Galaxy: 57-43 to Labor

A second Galaxy poll in consecutive weekends confirms last week’s disaster for Tony Abbott, although hypothetical voting intention questions under a Turnbull or Bishop scenario are slightly less bad for him than those served up by ReachTEL.

The News Corporation tabloids take a second bite of the Galaxy cherry in successive weekends, to mark the occasion of the looming Liberal leadership spill. It confirms last week’s shattering result for Tony Abbott in putting the Labor lead at 57-43. The inevitable questions on voting intention under Malcolm Turnbull and Julie Bishop aren’t quite as dramatic as ReachTEL’s, with Labor maintaining leads of 51-49 under a Turnbull scenario and 53-47 under Bishop. On a straight question of whether Tony Abbott should resign, 55% say yes and 35% say no, in case anyone’s wondering what might distinguish this leadership change from what happened in 2010. Primary votes and such to follow. HT: GhostWhoVotes.

UPDATE: All primary votes were perfectly unchanged on last week, with the Coalition on 36%, Labor on 43%, the Greens on 11% and Palmer United on 3%. A further question found only 24% anticipating that Tony Abbott would lead the Liberals to the next election, compared with 63% who believe he will not.

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

1,083 comments on “Galaxy: 57-43 to Labor”

Comments Page 4 of 22
1 3 4 5 22
  1. [urnbull says TA has shown great respect for the partyroom by saying the meeting will be on Tuesday not rushing it to Monday]

    In other words, I don’t have the numbers yet Tony but I may by Tuesday.

  2. Another barb from Malcolm saying “You can never consult your party room enough”. A huge complaint from back benchers has been Abbott not bothering.

  3. Straight after Turnbull 24 showed Abbott on his morning jog. One question.

    [Do you support Hockey as Treasurer?]

    Answer

    [Of course]

    It might be the jog but Abbott did not look happy to me

  4. Hilarious. Abbott moves the meeting to Monday, less than an hour after Turnbull commends Abbott for leaving the meeting to Tuesday.

    Student politics.

  5. Turnbull just said on Sky :

    “I respect the party room. You can never consult with the party room enough”

    A direct attack on Tony Abbott and his “Captain’s picks” and a boost for himself with the back bench.

    He was able to speak for several minutes without one three word slogan and never mentioned the Labor Party once!

  6. [Remember Abbott saying wtte that they would implement the policy they said they would, not the policy everyone thought they said they would? This showed clearly that they thought the voters of Australia are idiots.]

    For sure that was the first (of many) big self inflicted beatings to Abbott and his government’s credibility. “not the policy everyone thought” is right up there with “sleep walk into changing the government in a fit of absent mindedness almost” back in 07 and “It’s a classic example of what goes wrong when in a fit of absent mindedness people elect Labor Governments.” as a blazing siren to the contempt Abbott holds the people in.

  7. “@danielhurstbne: Abbott says he’s asked whip to call special party room mtg for 9am on Mon to consider the spill motion. Brings forward from Tues #libspill”

  8. Meeting had to be Monday – otherwise you have a Question Time like Simon Crean’s last where everyone knew he was gone and Liberals were “laying off” him out of respect.

    But Newspoll workers will be crunching the number all Sunday night to get the poll out Monday morning before this meeting anyway.

  9. Hah.. Turnbull on his doorstop saying that he preferred for there to be more time. I wonder if Peta was watching that interview?

  10. Morning all. Well the Liberal leadership contenders are clear now. I am a little surprised Turnbull did not announce his intentions more decisively once it was on. The prospect of Abbott winning round one is now greater. Of course, if he scrapes over the line, he is as wounded as Clarke and Dawes’ pet lame duck, Tones.

    Abbott confirming support for Hockey shows he needs every vote though. Without cabinet solidarity Abbott would be finished. Hockey would be reshuffled by any leader still in full control.

  11. Have noticed a certain fatigue in the general population about this leadership fight. Sure twitter is having some fun with it but offline people are definitely tuning out – Summer is meant to be a break from politics.

  12. If I were a wavering backbencher, Abbott’s bringing forward of the meeting would push towards change. It’s clear Abbott is panicking; doesn’t want another horror Newspoll splashed on newspapers under the arms of MPs as they arrive for the meeting; realises the numbers are moving against him.

  13. lizzie

    [Then why doesn’t he just put out a written statement?]
    He wants to dazzle wavering MPs with his soaring oratory ? 😆

  14. “@Kieran_Gilbert: Liberal backbencher on the partyroom move to Monday “And Abbott wonders why we think he doesn’t take us seriously” #libspill”

  15. Abbott’s “door is always open” is not quite true. A criticiam of the PM needs to be one-on-one.

    [Colleagues could always make an appointment with Howard’s office if they really needed to see him. But to most MPs, banging on the Prime Minister’s door was reserved for urgent matters, not to waste time with gossip and small talk.

    Abbott’s dinner plans with colleagues are different – a little more stilted and formal – and perhaps illustrative of many complaints about the “command and control” manner of his office and consultative style.

    When not too busy, on Tuesdays during sitting weeks Abbott will host a dinner in his parliamentary suite. A guest list is drawn up by his office and invitations are sent out. A group of about 15 are assembled, a mix of frontbenchers and backbenchers, sometimes a few key staff.

    A topic might be set as a theme to discuss. Or Abbott will simply ask those around the table to raise any issues of concern.

    The conversation can be robust, but the dynamic is different to the Howard approach. Less spontaneous and random. It takes a certain boldness to raise criticism in a forum where you’ve been invited – and while we might expect our politicians to be fearless advocates, anyone can find it nerve-racking to be called before the boss. Career limiting too, if one is not careful.]

    http://www.theage.com.au/comment/company-of-colleagues-needed-at-captains-table-20150207-13704p.html

  16. [If I were a wavering backbencher, Abbott’s bringing]

    I agree. This definitely demonstrates that Abbott hasn’t changed – he’s manipulating the situation to his own advantage rather than allowing the party room to take some time to reach its decision. Coupled with the leaks against the people putting forward the spill motion and it’s clear that Abbott should not remain leader.

  17. Morning all.

    Have just seen Ian MacDonald interviewed on ABC24 about the leadership. Why does nobody challenge the Liberals’ assertions that Abbott won’t be switched out because they aren’t the Labor party, when we’ve seen 3 first term Liberal state/territory leaders dumped?

  18. [Peter van Onselen @vanOnselenP · 29m 29 minutes ago
    Tony Abbott bringing the party room meeting forward to Monday, right after Malcolm Turnbull said it should stay on Tuesday as planned.]

    A PBer predicted this would happen. Can’t remember who though.

  19. “@TonyHWindsor: Mr Abbott demonstrates the problem once again by shifting Party meeting .Short term self service not long term leadership .”do anything”.”

Comments Page 4 of 22
1 3 4 5 22

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *