As reported by The Guardian, the latest Essential Research poll is one of the quarterly releases in which it unloads its voting intention data from the preceding period. This includes the pollster’s “two-party preferred plus” result, which uses respondent-allocated preferences for minor party and independent voters who indicate such a preference, previous election flows for those that don’t, and does not exclude those who were undecided on the primary vote. This produces a result of Coalition 48%, Labor 45% and 8% undecided. That’s all we have for now, but the full release today should have primary vote and two-party preferred plus results for the pollster’s other five fortnightly polls going back to August, which will reportedly show the Coalition leading in four but Labor ahead in a poll in early September.
Also featured are leadership ratings for the federal leaders, as well as for the state leaders based on what I presume to be small state-level sub-samples. The former record little change on the last such result six weeks ago, with Scott Morrison down one on both approval and disapproval, to 63% and 27% respectively; Anthony Albanese perfectly unchanged at 44% approval and 29% disapproval; and Morrison’s preferred prime minister lead nudging from 49-26 to 50-25.
The state results suggest last week’s unpleasantness has not done Gladys Berejiklian the slightest harm, with her approval rating at 67% – identical to the result of a YouGov poll in the Sunday Telegraph, on which more below. This puts Berejiklian clear of both Daniel Andrews on 54% and Annastacia Palaszczuk on 62%. Mark McGowan is on 84% and Steven Marshall 51%, though here sample sizes get very small indeed. McGowan’s rating is in line with polling elsewhere, but Marshall’s is at odds with the 68% he recorded in a much more robust poll in mid-September.
Other questions focus on the budget, finding 56% expecting it will help Australia recover from the recession and 53% that it will create jobs. However, 58% felt it would create long-term problems needing to be fixed in the future, and 62% believed current government debt and deficit would place “unnecessary burdens on future generations”. Fifty-four per cent felt it “balanced the needs of the genders”, contrary to much media analysis, but 45% thought it put the interests of younger Australians ahead of older people compared with 34% who thought it balanced. Forty-two per cent thought it put the interests of businesses ahead of employers, compared with 14% for vice-versa.
UPDATE: Full report here. The latest primary vote numbers are Coalition 39%, Labor 35%, Greens 9% and One Nation 3%, which becomes Coalition 42.4%, Labor 38.0%, Greens 9.8% and One Nation 3.3% if the 8% undecided are excluded.
In other news:
• The aforementioned YouGov poll in the Sunday Telegraph had Gladys Berejiklian at 68% approval and 26% disapproval, and found 60% support for her to remain as Premier, with only 29% saying she should resign. Forty-nine per cent said she had done nothing wrong, compared with 36% who felt otherwise. Thirty-six per cent were more likely to vote Coalition if Berejiklian was Premier, compared with 22% less likely and 42% no difference. The poll was conducted Friday and Saturday from a sample of 836.
• Sunday’s Nine News bulletin had grim polling for federal Labor in two of its most marginal seats, showing the Coalition leading 51.2% to 27.9% on the primary vote in Macquarie and 53.2% to 31.1% in Dobell. The poll was conducted by the Redbridge Group, which also had bad seat polling for Labor in August. However, it should be noted that the pollster is careful not to stake its reputation on its voting intention polling, with Samaras having observed that “Labor and the National Party always under-report in telephone surveys because they generally have a larger number of supporters who are difficult to engage”.
• I had a paywalled piece in Crikey yesterday considering the implications of Saturday’s results in New Zealand and the Australian Capital Territory.
https://www.crikey.com.au/2020/10/20/gladys-berejiklian-kyle-sandilands/
lizzie
Yes Gladdie is a very private person 😆
https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/hardly-a-dry-eye-in-sydney-after-premier-s-post-icac-media-blitz-20201019-p566jv.html
Janine Perrett has gone from Sky to Crikey!
That is something more than poacher to gamekeeper
Fortnightly payroll down
https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/labour/earnings-and-work-hours/weekly-payroll-jobs-and-wages-australia/latest-release
From the Guardian live.
Gorsuch & Kavanaugh are Trump plants. No prize for guessing which way Barrett would have gone.
Alpha Zero @ #136 Tuesday, October 20th, 2020 – 12:58 pm
And when they were, it was a very, very unstable and dangerous proposition.
a more salacious excerpt from that Crikey piece….probably will send GladysB’s approval rating further through the roof.
‘Enter Sandilands. A quick google will throw up a litany of salacious remarks. Last month he was found to have breached decency standards in the broadcasting code with offensive comments about the Virgin Mary.
Then there was last week’s gem when he said he always thought Berejiklian was “a mad lesbian”.
Obviously the perfect choice for an interview with a serious premier in the midst of a sensitive sex and corruption scandal.
Indeed, Kyle and his co-hosts were terribly excited she chose to come on their show, gushing about her “getting her freak on”. There was sniggering with her about “secret sex being the best sex”, while at one stage he claimed to have much in common with her, having had sex with seven of his co-workers at a Perth radio station.
“That’s a record I can’t break,” Berejiklian quipped.
Wait, there’s more. The premier, who was once offended to be asked by Fordham whether she ever had an abortion, was grilled by Sandilands and friends about whether she’d ever “dabbled” in same=sex relationships.
“No” she replied coolly, before quoting Seinfeld: “not that there’s anything wrong with that.”
Classy stuff.
This blood sugar business is a conundrum. The actual machine that does the reading from the blood soaked test strip can’t be an issue – there can be no risk on cross contamination with that; it’s a one way process. Once the finger is pricked and the blood extracted there is no going back to that puncture site.
It’s the finger lancing where things must be under question. Assuming a clean lancet is used each time, shirley, what must have happened is that they have used a lancing device with multiple lancets in an internal drum – see video below – and gone from person to person. The risk would then be that the new ‘clean’ lancet could be contaminated by previously used lancets as they use the same portal to project, and then retract.
https://youtu.be/Z-EP31Xy6PY
This is all conjecture on my part.
Rex Douglas:
Tuesday, October 20, 2020 at 12:53 pm
[‘It has resorted to Howard tactics with blatant cash bribery via childcare costs.’]
Tell that to the parents who find the child-care subsidy cost-prohibitive.
ItzaDream @ #158 Tuesday, October 20th, 2020 – 1:46 pm
We have been diabetics for a fair while, and with only one of the lancing devices we have used was it easy and obvious how to replace the needle.
We have the one above and it is fiddly and not that obvious how to turn the rondel to access a new needle. 6 needles in the rondel and they come (to us) in a box of only 5 rondels.
I can certainly see where this may have easily gone wrong.
Says the Auditor General, handing down her report, a week after Gladys’s star turn.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-10-20/icac-report-finds-independence-at-risk-from-premiers-funding/12785712
Reading Mungo’s write up on the whole sorry business, the word that stood out when talking about the Premier was *arrogant*, and ain’t that the case. It’s been middle finger (aka the money finger – there’s a joke there for later) from her from the start.
I have tried to piece the timeline together from a scattered report in the Guardian on Brexit negotiations.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2020/oct/19/brexit-gove-praises-constructive-move-as-eu-agrees-to-intensify-talks
It started encouragingly:
The Guardian notes:
Then Gove told MPs:
and then pivoted to:
A meeting with Gove yesterday:
But in the end:
I note too Gove’s use of the word “anger”.
laughtong @ #160 Tuesday, October 20th, 2020 – 1:56 pm
I suspect, and you would know, that once one lancet is used it can’t be used again i.e. you have to turn the rondel to get another one out. I’m suggesting that the exit/retraction portal could be soiled, which isn’t an issue when the device is single person use, like yourselves, but would be if the device were shared.
Rex Douglas
Albanese is now onto public housing
Yankee Doodle Dandy:
I would say I think you mean “prompts the question”, but that might be brutish!
A suggestion? Surely not.
Mavis @ #159 Tuesday, October 20th, 2020 – 1:48 pm
Especially the parents who’d prefer taxpayers to fund their childcare so they can upgrade their VW Touareg to a RangeRover.
You fuckin’ what?
https://www.themonthly.com.au/blog/martin-mckenzie-murray/2020/20/2020/1603147648/hopelessly-devoted-dan#mtr
Hey sprockets , 2 weeks to go to the US election , are you calling it for Biden ?
Morrison mislead the house
Claiming Mitsubishi left because of the Labor government in 2008
Howard responds to Mitsubishi closure speculation
PRINT FRIENDLY EMAIL STORY
The World Today – Wednesday, 13 September , 2006 12:26:00
Reporter: Eleanor Hall
ELEANOR HALL: The Prime Minister John Howard has joined his industry Minister in saying he can only rely on what Mitsubishi says about its future in Australia.
JOHN HOWARD: I can only reinforce what has been said already, and that is the company has made statements about continuing in South Australia, and in the end it’s a decision for the company, and we have provided a lot of assistance to Mitsubishi, as has the South Australian Government, and the motor manufacturing industry is very important to South Australia, and we’ve done a lot of things that have made motor manufacturing more attractive.
—–
In the end it’s a company decision, but the company has made statements, and that must be taken as an indication of the company’s intentions.
Itza:
The transmission scenario discussed by one expert (some sort of physician), was:
– infected patient is tested and whilst being tested, coughs on device
– lancet replace
– infectee (next patient) touches device, then immediately rubs eyes
This was suggested as the only scenario in which infection could occur (and was noted as very unlikely).
Separately, there was a discussion of a theoretical risk of blood disease transmission (of Hepatitis or HIV), as follows:
– infected patient tested, blood enters device via lancet
– lancet replaced, small amount of blood at the device / lancet interface contaniminates new lancet
– infectee tested, infection via contaminated lancet
If this has non-negligible likelihood of occurrence, it would also occur in hospital wards (per rhwombat’s description of standard practice). Since it doesn’t occur in that case, neither does it occur in hotels.
My suspicion is that some non-physician who is a diabetic and thus familiar with single person devices has become aware of multi-person use in the hotels (but not being a physician is not aware of multi-person devices in hospital wards) and has sounded the alarm, which seems to have been a false alarm.
What I can confidently call, LVT, is that Dotard has a fat arse and a willing megaphone in Miranda Devine…
NY Post’s Miranda Devine: Trump’s town hall was a “set-up from the start” because they gave him a “tiny” chair that “could barely fit half a buttock, let alone a whole one”
https://twitter.com/bad_takes/status/1318313464063053825?s=21
“to the increasingly weary NSW voters who simply want to know if she bonked him or not.”
Not this weary NSW voter. The less I know about Gladys’s personal life the better.
As with Barnaby, the public interest is in the rorting, not the rooting.
Meanwhile in Ireland:
Ireland is to close much of its economy and society in a second Covid-19 lockdown that imposes some of the severest restrictions in Europe…
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/oct/19/ireland-to-impose-5km-travel-limit-in-strict-new-covid-lockdown
Sounds like they are going to go 6 weeks, re-open and rinse and repeat. Yo-yo in and out of restrictions…
Rex Douglas:
Tuesday, October 20, 2020 at 12:53 pm
[‘Especially the parents who’d prefer taxpayers to fund their childcare so they can upgrade their VW Touareg to a RangeRover.’]
While some might, the majority would be trying to make ends meet. And as you’d know, the subsidy is capped, in consequence of which it’s not worthwhile to have a child/children in care for more than three days.
This will not only increase female participation in the workforce (which is relatively low) but is per se an election-winning policy.
Does this qualify as a dad joke?
Yes lizzie it does. But I almost laughed out loud when I got it.
😀
This is better from Labor , keep on putting McCormack under pressure
I thought Warren Entsch retired from parliament at the last election
Entsch ‘retired’ in 2007, but ran again (and won) in 2010. He’s contested (and won) every election since.
This is a subscriber only article but the message is clear from the headline.
The hard right (Seselja faction) who control the ACT Liberals obviously have no intention of ceding power to the more moderate faction after last Saturday’s voting disaster. This message from Josh Manuatu, party president along with a defiant stance today by Alistair Coe suggests that they will remain a sad and sorry bunch for some time to come.
Well done Labor ,asking Morrison about immigration connection with Maguire,
Morrison has something to hide
So we can all calm down? Or should we panic? Scotty says he has more work to do.
https://www.theage.com.au/politics/federal/i-m-a-full-termer-scott-morrison-dismisses-talk-of-early-election-20201020-p566tz.html
Labor has seemingly abandoned means testing with their proposition of removing the cap on the childcare subsidy.
Let’s not pretend it’s anything other than a blatant bribe in the true Howard style.
Having said that, knowing Australians, it may well be electorally profitable.
Kakuru says:
Tuesday, October 20, 2020 at 2:52 pm
Entsch ‘retired’ in 2007, but ran again (and won) in 2010. He’s contested (and won) every election since.
———————
Thanks
Lol Rex
E. G. Theodore @ #171 Tuesday, October 20th, 2020 – 2:22 pm
‘Expert’ One is way off the mark I reckon. For starters, in a non domestic situation, the device is usually held by a third party , nurse or some such, unless the person being tested is a known diabetic with their own device. If the device were being shared, with person to person handling, without cleansing in between, then that is major fail, but I don’t think that is what we are talking about. My understanding from one of the MOs was that they are not looking at Covid contamination, but only blood contamination (and Covid is not spread by blood) – hence HIV, Hep B, C et al.
I haven’t read what doc wombat said, but again, it is my understanding (and I just made a phone call to confirm same) that in the hospital situation, only single use lancet devices are used, albeit with a common testing unit. Using a multi-lancet device on different people would be a complete anathema to anyone paying attention to infection control basics – but that is my suspicion as to what happened.
lizzie @ #183 Tuesday, October 20th, 2020 – 2:57 pm
Sounds like an early election coming up to me.
ItzaDream
That’s how much we trust what Scomo says. 😆
Gone are the days of a policy framework it seems.
The major parties can only muster the energy and mental effort to offer voters individually targetted inducements.
I remember well Keatings Acme fightback contribution back in the day that addressed this.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAAf9nSd3ig
[EDIT] Just give Trump a choice of seats for the next debate.
Just give Trump a choice of seats for the next debate.
He’ll want a gilt throne.
on edit: Citizen: LOL
Rex Douglas:
[‘Tuesday, October 20, 2020 at 2:57 pm’]
Judging by your posts on the issue of Labor’s child-care policy, you appear to be smarting. I guess it must be painful in coming to terms with the realisation that Labor’s really onto something. And your contention that it’s a Howard-type giveaway is risible.
Paul Fletcher
Yeah OK Mr Fletcher. I’m judging right now! Waited 3 weeks for some dead plants. Bewdy!
Mavis @ #193 Tuesday, October 20th, 2020 – 3:16 pm
I try to be consistent.
Penny Wong asking about Morrison’s Qanon relationships….
In Senate Estimates, Wong asks ‘Is there a vector of influence (by Qanon over ScottyFromBunnings)’
This has got a ways to run..
https://www.news.com.au/world/coronavirus/australia/coronavirus-victoria-melbourne-makes-world-history-crushing-second-wave/news-story/8551d1e094b8ef0ddcd706db631f3a0e
Andrews doesnt get a skerrick of credit for this from the anti Labor media.
steve davis @ #199 Tuesday, October 20th, 2020 – 3:27 pm
Given the level of attack over the past months, I would hope the Premiers security detail is fully prepared.