Kind of old news now, but Essential Research didn’t let Saturday’s election stop them conduct their usual weekly poll, results of which were published on Tuesday and can be found here. I’m continuing to follow the progress of the count here, so you are invited to discuss count-related matters there while continuing discussion of a more general nature here.
Essential Research: 50-50
Results of a poll conducted concurrently with the election on the weekend, and a place for general discussion of the election aftermath.
Raaraa
75 would be fun. 👿
guytaur @ #83 Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 10:53 am
Simon Crean was so right. How dare the right accuse him of not doing the right thing. Bush, Blair and Howard should be tried as war criminals!
ctar1 @ #101 Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 11:17 am
Just imagine it: A Turnbull-Joyce-Katter(-Abbott) minority government!
Raaraa
The idea puts a grin on my dial.
Raaraa
Mr Crean’s finest hour. Pity he lost insight in the RGR wars. Still he had it when it counted for the nations interest.
If the coalition just makes it to 75, the decision on who to nominate for Speaker will be interesting, since putting Mr Smith back in the chair would leave the ALP and rest with a floor majority. But I have a funny feeling that the independents might all resist any temptations put to them to accept the Speakership.
Pedant
Yes 75 is a delicious number.
FJKeany: Former PM John Howard will call a press conference in Sydney at 1PM “for comment on the Chilcot Report”
I think that putting Tony Abbott up as speaker would be a great move…
doyley @ #85 Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 10:55 am
The vote isn’t tomorrow. But with no challenge, the status quo will remain. I think the endorsement is a prelude to an automatic leadership spill, if Labor doesn’t form government.
I would not be surprised given Turnbull pushing constitutional limits if Mr Turnbull invited Mr Slipper back for the role.
The look on Abbott and Pyne’s face would be a wonder to behold
Multiple banks have experienced a major stuff up with crediting payments into depositors’ accounts overnight. Message from Beyondbank:
A payment into my account has since arrived but it may be worth checking that any payments you are expecting have been credited.
tonylepony @ #16 Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 7:55 am
Thank you for that. Very forensic. The fact that I saw it as a more balanced treatment of the leaders at the time reflects how much worse the rest of the ABC has become. Nothing worse, of course, than the comparative treatment by Leigh Sales of Bill Shorten, then Malcolm Turnbull, and then Bill Shorten again in successive interviews.
I wonder if Turnbull is looking for a Labor Peter Slipper (or Mal Colston).
Livesquawk: [BREAKING] S&P revises Australia outlook to negative from stable; rating affirmed at AAA
6PR: .@ColinBarnett says @TurnbullMalcolm needed more policies that related to people in their daily lives, seen as a rather aloof campaign
6PR: .@ColinBarnett puts big swing against Liberals in WA down to ‘a sense of job insecurity and financial stress’.
Re the caucus meeting tomorrow, it was reported in the GG as Shorten to ‘see of challengers ‘, with the see off quoted.
Raaa,
Good point. This is an endorsement, not a vote.
guytaur @ #115 Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 11:33 am
Just as I guessed. Business as usual. All the scaremongering coming from populist papers and some Libs over uncertainty.
rogue scholar @ #54 Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 9:16 am
The thing about the poison chalice is that Bill Shorten and Labor are smart enough and experienced enough to hold it without getting poisoned – but they would lose a lot of skin in the effort. Malcolm Turnbull and his coalition will just drown in it – even if they just scrape a majority.
Smith would be 99 percent to retain the speaker’s chair. Can’t see an Indie talking it. That’s why 76 is so critical to Turnbull. 75, and he’s relying on an independent voting with him on every procedural vote. SSO’s, censures, standing orders. Everything. Increases the lack of authority massively.
Interesting numbers here
https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/wa/a/31999954/federal-election-regional-wa-voters-abandons-coalition-in-rural-revolt/
and the would be one nation Senator has some questions to answer
https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/32003520/perjury-query-for-one-nation-senate-hopeful-rod-culleton/
DrCraigEmerson: Yet more from conservative columnists today claiming if only @TurnbullMalcolm had shifted to the right he would have romped in #delusional
TheKouk: A damning assessment of the Coalition’s economic plan from S&P: Company tax cuts, deficits till 2020-21, puny surpluses after that. Hopeless
LOL Dutton, keep telling yourself that.
ratsak @ #121 Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 11:43 am
It’s the procedural stuff that will blow Turnbull up. Even 76 will be a hassle with the Speaker having to cast their ballot all the time. Basically, Turnbull can rely on Katter and, maybe, McGowan and Sharkie, to provide a stable base in the Parliament for confidence matters. However, as shown by the position taken by Oakeshott, Wilkie and Windsor between 2010 and 2013, the cross-benchers will look at every turn to increase their influence and profile. And they will do it by taking control of Parliamentary business away from the Government of the day. If Turnbull cannot get to 76, prepare to see QT look more like it was in the 43rd parliament than it was under Bishop and Smith.
jmodoh: Big news in NSW: @mikebairdMP will ban greyhound racing.
TPOF
Under the 43rd Parliament the government would not have got away with the secrecy.
Its going to be interesting to see what access the cross benches and Labor manage to get to information. Review of FOI applications could be a big worry for Turnbull.
political_alert: Shadow Treasurer, Chris Bowen, is in Sydney and will hold a doorstop, 12.20pm #auspol
Ratsak
If I recall correctly after 2010 Windsor at al said they would not support gag motions hence we had the regular stunt from Abbott where just before the end of QT he or one his minions would move a SSO so they could have a 10 minutes uninterrupted rant at Gillard which would make the TV broadcast before it cut to Play School.
I doubt that Turnbull would want to be relying on Katter to stop such things. As others have noted his presence in the house can be irregular and I doubt Labor would be giving him a pair.
Breaking: NSW government banning Greyhound racing from July next year.
Can’t stand Mike Baird but I’m all for that
The greyhound thing. Big hit to gambling clout.
Maybe Wilkie and Xenophon will get further this time. I hope so. Labor did its best but factors were against them. Now with this proving the clout is vulnerable to pressure a new pressure point would be good.
I still maintain its best to stop free for all on online gambling before it gets entrenched already too many adverts for gambling on your phone.
“Even 76 will be a hassle with the Speaker having to cast their ballot all the time.”
76 means 75-74 on the floor, so as long as the LNP can control every single vote of theirs, the Speaker’s vote won’t be needed.
(and that’s when all 5 cross benchers vote with ALP which, apart from procedural motions, probably won’t be that often.)
Martin B
The electorate voted to the left. Turnbull knows it. He needs Labor and the cross bench to counter the rabid right in his party if he finds his balls that is.
Tpof,
No. 76 means Pyne can control the house. Any vote is won 75-74 at worst.
Oh sure, watching how the rabid right try to leverage their position within the LNP in the next parliament is going to be a massive popcorn-fest.
Any scandal prone LNP members?
martin b @ #134 Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 12:00 pm
Don’t forget that the Nationals will from time to time object to proposals, with some members crossing the floor occasionally. This wasn’t so much of a problem in the last parliament.
Any scandal prone LNP members?
Can a duck swim?
martin b @ #134 Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 12:00 pm
OK. Get it now. Will still be fun.
rossmcg @ #141 Thursday, July 7, 2016 at 12:09 pm
If the msm pretends it’s not an issue, will it be?
MichaelPascoe01: So on a scale of disasters deserving royal commissions, how do Pink Batts compare with Iraq? #ChilcotReport
Morrison presser
I think Turnbull would need 77 seats.
You simply cannot have the Speaker having to cast a vote on, potentially, every disputed procedural motion, day-in, day-out.
You need a majority plus a clear extra 1 to preserve the office of the Speaker’s dignity.
I know it won’t always come down to this, but it will be subject to the whim of Labor – to ambush or not to ambush?
Given the lurks and perks associated with being Speaker there would be a few in the TCT party room who would not be happy to see an Indi in the job.
and I can just see Mal telling the party room what he wants.
I can see Labor if parliamentary process allow it introducing a Marriage Equality Bill every week. After all one of their expert strategists Peta Credlin has told Labor its an excellent way to divide the LNP
The problem for the Coalition and Turnbull is that there are many different possible causes that they can correlate with their falling popularity, some polar opposite (policies too Right, not Right enough, leadership changes, etc) and they are going to pick the ones that suit them. Getting it wrong (as we here think they are) leads to their acting in a way that will only exacerbate their problem.
@ Bushfire – 76 gives you a majority without requiring the speaker’s vote.
76./150 becomes 75/149 after appointing a speaker, which means 75 votes for and 74 against.
The speaker’s vote is only needed when at least one member abstains.