Resolve Strategic: Labor 28, One Nation 29, Coalition 20 (open thread)

A fifth pollster find One Nation leading on the primary vote, with Pauline Hanson leading on a three-way preferred prime minister question.

The monthly Resolve Strategic poll for Nine Newspapers joins most others in showing One Nation leading on the primary vote in its latest monthly result, with a five-point surge placing them at 29%. Labor is down one to 28%, the Coalition are down three to 20% (16% among women, equal with the Greens), and the Greens are steady on 12%.

Anthony Albanese’s combined very good and good rating is up one to 35%, while his poor and very poor rating is down one to 55%. Angus Taylor is respectively up one to 38% and up three to 32%. This pollster has been unusual in having Angus Taylor leading Anthony Albanese on preferred prime minister and does so again now, though the margin has narrowed from 33-30 to 32-31. A three-way preferred prime minister question, asked for the first time, suggests most of those favouring Taylor over Albanese in fact prefer Pauline Hanson to either: she is at 33% compared with 29% for Albanese and 16% for Taylor.

The poll again inquired about the three main contentious budget measures, finding 33% in favour of the negative gearing changes (down two on last month) with 26% opposed (up five); 31% in favour of the capital gains tax measures (down five) and 31% opposed (up 10); and 29% in favour of the changes to taxing of family trusts (down five) and 34% opposed (up 11). The poll was conducted Monday to Saturday from a sample of 1801.

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

619 thoughts on “Resolve Strategic: Labor 28, One Nation 29, Coalition 20 (open thread)”

Comments Page 2 of 13
1 2 3 13
  1. Yet more polling which seems to confirm that One Nation has solidified its vote in the high 20s/ low 30s, with Labor in the high 20s, the Coalition around 20 or slightly lower, and the Greens flatlining on 12. Exactly what this means for the 2PP is pretty hard to predict, given that we have no real historical data to guide us for where ONP’s preferences might go, but Occam’s Razor might suggest that Labor would likely be re-elected on these figures, while One nation would hoover up well over half the existing Coalition seats.

    The problem we have in interpreting current polling is that our political class don’t really understand either how polling works, or how our electoral system works.

    With polling, it’s important to remember that a single mid-term poll is not particularly meaningful. The trend might tell us a few things, but given that the next election is at least well over a year away, and probably closer to 2 years away, what those who are answering to pollsters right now is of no great moment. Right now, the effective question people are answering is “what do you think of the government”? but by early 2028, the question starts to flip towards “which party do you want to see run the country for the next three years”? One Nation may well stay in pole position when that latter question becomes more apparent, but somehow I doubt it.

    The electoral system is also a highly relevant consideration. Our parliament is not elected on raw vote shares – even if ONP does end up getting 30% of the vote, they aren’t going to win 30% of the seats. They’ll dominate in a number of rural and provincial areas, but almost certainly struggle in our diverse, younger, and more educated cities. My guess is that they will win 20-odd seats in the country (and maybe the odd outer suburban one), while Labor will win a comfortable parliamentary majority via our cities (which, remember, is where the vast majority of Australians live).

    And of course, primary vote numbers are only part of the story. Our system, as we know, requires not only a decent enough primary vote (and remember that Labor won a huge majority off a fairly modest primary vote last year), but also a fair swag of preferences from other candidates, and I suspect that it will be in preferences that ONP may really have some difficulties. They will attract the enthusiastic support of their core base, of course, maybe up to 25% of the electorate, but the voters of other parties may well be just as motivated to keep them out. Let’s assume they get 25% of the primary vote come election day 2028 – there’s an entirely plausible scenario where their 2PP vote only goes up to the low 40s once every other party’s preferences play out. And a 2PP of, say, 57-43 would see Labor re-elected in an even bigger landslide than 2025.

  2. goll says:
    Monday, June 15, 2026 at 7:49 am
    I’ve just enjoyed overnight the podcast presented by The Issue Ch7, with WB providing a commentary in regard to the current state of polling and the second coming of Ms Hanson and One Nation.
    Has this blog commented regarding this commentary?
    It was very good.
    =========
    Yes Goll, it was a good interview. Also liked the early history of blogging too.
    Cropped up on the site yesterday at 1.50pm

  3. Thomas Brian Mutter says:
    Monday, June 15, 2026 at 10:29 am
    The new Roy Morgan poll should be released sometime today.
    =======
    Should be just after 5PM TBM.
    Drop it on the site for us!

    New Victorian state polling figures should also turn up today/maybe tomorrow early AM via the Melbourne Age newspaper too.

  4. Some Cartoons

    Rowe

    Golding

    Mark David

    Megan Herbert

    Christopher Downes The Mercury
    Mona’s Ark

    Rod Emmerson NZ Herald

  5. Speaking of Roy Morgan, they’ve dropped this on their site.

    It is their monthly Consumer Confidence figure.

    They rank the lowest levels of Consumer Confidence, going way back to the 1970’s, when I believe they were known as the Morgan-Gallup poll…..

    “10 Lowest Monthly ANZ-Roy Morgan Consumer Confidence readings on record (1973 – 2026)”:

    1.April 2026 (63.6)
    2.May 2026 (66.0)
    3.March 2026 (70.5)
    4.December 1990 (71.3)
    5.October 1990 (71.4)
    6.June 1989 (72.8)
    7.July 1989 (73.0)
    8.November 1990 (73.1)
    9.July 2023 (73.8)
    10.June 2023 (73.9)

    Link: https://www.roymorgan.com/findings/anz-roy-morgan-consumer-confidence-in-mid-2026-is-lower-than-after-any-previous-federal-budget

  6. Trump says deal with Iran was reached despite objections by Israeli PM Netanyahu, according to NY Times report.

  7. I reckon old Chumpy and the yanks might have lost another Middle East war.

    Details are scant but from what we know so far, the Strait of Hormuz will be controlled by Iran and Oman. There were no controls previously.

    Iran will get frozen money back, money that was frozen in the west long before this conflict started.

    There will be “limitations” on Iranian nuclear ambitions but who knows what will happen deep inside the mountain ranges where the centrifuges operate.

    Further, old Chumpy might claim victory but the bloke holding the cards now is Netanyahu, and he is desperate to keep out of jail. His court cases will resume if the war stops and the powerful Israel lobby in Chumpistan will be pulling the strings that control the sycophants.

  8. Exactly what this means for the 2PP is pretty hard to predict
    ——————————————-
    Yep. And on how that relates to seats won and lost.

    As peeps keep reminding me, this is a polling blog site. But what is polling if it isnt predictive (even point in time predictive)? What can William and pollsters do to translate these primaries and 2PP estimates into something more, given this very peculiar set of circumstances? We know seat polling isnt a great predictor, maybe that changes now. Maybe different polling questions need to be asked? Maybe more weight to respondent allocated prefs?

  9. frednk at 10.10am

    Thanks for the link to the Malcolm Turnbul discussion. I found it to be very interesting.

    It’s a pity we didn’t get more out of him while he was PM.

  10. WB & others,

    Just a bit of a follow up on that newish pollster -Agenda C Synesis – who dropped a launch poll in late May.

    Link: https://www.pollbludger.net/2026/05/27/federal-polls-roy-morgan-and-essential-research-open-thread/comment-page-28/#comment-4726758

    They’ve spruced up their website and details of the poll can be found here.
    Link: https://agendac.com.au/research-service/the-federal-budget-fallout/

    Going by their cross reference to the AFR “in the news” article, it would appear the poll period was 26-28 May. I don’t know if this pollster is APC aligned, and will leave it to you whether you wish to plug it into BT or not.

  11. I know Resolve does not publish TPP figures. But what is the estimated TPP based on election pref flows or flows similar to other polls? 50-50?

  12. Hostilities will resume after a short break.. we appologise for this break in proceedings ….

    NYT..

    Mr. Trump also insisted that if Iran failed to reach a final nuclear accord with the United States — a process his aides say they expect will begin on Friday in Switzerland — he would restart military attacks on Tehran or make the United States “the guardian of the Middle East” in return for 20 percent of the region’s revenues.

    In a 28-minute phone conversation that Mr. Trump initiated from the White House residence, and a brief follow-up call, the president asserted that his decision to attack Iran in late February, and his subsequent naval blockade of its ports after Tehran closed the strait, had remade the Middle East in America’s favor.

  13. ‘There has been no official word from Israel on the agreement to end hostilities with Iran that President Trump announced on Sunday. Pakistan’s prime minister, Shehbaz Sharif, had said it would end all military activity, including in Lebanon, where Israel is fighting the Iranian-backed militant group Hezbollah.

    Trump had earlier warned Israel and Hezbollah to exercise restraint so as not to derail the deal after Israel struck a Hezbollah stronghold near the Lebanese capital of Beirut on Sunday. He did not mention Israel or Lebanon in his initial post announcing an agreement.

    Israeli news media reported late on Sunday, shortly before the deal was announced, that Trump and Israel’s prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, had spoken on the phone. Israel has not been a party to the talks, and Israelis across the political spectrum have been critical of the agreement between the United States and Iran.’

    – NYT

    Netanyahu was still bombing Beirut’s southern suburbs on Sunday; Trump’s peace deal is looking shaky, to say the least.

  14. More from the NYT..
    Over the past three months of negotiations, led by the president’s special envoy Steve Witkoff and his son-in-law Jared Kushner, the Iranians insisted they would never give up their right to enrich uranium under that treaty. Mr. Trump said they were still negotiating over whether Iran would suspend its enrichment for 20 years — Mr. Trump hinted he might settle for a 15-year suspension — but said Iran would be forever limited to enriching at low levels that “could never be used by the military.”

    The Obama administration’s agreement had the same requirement, but Iran began enriching at far higher levels — including near-bomb-grade uranium enriched to 60 percent purity — AFTER!!!!!! Mr. Trump scrapped that deal in 2018.

  15. HH at 11.06am.

    “Stock markets in Australia/Asia boom.”

    So now is the time for the sycophants to sell, and keep their ill-gotten gains handy, ready to buy back in when it becomes obvious that Chump’s deal is no better that the 40 odd victories he has previously announced.

  16. I keep posting, so long as Pollsters ask voters their preferred PM the entire process is a waste of time as PM is NOT on the ballot paper at times election.. the entire polling industry only exists to undermine democracy.

  17. I was thinking that if One Nation was ever going to win a metropolitan seat off of Labor, one of the most likely candidates would be Spence given the types of swings that occurred in the outer northern suburbs of Adelaide in the 2026 state election, and the fact that One Nation is usually stronger at the federal level, and Labor is usually weaker at that level as well.

  18. ‘Major questions remain unanswered.

    One concerns the fate of Iran’s nuclear program, over which neither country has shown much willingness to compromise. Officials previously said both sides would hold detailed negotiations over the program, as well as over the lifting of U.S. sanctions on Iran, during the 60-day cease-fire.

    Lebanon may prove to be another stumbling block. Any deal that includes the conflict there would depend on both the United States being able to compel Israel to wind down its military campaign and Iran’s cooperation in restraining Hezbollah.’

    – NYT

    It’s fair to ask: what has the US & Israel achieved in their war with Iran?
    I’d say diddly squat! Hostilities will almost inevitably resume.

  19. Was Albo’s decision to spend a fortune to increase the fuel reserve another dumb decision ?

    The surge in EV’s was always going to naturally increase the fuel reserve anyway.

    I see BYD are now the major sponsor of Melbourne Victory, so it looks like the ICE vehicle is going the way of the horse and cart.

    EV’s and hybrids are the norm now.

  20. >>>>>>>>>>>
    Could the same thing happen here with Clive and Pauline? Although I think One Nation is to the right of whatever Clive’s mob is called these days
    >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

    Clive is certainly pushing money into his yellow print ads, but I never hear him (or Babette) comment on current matters – they are just not in the news cycle or in my socials feeds.

    How he makes space for his party I can’t see other than via frontal assault on Hanson calling her policies too soft and a sellout to MAGA.

    (As per another post, he should invite those 1200 prospective ON candidates who miss out on a gig to become _his_ candidates…)

    Does Clive even release media statements?

  21. My grandsons have access to a bootlegged live feed of the “surreal” (the organisers’ word) Freedom-250 UFC fight at the White House, via the X Box.

    There are uniformed troops in attendance everywhere, doing all kinds of drills and trick marching; honour guard duty; Marine military bands and choirs providing the music; a synchronised flyover by the Blue Eagles during the national anthem.

    The stench of testosterone at the site must be awesome, as virtually nobody has any hair: it’s chrome domes as far as the eye can see. Fighters are robing up in the ante-room next to the Oval Office, surrounded by chintzy gold leaf wall decorations that would put Liberace, Saddam Hussein or any other tinpot dictator to shame. It’s Mar-a-Lago on the Potomac.

    Fighters enter the ring from inside the White House, walking out through a corridor lined with servicemen; they exit through a door that has armed Marines in dress uniform ceremonially guarding it. The Marines snap to attention as each fighter exits the portal.

    Flashing lights; crowds of young men inside the Octagon chanting “U-S-A! U-S-A! U-S-A!“; thousands more on the adjacent lawn a-hootin’ and a-hollerin’; Donald Trump (wearing his trademark blue suit and red tie) trying to stay awake, next to Dana White (wearing a sports jacket, no tie, and white Nikes); menacing clouds beginning to assemble; the once gay ikon, “YMCA”, is playing; advertising logos are plastered over everybsquare inch of free space; thick necks, big pecs, bald heads; a sea of baseball hats; cheers and rebel yells as one fighter starts kicking the other that he has just knocked down; uniformed troops punching the air. Joe Rogan, shouting, conducting the post-match interviews. Live read ads for Crypto.com, RAM trucks, and TrumpCoins.com are peppered throughout. The President is using the occasion to line his own pockets by selling worthless trinkets with his face them.

    We have been continually reminded of the great honour it is to be fighting at the White House, of how UFC is a symbol of American values and it’s struggle for FREEEEEEEdom… yet most of the fighters are Latino, either Mexican or from South and Central America: the exact types that are being told their nations are drug-soaked shitholes, full of murderers, whores, and wannabe illegal immigrants.

    “Surreal” is the word the commentators use. “Tacky” trending to “Disgusting” are mine. The enshittification of America, however, is doing just fine.

    As Tyson Fury puts it: “Freedom and the UFC, our warriors in and out of uniform, at the White House, on Donald Trump’s birthday! What an event!”

    Cheers, Bludgers.

  22. nadiasays:
    Monday, June 15, 2026 at 10:37 am
    Speaking of Roy Morgan, they’ve dropped this on their site.

    It is their monthly Consumer Confidence figure.
    ___________________________
    Funny how media outlets have been non-stop gloom and doom, yet somehow the government has been able to negotiate things like the Petrol Supply issue and keep things moving. Whether this is a combination of good luck, good management, good negotiation, who really knows? I suspect it is a case of a government quietly working the best they can and doing what they can do to improve things. The results speak for themselves in terms of fuel security over the past few months.

    Maybe those who have been forecasting doom and gloom have also been lying to us about the changes to CGT and negative gearing and the potential negative impacts there too…

  23. Good news that Trump’s and Netanyahu’s destructive war mongering is ceasing for the moment. Not sure how long this peace time lasts though.

    There’s just too many religious extremists with power now sadly, so I’d advise people to save and try to insulate themselves from international price shocks and financial risk.

  24. Rex Douglassays:
    Monday, June 15, 2026 at 11:42 am
    Was Albo’s decision to spend a fortune to increase the fuel reserve another dumb decision ?

    The surge in EV’s was always going to naturally increase the fuel reserve anyway.
    _______________

    It was $3.2 billion to increase the Minimum Stockholding Obligation to 50 days and is probably required, given:
    1. You can’t trust Trump to act rationally or the Iranians to keep the SoH open.
    2. It’s going to take a while to melt the ICE fleet. Incidentally, Hannah Ritchie created this simple model to explore this:
    https://hannahritchie.github.io/ev-fleet-transition/


  25. GrannyAnny says:
    Monday, June 15, 2026 at 11:09 am

    frednk at 10.10am

    Thanks for the link to the Malcolm Turnbul discussion. I found it to be very interesting.

    It’s a pity we didn’t get more out of him while he was PM.

    Thanks.
    Been thinking about it. The climate wars might of got MT, but in the end they got the Liberal party.

  26. Fuck Russia for this:

    “Kyiv’s historic Pechersk Lavra burns as Russia rains ballistic missiles on capital”
    http://kyivindependent.com/russian-attack-june-14-2026/

    Russia launched yet another round of ballistic missile strikes on Kyiv overnight on June 15, striking the city’s historic Assumption Cathedral within the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra, one of Ukraine’s most significant religious and cultural sites…

    … The Kyiv Pechersk Lavra, a labyrinthine monastery and cave complex that holds some of Ukraine’s most revered shrines and relics, came under direct fire — marking the second strike against the site of Russia’s full-scale war and only the third since World War II.

    “(T)he roof of one of the holiest places in the Christian world — the Assumption Cathedral of the Kyiv Pechersk Lavra — is burning,” Metropolitan Epiphanius, head of the Orthodox Church of Ukraine, wrote on X the night of the attack.

    “We ask for prayers for the salvation of the shrine from destruction. Another Russian crime against humanity, against history, against Christianity.”

    The cathedral was originally build in the 11th century as part of the wider monastery complex. The full extent of the damage is not immediately clear.

    Anyone who thinks Putin’s Russia is some sort of ‘defender of Christianity’ is either an idiot or evil.

  27. “Funny how media outlets have been non-stop gloom and doom….”
    ======
    Yes. Unfortunately that is what sells papers, generates clicks and comments and boosts revenue

    Mundane stuff such as;

    * The PM has appointed some new staff to the public sector, or
    * Sen Wong has signed an international MOU, or
    * Chris Bowen has arranged extra fuel supplies…

    Just doesn’t cut it for the media. Instead we have a frenzy over 3 word slogans and polls flying around everywhere.
    I’m getting the feeling that the pollsters are trying to outdo each other by producing the highest O.N. primary, so that the newspapers can then have another round of clicks, comments and more advertising revenue for their websites.


  28. Bushfire Bill says:
    Monday, June 15, 2026 at 11:47 am

    My grandsons have access to a bootlegged live feed of the “surreal” (the organisers’ word) Freedom-250 UFC fight at the White House, via the X Box.
    .
    .
    .


    All on the night the USA admits defeat int he middle east and Russia bombs buildings from the middles ages.

  29. Resolve poll for Victoria (State)

    L/NP: 26% (-3)
    Labor: 26% (-1)
    One Nation: 24% (+3)
    Green: 12% (+2)
    Independent: 5% (-2)
    Other: 7% (+1)

    Preferred Premier: Unchanged (Jess Wilson 39%, Jacinta Allan 20%)

  30. Kirsdarkesays:
    Monday, June 15, 2026 at 12:26 pm
    Resolve poll for Victoria (State)

    L/NP: 26% (-3)
    Labor: 26% (-1)
    One Nation: 24% (+3)
    Green: 12% (+2)
    Independent: 5% (-2)
    Other: 7% (+1)

    I dunno, but Labor retains Govt on those numbers perhaps.

    Labor should stay the course with Jacinta I reckon.

  31. “Regardless of how you intend to vote at the next Victorian state election, do you think Jacinta Allan and Labor deserve a fourth term in government?”

    Total: 25% Yes, 61% No
    Labor Voters: 52% Yes, 31% No
    Coalition Voters: 16% Yes, 79% No
    Greens Voters: 50% Yes, 26% No
    One Nation Voters: 4% Yes, 88% No

    “And do you think that Jess Wilson and the Liberal opposition are capable of governing the state effectively?”

    Total: 46% Yes, 35% No
    Labor Voters: 30% Yes, 51% No
    Coalition Voters: 82% Yes, 13% No
    Greens Voters: 25% Yes, 46% No
    One Nation Voters: 43% Yes, 40% No

  32. “And do you think that Jess Wilson and the Liberal opposition are capable of governing the state effectively
    _______________________
    They couldn’t do any worse.
    We might even get our potholes fixed.

  33. Kirsdarke, Monday, June 15, 2026 at 12:26 pm:

    Resolve poll for Victoria (State)

    L/NP: 26% (-3)
    Labor: 26% (-1)
    One Nation: 24% (+3)
    Green: 12% (+2)
    Independent: 5% (-2)
    Other: 7% (+1)

    Preferred Premier: Unchanged (Jess Wilson 39%, Jacinta Allan 20%)

    Back of the envelope: this looks like a Lab-LNP TPP of about 48.5-51.5 (better for Labor if Ind/Oth breaks for them better than 50/50).

  34. Rex – you think Allan is more competitive from being behind the LNP by 48.5-51.5 five months out from the election, than Albo is from a from being ahead of the LNP by 51.5-48.5 nearly two years out from his?

  35. @Rex Douglas

    I don’t think so, One Nation voters hate Labor more than Coalition voters do according to the poll.

Comments Page 2 of 13
1 2 3 13

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *