The morning after

A quick acknowledgement of pollster and poll aggregate failure, and a venue for discussion of the surprise re-election of the Morrison government.

I’m afraid in depth analysis of the result will have to wait until I’ve slept for just about the first time in 48 hours. I’ll just observe that that BludgerTrack thing on the sidebar isn’t looking too flash right now, to which the best defence I can offer is that aggregators gonna aggregate. Basically every poll at the end of the campaign showed Labor with a lead of 51.5-48.5, and so therefore did BludgerTrack – whereas it looks like the final result will end up being more like the other way around. The much maligned seat polling actually wound up looking better than the national ones, though it was all too tempting at the time to relate their pecularities to a past record of leaning in favour of the Coalition. However, even the seat polls likely overstated Labor’s position, though the number crunching required to measure how much by will have to wait for later.

Probably the sharpest piece of polling analysis to emerge before the event was provided by Mark the Ballot, who offered a prescient look at the all too obvious fact that the polling industry was guilty of herding – and, in this case, it was herding to the wrong place. In this the result carries echoes of the 2015 election in Britain, when polling spoke in one voice of an even money bet between the Conservatives and Labour, when the latter’s vote share on the day proved to be fully 6% higher. This resulted in a period of soul-searching in the British polling industry that will hopefully be reflected in Australia, where pollsters are far too secretive about their methods and provide none of the breakdowns and weighting information that are standard for the more respected pollsters internationally. More on that at a later time.

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

1,797 comments on “The morning after”

Comments Page 16 of 36
1 15 16 17 36
  1. Boerwar @ #670 Sunday, May 19th, 2019 – 12:33 pm

    Dan
    You have misunderstood me and this has caused you to run an argument against a straw man.
    What I am saying is that if 100% of Greens voters had voted for Labor, Labor would now be forming government.
    The rest follows from that.

    If 50% of LNP voters had voted for Labor it would be forming government now. Two obvious but pointless points.

  2. frednk says:

    This month x dollars was paid out to people that paid no tax; the nation debt went up y might be a good message every month.

    Not forgetting to describe the money paid as coming from “hard working Australian families” with occasional “struggling to make ends meet” added at the end.

  3. My biggest fear under this re-elected Lib government is their ongoing trashing of our progressive income tax system. The dreaded “Phase 3” changes would still be saved by an ALP win at the next election right?

  4. If Anthony Albnese had been Labor leader, I predict Labor would have won in a landslide. Especially this government was arguably the most incompetent in Australian history.

    Honestly I am predicting the Labor party will be replaced by the Australian Greens as the main Progressive party in Australian politics. By the wy I voted for Mehqren Farqui in the senate in NSW . I argue she is tens times the sort of leader Australian politics needs to have (I admit I am a ‘soft’ Corbynista by the way).

  5. ” is she a indi, or a tory in indi clothing”

    Troy fer sure. But, i will hold judgement until i see what she actually takes a stand on re: Climate/energy

  6. Maybe don’t make your message about making anyone pay more taxes? Because we’ve seen first hand how that easily morphs into “Labor wants to tax you to death”

    I’m not saying that we should not be making the wealthy and corporations pay more taxes. Just don’t make that your message. Or, if you do, make it CLEAR that’s what you’re talking about. Shorten’s vague terms like “top end” just opened imaginations that it might have meant them who he was going to increase taxes on.

  7. mundo @ #745 Sunday, May 19th, 2019 – 1:21 pm

    frednk @ #738 Sunday, May 19th, 2019 – 1:19 pm

    This month x dollars was paid out to people that paid no tax; the nation debt went up y might be a good message every month.

    Whatever, it has to be drip drip drip for it to sink in….Labor needs to start now.
    The party who laid the foundations of the modern Australian economy has a great story to sell.
    Just need a salesperson.

    Resurrect Tony’s Debt Truck. The more people see that the more they may start to believe it.

  8. I’m pretty sure there are bucketloads of sh*t to be thrown at Albo if he’s elected as leader. He has turned too many blind eyes in the past – to corruption in NSW (which our dear departed MTBW’s made clear he was aware of decades before it became public) and the machinations of Rudd, for starters. The msm would have lots of juicy stories they’ve been keeping in reserve, ready to go.

    Victoria Labor (ironically, under Shorten) has always been good at ruthlessly cutting out any MP who had anything to do with the Ancien Regime. After all, someone who has been in Parliament a couple of decades, who has had experience as a Minister, has probably achieved all they’re going to, but still has all the contacts, nous and authority to direct events from the outside. Strategic replacement of MPs such as this with bright young things and using the next three years to train them up is probably a good option.

    Same with leaders. Someone who has had some governmental experience – e.g. junior Ministry – done some policy development, worked out how to deal with the media, etc but is still a bit of a cleanskin (no connection with any of the knifings) is probably the best choice.

    Morrison is still facing a lot of difficulties. The Coalition have already shown they’re not that good at handling a marginal government, so the whole ‘herding cats’ thing which saw them paralysed for the last few years is still a Thing. If it’s minority government, that’s even harder. And there are several key Ministerial roles to be filled.

    On the brighter side, the Coalition knows they can’t revisit all the nasty things they wanted to do under Abbott. And we know that they actively resent leaders who try to run the show by themselves. They may have tolerated a Morrison dictatorship for the relatively short period of the election campaign, but there’s no guarantees they’ll knuckle under for an extended period of time. They’re still mad as cut snakes, remember – and not enough of their loonies have been booted.

    I’d like to dream of a DD, but this will be a government which clings to power to the last hour. It’s not there because it’s popular.

  9. YBob
    This election was not lost because labor failed to get the pension vote.

    That’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying that when you make a line such as “This month x people paid no tax, yet got y given to them ……” or wtte

    it could be seen as complaining that pensioners get the pension etc

  10. It has been 20 years since Naomi Kleins NoLogo was first published. A book about many things; it was in part about the power and negative effects of branding. The branding where giant companies were selling a lifestyle, through advertising. The fakeness was palbable. But people bought it.

    Advertising, branding, marketing became about who you want to be, what group you want to be associated with, affiliate with… identify with. This relationship only grew over the years and reinforced itself to the point it seeped into peoples core values and beliefs. Real life imitated fake branding. Modern western anthropologists write about this cultural phenomenon.

    Politics in our democracy has always been about the sell. And perhaps has been about identity and branding all along. Rarely about content, politics has been about hooking in a voter for life by branding them with a political identity- creating a base. Around the time NoLogo was published John Howard was starting his second term and well on the way to the right wing perfecting their branding.

    Last night was the pinnacle of all those years of constant broad spectrum focus on making large swathes of the electorate incapable of voting for the ALP, no matter the circumstances.

  11. Puffy TMD
    “If you are reading this and you did not vote for the ALP yesterday, you are a murderer.”
    “You voted for the rapist murderer party. So ask yourself, what are you?”

    If there is any silver lining to the result, its to stick it to absolute f*&^wits like this person. I hope that the ALP disowns and disavows people like you, as should their ardent supporters here. The more the likes of this kind of pathetic sore loser are in any way representative of the party or the movement then the less any normal people will want the slightest thing to do with it.

    I generally dont get personal and abusive here, but that kind of disgusting drivel says all we need to know about the author and not the supposed subject being advocated.

  12. YBob

    Indi’s indies are total frauds, but everyone – media included – seems to have drunk the KoolAid, so Zali should get away with it!

  13. If Albanese were leader, Labor would have lost by even more.
    Shorten would have white-anted him just to make sure that he lost, just like Krudd tried to do with Dullard.

  14. Just want to say fuck the pollsters (except you William, can’t do a good job when all you’ve got to work with is shit) and FUCK the compliant, self absorbed media! Even the ABC was biased in its coverage. Scummo probably won’t try to privatise it, but he’ll sure keep working on turning it into a Liberal party version of the People’s Daily.

    I wasn’t wrong about the polls being wrong, but I misread the way the vote would go. Clive Palmer saved the election for the libs. I didn’t think enough people would fall for his bullshit.

    My take:
    Labor needs to stand for what it believes in. It might be tempting to go further right, but you can’t win on being Liberal-lite and Greens hating. Right leaning voters won’t buy it, and left leaning ones take their first preference elsewhere. Full disclosure: I did. You can’t be wishy-washy. This election was a fuck up on tactics, messaging, and voter distrust of RGR era Shorten even though he could have been a competent PM. I don’t know who should replace him, but I reckon Penny Wong has what it takes if she could swap with someone in the lower house. Whoever takes the job has to be charismatic and take a strong stance. Look at Jackie Lambie. People like or respect her even if they don’t agree with a lot of what she has to say. Keep the base on side and win whoever else over you can, especially young people. The mainstream media is with the enemy and pollsters can be safely ignored for the time being.

    Oppositions can’t apparently can’t ever go big target, and they have to fight dirty. It shouldn’t be this way in a democracy with an educated populace, but it apparently is. There are always going to be a lot of ignorant and small minded people at the ballot box unless we start restricting voting based on ability to pass some kind of civics/basic knowledge test.

  15. zoomster backing someone with Junior Ministry experience. let me guess, from the Right? She’s obviously correct, I mean look at the Indi results!

  16. Katharine MurphyVerified account@murpharoo
    1m1 minute ago
    Bill Shorten to be interim leader until Labor sorts out the leadership #ausvotes

  17. meher baba says Sunday, May 19, 2019 at 1:07 pm

    I don’t know, as I wasn’t there. However, I don’t think the actual truth really matters that much: Shorten’s problem is that the image of him talking on the phone outside the Chinese restaurant added to a view in the collective minds of the public that had started to be formed back in the Beaconsfield days. That is, of a little popinjay who, while not having all that much to offer, manages to claw his way into a top job by endlessly thrusting himself forward and by clambering over the top of his rivals.

    The public draw their perceptions of politicians from their experiences in their workplaces, voluntary organisations, families, etc. Most of us are familiar with ambitious popinjays and, rightly or wrongly (I suspect mostly wrongly) that’s the image which has stuck to Shorten. If he was a better media performer and exuded a bit more charisma, he would have been able to transcend it.

    It’s ironic, but this probably equally applies to Morrison, except Morrison has been better able to hide his machinations. Look at what he did to Michael Towke, even getting the ALP to provide a dirt file on Towke (https://twitter.com/kyleandjackieo/status/1034236800670154752?lang=en), and I bet Sam regrets that now. There are still plenty of Abbott supporters who blame Morrison for the change to Turnbull. Then there are the claims that Morrison’s hands were not clean at all in the removal of Turnbull, and if anything, that he had been planning it for some time.

    It’s a pity, because I think he would have had a fair bit to offer as PM. But he didn’t have anywhere near what it takes to win the role.

    Even then, he might have made it if he hadn’t had to carry the tax package lead in his saddlebags.

    I think he would have been a PM very much in the Hawke style, although without the popularity, or the need to be loved.

    The superannuation changes that the Grattan Institute persuaded Turnbull to make went a long way towards alienating quite a few of the backbenchers who voted against him. And now Labor’s Grattan Institute-endorsed tax package has cost it government.

    I’m surprised no one made anything out of all the people who lost the pension in the last government.

    Message to politicians from all parties: stop listening to the Grattan Institute.

    Be careful with the advice of economists. How many of Ken Henry’s tax plan were politically feasible?

  18. …if you want grim reality, that over 65 cohort gets smaller by the day…

    Not true in the slightest. People are increasingly living longer.

  19. laughtong @ #754 Sunday, May 19th, 2019 – 1:27 pm

    mundo @ #745 Sunday, May 19th, 2019 – 1:21 pm

    frednk @ #738 Sunday, May 19th, 2019 – 1:19 pm

    This month x dollars was paid out to people that paid no tax; the nation debt went up y might be a good message every month.

    Whatever, it has to be drip drip drip for it to sink in….Labor needs to start now.
    The party who laid the foundations of the modern Australian economy has a great story to sell.
    Just need a salesperson.

    Resurrect Tony’s Debt Truck. The more people see that the more they may start to believe it.

    I honestly thought Labor would do it this time. Nope.
    Labor lacks the killer instinct. But they do really cool policy work. Hey guys, let’s go do some cool policy work, and, then let’s go write a musical!!! Yay!!

  20. Oh, and Keneally would be an awful, awful choice. A talented and charismatic woman, no doubt, but come on. If Shorten has baggage, then she has a fully packed airport carousel. The attack ads write themselves.

  21. Joel Fitzgibbon is deciding whether to put his hand up ,as leader or deputy leader of Labor

    Or he could do us a solid and catch the same bus out as Shorten.


  22. Rex Douglas says:
    Sunday, May 19, 2019 at 1:23 pm

    Queensland – 75.1% counted

    Primary vote

    ALP 27.4% (-3.5%)
    Greens 10.2% (+1.4%)

    And the Galilee Basin will now be developed; oh the success. The Greens campaigned hard against Labor and won along with Clive who campaigned hard against Labor and won; and the LNP that campaigned hard against Labor and won.

  23. If Labor had proposed universal basic income which is not means tested, then those who feared from losing from Labor’s proposed negative gearing and franking dividends changes.

    Because one needs to realize that some Boomer retirees are actually supporting financially especially their Millennial children (if they have them( considerably, by if possible paying for their whole university fees or providing deposits for their home loans. Wonder why Boomers are worried about Labor’s promised changes to Franking Dividends. Because many Baby Boomers who have Millennial children are supporting them as much as possible

  24. Oh, and Keneally would be an awful, awful choice. A talented and charismatic woman, no doubt, but come on. The attack ads write themselves.

    It is such a tone deaf move, it might just happen.

    And I do think she’s a good spokesperson. Just… really? You want to remind everybody of your link to the late, ultra-corrupt NSW State Labor Government?!

  25. I remember when KK got the nod from Eddie and Joe to become premier – that is enough to exclude her from leadership

  26. Donald J. TrumpVerified account@realDonaldTrump
    7h7 hours ago
    Congratulations to Scott on a GREAT WIN!

    Brothers.


  27. laughtong says:
    Sunday, May 19, 2019 at 1:27 pm

    ….

    Resurrect Tony’s Debt Truck. The more people see that the more they may start to believe it.

    If the budget keeps going as it is ( the surplus thing was bullshit) then 100% agree,

  28. frednk @ #743 Sunday, May 19th, 2019 – 11:19 am

    This month x dollars was paid out to people that paid no tax; the nation debt went up y might be a good message every month.

    Yes. Let’s not rush to jettison the entire platform. Much of it was valid and may only need the odd tweak. Other parts need to be completely re-fashioned. Take time people. We have to get it right.

  29. zoomster says Sunday, May 19, 2019 at 1:31 pm

    …if you want grim reality, that over 65 cohort gets smaller by the day…

    Quite the opposite. We have an aging population and that cohort is getting large by the day.

  30. frednk @ #778 Sunday, May 19th, 2019 – 1:37 pm


    Rex Douglas says:
    Sunday, May 19, 2019 at 1:23 pm

    Queensland – 75.1% counted

    Primary vote

    ALP 27.4% (-3.5%)
    Greens 10.2% (+1.4%)

    And the Galilee Basin will now be developed; oh the success. The Greens campaigned hard against Labor and won along with Clive who campaigned hard against Labor and won; and the LNP that campaigned hard against Labor and won.

    Don’t you mean the Queensland CFMMEU campaigned against Labor ..?

  31. expat,
    while I do not endorse the comment you refer to, I understand the sentiment behind it.

    Voting is not a whimsy, it is a responsibility. And with it must come some accountability. The Abbott experiment made some sense. At a time when we are feeling the undoubted force of climate change (a clear and present danger from natural disasters, food and water security to global political stability) with a political party demonstrably disinterested and/or incapable of being part of the solution to that threat, voting for Morrison is at best reckless. Deliberate, unjustifiable recklessness.

  32. Given that Queenslanders are so determined to fry the planet and trash their main tourist attraction we should be proactive and rename it the “Once Great Barrier Reef”.

  33. Rational Leftist:

    Morning all. I hope everyone is OK. I’m a bit hungover, myself.

    I am not going to write a tedious screed about “why Labor lost” where I try to dress my ideological hang-ups and personal feelings as objective analysis. There’s been enough of that.

    I can’t say what the next change of government will look like. I daresay it’s not that far away (i.e. probably next election.) Morrison won but he still scraped over the line. I know it was said about 2019 as well but he still won’t have much to work with.

    However, if there’s one thing to take away, it’s this: meta-think more often. Don’t just embrace things that tell you want to hear and ignore/downplay those that don’t. And don’t overrely on heuristics. They’re a good starting point but a very weak conclusion.

    I know, people will say, “Oh but the polls had Labor winning and I responded to that” and that’s fine. We all get things wrong, no matter how we think getting there. I was wrong. However, I saw people also rubbishing polls because “there is no way that Labor’s primary is that low!” (Spoiler: it was) and people arbitrarily adding another percent because, y’know, it feels right.

    I guess the TL;DR of this is just be more open to perspectives you don’t want to hear and, if you were the type of person who angrily tried to silence those perspectives (you know who you are), maybe it’s time to self-evaluate and change because you were the biggest loser here.

    This deserves to be repeated.

    Oakeshott Country:

    So Labor is likely to have the lowest PV in 90 years but its the murdering, raping Australian people who are at fault.
    If this attitude is wide spread it will be a long time before the ALP again gains government

    As does this.

Comments Page 16 of 36
1 15 16 17 36

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *