Galaxy: 53-47 to Coalition (plus marginals polling)

Galaxy has an on-trend national poll result plus more of its electorate-level automated polls, including the first such polling for the campaign from Western Australia.

GhostWhoVotes relates that Galaxy has a national poll showing the Coalition leading 53-47, from primary votes of 35% for Labor, 46% for the Coalition and 10% for the Greens. We also have these latest additions to Galaxy’s series of 550-sample electorate-level automated phone polls:

• Three Perth seats have been targeted for the first electorate-level polls to emerge from Western Australia during the campaign. One of these, for the electorate of Perth, holds another distinction in being the first published opinion poll of any kind during the campaign to show a clear swing to Labor. It has Labor candidate Alannah MacTiernan leading Liberal candidate Darryl Moore by 58-42, compared with Stephen Smith’s 2010 margin of 5.9%. MacTiernan outperformed the state average by about 5% as the unsuccessful candidate for Canning in 2010.

• Less happily for Labor, the second poll shows Liberal member Ken Wyatt with a clear 55-45 lead over Labor candidate Adrian Evans in the state’s most marginal seat of Hasluck, which Wyatt holds for the Liberals on a margin of 0.6%.

• GhostWhoVotes also relates that a Brand poll has both parties on 42% of the primary vote, with no two-party preferred result provided. However, it would presumably give Labor member Gary Gray the lead over his Liberal challenger Donna Gordin. Gray polled 40.8% of the primary vote in 2010 to Gordin’s 39.4% (UPDATE: The two-party preferred turns out to be 52-48 to Labor).

• The other two polls are from Queensland, one being for the Townsville seat of Herbert, where Liberal National Party member Ewen Jones is given a 55-45 lead over Labor candidate Cathy O’Toole, compared with a 2010 margin of 2.2%.

• The second Queensland poll is from Herbert’s southern neighbour Dawson, and it shows LNP member George Christensen well clear of Labor candidate Bronwyn Taha with a lead of 57-43, compared with 2.4% in 2010.

UPDATE: Galaxy, which I have little doubt is doing the most credible work in the electorate-level automated phone poll game, now has polls for two further Queensland seats: one showing Kevin Rudd leading Bill Glasson 54-46 in Griffith, the other showing and Labor’s Shayne Neumann tied 50-50 with the Liberal National Party’s Teresa Harding.

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

1,830 comments on “Galaxy: 53-47 to Coalition (plus marginals polling)”

Comments Page 34 of 37
1 33 34 35 37
  1. [1601
    confessions

    briefly:

    Maybe it just feels like a dry winter.]

    I think the warmth makes a difference. I was quite surprised by the rainfall. It has been drier than usual inland, but close to average along the South Coast for the last three months. The BOM is hours of fun 🙂

  2. Yes it’s a fake, but a clever one. The Voted is off the side of the screen so it’s not immediately obvious it’s not the real Ghost if you follow #Newspoll rather than @GhostWhoVotes. It contradicts the indicative results already released by Sky.

  3. bemused

    Sky News is a disgrace. Their panel discussions are mainly dominated by right-wing rednecks. There is no suggestion of even an attempt to be fair.

    I only have it as I love sport and international affairs, and you get a great coverage there.

  4. Paul Murray ‏@PMOnAir 27m

    Breaking @chriskkenny reports #Newspoll will show Abbott is now preferred PM, Rudd dissatisfaction is up & ALP’s 2PP has fallen.
    Apparenty this is Wow and interesting

  5. Good Labor launch. It would seem the US deputy sheriff is into baddies vs baddies. Wonder if Obama will be keen to deputise the moron?

  6. TheFinnigans天地有道人无道 ‏@Thefinnigans 6m
    And this from PB

    #Newspoll Abbott: Approve 38 (-4) Disapprove 52 (+3)

    #Newspoll Rudd: Approve 42 (+5) Disapprove 43 (-9)

  7. [Christ you are a sour bunch.]

    Actually, quite the opposite. I love life, I am grateful for everything I have and try to make the best of things.

    You, on the other hand, are a bitter, envious loser. You spend all day, every day on here whinging about scary boat people, your hard dodged taxes going to making the country better and those bitchy feminazi women always throwing their weight around.

    My guess from your posting behaviour is you do not get out much. Yes, you make trips to the grocery store and Centrelink appointments but that’s it. You probably don’t have any friends and absolutely no love life (no that checkout girl who smiles at you when you go shopping isn’t into you.)

    This bitterness could be solved if you got out and enjoyed the world for what it is, instead of being resentful about everything. You might even start being a pleasant person to be around.

    [The prediction of course is mine, all mine.]

    It must be wrong then. Stick to script.

    [Aussies aren’t going to put up with Labors shit for another 3 years]

    Probably. But it’s all swings and roundabouts. Your lot will be in charge – which means you’ll have to actually identify solutions, rather than just highlight problems. Good luck with it. No amount of copy and paste and bumper stickers can substitute quality governing.

  8. [Newspoll will show Abbott is now preferred PM, Rudd dissatisfaction is up & ALP’s 2PP has fallen.]

    Sadness that the country is having a collective attack of the stupids. :monkey: preferred PM??

  9. William and Kevin Bonham

    Now this may seem an idiotic question.

    But is it? So tricky is this stuff.

    Nick X is allocating his preferences to the Nats then the Liberals then DLP. Then.. Unless I have got this totally wrong.

    His associate, Stirling Griff, is allocating his preferences to Labor. Then assorted no ones.

    Does it make a difference to preference flows if one were to nominate Griff as 1 and Nick as 2? Is this some weird confidence trick?

    If that makes any sense at all. Seeing as the whole bizarre thing is incredibly difficult to fathom.

  10. Everyone in voterland knows Abbott is the next PM. The undecideds will break for him mostly. What we are seeing now in the approvals and PPM is an acceptance from average Joe that Abbott is going to be PM. He’s getting the little boost that all new PMs get. Just early

  11. Imperial Madness
    ______________
    A US writer in Counterpunch wonders if the “chemical warfare” story may not be similar to the “weapons of mass destruction” story we heard in 2003 and many were taken in by… the stories of Blair and Bush…remember 2003 ?

    The US wants to remove Assad who is an ally of Iran.the real target ..just it wants to remove the regime in Tehran which controls vast reserves of oil and gas…all vital to the US economy

    Is this new war cry against Syria just as falacious as the “MMD” scare of Bush/Blair in 2003 ??
    ….what is undoubted is the willingness of the Imperial US war machine to devestate Damascus and other Syrian cities as they have devestated Iraq and Libya

    A great article fropm Counterpunch illustrates the similarities between 2003 and 2013

  12. crikey whitey@1677

    William and Kevin Bonham

    Now this may seem an idiotic question.

    But is it? So tricky is this stuff.

    Nick X is allocating his preferences to the Nats then the Liberals then DLP. Then.. Unless I have got this totally wrong.

    His associate, Stirling Griff, is allocating his preferences to Labor. Then assorted no ones.

    Does it make a difference to preference flows if one were to nominate Griff as 1 and Nick as 2? Is this some weird confidence trick?

    If that makes any sense at all. Seeing as the whole bizarre thing is incredibly difficult to fathom.

    Nick’s associate is not allocating preferences anywhere. Rather Nick’s ticket has lodged two preference tickets so that half his votes go one way and half go the other. Half go Nats then Libs and half go to ALP. A vote for Nick X above the line is a vote for your preference to effectively split between the majors.

    If you vote below the line you can vote for either of them 1 and direct your preferences however you like.

    If it was me and I was a Nick X supporter I’d be sneaky and vote 1 below the line for Griff so that if Nick got a surplus on the first ballot my vote would continue on at full value. 🙂

  13. CW, I gather you’re a bit confused about Nick Xenophon having two preference tickets. This does not mean one for him and one for his running mate – it means that above-the-line votes for the Nick Xenophon Group will go two ways when preferences are distributed, with half the vote following the first ticket and the other half following the second.

    Both will go firstly to the Nationals, but that’s unlikely to matter because they’ll get knocked out early in the count. So half will go Liberal and half will go Labor. If the sixth seat is a contest between a major party and a minor, his preferences will go to the major party. But if it’s between any kind of right-wing party and any kind of left-wing party, they will equally divide either way.

  14. [Sadness that the country is having a collective attack of the stupids. ]

    To be fair, Australia has always had more than its fair share of those who in some combination are intellectually marginalised, indolent, venal, ignorant, irrationally fearful, xenophobic or anomic — which for the sake of brevity one may call “stupid”.

    Tony Abbott’s insight was that he could, with the help of the Murdochracy, exploit his authentic stupidity to reach out to a disproportionate share of this critical demographic. The ALP saw the danger too late,and failed to try reducing the size of the demographic in 2007 — instead, trading on it with a leader who simply didn’t look stupid enough.

    That was a classic blunder.

  15. Carey

    Good onya!

    Look, will I be disappointed if Rabbott wins the election?

    Bloody oath, but gee, it’s politics!

    It’s turns and roundabouts.

    No government stays forever but the biggest disappointment will be the feeling that ‘Murdoch’ won the election.

  16. I think I need to rephrase this:

    [ If the sixth seat is a contest between a major party and a minor, his preferences will go to the major party. But if it’s between any kind of right-wing party and any kind of left-wing party, they will equally divide either way.]

    Read this as:

    [if it’s between any kind of right-wing party and any kind of left-wing party, they will equally divide either way, unless it’s One Nation, who he has put last. If it’s between Labor and the Greens, they will all go to Labor. If it’s between Liberal and, say, Family First, they will divide equally.]

  17. Iran is an evil country who sponsors terrorism worldwide- look at the links between them and north korea.
    Attacking syria is senseless.
    The US no longer needs iran’s oil
    And u are an anti-semetic bigot.

    Been enjoying the chocolate at Max Brenner’s

  18. zoidy @1690 – I suppose you think there is a $70 billion black hole in the costings too. I’m over your unfounded crap.

Comments Page 34 of 37
1 33 34 35 37

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *