.’
Just as well that they judged the Gillard govt by the same standard.
He’s dumping Hockey in it, way to go Brandis.
wow……
Hillary Clinton
1h1 hour ago
Hillary Clinton @VoteHillary2016
Perhaps the millions you claim “voted illegally” actually voted for you, Donald–making you the loser of Electoral College AND popular vote. https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/802972944532209664 …
Did Brandis just shit on Joe Hockey?
In a nutshell
Likes
Tweets
Rowan
2m2 minutes ago
Rowan @FightingTories
@ItsBouquet Looks to throw Hockey under the bus and starts to protect current MPs
Brandis is spraying the diarrhea all over people
I wonder if Joe’s awake.
Brandis just sending him an “eat shit and die” message!
Photos
Likes
Tweets
Bevan Shields
1m1 minute ago
Bevan Shields @BevanShields
George Brandis working overtime to distance himself, Kelly O’Dwyer and Christian Porter from Joe Hockey’s actions on Bell case #auspol
It wasn’t me, mum, it was him.
George “We knew nothing”
With all these negotiations and amendments, there might not be much more than a facade or a brand name left for the ABCC Bill.
This is in keeping with their other efforts – aided and abetted by a lazy media who only sees things in terms of what will “play”, as written up in the columns they are just about to get started on.
“NBN”? Keep the brand name, gut the rest.
“Medicare”? Sell it off,piece by piece. Sool the AFP onto Labor as a nice diversionary tactice.
“ABCC Bill”? Amend the shit out of it, then strut your victory.
Mind youse, this is only ONE piece of legislation,among dozens, if not hundreds, still stalled because they are so stupid. Nowadays it getting so that if a government does what it supposed to do – pass legislation, any legislation – this is trumpeted as a major victory.
Of course, with Gillard’s government, passing legislation wasn’t trumpeted at all, hardly even mentioned, almost an afterthought in the minds of the Gallery. So unimportant compared to renovations to her verandah 20 years before, or a shoe malfunction in Delhi.
Electricity prices have gone up in the past year much more than they ever went up under Gillard. Has the Gallery even made a peep about this?
Brandis is mentioning the name ‘Hockey’ quite often.
George with his Sargent Schulz defence, again.
For an alleged QC he knows very little of what is going on around him.
I know I should be paying close attention to what Brandis is saying but his voice just drones on. But he is throwing Hockey under a cavalcade of double deckers.
Has George denied telling Gleeson not to run the killer point?
adrian @ #154 Monday, November 28, 2016 at 12:08 pm
Exception reporting. Julia Gillard passed lots of legislation – so it was not reportable. For Turnbull to even pass one piece of legislation, on which he has to compromise and compromise and compromise, is quite exceptional. Hence the reporting.
antonbruckner11 @ #168 Monday, November 28, 2016 at 12:27 pm
No.
Anton,
Not that I can understand, but understanding Brandis is a difficult task.
Then George is DUN
Brandis is paying close attention to Penny, and if that is not hate in his eyes it is the closest thing to it.
Whenny cooking Brandis.
“Senator Brandis says he was not aware of Mr Hockey’s dealings with the WA government until March 4 this year.”
@ The person who asked earlier.
Clearly there is something very strong to stop Gleeson from speaking to the media/Senate. Brandis would not dare to make such a statement otherwise.
Henry: “Who knew that Noel Pearson was such a c**t.”
I was always a bit worried after I heard Tony Abbott describe himself as “channeling Noel Pearson.”
Gleeson needs to issue a very simple statement that “Senator Brandis did advise me to not mount a legal case on behalf of the commonwealth”.
Career over for Brandis if he does that.
Tweets
Sky News Australia
1m1 minute ago
Sky News Australia @SkyNewsAust
.@SenatorWong: You don’t get to ignore the constitution as the first law officer because there’s a political problem http://snpy.tv/2fq1pAG
Green’s senator McKim nailing Brandis to the wall. No rebuttal by Brandis of WA newspaper’s claim that Brandis told the SG to run dead on the strongest defence in the HC case.
The way the politicians throw around amounts of money is amazing.
I remember Costello mentioning that during a meeting on GST at a point he whispered “400” to John Howard.
Costello meant $400,000.
Howard gave them $40m.
Sky News Australia
1m1 minute ago
Sky News Australia @SkyNewsAust
.@SenatorWong says A-G Brandis seeks to blame @JoeHockey #auspol http://snpy.tv/2g8pKtZ
McKim nails it:
Greens senator Nick McKim:
Let’s be very clear about what that allegation is. That allegation is that the Attorney-General instructed the then Solicitor-General Mr Gleeson to effectively run dead on the strongest argument he had at his disposal in the High Court…that statement that we have just heard from theAttorney-General did not rebut that allegation.
HENRY – Gleeson doesn’t need to say anything. George has basically admitted that.
Henry
He won’t do that. Gleeson has his own promising career prospects. George doesn’t.
Richard Tuffin retweeted
bernice finlayson
10m10 minutes ago
bernice finlayson @berniceFinl19
No matter that Brandis says Hockey made plans w/ WA & not him, there remains his instruction to SGen to ‘play dead’
It’s pretty obvious this whole saga re: Bell Group was the federal toadies sop to the WA state toadies in relation to the GST carve up.
“Look, we can’t alter the GST arrangements as that will piss off NSW too much, but here’s another great idea for you to close the gap”.
The incompetence is breathtaking.
brandis now being interviewed by PVO
Sky News Australia
41s41 seconds ago
Sky News Australia @SkyNewsAust
A-G Brandis says the facts do not support the suggestion of corruption made by Labor and the Greens #auspol
Sky News Australia
1m1 minute ago
Sky News Australia @SkyNewsAust
A-G Brandis says his decision was whether commonwealth should intervene on top of the ATO, which Justin Gleeson advised him to do #auspol
This Bell Group thing is an absolutely massive story IMO: perhaps the biggest of its type in a long time. It could potentially just run and run and run.
There are potentially umpteen lines of questioning to run on the issue. It’s a major crisis for the Turnbull Government, and Abbott is going to have some questions to answer about it too.
It’s just amazing.
CTar1
There was a similar story around the ‘reversing the brain drain’ policy – Howard mixed up his figures, and the program was extended far beyond the number of years originally intended.
Isn’t Penny Wong all class!
Nothing to see here move along……
Bevan Shields @BevanShields
Brandis says Mark Dreyfus goes too far and ought to “get over his obsession with me”
“The weaker the argument, the stronger the rhetoric”
3
1
Bevan Shields
3m3 minutes ago
Bevan Shields @BevanShields
George Brandis says Labor should feel “very foolish” because they can’t prove he has acted corruptly #auspol
Here we go… what’ll this bloke say?
Let me guess…
“It’s all Labor’s fault!”
(Before I’d even stopped typing he’d said it).
HENRY – It’s also staggering they thought they would get away with it. The HC would have been apoplectic about being used to let state law override Cth tax law.
Matthew Knott (did he used to work for Crikey?) in the SMH shows breathtaking naivete or something…
‘It is unclear how the ABC board would be instructed to change the way it conducts board meetings. The ABC guards its independence from government fiercely and could resist interference in its operations.’
This liberal WA senator is useless and is entirely missing the point.
It’s not about Burke, Connell, Bond, WA Inc etc.
It’s about subverting commonwealth law for the benefit of the state.
meher baba @ #188 Monday, November 28, 2016 at 1:00 pm
…………………………………………………………………
Yet ABC TV News in Sydney at Noon, made no mention of it.
Pathetic.
Thanks Kevin. I found having to scroll down to the latest entry a little counter-intuitive. I assume you figure the “Grumps” stuff is more interesting than a poll who’s primaries are hard to reconcile with other polls and the actual election result.
Zoom
I’ll flip with you for the change!
Couldn’t agree more!
Aftermath of election campaign raid by AFP:
http://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/leaked-nbn-documents-to-be-protected/news-story/e78ff29bb1673a11139df171d26e6320