Essential Research: 52-48 to Labor

With much of the country enjoying a long weekend, a status quo reading from Essential Research is the only new voting intention result for the week.

The Guardian reports that the latest reading of the Essential Research fortnight rolling average, which has been delayed a day due to Monday’s public holiday, has Labor’s two-party lead unchanged at 52-48, after it fell from 53-47 last week. Primary votes will have to wait until later today. UPDATE: Full report here, with primary votes at Coalition 38% (down one), Labor 36% (down one), Greens 10% (steady), One Nation 8% (up two).

Other reported findings focus on terrorism and a low emissions target, with the former including a 47% approval rating for Malcolm Turnbull’s handling of the terror threat, compared with 56% in October 2015, and 24% disapproval, compared with 17%; 74% saying the terrorism threat in Australia has risen over recent years; 46% saying the government should be spending more on counter-terrorism, compared with only 9% for less; and 44% saying there should be more restrictions on rights and freedoms to combat terrorism, with only 12% saying current restrictions go too far, and 19% believing the current balance is right.

With respect to carbon emissions, 44% favour a low emissions target and 20% an emissions intensity scheme, with 36% opting for don’t know; and 27% saying capture and storage from coal generation should count as a low emissions energy source, compared with 29% who disagreed.

Also this week:

• The Australia Institute has published a ReachTEL poll of the Environment Minister Josh Frydenberg’s seat of Kooyong, which after incorporating prompting responses for the undecided finds primary votes of Liberal 48.9% (58.2% at the election), Labor 25.5% (19.8%) and Greens 17.0% (18.9%), and a respondent-allocated two-party result of 56-44 to Liberal (63.3-36.7). The poll also records a 77.9-15.5 split in favour of a clean energy target,

• Western Australian Senator Chris Back has announced he will retire as of the end of July, leaving a vacancy for a three-year term that runs to mid-2019. Andrew Burrell of The Australian identifies two possible successors: Slade Brockman, former chief-of-staff to Mathias Cormann, who is rated the front-runner; and Matt O’Sullivan, chief operating officer of Andrew Forrest’s GenerationOne indigenous youth employment scheme, who ran unsuccessfully in the southern Perth seat of Burt at last year’s federal election.

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

1,379 comments on “Essential Research: 52-48 to Labor”

Comments Page 20 of 28
1 19 20 21 28
  1. AB11,
    Front page of the AFR is the big jump in electricity prices. AT least it will send people rushing to solar, I suppose.

    IF you can afford Solar.

    IF you aren’t living in Rental Accommodation and your landlord doesn’t want to spend their money on Solar for you.

    Chances are, all that will be the result is that Electricity Bills will keep going, ‘up and up and up’, for those who can least afford it. Those who can afford Solar, will do Solar. It has ever been thus.

    It’s also why I love my Pink Batts. They were free and they have saved me money and distress from the heat in summer and the cold in winter….Plus the PB AC. 🙂

  2. Putin sarcastically offers Comey political asylum in Russia

    MOSCOW — Wading into the furor surrounding the investigations of the Trump White House, President Vladimir Putin used a national call-in show Thursday to disparage what he called U.S. ‘‘political infighting’’ that is blocking better relations with Russia.

    The Russian leader even sarcastically offered political asylum to fired FBI Director James Comey.

    https://www.bostonglobe.com/news/politics/2017/06/15/putin-sarcastically-offers-james-comey-political-asylum-russia/Zn86BZRFGbGphNOw1t6GdK/story.html

  3. grimace @ #893 Friday, June 16, 2017 at 12:50 am

    bemused @ #890 Friday, June 16, 2017 at 12:10 am

    grimace @ #887 Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 11:27 pm

    darn @ #886 Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 11:18 pm

    Alias
    Thursday, June 15, 2017 at 9:35 pm
    From what I have seen, Chloe Shorten is an infinitely better media performer than her fumbling, bumbling, scripted-sounding husband.

    You mean the guy who took fourteen seats off the Liberals at the last election and according to the latest Bludgertrack update is poised to take up to twenty more at the next one? Yeah, he’s a real bumbler alright.

    I’ve been going to Toastmasters for about 3 years now to hone my public speaking skills, and have delivered a lot of speeches. I can assure everyone here that when you get up and speak, not looking wooden / rehearsed / plastic / fake / emotionless / plastic / robotic etc is one hell of a lot harder than it looks from the outside.

    Fellow Toastmaster!
    I joined in 2013 IIRC. I was already fairly experienced so went pretty well from the start. But the change in some of our members has been quite profound.
    Just been elected Club President.

    Which club? I’m from Ellenbrook.

    I am in Victoria and my club meets in the CBD.
    Sorry, I had to go to bed before you replied to me.

  4. Don

    ‘Perhaps I misunderstood, but Itza seemed to be saying that we should never have started agriculture in the first place.’

    Speaking for myself, it was more about the attractions of agriculture (as I said, on paper at least, nomadism is in many ways superior) and the inevitable consequences of a settled life – which include the demise of agriculture…

  5. geoffrey @ #897 Friday, June 16, 2017 at 3:16 am

    I’ve been going to Toastmasters for about 3 years now to hone my public speaking skills, and have delivered a lot of speeches. I can assure everyone here that when you get up and speak, not looking wooden / rehearsed / plastic / fake / emotionless / plastic / robotic etc is one hell of a lot harder than it looks from the outside.
    ———-maybe. but there also many individuals who are talented at public address, who do it at ease – many also teach, or do PR, or act, or run organisations etc …. This skill should be one of set for public figure like party leader. Bill does not have it, and presumably after much training never will … he just may be satisfactory without it

    Name one?
    Some may start off with some natural ability that gives them a bit of a head start, but I suggest even the very best have worked hard to develop their skills further.

  6. Best answer for critics about Shorten not being a scripted polished performer.

    Look at results for Mr Corbyn. Its being too scripted and polished that is the problem. People can spot fake a mile off

  7. Bloomberg New Energy Finance underlines the rubbish modelling by Jacobs that was used by Finkel when compiling his ridiculous report.

    In a further deep contrast with the modelling done by Jacobs for Finkel, BNEF says that solar will outstrip wind energy installations, with large and small scale solar reaching 72GW by 2040. Half of all capacity will be “behind the meter, flagging a fundamental shift from centralised to distributed generation.
    “The analysis shows that Australia’s power sector is rapidly re-orienting from a centralized and fossil-fueled electricity grid to a highly distributed and predominantly renewable system,” BNEF says.
    “Although this transformation is forecast to take place based purely on economics, this does not circumvent the need for robust energy and emissions reduction policy in Australia.

    http://reneweconomy.com.au/how-wind-and-solar-will-kill-coal-sooner-than-finkel-suggests-92750/

  8. Morning bludgers

    As mentioned in past, the problem of this fire risk cladding as well as products comprising asbestos is a scandal. The feds and state authorities have known about this for ages. In fact, state projects have been caught up using these faulty products.
    As also stated in past, the evil trade unions have been railing about this for ages too. But of course, our esteemed govt and our msm are more interested in telling all and sundry that the unions are just evil, blah blah. . .sigh………..

  9. I’ve seen speeches of Bill’s in Parliament which were simply electrifying.

    It’s possible, of course, that all this scrutiny is cramping his style (even Tingle implied he’s usually a better performer at the Winter Ball than Turnbull).

  10. Of course the agenda is apparent. Turnbull does reckless humour so blame Mr Shorten for not getting attention by doing something outrageous.

  11. Meanwhile Turnbull has taken a calculated risk parodying Trump.
    Turnbull would know more than most, where the Trump imbroglio is headed, and therefore probably felt on safe ground parodying him.
    But, and there is a but. As PM and ally of the US, I don’t think it was an appropriate thing to do just yet. And everyone knows My feelings about Trump.

  12. PS
    My partner works in a business that is a tenant in a large regional shopping mall. Representatives of the mall visited her yesterday to discuss power options, as they are about to cover the entire roof with solar, and offer tenants cheaper power i.e. behind the meter.
    This will be the norm, not an exception.
    It shows why Finkels estimate of 350% increase in rooftop solar by 2030 is a ridiculous underestimate, and example of political expediency rather than objective fact.
    2020 will be nearer to the mark.

  13. Several RWNJs are really getting worried:

    Two-faced Shorten on track to be PM?
    BILL Shorten is getting away with gross political hypocrisy as people hate Malcolm Turnbull more for the unforgivable sin of overthrowing an elected prime minister, writes Sharri Markson. (DT headline)

  14. Not wanting to enter the energy wars, I thought however I would post this from Crowe’s article linked by BK.
    From our friends at the Mineral Council:
    “The Minerals Council of Australia estimates the added cost of battery storage could push the cost of wind power from $92 per megawatt hour to anywhere between $304 and $727 per megawatt hour.

    “The inclusion of the costs of back-up battery storage would make a substantial difference in the overall cost impact of the CET scheme,” it said in its summary.”

    This is the sort of information being given to the coalition backbench, and why alternative energy plans have to be credible.

    Note I am not commenting on figures mentioned here, just making the point that for the right, this is a ideological war.

  15. ccroucher9: Quote from Bill Shorten’s office:

    This is completely wrong. Senator Cormann should apologise for this disgraceful lie. twitter.com/ccroucher9/sta…

    ccroucher9: “Bill Shorten will have to clarify today whether it is true that his office was behind leaking those secret recordings”
    – Mathias Cormann pic.twitter.com/1IfCyQVLIl

    https://twitter.com/ccroucher9/status/875488208909287425

  16. Trog – With electricity/gas prices going through the roof, surely people will start flocking to solar panels. The big energy coys are strangling the golden goose.

  17. Mike Pence Just Lawyered Up As The Vice President Also Has Huge Russia Problems

    The news that Vice President Mike Pence has hired a private lawyer to represent him is a sign that Pence may go down with Trump for the Russia scandal.

    Mike Pence has lied about everything from Mike Flynn to James Comey. The Vice President is far from clean in this scandal, and his lawyering up demonstrates, Pence has his own serious Russia problems.

    http://www.politicususa.com/2017/06/15/mike-pence-lawyered-vice-president-huge-russia-problems.html

  18. trog sorrenson @ #959 Friday, June 16, 2017 at 8:59 am

    Bloomberg New Energy Finance underlines the rubbish modelling by Jacobs that was used by Finkel when compiling his ridiculous report. …

    Christ, Trog – are you still being sucked in by RenewEconomy bullshit …

    It underlines a central message of the Finkel Review – that the cost of wind and solar, and battery storage, is significantly cheaper than fossil fuels

    The Finkel report says the opposite of this. You can certainly question the figures Finkel uses (which I have posted here twice already) but for goodness sake you can’t simply lie about them and hope people won’t notice.

  19. Labor should start installing solar power on all social housing for tenants of same. Lead by example. Won’t help people in Liberal states but may shame them.

  20. trog sorrenson @ #964 Friday, June 16, 2017 at 9:08 am

    It shows why Finkels estimate of 350% increase in rooftop solar by 2030 is a ridiculous underestimate, and example of political expediency rather than objective fact.
    2020 will be nearer to the mark.

    A 350% increase by 2020? You are drinking too much of the RenewEconomy Kool Aid.

  21. ‘as people hate Malcolm Turnbull more for the unforgivable sin of overthrowing an elected prime minister..’

    People adored Malcolm Turnbull for overthrowing Abbott. He was never more popular. It’s that he didn’t then do at least some of the things they hoped he would that p*ssed them off.

    ‘ “Bill Shorten will have to clarify today whether it is true that his office was behind leaking those secret recordings”’

    Laurie Oakes made it pretty clear that it came from a journalist.

  22. **************
    John Reidy
    Friday, June 16, 2017 at 9:10 am
    Not wanting to enter the energy wars, I thought however I would post this from Crowe’s article linked by BK.
    From our friends at the Mineral Council:
    “The Minerals Council of Australia estimates the added cost of battery storage could push the cost of wind power from $92 per megawatt hour to anywhere between $304 and $727 per megawatt hour.

    “The inclusion of the costs of back-up battery storage would make a substantial difference in the overall cost impact of the CET scheme,” it said in its summary.”
    ********************
    I wonder where they are getting their figures from?, and what parameters are they using?

    This link says that a very low cost solar plant in the US will provide battery storage for four hours at 30 MW, probably enough for the purpose envisaged.

    http://reneweconomy.com.au/stunning-new-lows-in-solar-and-battery-storage-costs-13929/

    ***********************
    Stunning new lows in solar and battery storage costs

    By Giles Parkinson on 24 May 2017
    Print Friendly
    A new contract signed by a utility in Arizona has set a new low price for large-scale solar power in that country, but more importantly has also smashed expectations of the combined cost of large-scale solar and battery storage.

    Tucson Electric Power (TEP) this week announced it would buy solar energy from a new 100MW solar plant at the historically low price of less than US3c/kWh – less than half of what it had agreed to pay in similar contracts over the last few years.

    The project will also include 30MW/120MWh of battery storage, and the company says that the power purchase agreement for the combined output is “significantly less” than US4.5c/kWh – nearly two-thirds cheaper than the previous such contract struck in Hawaii, and well below the cost of a gas-fired peaking plant.
    ********************

  23. ‘ “Bill Shorten will have to clarify today whether it is true that his office was behind leaking those secret recordings”’

    So what do they want this to be a distraction from today?? More Gloriousness from Bishop??

    You know, if only the RWNJobbies of various degrees could STFU, they would be having less trouble advancing their agenda.

  24. I think that comments on Katherine Murphy articles have become a distinct art-form. Someone should compile them in a book.

  25. As wages stagnate, energy prices rise steeply and households face a myriad of day-to-day challenges, all the LNP can do is fight amongst themselves and continue screaming about terrorists and pledges of allegiance.

    Little wonder that, on current trends, they are facing electoral defeat.

    FM news this morning played a few seconds of Turnbull on Trump, followed by loud laughter from a (probably) drunk crowd at the very incestuous midwinter ball. Turnbull’s jokes do absolutely nothing to improve the lives of ordinary Australians and people will see it this way.

  26. [Citizen
    Friday, June 16, 2017 at 9:09 am
    Several RWNJs are really getting worried:

    Two-faced Shorten on track to be PM?
    BILL Shorten is getting away with gross political hypocrisy as people hate Malcolm Turnbull more for the unforgivable sin of overthrowing an elected prime minister, writes Sharri Markson. (DT headline)]
    Unforgivable? Sin???
    Sharri must live in an alternative universe to me. The overwhelming response across the Nation to the unforgivable sin of dumping Abbott was relief. It was reflected in the polls immediately and the sense of relief from Abbott PM lingers strongly.

  27. Citizen

    The damage to Turnbull from that humour being leaked is that he is the two faced one. Thats why the articles about Shorten hypocrisy. Its do distract from the hypocrisy of Turnbull who in “private” shows his real views.

  28. P1
    (At the risk of being sucked in by your dissembling.)

    Christ, Trog – are you still being sucked in by RenewEconomy bullshit …

    It is Bloomberg New Energy finance – not RenewEconomy – here is the original report:
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-06-15/solar-power-will-kill-coal-sooner-than-you-think

    The Finkel report says the opposite of this. You can certainly question the figures Finkel uses (which I have posted here twice already) but for goodness sake you can’t simply lie about them and hope people won’t notice.

    Nice try at deflection P1. Something at which you are adept, I must concede.
    I am not lying about it, simply quoting the reneweconomy article, which is actually generous to Finkel.
    I agree with you that the Finkel review does not accurately address the costs of different power sources, if that is what you are implying.
    The real point is that Finkel relies on Jacobs, who has grossly underestimated the cost of renewables – probably for political reasons.

  29. Hah this says it better than I did.

    Brocklesnitch: Turnbull sucks up to Trump in public & does this behind his back. Again proving he is a messy bitch who loves the drama

  30. P1

    A 350% increase by 2020? You are drinking too much of the RenewEconomy Kool Aid.

    Solar pv has been installed at a compound annual growth rate of 46% for several years.
    If you take the installed base as say, 100 units, at December 2016 and apply 46% compound growth for 4 years – you get 454 units at the end of 2020 i.e. 454%.
    So yes, it is entirely feasible – as should be obvious to anyone who understands simple arithmetic. 350% is probably an underestimate.
    Or do you, P1, in your wisdom, believe that with current power prices going through the roof, that people are going to start slacking off on solar pv installation, and the long established rate of growth in solar pv is going to fall?

  31. trog sorrenson @ #981 Friday, June 16, 2017 at 9:29 am

    Nice try at deflection P1. Something at which you are adept, I must concede.

    Not half as adept as you and RenewEconomy …

    I am not lying about it, simply quoting the reneweconomy article, which is actually generous to Finkel.

    If repeating lies is not lying, then you are simply being suckered by RenewEconomy.

    I agree with you that the Finkel review does not accurately address the costs of different power sources, if that is what you are implying.

    No, I am implying that you don’t know what you are talking about, and that you continually rely on single a dodgy source for all your information.

    The real point is that Finkel relies on Jacobs, who has grossly underestimated the cost of renewables – probably for political reasons.

    I’ll assume this is a Freudian slip, and not comment further : )

  32. The real point is that Finkel relies on Jacobs, who has grossly underestimated the cost of renewables – probably for political reasons.

    should be overestimated
    For once P1 is correct.

  33. trog sorrenson @ #985 Friday, June 16, 2017 at 9:40 am

    Solar pv has been installed at a compound annual growth rate of 46% for several years.
    If you take the installed base as say, 100 units, at December 2016 and apply 46% compound growth for 4 years – you get 454 units at the end of 2020 i.e. 454%.
    So yes, it is entirely feasible – as should be obvious to anyone who understands simple arithmetic. 350% is probably an underestimate.

    I also understand how growth works in the presence of constraints, which you apparently don’t.

  34. Jared Kushner Is Now Under Special Counsel Investigation For His Financial Dealings With Russia

    The investigation into Kushner – Trump’s son-in-law and most trusted advisor – appears to have escalated yet again.

    Previously, it was reported that Kushner worked to establish a secret channel of communication between Moscow and the Trump team during the post-election transition phase.

    With Thursday’s reporting, the investigation into Kushner – Trump’s son-in-law and most trusted advisor – appears to have escalated yet again, and it’s destroying the myth perpetuated by Trump and his allies that there is nothing to see here.

    http://www.politicususa.com/2017/06/15/jared-kushner-special-counsel-investigation-financial-dealings-russia.html

  35. Goodness me! Isn’t it amazing what you find when you actually bother looking

    From http://pv-map.apvi.org.au/analyses (my bold) …

    Between 2001 and 2010 the growth in the market for solar PV was around 15%. A period of extremely rapid growth occurred between 2010-2013. The number of monthly installations stabilised through 2014 and 2015, and now appears to be trending slightly down in the residential sector, with an increase in the number of larger (commercial and utility-scale) PV systems keeping overall installed capacity high.

    And then have a look at the graph on this page, showing growth in installed solar capacity from 2001 to now. Excuse my arithmetic ignorance, but to me that graph looks amazingly linear.

    Of course, this data has not been “massaged” by RenewEconomy – it comes straight from the Australian Photovoltaic Institute – so can you really trust it?

  36. The answer for Turnbull is simple.

    It is not to blame Shorten for his own embarrassing public indiscretions.

    It is to behave as a statesman at all times, not like an irresponsible fool when he thinks no one is watching.

  37. From page 15 of today’s AFR, CBS offered a lifeline to Ten,by cutting the costs of programming but this was rejected,and finance was pulled.

  38. P1
    That was a truly gross distortion of the data. You must hoping that no PBers actually look at your link – http://pv-map.apvi.org.au/analyses- otherwise they will realise immediately how much bullshit you are spouting.
    15% from 2001 to 2017 is correct, but this includes damn near 70% annually from 2010 -2017 which are the recent years here. My 46% is a global figure – clearly the annual rate in Australia is much higher.
    If we apply your data from the Australian Photovoltaic Institute then we extrapolate growth rates of 70% annually. This will give 835% increase in solar by 2020!

  39. Rachel Siewert on drug testing of welfare recipients:
    http://rachel-siewert.greensmps.org.au/articles/labor-sides-government-motion-abandon-drug-testing-income-support-recipients-voted-down

    A senate motion calling on the Government to abandon drug testing income support recipients has been voted down by the Coalition with the help of Labor.

    “Labor has today made it clear what they think of drug testing people accessing the social safety net.

    “They have been vague around this measure since it was announced but have taken sides with the Government today.

    “This motion also gave members of the Government the chance to see sense and abandon this flawed approach.

    “The Government has conceded they may need an exemption from the Disability Discrimination Act to roll out this measure, if that is not a red flag I don’t know what is. It is clearly discriminatory.

    “Drug addiction needs to be treated as a health issue. Testing income support recipients has been a failed measure in the US and has been abandoned after proposals in the UK and Canada. It needs to be abandoned.”

    Labor panders to the unemployed ‘dole bludgers’ stereotype / stigmatization so popular with segments of the voting public.

  40. ‘But, and there is a but. As PM and ally of the US, I don’t think it was an appropriate thing to do just yet. And everyone knows My feelings about Trump.’

    Yes, and imagine the outcry if Shorten had done this.

Comments Page 20 of 28
1 19 20 21 28

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *