Essential Research: 52-48 to Labor

Bill Shorten’s personal ratings take a hit in Essential’s latest poll, while Galaxy charts One Nation’s ongoing progress in Queensland.

The Essential Research fortnight rolling average moves a point back to the Coalition for the second week in a row, reducing Labor’s lead to 52-48. Labor is down two points on the primary vote to 35%, with the Coalition steady on 36%, One Nation steady on 10% and the Greens up a point to 9%. The monthly leaders ratings find Bill Shorten taking a big hit, down seven points on approval to 30% and up three on disapproval to 47%, and Malcolm Turnbull a smaller one, down three on approval to 34% and up one on disapproval to 49%. Turnbull’s lead as preferred prime minister is out from 39-28 last month to 39-25.

The survey also asked respondents if they would be likely to vote for Cory Bernardi’s Conservative Party, to which 14% said yes – which, as is always the case when questions like this are asked, is well above the party’s plausible vote share. Sixty-two per cent say they would be unlikely to, which is on the high side as these things go. The poll also has 17% saying Bernardi’s defection is good for the Liberal Party, 26% bad, 29% neither, and 28% don’t know. As of next week, the Essential Research poll will be published in conjunction with The Guardian.

We’ve also had federal voting intention results from the weekend’s Queensland poll by Galaxy for the Courier-Mail, which has One Nation on 18% (up six since November), the Coalition on 35% (down four), Labor on 29% (down one) and the Greens on 8% (steady), with the Coalition down a point on two-party preferred to lead 51-49. The poll was conducted last Wednesday and Thursday from a sample of 867.

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

1,956 comments on “Essential Research: 52-48 to Labor”

Comments Page 38 of 40
1 37 38 39 40
  1. Some bludgers say they do not understand men….but if Pamela Anderson is actually attracted to Asange, I gotta admit I do not understand women…

    As a woman I share your lack of understanding!

  2. When I was 13 my scallywag uncle bought me the December 1994 issue of Playboy. Black cover, Pamela Anderson featured.

    At the time it was a most prized possession. Until then, I had not seen something so unbelievably sexy as that figure.

    She may not have aged perfectly gracefully, but you’ll not here a bad word from me about Pam.

  3. P1,
    Get your head out of your ass and you might be able to read.
    What I’m advocating is going out and building TODAY stuff that we already know how to build. Some gas. Lots of solar and wind.
    What is YOUR plan?

    Edit: From your above post it seems a fair reading that your plan is just to replace every coal fired power station with gas, and gas alone. No renewables. Do I hear you right?

  4. As I just heard one of Trump’s media apologists say about his press conference yesterday when trying to put a positive spin on it

    The ex intelligence agency office on Real Time said pretty much the same thing, only likening what Trump is doing to the media with what Putin did to Russian media when he came to prominence: divide and conquer.

    I just hope the American media has its wits about it enough to see and resist this, and that they bandy about their peers to form a collective which has the power to resist this.

  5. I’ve posted it before here but I’ll say it again. The whole climate change thing brings to mind the old Chinese truism.

    When’s the best time to plant a tree?

    Thirty years ago.

    Next best time?

    Now.

    We (collectively) have been stuffing around for 30 years. Our Governments have been fart arsing about, insisting everything was OK, defending the status quo, cultivating moral panic over cost increases or pretending to take action (honourable exception in Australia – the Rudd / Gillard Governments).

    So we do what we can from here. As far as energy policy goes, I am no ‘tech head’ like some here are or appear to be. I go for what works best to get us where we need to be, ultimately 100% renewable if our advanced civilisation is to endure beyond the 22nd century.

    So Renewables as far as / as soon as technology allows, it seems to be rapidly developing and needs Government support, nit wrecking. Gas is better than coal, looks like a good transitional option. I am open to nuclear. It is big and dirty so right wingers will love it. But it has serious problems. Canonly be acteansitional option at best.

    But whatever, we need to get going.

  6. Lets go through each one:

    taylormade
    Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 9:10 pm

    Confessions @ Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 7:04 pm
    The Andrews Govt is not that great, in fact it is a pretty ordinary once you see through all the spin. Issues i have with this govt.
    Port privatisation and asset sales,

    Also liberal policy and how the development of our road and rail is being funded.

    Transurban citylink toll extension,

    Paying for the Tula windening.

    firefighters dispute,

    Not willing to comment; miss information from the left and the right

    juvenile crime,

    And that is Andrews fault how? He is dealing with a youth center being trashed.

    heavy reliance on pokie revenue,

    And he introduced pokies?

    poor state of regional road network,

    The state of regional roads happened since the election?

    election rorting cover up?

    Trump would be so proud of you.

    desalination plant,

    It got build fora drought that ended; Liberals did their best to turn it into a white elephant; Andrews is getting it going again so if we need it, it works. The Liberals playing politics with this significant asset serves to highlight how pathetic the Liberals are. Liberals really are beyond a joke

    poor regional train network,

    As it is Labor that has brought back the lines and brought the trains and is now expanding the network; this highlights just how pathetic your comment is.

    very secretive on use of taxpayers funds – especially public sector pay increases.

    Oh someone got a pay increase; Liberals sad; money should have gone to Craymend island.

  7. Gawd please don’t mention old cows!
    If you didn’t appreciate Pamela Anderson in Baywatch you either had to be dead or gay and that’s probably an inappropriate comment 🙁

  8. cud chewer @ #1852 Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 9:35 pm

    Get your head out of your ass and you might be able to read.

    I read very well, thanks.

    What I’m advocating is going out and building TODAY stuff that we already know how to build. Some gas. Lots of solar and wind.

    There’s certainly lots of gas and wind around here. What are you using to replace baseload? Thermal? Pumped Hydro? Batteries? Perhaps a mix of all three? And in what time frame, given that none of these are practical at the required scale yet (even just here in Australia)?

    What is YOUR plan?

    I laid out my plan. Did you not read it? I even have modelling to back it up. And my plan relies only on existing technologies – yours (at least as far as I can understand it) relies largely on unproven technologies, extrapolation, supposition and wishful thinking.

    Edit: From your above post it seems a fair reading that your plan is just to replace every coal fired power station with gas, and gas alone. No renewables. Do I hear you right?

    No you don’t. Now who can’t read?

  9. Dave sadly time does that to all of us even us blokes. Bits just don’t remain exactly where they started from. Some bits of the hair variety just disappear. Haven’t seen any evidence that medical science can successfully remedy that.

  10. “Comrade all us Liberal Trolls are dumb or else we wouldn’t be trolls ”

    stop spending 36 billion dollars on 100 year old technology then lol

  11. Briefly
    Re – Liberal Troll
    How about you just concentrate on giving us Eastern Staters a realistic and unbiased view of what is happening in WA state and federal politics as i tried to do with Confessions on Vic State politics.
    I used to read all your posts and i had you down as a bit of an expert on WA politics with all your door knocking adventures, but the past few elections and by-elections in WA your observations and predictions have always proven to be widely over optimistic.
    As a Victorian interested in the upcoming WA election, could i request less barracking and more analysis from poll bludgers in WA please.

  12. taylormade @ #1874 Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 10:06 pm

    Briefly
    Re – Liberal Troll
    How about you just concentrate on giving us Eastern Staters a realistic and unbiased view of what is happening in WA state and federal politics as i tried to do with Confessions on Vic State politics.
    I used to read all your posts and i had you down as a bit of an expert on WA politics with all your door knocking adventures, but the past few elections and by-elections in WA your observations and predictions have always proven to be widely over optimistic.
    As a Victorian interested in the upcoming WA election, could i request less barracking and more analysis from poll bludgers in WA please.

    Go to the WA thread.

  13. I used to read all your posts and i had you down as a bit of an expert on WA politics with all your door knocking adventures

    All my door knocking adventures? I think you’re confusing me with someone else.

    My only door knocking adventures come when the bloody mormons or jehovahs witness mob come knocking on my door.

  14. As a Victorian interested in the upcoming WA election, could i request less barracking and more analysis from poll bludgers in WA please.

    William offers dedicated WA election threads. Please don’t let me stand in your way of commenting over on those posts. 🙂

  15. cud chewer @ #1878 Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 10:10 pm

    P1,
    All you’ve said is that you want to replace every existing coal fired power station with gas. Then what? And when?

    Jeez, why don’t you read what I actually wrote? Try this bit …

    Let renewables compete in an open market on energy intensity along with gas and all other sources. Modelling shows that if you do this, gas will replace coal very quickly, and renewables will eventually be able to replace gas once they are competitive.

    This is not only practical (since it depends only on existing technologies, and also a market with the same characteristics as the one we currently have – not the one we might wish we had), but the modelling posted by Trog earlier today shows it is also the cheapest option (I don’t think he realized that, but then he often doesn’t seem to read past the headlines of what he posts).

    Now, to be fair, I did say I preferred a simple carbon price to an EIS (because it has been proven to be effective, and also because it better encourages behaviour change) but nowhere do I rule out renewables. If they can compete, they’re in – if not, then not.

  16. Well said Frednk. I am a train driver in Melbourne and all across the network there is a huge amount of investment and works ongoing. I have never seen anything like this. Monash, M80, Tulla are all getting upgrades. New paramedics, firefighters and police are funded for. Large number of new schools being built. All of these make me proud to be Labor.

    Many of this get lost during the news cycle and both Herald Sun and The Age hates Andrews’s guts. Maybe the law and order problems will cause big hurt, who knows, maybe Andrews will fail politically and lose the next election, I don’t know but thanks partially to Andrews Labor government (Also Abbott’s 2014 budget) I am a strong believer that elections matter and Labor’s platform is worth fighting for.

    I think Vic gov. is as good a government that can be in this day and age with hostile media environment, corporate influences, social media fuelled outrage and general anti-incumbent/anti-politician wave.

  17. gorkay king @ #1887 Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 10:28 pm

    Well said Frednk. I am a train driver in Melbourne and all across the network there is a huge amount of investment and works ongoing. I have never seen anything like this. Monash, M80, Tulla are all getting upgrades. New paramedics, firefighters and police are funded for. Large number of new schools being built. All of these make me proud to be Labor.
    Many of this get lost during the news cycle and both Herald Sun and The Age hates Andrews’s guts. Maybe the law and order problems will cause big hurt, who knows, maybe Andrews will fail politically and lose the next election, I don’t know but thanks partially to Andrews Labor government (Also Abbott’s 2014 budget) I am a strong believer that elections matter and Labor’s platform is worth fighting for.
    I think Vic gov. is as good a government that can be in this day and age with hostile media environment, corporate influences, social media fuelled outrage and general anti-incumbent/anti-politician wave.

    Hmmm I may have ridden in trains you drove. 😀
    There is such an enormous backlog of stuff that needs doing on the rail system.
    I was shocked recently to learn that Caroline Springs is V-Line. I had assumed suburban rail went as far as Melton.

  18. Taylormade
    Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 10:06 pm
    Briefly
    Re – Liberal Troll

    How about you just concentrate ….the past few elections and by-elections in WA your observations and predictions have always proven to be widely over optimistic.

    Canning….precipitated the ejection from office of the worst PM in Australian history
    Cowan…campaign to remove a thoroughly useless Lib with an excellent Labor candidate….won that.
    State Election…working hard to remove the most indolent and incompetent Government once Ray O’Connor…will win

  19. libertarian unionist @ #1886 Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 10:24 pm

    What is “an open market on energy intensity”? Genuine question.

    A fair question – I mean an energy intensity scheme plus a proper national energy market, where generators get paid according to what they actually bid – i.e. no pooling. Their bids would have to be made taking into account their expected energy intensity debits or credits. So a supplier that has higher C02 emissions per MW would have to bid higher to break even, knowing they will have to pay EIS credits. A supplier that generates less C02 per MW could potentially even bid below cost, knowing they will get credits from the other suppliers.

    This would make a change from the system we have at the moment, which it seems to me encourages precisely the opposite!

  20. “I was shocked recently to learn that Caroline Springs is V-Line. I had assumed suburban rail went as far as Melton.”

    Crazy isn’t it? It just opened last month. First, proposed in 2008, put on hold by LNP gov after election. After 4 wasted years finally delivered.

    Line is on track to be duplicated, as single track section between Melton-Deer Park makes it hard to run frequent trains. Staffer of local MP advised me that works on that line should start very soon. I believe eventual plan is to electrify the line in conjuction with Metro Tunnel.

  21. Does anyone know if the reported 36 billion dollar cost of the Coalition’s fraudband is largely due to massive insurance premiums for likely failure of obsolete infrastructure?

  22. gorkay king @ #1893 Saturday, February 18, 2017 at 10:47 pm

    “I was shocked recently to learn that Caroline Springs is V-Line. I had assumed suburban rail went as far as Melton.”
    Crazy isn’t it? It just opened last month. First, proposed in 2008, put on hold by LNP gov after election. After 4 wasted years finally delivered.
    Line is on track to be duplicated, as single track section between Melton-Deer Park makes it hard to run frequent trains. Staffer of local MP advised me that works on that line should start very soon. I believe eventual plan is to electrify the line in conjuction with Metro Tunnel.

    Ahh, looked on Google maps and thought it was single track. That is just unbelievable.
    Do you know much about the Sydney rail network?
    They seem to build a lot more track there, with track quadruplication in places.

  23. pamela anderson hey woohoo if that video with tommy whatsisname is anything to go by, Julian will be lucky to get a chance to hack anyones computer or influence any elections

  24. @Bemused

    I have zero knowledge outside Melbourne. Though state LNP there seems to understand they need PT and railways. I feel a bit sad they are opting for driverless trains though, as it is my profession.

Comments Page 38 of 40
1 37 38 39 40

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *