BludgerTrack: 53.2-46.8 to Labor

One new poll result this week leaves the BludgerTrack poll aggregate all but unchanged.

The only new federal poll this week, from Essential Research, hasn’t made the least bit of difference to the voting intention numbers on the BludgerTrack poll aggregate. However, Labor is up two seats, one in Victoria and one in Western Australia, exacerbating Labor’s hard-to-credit lead in the latter state. One possibly interesting point to emerge from the state breakdowns, which you can explore through the link below, is a spike to the Greens in Victoria – could be a Batman by-election effect, could be noise. Essential also produced its monthly leadership ratings, and they too have made little difference to the relevant trend measures.

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

2,248 comments on “BludgerTrack: 53.2-46.8 to Labor”

Comments Page 42 of 45
1 41 42 43 45
  1. confessions:

    Good point.

    The continual hatred and undermining of Turnbull by the Coalition’s hard right, ostensibly because of how “moderate” he is, continues to baffle me. He has capitulated to pretty much every one of their demands, pretty much sold out everything he once believed in (or claimed to believe in), and it still isn’t enough.

    I mean, fair enough, I couldn’t really blame them if they hated him for his continual own goals and political ineptitude, but it always seems to come back to how “left-wing” he is, and many of his blunders were made possible and/or exacerbated by the monkey pod’s white-anting.

  2. TPOF:

    If he was rolled I think Turnbull would announce his retirement at the next election and go. Why hang around in a party that has lost its way?

  3. rossmcg:

    My first thought this morning when I read of Jewellery Bishop’s slap down of Dutton on the South African farmers was that it went a bit beyond the usual polite disagreement with a cabinet colleague and may have been related to leadership issues.

    History says that if Dutton hasn’t got her on side he hasn’t a chance.

    I imagine Bishop is sharpening the knives for her own tilt at the leadership, and is doing her best to undermine her main opponent.

    I actually hope she prevails. Not because I think she’d make a good PM – I don’t – but because I’ll win roughly $500 if she succeeds Turnbull.

  4. 1892CFC @ #2000 Sunday, March 18th, 2018 – 6:05 pm

    I was the one who brought up the use of the suffix tard
    Bemused – I’m definitely not a sensitive soul – just someone who listened to my daughter who found my use of the suffix tard attached to whichever descriptor I was unhappy with to be insulting to special needs people and their friends and family- who she has taught dance to since she was 13
    You can keep using it, as can anyone else, I really don’t care.
    I brought it up In a polite manner , in case people here didn’t realize a whole community found the practice insulting. I did not say people must stop using it. I’m not a censor.
    I love that you now say your use of tard is an abbreviation of dastard which because of my intervention you say you now have to type in full. Tells me all I need to know
    As a lurker I now understand how people get frustrated with your one on one arguments
    Keep fighting the good fight Bemused

    I regret any upset I caused to your daughter, but she was making an invalid assumption. There are a lot of words with the suffix -ard or tard. Check it out. The usage of either suffix is pejorative which is exactly what I wanted to express about the Greens, disdain, contempt or disapproval. ‘Dastard’ comes closest if I can’t just use the suffix.

    I admire your daughter for the work she does and did not want to imply any association between her special needs people and their friends. No offence intended.

    Check this out for example: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Category:English_words_suffixed_with_-tard

  5. Yeah, Turnbull has promised/threatened to immediately resign from politics as soon as he’s no longer PM. But even if he keeps his word – something he doesn’t have a great track record on – there’s nothing stopping him from donning the leather jacket and making life hard for his successor on TV and in print. He strikes me as being spiteful enough to do so.

  6. C
    By-election distraction, period during which there is no-one representing Wentworth. Liberals forced to use up scarce resources. Labor does not have to give them a pair…

  7. The Greens would have a big show in Wentworth. It includes numerous LGBTIQ, digital economy denizens and doctor’s wives.

    They should target this rather than Sydney and Grayndler

  8. The batteries provided by Elon Musk in SA were installed quickly and would seem to be fairly portable. He is supposed to have given SA a special deal as as it was essentially a demonstration project for his product. If the deal involved rental and not purchase, Musk might decide to move the batteries elsewhere if the Liberals abandon Labor’s renewable energy initiatives.

    That would then leave Marshall in somewhat of a pickle and Frydenberg could not rescue him.

  9. ‘sprocket_ says:
    Sunday, March 18, 2018 at 7:36 pm

    They should target this rather than Sydney and Grayndler’

    But, but, but… it is a Coalition seat.

  10. Boerwar:

    Would they even need to campaign? Mum lives in Wentworth and is surrounded by rich folk whom she says always vote Liberal. Doesn’t matter who the candidate is, long’s they got that magic Liberal next to their name, the voters will fall in behind him or her.

  11. “Sunday, March 18, 2018 at 7:36 pm
    The batteries provided by Elon Musk in SA were installed quickly and would seem to be fairly portable. He is supposed to have given SA a special deal as as it was essentially a demonstration project for his product. If the deal involved rental and not purchase, Musk might decide to move the batteries elsewhere if the Liberals abandon Labor’s renewable energy initiatives.”

    I’m pretty sure the batteries are owned by a French outfit and they have no intention of taking them anyway, if what I read is true they are making an absolute killing.

  12. In fact the existing battery makes a lot lot more money if there aren’t additional storage options in South Australia and they commit to maintaining really expensive non-renewable power from their small cartel of suppliers. You can get almost free excess wind power and then sell it back at massive highs later in the 24 hour cycle, a little ripper even without the cash flow from frequency services.

    You keep adding renewables and storage and eventually you even out the 24 hour cycle and eliminate the arbitrage.

  13. Im not bothered if Turnbull retires or not.Hes just a nowhere man who sold himself to the right wing and bought the PMs job.His legacy is one of a complete failure and disappointment.

  14. “The Liberals will not lose Wentworth in a by-election, so what blackmail?”

    Hey , maybe the Greens can win it?? 🙂

  15. imacca @ #2036 Sunday, March 18th, 2018 – 7:03 pm

    “One local Greens figure said the tactics of running hard on federal issues such as the Adani mine and asylum seekers rather than local concerns like Labor was focused on was a big factor in the loss.
    “We got so caught up with speaking to our own base, the votes we needed to win were not going to come from Adani,” the insider said.
    The same person said the preselection of Ms Kearney was also a major contributor because it showed how soft the vote is among Greens voters when given the choice of voting for a progressive Labor candidate.”

    Sounds rational. Lesson there is talk about things the electorate is concerned about, not about yourselves. By election (particularly one that ISN’T going to endanger the Govt majority) seems much more influenced by local, rather than “national” issues.

    From working phone banks, I can reveal that most of the issues raised are not Federal, not State, but more local council issues!
    To get the conversation onto State or Federal issues, depending on the campaign, most voters usually have to be prompted.
    PB is not a good sample to draw conclusions from!

  16. PTMD,
    You do know that squashing bugs, especially that type, and leaving them in a spa is a Public Health hazard? 🙂

  17. Asha Leu @ #2039 Sunday, March 18th, 2018 – 7:09 pm

    It does certainly seem that Dutton’s on the verge of making a move.

    I still undecided on whether to be delighted or horrified at the prospect of Prime Minister Peter Dutton. It would surely be a gift for Bill Shorten, but I shudder to imagine the bastardry he would preside over while in office.

    There’s also the worrying (but, I hope, slim) possibility that we’ve all fatally underestimated his political cunning, and he winds up successfully dogwhistling and union-bashing the Coalition back into a TTP lead and goes on to enjoy a long, awful reign as Prime Minister. Personally, I think he’ll sink like a stone – as an Abbott-esque, attack dog opposition leader up against a tired or mildly unpopular Labor government, he could be very effective, but not as the third Coalition Prime Minister in five years with the unenviable task of winning back the great swathes of swing voters who abandoned the government, gave them a second chance, and then abandoned them again. Especially if he has not one, but two bitter ex-PMs white-anting him.

    But, then, my reaction to Abbott being elected Opposition Leader was sheer delight at the Coalition being dumb enough to hand Rudd a landslide victory in 2010, so what do I know?

    You were probably going to be right about 2010, but events intervened.

  18. imacca @ #2071 Sunday, March 18th, 2018 – 4:44 pm

    “The Liberals will not lose Wentworth in a by-election, so what blackmail?”

    Hey , maybe the Greens can win it?? 🙂

    Isn’t it ironic that the Greens have their first ever Liberal lite federal leader yet don’t deploy him or party resources to taking seats off Liberals? I personally doubt they’d have a shot in Wentworth, but Mr Employer of Au Pairs would appeal more to the uber wealthy demographic than a Labor candidate or a Bob Brown/Christine Milne type.

  19. Dutton PM will show his reasonable side, assuming that he has one. He’ll be endlessly boosted by Newscrap. Other media will boost him to a greater or lesser extent as something new and interesting. He’ll be popular with shoutback radio, the “Liberal” base, the Nationals and the dominant wing of the “Liberals”. The conversation will turn to boats and terror. People who despise Dutton (like most here) will be dismissed as politically correct lefty whingers.

    The “Liberal” party contains the seeds of fascism. Dutton PM will water and nourish them. He is dangerous, far more so than that buffoon Abbott or the risible Hanson.

  20. Dan: ‘How will the dividend be greater for companies that currently pay zero tax when the tax rate is reduced to 25%?’

    Obviously, no tax, no credits, dividends stay the same.

    Someone mentioned to me foreign companies may be a better investment when the credits go. My superfund reported that overseas shares returned 25% last calendar year so maybe they are right.

  21. WeWantPaul

    So it looks like Marshall is stuck with Musk’s batteries for the time being.

    However firms are very unlikely to invest in renewable power in SA if the new government indicates a hostility to their presence.

    Talking of which, a wind farm proposal in NSW has been withdrawn after local residents and councils objected. Ms Berejiklian has created a climate of investing in sports stadiums and toll roads but not renewable energy it seems.

    Jupiter Wind Farm application withdrawn after 400-plus objections to Department of Planning and Environment

    Locals say they are “surprised and relieved” the proponent of a wind farm between Canberra and Goulburn has withdrawn its application.

    Renewable energy company EPYC said its proposed 54-turbine Jupiter Wind Farm five kilometres south-east of Tarago will not be going ahead.

    The long-running controversial project has been widely opposed by local residents and the Queanbeyan-Palerang and Goulburn Mulwaree councils.

    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-03-18/controversial-wind-farm-application-withdrawn/9560698

  22. Dutton may be as competent as Ernst Röhm. However …

    Dutton has the same death face lack of expression as Putin.

    The punters will love him leading torch light rallies.

    Beware.

  23. PeeBee @ #2080 Sunday, March 18th, 2018 – 7:58 pm

    Dan: ‘How will the dividend be greater for companies that currently pay zero tax when the tax rate is reduced to 25%?’

    Obviously, no tax, no credits, dividends stay the same.

    Someone mentioned to me foreign companies may be a better investment when the credits go. My superfund reported that overseas shares returned 25% last calendar year so maybe they are right.

    Who knows? Maybe the super fund managers. However, Australian dividends from companies that have paid enough company tax will still provide franked dividends. So if you earn enough TAXABLE INCOME to actually pay tax there is no benefit to changing.

  24. Confessions:

    The Liberals will not lose Wentworth in a by-election, so what blackmail?

    Probably not, no, but I wouldn’t think it’s quite as safe as the results of the last few elections would make it appear. Turnbull would have a high personal vote, and he only won by 53-47 the last time Labor won majority government (incidentally, he then skyrocketed to 64-36 in 2010, presumably thanks to the popularity of Leather Jacket Mal.) As the Greens generally poll strongly there, Labor would benefit from a strong preference flow, especially with “Moderate” Malcolm no longer a candidate. I’d also assume that th polling whenever Turnbull is rolled would show a TPP that’s rather worse for the Coalition than their 2007 results, and it’s not a given that his successor’s honeymoon (if there is one) would last all the way until the by-election.

    It’s most likely a Coalition retain, but – IMO – hardly a certainly, particularly with a strong Labor candidate. And having to immediately deal with yet another temporary hung parliament that’ll be determined by an upcoming by-election would be suck a lot of oxygen from whoever rolls him.

  25. Why would Turnbull threat to resign be blackmail?

    Don’t forget the small matter of the $1 million plus personal donation to the party last time.

    Kiss that goodbye if they shaft him.

  26. A good one from John Quiggin.

    When Malcolm Turnbull, as PM, first faced Bill Shorten, as Opposition Leader, I correctly surmised that this would be a contest between a bold and innovative leader, unafraid to put forward controversial policies if they were right for the country, and a timid pragmatist, tied down by secret deals with factional warlords, and standing for nothing. I just didn’t realise which was which.

    http://johnquiggin.com/2018/03/17/changing-places-2/

  27. TPOF:’Who knows? Maybe the super fund managers. However, Australian dividends from companies that have paid enough company tax will still provide franked dividends. So if you earn enough TAXABLE INCOME to actually pay tax there is no benefit to changing.’

    Not changing is the luxury of the rich.

    The poorer investor/pensioner will have to scratch around finding investments that can make up for the lost credits.

  28. Don’t forget that Labor put up a popular candidate in Wentworth at the last election. He may be just the sort of true Centre Left representative that so many of them craved in Malcolm Turnbull but never really got.

  29. There’s a Newspoll tonight, right?

    Between the South Australian election, the non-sitting week for the House, and the fact that we’ve gone a while without a three-week gap — I’d doubt it. Which could very well mean no polling at all this week, given it’s an off week for Essential.

  30. “The poorer investor/pensioner will have to scratch around finding investments that can make up for the lost credits.”

    When the poorer investor is on the same as a real pensioner then they will be ‘poor’ until then they are well off investors whinging that santa didn’t keep bringing them unearned candy.

  31. The people of Wentworth are died in the wool Libs who wouldn’t think twice about stomping on poor people that got between them and a bucket of money.

    But I’m not sure they’re fascists.

    If Reichstuber SS Kartoffelkopf managed a putsch and declared himself Fuhrer I’m not certain they’d be in a rush to shout Zeig Heil. Those sorts are happy enough to pander to the likes of Dutton for the votes they need to maintain power. I don’t know how keen they would be to submit to him being the boss though.

  32. Between the South Australian election, the non-sitting week for the House, and the fact that we’ve gone a while without a three-week gap — I’d doubt it. Which could very well mean no polling at all this week, given it’s an off week for Essential.

    There’ll be a riot.

  33. bemused @ #2088 Sunday, March 18th, 2018 – 8:14 pm

    A good one from John Quiggin.

    When Malcolm Turnbull, as PM, first faced Bill Shorten, as Opposition Leader, I correctly surmised that this would be a contest between a bold and innovative leader, unafraid to put forward controversial policies if they were right for the country, and a timid pragmatist, tied down by secret deals with factional warlords, and standing for nothing. I just didn’t realise which was which.

    http://johnquiggin.com/2018/03/17/changing-places-2/

    I thought this post from yesterday was more telling, given how left wing John Quiggin is:

    “I haven’t had time to do a proper economic analysis of Labor’s proposals on dividend imputation credits. But you don’t need an economic analysis to see that making an overt appeal to conservative voters on the issue, as Richard di Natale has just done, is a very bad move if the Greens party wants to present itself as a left alternative to Labor.

    Perhaps this is poor judgement in the heat of a by-election campaign, the significance of which seems to me to be greatly over-rated by all.

    Alternatively, perhaps it indicates that di Natale is taking the Greens in a different direction. The obvious choices are

    (i) A soft liberal centrist party in the mould of the Australian Democrats under Don Chipp
    (ii) A serious push to displace Labor as the main alternative to the LNP

    I don’t think there’s a real constituency for (i) and, to the extent that there is, it’s very different from the existing Greens support base.

    I also don’t think (ii) has any chance of success. But, if it does, it will involve a lot of the kind of grubby compromises that are inevitably entailed in an attempt to put together an electoral majority. Labor’s shuffles on Adani and refugees are obvious examples, which have driven a lot of people to support the Greens. But now it looks as if the boot may be on the other foot.

    A lower profile, but similar, example came up with the Senate inquiry into SA Tafe, which was a stunt by education minister Simon Birmingham intended to embarrass Labor ahead of today’s state election. It backfired both procedurally (because the Labor majority on the committee refused to take its ostensible purpose seriously) and in policy terms, since the submissions (including mine) focused on the disastrous state of vocational education in Australia generally. Despite this, the Greens joined the LNP in a minority report which tried to defend the whole sorry process.”

    John Quiggin is precisely the kind of intellectual economist that the Greens need onside if they are to be taken seriously as a Labor replacement. The fact that these are his comments, rather than GG’s or Boerwar’s, should be really concerning to Rex and Pegasus.

  34. “The poorer investor/pensioner will have to scratch around finding investments that can make up for the lost credits.”

    Or they might just find out they don’t have enough money to do everything they want, you know like real pensioners who are paid sub-poverty level pensioners find out nearly every fortnight when they can’t afford all the food that want. So sort of the same but skiing holidays rather than food.

  35. SA election result a win for the mainstream:

    – Chris Kenny’s sister in the seat of Torrens saw a swing of around 2.8% to Labor. Even better that her brother was campaigning for her. Fail.

    – Cory Bernardi’s party suffered a stunning fail. Apparently people will vote for a party benignly called Family First but not one ideologically titled Australian Conservatives. Will he try to get back with the Libs when his Senate term expires rather than suffer the ignominy of losing bigly?

    – A swing TO Labor overall.

  36. Pee Bee,
    The poorer investor/pensioner will have to scratch around finding investments that can make up for the lost credits.

    My heart bleeds. Not. I mean, can you not see how selfish you sound when you write stuff like that? Lord knows how you would go really ‘scratching around’ to survive on the Aged or Disability Pension as your only source of income. Like so many Middle Aged Women, such as myself.

    Frankly, I’d rather believe Grog’s take on the subject, than your complaints:

    While income inequality often gets the attention, wealth inequality is even bigger, and with it comes intergenerational inequality.

    The richest 20% of Australians hold about 40% of the national income but nearly 65% of the national wealth, and a majority of the wealth is held by those over 55. And our tax system is designed to help them not only keep it, but to garner more and then give it to their children (who then garner more and then give it to their children, who then …)

    Our retirement system is based around tax-free holdings of wealth – through the family home, which is exempt from capital gains tax, and tax-free income from superannuation.

    Or you could, as the ALP is doing, seek to find extra revenue by cutting out rorts that were designed as electoral sweeteners and favours to the Howard-Costello key demographic.

    When this imputation cash rebate was introduced, not many were affected but like any good tax rort, accountants soon caught wind. Add in to make income from superannuation tax free for those over 60, and suddenly you had a lot of people with a high actual income but very low or zero taxable income taking advantage of it.

    Further add in this weird belief that the retirement nest egg must not be touched, and you get a lot of idiotic reporting – such as in the Herald Sun, which had the case study of a woman with an income of $160,000, who we should feel sad for because she will lose her $12,775 rebate. She could, of course, sell some of her shares, but that would actually be using superannuation for its purpose and not as a tax-free inheritance fund.

    So it is a smart and needed policy, but also a dangerous one because it affects an area shrouded in confusion and thus very much susceptible to fear-mongering.

    https://www.theguardian.com/business/grogonomics/2018/mar/18/labors-dividend-tax-policy-is-smart-bold-and-dangerous

Comments Page 42 of 45
1 41 42 43 45

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *