A big week of polling, with the weekly Essential, fortnightly Newspoll and YouGov and monthly ReachTEL landing all at once, and their combined effect is to shake the BludgerTrack aggregate out of its lethargy with a solid move to Labor. The two contributors to this were Newspoll, whose 53-47 to 54-46 movement this fortnight is almost precisely replicated by BludgerTrack, but also by ReachTEL, whose primary vote numbers were a lot worse for the Coalition than the 52-48 two-party headline suggested. All of which causes Labor to gain four on the seat projection, including one apiece in each of the four largest states. The Coalition has taken a particularly heavy hit on the primary vote, but it’s One Nation rather than Labor that has yielded the advantage. A new set of leadership numbers from Newspoll sends both leaders downwards on the net satisfaction trend, with Bill Shorten gaining fractionally on preferred prime minister.
BludgerTrack: 54.0-46.0 to Labor
A solid bump to Labor on the BludgerTrack poll aggregate after particularly dire result for the government from Newspoll and ReachTEL.
I see Turnbull is on 730 tonight and qanda is tweeting he might make it to their program as well. The scheduled qanda matchup was Brandis vs Burke so perhaps George is getting the evening off.
Boris @ #877 Monday, August 28th, 2017 – 4:44 pm
Exactly. We have to accept some Libs in Parliament. Might as well have as many of them as useless logs like Goodenough (another prime example of them being the Antonym party).
lizzie @ #1205 Monday, August 28th, 2017 – 5:31 pm
And it’s still raining; likely to continue until around Wednesday (U.S. time).
Meanwhile Trump says “wow” before moving on to “border wall” and NAFTA (“worst trade deal ever made”, you know).
@P1
No wonder Turnbull goes after people like you, and then tells Shorten to shut up on energy crises.
Too much ego and trust.
Federal Politics @PoliticsFairfax
·
4m
Charities, advocates, unions join forces to fight asylum seeker crackdown
I imagine it can be a bit misleading to look at power provided by source as I think this is what results after various generators have bid into the market and distributors have picked to use based on the bid prices.
It doesn’t directly show what amount of generation was potentially available from each source at those times, although that would be a factor in the result.
Interested if someone more familiar with the system than I am can confirm or contradict this understanding. Those with an agenda please don’t bother.
According to Pascoe on The Drum, allowing refugees in Australia to work is one of the bits of Libs’ you beaut new AS policy, which they have been ‘working on for 12 months’ and will be dribbled out slowly.
zoidlord @ #904 Monday, August 28th, 2017 – 5:52 pm
What on earth are you on about?
Interesting write-up in the Bangkok Post….
http://www.bangkokpost.com/opinion/opinion/1313123/the-climate-truth-we-can-no-longer-ignore
He argues
Who is he?
a) a early adolescent male trying to impress a teacher
b) a geriatric in a nursing home
c) the examiner setting questions for young liberals entry quiz
d) a boxer suffering brain damage
e) none of the above
Answer here
@P1
The question should be what are you on about believing such large numbers, giving the desperation of Liberals.
http://www.theage.com.au/federal-politics/political-opinion/any-deport-in-a-storm-malcolm-turnbulls-search-for-a-distraction-20170828-gy5pdw.html
Tony keeps trying to be helpful. 🙂
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/aug/28/tony-abbott-outlines-policy-common-sense-in-swipe-at-turnbull
zoidlord @ #894 Monday, August 28th, 2017 – 3:30 pm
P1 is relying on a Q&A written by a copywriter. Says it all really.
P1 has also quoted retail battery pricing, ignoring that the government would get an enormous discount for ordering a couple of billion dollars of batteries.
Tony Abbott should have 80% of his parliamentary/government payments quarantined because he has a drug problem.
(Alcohol is the biggest drug problem that Australia faces. Just because it’s legal doesn’t make it any less of a problem drug).
Zoidlord@4:37PM
When Governments engage in bastardry they normally do it quietly, announcing it if they have to on Friday night, ideally while there’s other big news about. This one got the full two-page spread in the Murdoch crapsheets on Monday morning. Dutton is using a slide trombone, not a dog whistle.
I think that tweet gives the game away. Dutton wants asylum seekers back in the news. The welfare of the 100 or so unfortunates is of no concern to him or the tranche of voters he is playing to. They are just pawns to help distract the punters from weeks of bad news for the Government, which, we need to remember is, apart from being clownishly stupid and incompetent, positively malevolent.
Turnbull also said it would create 5,000 jobs in the coming years, note he said in the future.
No details no planning
grimace @ #914 Monday, August 28th, 2017 – 6:25 pm
P1 is relying on fairly easily discovered numbers. You are relying on hot air and wishful thinking.
.@PeterDutton_MP: people smugglers will use Labor’s position as a sign Australia is ‘open for business.’ _____________
It’s about time some Labor heavy called out Dutton as vile human being.
Two billion dollar on batteries that last 10 years or two billion on scheme that lasts a 100. As I said this could be labors NBN but I don’t think shorten is that stupid.
LOL p1
The people here for medical treatment can now work. All hidden behind sound and fury.
retract
I have referred to members of the government as scumbags. This is been grossly unfair to all concerned.
I apologise unreservedly to scumbags everywhere for the slur on their good name.
This is worth a look if you need a laugh
https://www.facebook.com/OccupyDemocrats/videos/1669940853098962/
A trump parody
C@tmomma @ #915 Monday, August 28th, 2017 – 6:25 pm
history of overdoses
damages work place property
abuse of salary entitlements
keeps bad company
completely lacking insight into his drug problem
Caption time!
frednk @ #920 Monday, August 28th, 2017 – 6:33 pm
I can’t figure out from this if you are in favor of pumped hydro or not! : )
C@tmomma @ #928 Monday, August 28th, 2017 – 6:43 pm
‘oh gosh, is that what dirt looks like’
C@tmomma
> Caption time!
Phew! Can’t feel the knife there yet. (with his left hand)
Caption – “looking for coal”.
C@tmomma; “Over here. This looks Clean. Why don’t we burn this bit?”
frednk @ #897 Monday, August 28th, 2017 – 3:39 pm
You’ve forgotten only going to 50% depth of discharge.
There are about 15 chemistry’s of lithium batteries and cycle life, depth of discharge, performance at high temperatures etc depends on the chemistry.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-28/federal-governments-$10bn-bill-rivals-newstart-cost/8849562
C@tmomma @ #928 Monday, August 28th, 2017 – 6:43 pm
If I just keep digging…
How long do you think I’ll have to keep my finger in the hole to stop this leak from flooding the tunnel?
frednk
Whether it is invested in batteries or not is not the core issue. The point is that storage and distribution needs to be distributed not highly centralised. There are plenty of other pumped hydro sites that don’t require massive expenditure on tunneling and are located closer to the source of generation or utilisation. A distributed grid is also much more resistant to major outages.
e.g. If a major user, such as a refinery, smelter, town or whatever, wants to set up it’s own solar or wind farm, it is much more efficient to have the storage located nearby integrated with the local grid.
Transmission costs are a major component of power costs.
Responding to the good-to-see fightback, Dutton gives the clear impression that he not only doesn’t have any empathy for people needing medical assistance, well we knew that, cold hearted bastard, but that he doesn’t believe they even needed any; I read he thinks they were faking it.
http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/charities-advocates-unions-join-forces-to-fight-asylum-seeker-crackdown-20170828-gy5ln2.html
“Rock of Ages, cleft for me/Let me hide myself in thee…”
C@tmomma @ #928 Monday, August 28th, 2017 – 6:43 pm
I actually have quite a lot of friends, just I like to spend time alone.
Deep underground.
Where no one can hear me cry.
From time to time…
Player One @ #929 Monday, August 28th, 2017 – 4:44 pm
I know it’s not directed at me, and i’m interjecting anyway.
I’m generally in support of pumped hydro where it is practical – meaning cost effective relative to other options.
Specifically, I’m very dubious about the Snowy 2.0 proposal because its already known to be a decades old proposal that’s been passed over a number of times, and I think the aim is to solve a political problem for the L/NP rather than the perceived practical problem of wholesale electricity prices.
There is very little doubt in my mind that there are a number of other options such as pumped hydro at alternate sites, wind, PV or CST that are going to achieve a better result sooner and in a more cost effective way.
The cost of Snowy 2.0 blew out 50% as soon as it was exposed to basic scrutiny and before work had even started on the feasibility study. I’d hate to think what the cost of a fully commissioned Snowy 2.0 would be.
Trog Sorrenson @ #938 Monday, August 28th, 2017 – 6:57 pm
Blast! you’re quite right … if only we already had a transmission network … preferably one that had been “gold plated” over time by massive over-investment … oh, wait …
grimace @ #942 Monday, August 28th, 2017 – 7:04 pm
Bingo. This is being pushed by a goose that has backed himself into a corner by closing off every other option. It is purely the politics of Trumble trying to wake up in the Lodge one more morning. If and when a government that has left all the options open and so can choose the best one comes out and says this is a winner we can get interested. Until then this is just more money Trumble is happy to burn on the bonfire of his own vanity.
$10 billion wasted:
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-08-28/federal-governments-$10bn-bill-rivals-newstart-cost/8849562
Player One @ #943 Monday, August 28th, 2017 – 5:07 pm
You do remember that the transmission network requires an estimated $1b of upgrades to accommodate Snowy 2.0 don’t you?
grimace @ #942 Monday, August 28th, 2017 – 7:04 pm
Even if this were true (I don’t know, and we probably won’t get a real answer until the CBA is complete) the capital cost of Snowy 2.0 is still a fraction of the cost of an equivalent greenfields pumped hydro development.
Somewhere near Snowy Hydro 2.0: “I wish Bronny would hurry up cos I don’t want to miss the start of Days of Our Lives.”
My contribution:
They said if I looked hard enough I might find my lost soul here.
grimace @ #946 Monday, August 28th, 2017 – 7:12 pm
I do indeed. See my subsequent post. Even if this turns out to be true, the capital cost of Snowy Hydro 2.0 is low compared to comparable pumped hydro projects.