Speaking on RN Breakfast on Friday, Ben Oquist of progressive think tank the Australia Institute voiced the beltway consensus that “the bookies have got this one wrong at the moment – they’re forecasting a much bigger Labor victory than anybody seems to be predicting”. Betting markets at first appeared to respond, if not to Oquist specifically, then to the view coming through in media reports that both major parties were expecting a tight contest. Labrokes was offering $5 on a Coalition on Thursday, but by Sunday this was in to $3.50. Then came Newspoll, showing Labor maintaining its lead, and the Coalition blew back out to $4.50.
The individual seat markets have been more consistent, pointing to a Labor landslide of even greater dimensions than the one currently projected by BludgerTrack, which I would have thought quite a bit too favourable for Labor, particularly in Queensland. Ladbrokes rates Labor as favourites in five Coalition-held seats in New South Wales (Banks, Gilmore, Page, Reid and Robertson), four in Victoria (Chisholm, Corangamite, Deakin and Dunkley), three in Western Australia (Hasluck, Pearce and Swan), one in South Australia (Boothby), and a Kevin Rudd-equalling nine in Queensland (Bonner, Brisbane, Capricornia, Dawson, Dickson, Flynn, Forde, Leichhardt and Petrie).
There has been some movement to the Coalition in the seat markets, notably in Flinders, where Liberal member Greg Hunt has edged to very narrow favouritism. Other significant movements have been recorded in the Liberals’ favour in Banks ($3.50 to $2.25), Lindsay ($3.50 to $2.05), Page ($2.40 to $1.90), Lyons ($5.50 to $4), Chisholm ($5 to $3.75), although Labor remains favourites in each. However, there has actually been movement in Labor’s favour in Gilmore, where they are in from $1.30 to $1.18, with Liberal out from $4.50 to $4.75.
Of the independent contenders, Albury mayor Ken Mack is rated equally likely to succeed against Liberal member Sussan Ley in Farrer as Zali Steggall is against Tony Abbott in Warringah, each offering a payout of $2.00. Both are trumped by Rob Oakeshott in Cowper, the most highly fancied non-incumbent independent at $1.75. In Mallee, where Andrew Broad of the Nationals is retired hurt, Ladbrokes is offering $3 for an independent to win, be it Ray Kingston, Cecilia Moar or Jason Modica. (Sportsbet has it at $4.75). Dave Sharma is favoured to recover Wentworth for the Liberals from Kerryn Phelps, with the two respectively at $1.57 and $2.30.
Among the many features of the Poll Bludger election guide, you can find Ladbrokes’ seat odds listed on the bottom right of each of the electorate pages, which are linked to individually throughout this post.
Confessions says: Tuesday, April 16, 2019 at 7:46 am
Donald J. TrumpVerified account@realDonaldTrump
So horrible to watch the massive fire at Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris. Perhaps flying water tankers could be used to put it out. Must act quickly!
**********************************************************
‘Fire Expert’ Trump Tells Paris How To Put Out Notre Dame Cathedral Fire
Trump’s knowlege of firefighting is probably on par with his knowledge of the Constitution and how government works, which is to say that he knows nothing……. but he is getting ready to go fight the fire
A primary challenger to Trump emerges.
phoenixRed:
LOL!
The Gladys Liu in Chisholm sounds like another Michaela Cash. What a piece of work.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/apr/15/liberal-candidates-fake-reporting-claim-prompts-release-of-interview
swamprat @ #47 Tuesday, April 16th, 2019 – 7:49 am
Quick thinking by someone!
ajm says:
Tuesday, April 16, 2019 at 7:38 am
Dog’s Breakfast @ #37 Tuesday, April 16th, 2019 – 7:27 am
R and n?
My guess is “Rex and nath “
———————————————————————————————-
That’s about it, thanks ajm.
Amazing how the PB community has ‘normalized’ those two. They will take much comfort from that.
The betting odds are an OK diversion in the absence of polling but it’s difficult to see why they’d have much predictive value. At the same time the official (“it’s closer than everyone thinks”) line coming from both camps that William mentions at the top of the thread is highly predictable. No one wants to come over as complacent and, in the case of the coalition, they don’t want to come over as having given up. Best evidence is current polling which puts the ALP modestly ahead on a consistent basis. Polling error, as in the Victorian election, could upset the applecart, and could occur in either direction- meaning anywhere between a narrow Coalition victory, in majority or minority, or a thumping Labor win shouldn’t be a surprising result.
James McGrath has worked for Santos and Crosby Textor. Showed typical fury and indignation when Larissa accused him.
https://www.michaelwest.com.au/people/revolving-doors/james-mcgrath/
Gladys Liu was Michael Sukkars preferred candidate. She beat a whole bunch of lame Whitehorse councillors…
I wonder whether Jim Chalmers might be a better choice than Bowen for Treasurer. Bowen has wanted the position for so long I’m sure he’d disagree, but Chalmers is very calm and clear.
Even on Gladys Liu’s own version of events, her statement is indefensible. I imagine that a large number of Chinese Australians would be appalled at being characterised as homophobic jerks. Imagine if anyone else imputed that an entire ethnic community shared prejudiced views. It would be called out as racist. The fact that she is a member of that community is neither here nor there.
Morning all
Even with the Notre dame fire, Trump has it insert himself. When will the insanity cease
Good Morning
Michael Rowland just did a good interview with Frydenberg. He asked if the LNP are going to disendows Gladys Liu. Frydenberg went on about how the passing of the Marriage Equality legislation was proof they are inclusive. Then no they were not going to disendorse her. Rowland then asked what voters especially LGBTI ones would think in Chisholm. Frydenberg basically dismissed it as a concern though I can’t remember his exact words.
Frydenberg showed more concern for things than people in that interview IMO. Appropriate comments about Notre Dame but the contrast with his Liu comments were to me stark.
In response to Notre Dame this morning (paraphrasing, but close to the real words)..
Shorten- Paris has lost it soul this morning
Morrison- I have been there with my wife!
There are certain narcissists, psychopaths, out-of-touch self obsessives, whatever, who make themselves the subject of every sentence- use the words I and we constantly. Morrison, Trump and Abbott are 3.
Victoria @ #61 Tuesday, April 16th, 2019 – 6:24 am
And not to commiserate at the destruction of an iconic piece of history, but to question the fire-fighting methods!
Sanders finally releases his tax returns.
https://berniesanders.com/tax-returns/
Fess
Yep. Considering how frickin useless Trump would be at anything that remotely resembling physical work.
He is proficient in being a narcissistic con man, and not much else.
@MattDoran91 tweets
Jim Molan’s campaign has sent our helpful hints to supporters to help him hold his seat, after he was relegated to a usually unwindable position on the NSW Liberal Senate ticket @politicsabc #ausvotes https://twitter.com/MattDoran91/status/1117918396048265217/photo/1
I love the way the Coalition have taken ownership of the SSM plebiscite.
On ABC TV this morning Josh Frydenberg was asked about Gladys Liu’s comments, and what would happen to her candidacy?
His answer: “Bill Shorten… SSM plebiscite… great candidate… Bill Shorten… yada-yada… MELISSA PARKE!!!!”
Question: ” Yeah, Melissa Parke was sacked. What are YOU going to do about Gladys?”
Nice point, but I do wish the ABC would have some Labor people on occasionally.
Betting markets got it right with NSW State election although quite a few PBers including me expressed their doubts on those odds. The betting markets for NSW state election change significantly after Daley Asian slur.
Although it is longway from federal election date and things can change, we should not dismiss the current market odds. Hopefully they hold till election night.
@ezraklein on Sanders tax returns
I’d say the most embarrassing thing in here is that 3.4% to charity in a year you make more than $560,000 is really low, even if you’ve got an old book where the proceeds go to charity.
@SBSNews
French authorities have confirmed Notre-Dame cathedral’s facade and two towers have been saved
http://bit.ly/2v5BUd9
Thanks BK for the Dawn Patrol.
Peter FitzSimons writes about how he handles social media trolls,
https://www.smh.com.au/national/my-three-rules-to-beat-the-trolls-20190415-p51eeh.html
Some excellent advice regarding online trolls.
Or, more or less – is there any point in hating somebody if they don’t know about it ❓
Good morning in Newcastle – 🌞
swamprat@8:03am
No she is not Cash. She is Chinese.
Remember SSM results in Banks and Bennelong electorates where Chinese are in significant number. If you don’t remember SSM was ‘No’ in Banks and Bennelong. So I believe that she is expressing her community and her views on SSM. I see this villification of people who did not support SSM continues on PB.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/apr/16/if-you-read-life-on-the-breadline-you-got-to-know-the-humans-behind-the-headlines
It’s time to raise Newstart now.
Ven
Homophobia is homophobia. She is being condemned for seeming to accept and excuse those community views. Not for saying they exist.
Yes. Send the flying water tankers. That’ll surely work!
Grassroots environmental activism:
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/apr/16/environment-crisis-wilderness-society-pursues-parties-over-election-commitments
The Paris fire will suck oxygen out of today’s campaign in Australia.
Yep it was big fire.
@liamalexander tweets
Frydenburg: “The LNP stands for tolerance.”
Gladys Liu: “Chinese people come to Australia because they want good … things for the next generation, not to be destroyed — by same-sex, transgender, intergender. All this rubbish. To them, they are just ridiculous rubbish.”
#auspol
Very sad about Notre Dame.
Police still unsure of what started it but I hear some guy called Quasimodo has a hunch.
More from Captain Carnival Barker on the Notre Dame fire.
Warwick Smith of the University of Melbourne has a macroeconomically literate piece in The Conversation today:
https://theconversation.com/memories-in-1961-labor-promised-to-boost-the-deficit-to-fight-unemployment-the-promise-won-115376
The last questioner on Q & A described herself as a farmer’s daughter and a small business woman who regarded the environment as her number one issue. Despite the stereotypes bandied about regarding the demographic and personal characteristics of Greens voters and supporters, she indicated she will be voting Greens at the upcoming election. Nice end to a rather fractious episode where the three women shone for their sane and civilised responses.
As evidenced by Gladys Liu’s comments, the basic difference between Labor and Coalition policies is the priority given to “making money” as opposed to “dealing with social issues”.
The whole Coalition pitch is that tax cuts, rebates, profits take primacy. If there’s any cash left over (which there rarely is) we can look at other matters.
Well, it looks like The Greens have settled on their issue du jour if Labor get elected.
‘Raise Newstart now!’ they will chirrup endlessly like political Indian Mynah Birds.
Knowing full well that Labor have committed to a root and branch review of all Welfare payments, should they be privileged enough to be elected by the Australian people.
Hopefully, one day, The Greens will just grow up. Bipartisanship works both ways.
The main campaign ad I have seen quite a few times now, is the debt and deficit one by the coalition. Something about a Bill Australia can’t afford.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/elections-shouldn-t-be-bought-push-for-donation-limits-to-prevent-corruption-20190415-p51ec7.html
Cat
Last I looked the unions were not the Greens and they have joined the raise Newstart push.
The theory is that Labor wants a review because they want to raise the rate to a level that is unacceptable to activist groups. Like the Unemployed Workers Union.
Dog’s Breakfast
says:
Tuesday, April 16, 2019 at 8:12 am
ajm says:
Tuesday, April 16, 2019 at 7:38 am
Dog’s Breakfast @ #37 Tuesday, April 16th, 2019 – 7:27 am
R and n?
My guess is “Rex and nath “
———————————————————————————————-
That’s about it, thanks ajm.
Amazing how the PB community has ‘normalized’ those two. They will take much comfort from that.
______________________________________
I know! It’s almost as if the blog is not designed to cater specifically to the prejudices of a Dog’s Breakfast! Who knew!
The same way that the federal government pays for everything that it buys, thousands of times every single day.
The Commonwealth Parliament authorizes the Treasury to spend.
The Treasury instructs the central bank to credit the relevant Exchange Settlement Balances (accounts that commercial banks hold at the Reserve Bank of Australia).
The commercial banks credit the relevant checking accounts (the accounts that individuals and businesses hold at commercial banks).
Your real question is: Does this extra spending have to be offset by spending cuts and / or tax increases to make it non-inflationary?
The answer is: No, right now there is ample scope for net increases to the federal government’s spending without causing accelerating inflation. The economy is far short of full employment. NAIRU full employment is not genuine full employment.
We’ll know that the economy is at full employment when the unemployment rate is 1 or 2 percent, time-related under-employment is zero, and hidden unemployment is zero.
Today the unemployment rate is 5 percent, time-related under-employment is 8 percent, and there are 900,000 hidden unemployed people in Australia.
As long as the extra spending is targeted correctly, the federal government could probably increase its net spending by about $50 billion per year at the moment without causing an inflation problem.
Oh dear another scare campaign bites the dust.
@janeenorman tweets
Scott Morrison says Australia’s been “working quietly behind the scenes with the Red Cross” to find a way of bringing the Sharrouf kids home from Syria but says there are significant hurdles to clear #auspol
Could I please say that my ethnic Chinese friends are greatly insulted that the whole community would be tarred as homophobic.
There are many very conservative Chinese voters, but there are also a great number of socially progressive ethnic Chinese voters in Australia. Ven’s implying that the entire community is homophobic is pretty racist.
FWIW Chisholm, with its huge Chinese and broader Asian migrant communities, voted 62% for marriage equality. Liu does not represent the views of this electorate.
To be fair, to many voters, a “cat stuck up a tree” story would do that right now…
Expat
I believe that. There are many family and friends of all those Chinese people in the Melbourne part of the Sydney Mardi Gras just for starters.
It is an insult to the Chinese community as much as the LGBTI community to say such a general comment.
Two weeks ago he was rabbiting on about “not risking one Australian life” to rescue terrorists’ kids, as if it was the kids’ fault.
In response to the advice of the US President, the Fire Authority in Paris said that water bombing the Cathedral would do more harm to it. It was not a good idea.
Liu’s comments go against her party’s recent concern for youth mental health and suicide. At Sunday’s rally, Scott made youth mental health and suicide a priority. There is a a high rate of youth mental health and suicide in the LGBTIQ community, with young people struggling to come to terms with their identity and being accepted. Liu’s words of such people being ‘just ridiculous rubbish’ as well as opposing Safe Schools and same-sex marriage all fly in the face of trying to tackle youth mental health and suicide. Not good enough. And another example of this party saying one thing, and acting in a different way.
To be fair to Trump, he only asked whether water bombing could be a solution.
I hope Getup is targeting Chisholm! I don’t want Liu in Parliament.