First, I invite you to bask in the eye-wateringly detailed feast of psephological goodness that is my Senate election guide, subject of the post immediately below this one. Second, I understand we may yet see results from an Essential Research poll conducted over the weekend, but apparently not quite yet. Third, we reach an important milestone in the campaign today with the declaration of candidates and ballot papers draws, nominations having closed yesterday.
With all that out of the way, I offer the following assembly of polling snippets and horse race prognostication, in keeping with my performance indicator of having at least one new post up on every day of the campaign, except maybe on Saturdays.
• The unpredictable Roy Morgan has released the results of its weekend face-to-face polling – probably a more fraught exercise than usual over Easter – which finds Labor with a two-party lead of 51-49, from primary votes of Coalition 39%, Labor 35.5%, Greens 9.5%, One Nation 4.5% and, contrary to its strong showing in the marginal seat Newspolls published yesterday, United Australia Party 2.0%. The published release compares with those of “the prior surveying period of April 6/7 & 13/14, 2019”, though the last results it actually published covered only the first half of that period. Either way, the result in the earlier poll was 52.5-47.5 to Labor. The sample of this latest poll was a rather modest 707.
• Roy Morgan also appears to be doing separate polling for the Australian Futures Project which I must find out more about, since all I can tell you is that News Corp’s Annika Smedhurst has published results from it on two successive Sundays. I didn’t bother with its findings last week because they related only to issue salience and didn’t show up anything you couldn’t have guessed, and the most recent results have only just come to my attention. These do actually cover voting intention, and record a 52-48 lead to Labor on two-party preferred. Beyond that though, there are no primary votes and nothing on sample size or survey methodology, with other details in the report relating only to the undecided rate. I can’t find the report online, but Smedhurst has posted an image of it on Twitter.
• Polling conducted by the Liberals for Telereach in the the north-western Tasmanian seat of Braddon, and published by local newspaper the Burnie Advocate, finds Scott Morrison with a 44% approval rating and 43% disapproval rating in the electorate, whereas Bill Shorten has 31% approval and 59% disapproval. Though perhaps the past tense would be more appropriate – the poll was conducted on April 3, from a sample of 626. Some may ask why the Liberals would provide data on leadership ratings but not voting intention. I do not know the answer.
• Journalists continue to receive wildly different impressions of the situation in Victoria depending on whom they talk to. The Financial Review yesterday reported Scott Morrison was starting to find favour among “blue-collar and outer-suburban voters”, turning around what was a “horrendous” situation two months ago, with Labor consistently around 7% ahead statewide. They still expect to lose Chisholm and Dunkley, but believe they may hold not just La Trobe but also Corangamite, albeit that skepticism was expressed about the 54-46 result in the Geelong Advertiser’s ReachTEL poll. The obverse of this would seem to be that things remain radically bad for the Liberals nearer the city, to the extent that they are only “narrowly ahead” in Kooyong and Higgins.
• On the ABC’s Insiders on Sunday, Patricia Karvelas said she had spoken to Nationals who believed George Christensen was “gone” in Dawson, while fellow panellist Andrew Probyn said both sides did not know what to expect given the wild card of preferences from One Nation, who did not field a candidate in 2016 and are now expected to poll up to 20%.
Quoll @ #48 Wednesday, April 24th, 2019 – 8:15 am
Why the Trumpian lies ?
https://www.brisbanetimes.com.au/politics/federal/labor-calls-for-major-inquiry-into-water-scandal-and-accuses-scott-morrison-of-a-cover-up-20190423-p51glz.html
Quoll@8:15am
“Greens keeping up the pressure on Barny and Taylor”
Is anybody laughing out loud reading that idiotic statement? I am certainly choking on my breakfast.
Two old mates accidentally meet at a cafe in Mornington during a contested Election Campaign.
Ven @ #52 Wednesday, April 24th, 2019 – 8:23 am
The Greens are the “Nigel No Friends” of Australian Politics.
Clive doing more than just uniting Australia. Here is some stuff in the High Court summarised by Ben Raue
http://www.tallyroom.com.au/38505#more-38505
http://www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/viewdoc/au/cases/cth/HCATrans/2019/64.html
http://www.hcourt.gov.au/assets/cases/02-Brisbane/b19-2019/Palmer-AEC_Pltf.pdf
Ven @ #50 Wednesday, April 24th, 2019 – 8:19 am
True.
Greensborough Growler @ #53 Wednesday, April 24th, 2019 – 8:25 am
Is this the beginning of the split in the Liberal Party?
Labor not counting on Palmer preferences:
C@tmomma @ #57 Wednesday, April 24th, 2019 – 8:31 am
With a few Libs candidates running as Modern Libs and many others removing the brand Liberal from their advertising it may be a question of what Liberal Party.
Barnaby Joyce requested updates on $80m sale of water by Eastern Australia Agriculture
Joyce asked department to ‘report back to me on this and seek final approval before settling the purchase’
He could follow with …I just want to check that my corrupt mates are being looked after…. Favours to return & all that… ( satire)
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/apr/23/barnaby-joyce-requested-updates-on-80m-sale-of-water-by-eastern-australia-agriculture
The Project followed up last night on its original #watergate story, featuring commentary from PvO.
https://twitter.com/theprojecttv/status/1120628506868764672
Comparisons are problematic.
Three members of what is inaptly described as “the corrupt, immoral, unethical NSW ALP government from 2007-2011” will be part of a Shorten government.
I’ve been getting inundated with Clive Palmer ads on YouTube and Facebook. This latest one, from a “sponsored” Facebook post, is a doozy.
Greensborough Growler @ #59 Wednesday, April 24th, 2019 – 8:33 am
May it then be a case of a Liberal Conservative Party( the LibCons for short 😉 ) and a Modern Liberal Party?
Thank you again BK. This little gem made me smile.
I was still half asleep when I scanned it and thought, “I’m pretty sure that’s not what causes it.” I’m sure you didn’t mean it that way. 😉
C@tmomma@8:29am
Paraphrasing Casablanca
Of all the coffee joints in the towns of the world, she walks into mine. 🙂
shellbell @ #62 Wednesday, April 24th, 2019 – 8:36 am
You also have a good point. However, in Ven’s favour, she was making a generalisation and not specifically tarring each and every member of that government with the same brush.
Sheesh! Lawyers!
Ven @ #66 Wednesday, April 24th, 2019 – 8:42 am
They’ll always have Canberra!
The United Australia Party was on track to win Government at the next Federal Election, Federal Leader, Clive Palmer, said today.
He said that last time about the PUP, iirc, and ended up with one seat in the Lower House. Just.
Also, how can the ‘king maker’ be also the king?
Labor is only supporting an inquiry into the transactions made in 2017 under Joyce. Labor, like the Coalition, is not supporting a wide -ranging RC into the MDB plan as advocated by the Greens and Centre Alliance.
Burke’s interview yesterday on ABC RN Drive:
https://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/drive/shadow-environment-minister-tony-burke-rules-out-murray-darling/11040172
Regarding the Liberal Party candidates who are removing their “Liberal” brand from their advertising, if elected which party do we think they will belong to? Either they will still be in the Liberal Party or they will announce their split from the Liberal Party after the election. It’s one or the other. They aren’t embarrassed by the Liberal brand they are being disingenuous. You could go as far as asking are they lying to get elected. I hope they get called out on it. (Even the tag “Modern” is open to this interpretation.)
Credlin belled the cat on the Carbon Tax lie the Libs propagate two years ago. But, the Libs find the lie too convenient to refute.
https://www.buzzfeed.com/markdistefano/whats-the-point-of-australian-politics
I’d say exactly that.
I often wonder what the point of rolling out former PMs is. The possible number of people who’d even see them would be so low it’d hardly be worthwhile.
Of course Labor don’t have a former PM to roll out at the moment, nor will the Liberals once Howard ceases campaigning.
Whatever you want to make of that Morgan poll…. It’s still ALP ahead.
When the situation of a party is fully resilient to all sorts of changes in the assumptions, sample size, methods of a diversity of pollsters, you know that the result is already locked in.
The only meaningful question remaining is what the real 2PP in favour of the ALP going to be…. at this stage, 52-53% looks pretty safe.
Reminds me of the Rowan Atkinsons comedy sketch –
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=91DSNL1BEeY
Aren’t there 150 seats in the House of Reps?
Here’s the full “When Julia met Julie” article from the Hun this morning.
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victoria/julie-bishop-and-julia-banks-have-a-surprise-run-in-at-mornington-restaurant/news-story/e33dabaa457283b5cd81c45c6cd4049f
Burgey @ #80 Wednesday, April 24th, 2019 – 9:01 am
151 this time following re-distributions.
Has the AEC posted the full list of election nominations yet ?
Burgey @ #80 Wednesday, April 24th, 2019 – 9:01 am
—
151 now burgey
Simon² Katich
Thanks for the laugh. 🙂
Yesterday, I asked if anyone could point me to the detail of Labor’s promise to support the establishment of a federal ICAC. All I found was Labor’s petition for people to sign. To date no one has provided the detail re what sort of fed ICAC Labor is promising.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/jan/23/federal-anti-corruption-body-must-have-power-to-make-arrests-and-conduct-searches-judges-say
Nominations have now closed. Candidates will be formally declared on Wednesday with details progressively published on the website from late afternoon.
Holden Hillbilly @ #87 Wednesday, April 24th, 2019 – 9:04 am
—
tyvm HH
Is Credlin helping Libs?
https://thenewdaily.com.au/news/national/2019/04/24/bill-shorten-death-tax/
A Labor ICAC will be 100% more real than a green one
Like birds of a feather…
Is FY13 from July 13 to June 14?
The article C@t quoted suggested that Angus Taylor had quit before some time in 2013.
Still no PHON in a few critical QLD seats yet- yay.
I’ve started looking through the eye-watering detail in WB’s Senate Election Guide.
First, thank you WB. This is a huge effort and much appreciated. It will be a great reference as this election drags on.
Second, I have a question to anyone. Are ACT and NT senators always short-term or long-term? The table implies it’s one or the other but doesn’t say.
Good morning Simon Katich
Last night you asked about preparation of the seed production area. The only scalping that occurred was when the site was minimally levelled. This was followed by two “nukings” with glyphosate.
It took three years of weeding before the planted native grass has come to hold its own. You should stop by on the main road and have a look at it next time you are driving through. There is a big sign at the fence line.
Kung Fu Easter Bunny.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1120517648238829568
LR:
ACT and NT Senators are elected each election.
Late Riser @ #94 Wednesday, April 24th, 2019 – 9:10 am
Short term.
Apart from being a rubbish paper, the West is also incoherent……….
Today, its editorial bags Palmer (clearly Stokes sees him more of a danger than apparently his mate at the Oz) Paul Murray bags Shorten for his support in reinstating penalty rates while the “Who is winning?” has Morrison on 6, Shorten on 2 and Tie 4. Of the 6 Morrison has scored, 1 has been for calling the election, another for being ‘Prime-ministerial’ after the bombings in Sri Lank and today, for somehow, remaining “calm”. In the tied competition, Morrison scored with Shorten a point because they both agreed to the Stoke’s sponsored debate coming on the 29th. Oh, and in the scoring, Shorten was said to have “disappeared” for the day, yesterday. Apparently a marginal seat in Queensland for Shorten, is “disappearing”.
And, to top it off, yet another day passes while the Eastern seaboard goes crackers over Watergate, and here, well, zilch as of yesterday
Late Riser
William’s report on senate voting suggests that the AEC has more work to do. Perhaps the voting ‘rules’ should have been tried out on a group with poor comprehension first, not just checked by AEC staff.
https://www.pollbludger.net/2019/04/24/senate-election-guide/