Essential Research: 54-46 to Labor

Labor roars back in the latest Essential poll, despite a slump in Bill Shorten’s personal ratings.

The latest fortnightly Essential Research poll sharply reverses a recent trend away from Labor, who are back to leading 54-46 on two-party preferred after their lead fell to 51-49 in the previous poll. This is apparently driven by a four point drop in the Coalition primary vote, but as usual we will have to wait until later today for the full numbers. However, it’s a curiously different story on leadership ratings, on which Malcolm Turnbull gains two on approval since last month to reach 42% while remaining steady on 42% disapproval, while Bill Shorten is down four to 33% and up five to 46%. Turnbull’s lead over Shorten as preferred prime minister is unchanged, shifting from 40-26 to 41-27. Like ReachTEL and unlike Newspoll, Essential has posed a straightforward question on company tax cuts that finds approval and disapproval tied on 37%. The poll also finds 68% support for an increase in Newstart.

UPDATE: Full results here. The Coalition primary vote crashes from 40% to 36%, Labor’s rises one to 37%, the Greens are steady on 10% and One Nation are steady on 8%.

UPDATE 2: Further details from those ReachTEL polls for Sky News, which were conducted last Wednesday. In the national poll, after allocating results from a forced response follow-up for the 5.1% undecided, the primary votes were Coalition 36.5%, Labor 35.3%, Greens 10.7%, One Nation 9.3% and others 8.2%, translating into a 52-48 lead for Labor after respondent-allocated preferences favoured them by 54.8-45.2. Malcolm Turnbull’s lead on the forced response preferred prime minister question was almost exactly unchanged at 54.6-45.4 (54.5-45.5 last month); his very good plus good rating went from 29.9% to 30.8%, and his poor plus very poor from 32.6% to 37.0%. Bill Shorten went from 28.4% to 27.7% on good plus very good, and from 35.5% to 39.9% on poor plus very poor.

In the poll for the Braddon by-election, after allocating the forced follow-up results from the 5.9% undecided, the primary votes were Liberal 48.2%, Labor 34.5%, Greens 6.6%, independents 7.2%, others 3.5%, resulting in a 54-46 Liberal lead on respondent-allocated two-party preferred. In Longman, with the 7.1% initially undecided likewise allocated, the results are Liberal National Party 40.4%, Labor 37.3%, independents 5.5%, Greens 2.7% and others 14.1% (confirming there was no specific option for One Nation), resulting in an LNP lead of 52-48. Respondents for these polls were asked how they would vote “if a by-election in the federal electorate of X were to be held today”. The by-election polls were conducted last Wednesday, from samples of 824 in Braddon and 810 in Longman; the national poll was conducted Wednesday and Thursday from a sample of 2523.

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

2,057 comments on “Essential Research: 54-46 to Labor”

Comments Page 37 of 42
1 36 37 38 42
  1. One example of differentiating headlines —

    When I go to this link,

    https://www.bordermail.com.au/news/local-news/5457643/not-much-point-having-abortion-help-away-from-clinic-helper/

    I get ‘Reaction from Albury figures to abortion clinic protest ban’ as the headline, which is reasonable.

    However, the front page of the digital edition

    https://www.bordermail.com.au/

    has ‘Not much point having abortion help away from clinic: Helper.”

    In the latter example, I thought that there must be some proposal to shift counselling for women away from the clinic, and that “Helper” was the surname of a spokesperson.

    But no – the ‘help’ referred to is the practice of standing outside abortion clinics harassing women, and the ‘helper’ is one of the organisers of these protests.

  2. caf @ #1776 Friday, June 8th, 2018 – 10:14 pm

    Late Riser:

    The base assumption is that there is some underlying “true value” of the proportion of support for the different parties over the entire voting population, and that this true measure of support changes over time in response to prevailing political and economic conditions. Individual polls tell us a noisy point-in-time estimate of those underlying values, and poll aggregates like BludgerTrack seek to combine estimates from multiple polls to produce a less noisy estimate. An engineering equivalent might be the way in which GPS receivers combine a series of noisy range estimates to produce a more precise time-varying position estimate.

    As for how voting intentions change into the future, unless you have some insight into particular political or economic circumstances, the best model is likely a random walk.

    Thanks caf. I like your analogies. I’ll see if I can find how GPS receivers balance noisy satellite info. Random walk has step length and frequency parameters. I’ll give that some thought too.

  3. Diogenes @ #1784 Saturday, June 9th, 2018 – 1:00 am

    Late Riser
    Unfortunately William hasn’t commented so I’ll try to wring the dim memory from my brain cells.
    55-45 equates to a 66% chance of winning 6 months before a poll. 55-45 6 weeks before a poll is 90%.
    You will notice Trump is just under 50/50 with the bookies. The polls are about 55-45 against him but more than 2 years out they aren’t worth much.

    That’s interesting. I can use that straight away. Thanks Dio!

  4. Diogenes says:
    Saturday, June 9, 2018 at 1:09 am
    Anyone committing suicide is incredibly sad but having Kate Spade and now Anthony Bourdain in one week just shows no matter how much talent, success and money you have, depression can be more powerful than them all.

    A series by Anthony Bourdain has been playing on the SBS Food Channel. He was one of the more entertaining celebrity chefs and gave his own unique insights into the many and varied places around the world that he visited.

    He certainly was a cut above the horrible Gordon Ramsay with his shouting and swearing.

  5. Facebook seems to be rooted this morning. I can only see a few items – and not recent ones at that. Anyone else having problems?

  6. BK

    No, mine is working fine, but I’ve had similar problems in the past, sometimes for a few days. Eventually everything just went back to normal.

  7. From the BK Files.

    A “must read” from Mike Seccombe on “Mitch Fifield, the IPA and the ABC”.
    https://outline.com/Vh9F2f

    *************************************************************
    Not a lot of laughs in this story. There are a lot of home truths for anybody interested in the nature and intent of our current government.

    I do like the following excerpt :-

    Which brings us back to Margaret Reynolds who, as it happens, was on her way to the dump when The Saturday Paper called.

    She may be a little bit of a Pollyanna, but she is not naive about politics, and she was frankly at a loss to understand what Fifield and co hope to achieve.

    Not so, I thought, naive or not, Ms. Reynolds

    For “the first year or so”, the ABC champion tried to build bridges. Latterly, though, she’s realised there’s not much point. She and other supporters of public broadcasting are up against an implacable ideological opposition.

    “In the last six to 12 months,” Reynolds says, “it’s become clear he’s got no understanding of what the role of a public broadcaster is.”

    That’s an arguable proposition. One might equally suggest, on the available evidence, that Fifield has a clear understanding of the role of a public broadcaster – including the provision of independent news and analysis – and opposes it for that very reason.

    knows full well what is the intent of Mr. Fifield, hide though he may, from time to time, behind a blather of bullshit, blarny and deception.

    While

    The ABC remains trusted in a time of declining confidence in other institutions

    The attacks are not going away, Ms. Hanson, stout defender of the good old days of yore with a cacophony of vehemence from RW supporters, wants changes to the ABC.

    Now that Midsomer Murders can be seen on commercial TV and while in-depth journalism is stifled, when will the time be ripe for a closing down sale ❓

    I concur with BK this really is a must read item.

    The reason I like the bit about the dump is because I had a vision of Mr. Fifield travelling with Ms. Margaret but Ms. Margaret returning alone. He He He …..

  8. Morning all. I recommend reading Canadian PM Trudeau’s G7 address, highlighting many policy areas Labor should support. It is striking how consistent Australia’s main economic policy problems are with the G7. The solutions (education, participation, increasing low and middle incomes, ending tax evasion) are also consistent with many Labor policies. Note the total absence of talk about tax cuts.
    https://www.scribd.com/document/381266413/Achieving-Growth-that-Works-for-Everyone

  9. Every woman knows that when she wants to “refresh” her image, she will adopt a new hairstyle. Sometimes it happens with new employment, sometimes after the breakdown of a relationship, sometimes just because…

    Has anyone else noticed that Julie Bishop has not only changed the side she parts her hair, but has gone bouffant, almost in the style of Michaelia Cash?

    There could be a number of reasons for this, but it’s interesting, from a political pov, to speculate…

  10. Has anyone else noticed that Julie Bishop has not only changed the side she parts her hair, but has gone bouffant, almost in the style of Michaelia Cash?

    She looks the same to me as she always has. Then again, I don’t pay that much attention to her.

  11. There seems to be a power struggle at the moment between Porter (and probably Dutton) on the one hand and the more more ‘moderate’ types like Pyne, on the other .

    It revolves around Porter claiming that new ‘anti-foreign interference’ laws must be enacted to protect the by-elections from manipulation by nasty people. Porter, using Benson in the Oz as his mouthpiece, is obviously trying to wedge Labor into rushing the whole suite of anti-foreign interference bills into law. However he seems to have fallen foul of people like Pyne who question the rush.

    Long may this L/NP disunity continue.

    https://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/national-security/asio-afp-called-up-for-byelection-security-duty/news-story/b3c5e9068d332fb3ab13412f0b2b591a?from=htc_rss&utm_source=TheAustralian&utm_campaign=EditorialSF&utm_content=SocialFlow&utm_medium=Twitter

    The article is also in outline.com courtesy of BK.

  12. Paul Manafort and his longtime business associate were indicted Friday on new charges that they conspired to obstruct justice — ratcheting up the pressure on President Trump’s former campaign chairman as he tries to stay out of jail while awaiting trial.

    The indictment filed in U.S. District Court in Washington marked the first such charges for Manafort’s associate, Konstantin Kilimnik, who is believed to be in Moscow — and therefore probably safe from arrest because Russia does not extradite its citizens. Prosecutors have previously said Kilimnik has ties to Russian intelligence, which he denies.

    For Manafort, though, the charges come at a perilous time, just hours before his attorneys were due to file legal briefs arguing that he should be allowed to be freed from home confinement on bond pending his trial, scheduled for next month in Alexandria, Va. He faces a second trial in Washington in September.

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/special-counsel-mueller-indicts-associate-of-paul-manafort/2018/06/08/507ae696-6b44-11e8-bf8c-f9ed2e672adf_story.html?utm_term=.6a409abf6223

    The indictment is here: https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4499404-Show-Temp-2.html

  13. I’m not the only one who’s noticed the change. 😆
    (Can’t produce a pic, sorry.)

    Denise Allen‏ @denniallen · 16h16 hours ago

    Replying to @SkyNewsAust @JulieBishopMP
    Sorry, Julie, but the hair is just not working for you….. are you trying to emulate Michaela Cash?

  14. The Saturday Paper‏Verified account @SatPaper

    How Peter Dutton’s office is secretly recruiting Muslim leaders and using them to push the government line.

    Fr Rod Bower‏ @FrBower · 16m16 minutes ago

    Replying to @SatPaper
    I was used by Breakthrough Media too. Now I feel dirty. #Auspol

  15. lizzie @ #1821 Saturday, June 9th, 2018 – 6:29 am

    I’m not the only one who’s noticed the change. 😆
    (Can’t produce a pic, sorry.)

    Denise Allen‏ @denniallen · 16h16 hours ago

    Replying to @SkyNewsAust @JulieBishopMP
    Sorry, Julie, but the hair is just not working for you….. are you trying to emulate Michaela Cash?

    I’ve said before that it reminds me of the girls here who sometimes walk around with their helmets on rather than carry then, so maybe it’s hiding some sort of protection the Party environment requires?

    Or maybe it’s a just WA thing that hasn’t caught on with the Labor women? 🙂

  16. Trump’s man in the Interior Department is forcing out the superintendent of Yellowstone National Park as an example to those who are resisting moves to introduce hunting, mining and other activities into national parks.

    The superintendent of Yellowstone national park says he has been forced out of his job by the Trump administration over his wildlife advocacy.

    “It’s a hell of a way to be treated at the end of four decades spent trying to do my best for the park service and places like Yellowstone, but that’s how these guys are,” said Dan Wenk, referring to the US interior department. “Throughout my career, I’ve not encountered anything like this, ever.”

    On Monday, Wenk, 66, was notified by the interior department that he must take a reassignment to the park service’s Capital Region in Washington DC, a collection of monuments including the White House and the Lincoln Memorial, within 60 days or resign.

    An interior department spokeswoman, Heather Swift, said: “The department does not discuss personnel matters.” A former park service national director, Jon Jarvis, said the maneuver was intended to send a chilling message and make an example out of Wenk.

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jun/07/yellowstone-trump-administration-dan-wenk

  17. The world authority on nature protection has blasted Australia’s blueprint to save animals and plants from extinction as “fundamentally deficient” and the federal government’s own experts say it is “doomed to failure”.

    The damning feedback comes weeks after 41 new species of animals and plants were added to the official list of those edging towards extinction, further entrenching Australia’s record as a world leader in biodiversity loss.

    In its submission, the International Union for Conservation of Nature – the only environment group with United Nations observer status – described the draft strategy as “fundamentally deficient” for failing to state how progress would be achieved.

    The union is the official World Heritage Convention advisory body. It is made up of government and civil society groups and draws on advice from 10,000 international experts.

    It said the document expressed “fine aspirations” and its priorities and objectives were “sensible and clear”. However “there is no mention of investments of any kind in the strategy”, nor was there mention of law, policy, financial settings or other tools for change.

    The organisation also criticised the omission of “measurable, time-bound goals and targets” that would allow progress to be evaluated. Australia’s previous failure to meet biodiversity targets “is not sufficient justification” for abandoning them, it said.

    https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/deficient-and-doomed-to-fail-experts-roast-threatened-species-plan-20180608-p4zkc3.html

  18. Hours before President Trump landed in Canada on Friday, 18-year-old allegations that Justin Trudeau once groped a reporter resurfaced on a website sympathetic to the president.

    Coincidence? Maybe, maybe not.

    But it only added to the mounting tensions between Mr. Trudeau, now the Canadian prime minister, and Mr. Trump as the president arrived for the Group of 7 summit meeting that had become so fractured before it started that many observers were calling it the “G-6 plus 1” — with Mr. Trump being cast as the irrational, irascible and dangerous outsider.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/08/world/canada/canada-trudeau-trump-us-group-of-7.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news

    The website reporting the 18 year old story? Breitbart of course!

  19. booleanbach @ #1811 Saturday, June 9th, 2018 – 9:04 am

    https://truthout.org/articles/marine-heatwaves-changing-ocean-currents-and-capitalisms-threat-to-life/

    This headline says it all – sadly, we reap what we sow.

    We do indeed. Many people don’t realize that the oceans are absorbing about 90% of the additional heat energy that the planet has accumulated due to global warming. That’s about the same heat energy as 4 Hiroshima-sized atomic bombs going off every second.

    In a coal mine they used canaries to warn of dangerous conditions – if the canary died, you got out. In the oceans it is coral that gives the early warning, and the coral is dying. Unfortunately there’s nowhere for us to go – if the oceans die, we die too 🙁

  20. Hand in glove: Coalition and IPA. But we knew that, didn’t we.

    Ewin Hannan‏Verified account @EwinHannan

    Departing Public Service Commissioner John Lloyd says the Institute of Public Affairs seeks information from government agencies “week in, week out” and the Coalition provides it to the conservative think tank. @australian https://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/ipa-taps-the-public-service-for-material-says-john-lloyd/news-story/e0cca011215f55ca20acf157edacb20a#load-story-comments

  21. Meanwhile Trump continues to give Russia everything Putin wants.

    President Donald Trump said Friday that Russia should be reinstated to a leading group of industrialized nations ahead of his visit to the G7 summit this weekend.

    Trump’s statement is an extraordinary break from key US allies, and particularly striking given Russia’s meddling in the 2016 election.

    “Russia should be in this meeting,” Trump told reporters upon leaving the White House for the summit, which is being held in Charlevoix, Canada. “They should let Russia come back in, because we should have Russia at the negotiating table.”

    Russia was suspended from the group — then known as the G8 — in 2014 after the majority of member countries allied against Russia’s annexation of Crimea, which Russia continues to hold.

    https://edition.cnn.com/2018/06/08/politics/russia-g7/index.html

    No collusion, indeed. They’re colluding in plain sight!

  22. Citizen (and many others)

    Something in my bones tells me that there is a power struggle afoot within the defence/security/FA establishment. The Andrew Hastie statement, the security laws and now this SAS revelation all seem to be part of it.

    Expect casualties.

  23. MasonNSI@MasonNatSec
    5h5 hours ago

    Statement from @MasonNatSec founder @jamil_n_jaffer on the President’s position on Russia’s admission to the G7:

    :large

  24. a r:

    If people are referring to the G7 as the G6+1, the 6 being the normal, sane countries and the +1 being the imbecile from the US, Trump will find he’s pushing a large, overloaded wheelbarrow up a very steep hill to get them to re-admit Russia, methinks!

  25. ar

    I suspect that colluding is putting it too strongly. Russia really does not need to be a member of the G7 which is pretty irrelevant anyway. Without China it is an absurd archaic forum when it comes to matters economic. It might be more relevant if it was recast as a North Atlantic forum,where Japan and maybe Italy leave but add in the major Scandinavians and Spain and Portugal.

    As it stands now it is either a Allies of the USA (but without Australia) league or a statement of the economic powers of 1980.

    Other fora have superseded the G7 – obviously the G20 but also BRICS which I guess is sort of its rival. OPEC is also still important.

    Whatever G7 is without China it is a waste of time.

  26. “The Age” has an article titled “Unfair: the human misery of franchising”

    The first question is not asked

    That being who purchased a franchise and why?

    And then look at the funding of the purchase

    So is the funding provided from retrenchment packages plus putting a mortgage over the family home?

    How much real unemployment is franchising hiding?

    Then, to run any business, protect the Balance Sheet, manage liquidity and return a wage to Self takes a skill set I would suggest many have not got

    Risk is with the business proprietor, that risk assumed from 7 Eleven, Domino’s, Caltex, Mortgage Choice, Harvey Norman and the proprietors of those business names and models

  27. This is why I worry about the Coalition’s gungho attitude towards trade arrangements, especially with Ciobo “in charge”..

    Paul Barratt‏ @phbarratt · 56s56 seconds ago
    Paul Barratt Retweeted Matthew Rimmer

    Trump says trade rules disadvantage US. Having spent 15 years at senior level of Trade Department I can say US dominated every multilateral trade round. Didn’t get all it wanted but rules were written to *advantage* US and the rest of us had to live with it.

  28. And with the image of the Parakeet of High Fashion, look at the advertising board behind her

    Victorian Chamber of Industry and Commerce

    Those who preach that one man’s pay increase is another man’s job

  29. LOL!

    Daniel DaleVerified account@ddale8
    7h7 hours ago
    Here’s the official transcript of Trump’s call for Russia’s inclusion. He was not asked about Russia at all — the question was something about people calling this summit a “G6 plus 1” because of the divide with him.

    :large

  30. Confessions @ #1832 Saturday, June 9th, 2018 – 10:17 am

    a r:

    If people are referring to the G7 as the G6+1, the 6 being the normal, sane countries and the +1 being the imbecile from the US, Trump will find he’s pushing a large, overloaded wheelbarrow up a very steep hill to get them to re-admit Russia, methinks!

    The “G6+1” doesn’t tell the full story for me. I prefer “G7-1”, or if you want more history, “G8-2” to put some attention the loss.

  31. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/jun/08/domestic-tourism-to-great-barrier-reef-falls-in-wake-of-coral-bleaching?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

    Fontes says some tourism businesses had “put their head in the sand” about bleaching and refused to admit there was a problem, mainly out of fear that negative publicity would discourage visitors.

    “In 2017 when the bleaching moved further south, the tourism industry started to become a little more proactive than what they used to,” Fontes said. “By hiding and not admitting that we’ve got a problem, that’s not helping. They’re starting to come together and advocate for better action, better late than never.

    “We’ve exploited the reef forever as tourism operators. Very few of us have ever given anything back to the reef. Not enough of us are standing up to back the reef.”

    The report was focused on local actions that could be taken to support the tourism industry.

    These included developing new attractions that could motivate tourists to visit for other reasons, and to encourage “positive rather than negative media on the future of the GBR”, something that has led to tension between concerned reef scientists and some in the tourism industry.

  32. Re Confessions @10:37. Even allowing that it is a transcript of replies at a press conference, what an incoherent ramble from Trump.

  33. BRICS has no formal or informal institutional existence. It is simply an abbreviation for 5 economies – Brazil, Russia, India, China And South Africa – brought into fashion by Goldman Sachs. Its relevance as grouping concept is fading.

    The G7 is a leadership forum. It can hardly make sense to include Putin in the forum when he is intent on disrupting the economic and political order the 7 have created and continue to sustain, despite the disruptions launched by Trump.

  34. Late Riser:

    It’s obvious that Trump is increasingly isolating the US from its historical allies. They must be wondering why Trump is so taken with anything Putin and Russia. And on that front, I found this tweet interesting.

    Malcolm NanceVerified account@MalcolmNance
    1h1 hour ago
    Only counterintelligence explains Trumps slavishness. He a witting asset of the Kremlin. Since the Nobu Resturant meeting with the Russian Oligarchs in November 2013 he has been convinced Russian is his greatest supporter. He won’t let them down. #HailHydra

  35. Maybe blonde helmet wigs are popular in WA. Or perhaps Julie has borrowed Michaelia’s wig. Have the two been seen together lately?

  36. When Trump says Russia, I keep hearing ‘Roger’, who apparently should be part of every group. Trump’s protestations on the inclusion or exclusion of Russia seem to make no sense… something to do with ruling the world, I think.

  37. Kurt EichenwaldVerified account@kurteichenwald
    8h8 hours ago
    What Putin wanted in 2016, according to foreign intel sources I spoke to that year:
    1. Strained relations in NATO.
    2. Trade war among US and its allies
    3. Readmission to G-7 (which would then be G-8)
    4. Lifting sanctions.

    Trump gave Putin 1,2, fought for 3 & tried to give 4.

Comments Page 37 of 42
1 36 37 38 42

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *