BludgerTrack: 51.2-48.8 to Labor

Another strong result for Labor from a major pollster pushes them to giddy new heights on the BludgerTrack poll aggregate, which has now branched out into leader satisfaction and preferred prime minister.

A strong result for Labor from Newspoll sees blue and red cross paths on the BludgerTrack two-party preferred aggregate, with Labor seizing its first substantial lead since the aggregate opened for business late last year. Labor has also been boosted to one shy of an absolute majority on the seat projection, with the Coalition crashing to 70. The state breakdowns find Labor back to 2010 territory in Victoria, and doing rather a lot better than that in Queensland and Western Australia.

While mostly the work of Newspoll, part of the shift to Labor is the result of a modelling tweak to deal with the particular difficulty posed by Essential Research, which instead of favouring a particular party over time appears to have a bias towards stability. Bias adjustments based on its pre-election performance have accordingly been correcting for a lean to Labor that disappeared together with the Coalition’s polling ascendancy. So I will instead be plotting the trend of Essential’s deviation from the model’s results, with the bias corrections adjusting over time.

The other big news on the BludgerTrack front is that it is now tracking leadership ratings as well as voting intention. Such data is available fortnightly from Newspoll and monthly from Nielsen and Essential Research, which at this state leaves a fairly shallow pool. It is nonetheless clear from the sidebar that meaningful trends are already evident. I am excluding from consideration the personal ratings from ReachTEL, whose refusal to give respondents an uncommitted option leads to idiosyncratic results.

In other news, Crikey subscribers might care to enjoy my article yesterday on the inquiry into the missing WA Senate ballots.

UPDATE: Kevin Bonham offers an excellent review of what the polls say, and what they mean (and don’t mean).

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

2,310 comments on “BludgerTrack: 51.2-48.8 to Labor”

Comments Page 35 of 47
1 34 35 36 47
  1. BH

    [Good on Louise for leaving home to work and live with her boyfriend but this is the 21st century. I wonder how he felt about being hidden away from the media to protect Abbott’s inane views on modern relationships.]

    Remembering of course that Abbott had a child in an earlier relationship before he married.

  2. Mark Latham in the AFR. Oh dear. Peta Kremlin!!!

    [MARK LATHAM
    When Tony Abbott promised a government of no surprises, he couldn’t have been talking about his media strategy. Since September 7, commentators have been befuddled by the Liberal leader’s low-key, regimented style, under the iron fist of his chief of staff, Peta Kremlin. Against expectations, Australia has a Mogadon prime minister.]

    http://www.afr.com/p/national/arts_saleroom/tony_abbott_and_the_iron_fist_of_yPLdvCVaw3AHyk9Siok1PN

  3. confessions the point Iwas making was that someone else was talking procurement.

    However no you have to focus on the clever wordplay of coincidence regarding the daughter. Even though the tweet made the point about procurement and I specifically referred to it.

  4. Diog

    don’t see anywhere where anyone was attacked for being nice, or even for being Liberal.

    The point being made is one about the role and responsibilities of those on protective detail.

  5. Diogenes@1683

    Bligh saying Newman would end up in jail was one of the dumbest, most desperate things said in a campaign. Basically she told everyone she was prepared to lie, cheat, smear without any basis to stay in power and she got what was coming to her.

    zoomster wants you to prove it. 😛

  6. Dio @ 1686

    If they disown the past two terms they’re also disowning policy. So then they have to somehow squash into their soundbite that they still believe in their own policy.

  7. So now all those who correct the twitter lunacy that 1) Abbott’s daughter is working for BMW, and 2) that her appointment with the ATC was a cunning plot for BMW to win the tender for the PM’s vehicle are Obeid drones.

    Well done guytaur. You’ve officially jumped the frickin shark.

  8. bemused

    [zoomster wants you to prove it]

    Incorrect. You’re always going on about other people’s lack of comprehension, so you think you’d try harder yourself.

    I’m not defending Bligh’s comments. I’m disputing that they led to a bigger ALP loss than was predicted anyway, and asking those who dispute THAT to provide actual figures to back it up.

    The Queensland loss was bigger than expected, but my understanding was it was because of the way the seats fell (that is, the polling was accurate, but the number of seats lost was disproportionate).

  9. confessions

    Welldone with your red herrings a good try at diverting from the point of Tony Abbott not following rules.

    Something the Liberals would be jumping all over Labor for and with far worse comments than something fishy

  10. Sean Tisme@1647

    All anyone has said is has this fact been part of Tony Abbott’s decision?


    No, you’ve been told this but have sticky stuff in your ears.

    The Holden Tender for the Bomb Proof Car:

    1. Didn’t meet international standards for terrorism level protection and required a 3rd party to bodge a supplied Holden Body, rather than Holden building it from scratch

    2. Even though it wasn’t international standards for terrorism protection, ended up being significantly MORE expensive than the BMW alternative in the magnitude of 2-3 times the cost per vehicle

    Now unless the Government completely ignored the tender process and hand selected the most expensive, worst designed vehicle… Holden wouldn’t have won. Please try to let this sink into your thick.. thick… skull.

    Ah yes, the bomb proof BMW, as recommended by 9 out of 10 Tin Pot, Third World, Dictators every where.

  11. [I’m not defending Bligh’s comments.]

    I will. I think they were exaggerated, and politically damaging to her, but his behaviour in office has been atrocious. He may have committed no crimes and he may never go to jail but he is dangerously unconcerned with doing the right thing.

  12. zoomster@1700

    bemused

    All news to me. I don’t even know what drugs you were on.


    You said – on more than one occasion – that it was clear my medication was affecting my thinking.

    (Trust you to try and wriggle out of that with a bit of wordplay).

    Oh I see. When I was making excuses for you.

    You yourself mentioned it on several occasions.

  13. guytaur:

    If you want to question the probity of the tender process then do it without reference to Bridget Abbott. Until we have clear evidence to the contrary, the two issues are completely unrelated, no matter how many twitter users are trying to connect the two.

  14. MTBW@1701

    BH

    Good on Louise for leaving home to work and live with her boyfriend but this is the 21st century. I wonder how he felt about being hidden away from the media to protect Abbott’s inane views on modern relationships.


    Remembering of course that Abbott had a child in an earlier relationship before he married.

    Not quite.

    Turns out he was not the father.

  15. confessions

    I posted some tweets being clever about the procurement process. You decided that focusing on Abbott’s daughter was the important thing.

  16. [Welldone with your red herrings a good try at diverting from the point of Tony Abbott not following rules.]

    Um, it was you not me who introduced Bridget Abbott to this. Not once, but 3 or 4 times now.

    And it was you not me who introduced Eddie Obeid. Not once, but twice.

    Neither of these people have anything to do with Abbott’s vehicle.

  17. [You decided that focusing on Abbott’s daughter was the important thing.]

    No, I decided it was important to correct your absurd accusations.

  18. confessions@1710

    So now all those who correct the twitter lunacy that 1) Abbott’s daughter is working for BMW, and 2) that her appointment with the ATC was a cunning plot for BMW to win the tender for the PM’s vehicle are Obeid drones.

    Well done guytaur. You’ve officially jumped the frickin shark.

    10 out of 10 today confessions!

    I will have to revise my opinion about you being usually wrong. You are 100% right today. 😉

  19. zoomster@1713

    bemused

    zoomster wants you to prove it


    Incorrect. You’re always going on about other people’s lack of comprehension, so you think you’d try harder yourself.

    I’m not defending Bligh’s comments. I’m disputing that they led to a bigger ALP loss than was predicted anyway, and asking those who dispute THAT to provide actual figures to back it up.

    The Queensland loss was bigger than expected, but my understanding was it was because of the way the seats fell (that is, the polling was accurate, but the number of seats lost was disproportionate).

    WRONG.

    There was a final collapse of the Labor vote from its already disastrous level.

    The tactics of desperation backfired badly.

  20. confessions

    The relation between the two is Tony Abbott and is a clever way of pointing out the procurement thing. The most anyone has said is something fishy. A good hook to get people to think.

    However somehow in PB land that was made into an attack on the integrity of the daughter. No such thing ever happened.

    That is why the Obeid comparison is apt. Its such thinking that let him get in.

    Think first of the integrity of government process. If you had you would have seen that there was no attack on Abbott’s daughter and that direct job or indirect was not the point. The point was BMW and Abbott.

  21. guytaur@1721

    bemused

    No you are ignoring like others that the subject is rules in government. Obeid ignored procurement rules as ICAC has found.

    I haven’t a clue how this relates to the current discussion and I have been consistently calling for Obeid and his scummy lot to be (metaphorically) put to the sword for longer than just about anyone else.

  22. Arguing about who asked who to the races is soooooo much more important than understanding what is going on with the TPP. Obviously. Because the damn 2012 Sydney racing carnival is the hot topic here today. Sigh…..

  23. DN

    Labor can disown the backbiting and still taut the policies.

    I really think Labor should work on the idea the voters never really wanted Abbott and now they know why.

  24. MTBW,

    [My son’s mate was just saying how kind Margie Abbott was to them – is that a sin now or is it covered in any rule book?

    Middle of winter sitting in a car all night and someone brings you something to eat – shame on them!]

    I can see a few breaches of protocol there.

    First, if it really was Margie, why wasn’t she safely indoors doing the ironing as Tones would have it?

    And second, how did the protection guys know it really was Margie? She could have been an Indonesian foreign agent look-a-like, who laced their lammies with cyanide.

    Those security men make Maxwell Smart look like James Bond.

  25. Acerbic Conehead

    [I can see a few breaches of protocol there.

    First, if it really was Margie, why wasn’t she safely indoors doing the ironing as Tones would have it?

    And second, how did the protection guys know it really was Margie? She could have been an Indonesian foreign agent look-a-like, who laced their lammies with cyanide.

    Those security men make Maxwell Smart look like James Bond.]

    You nailed it and lets put them gaol!

  26. Dio, it sounds like one of those too clever messages with all these nice, logical theories about how it will be received where instead listeners just take away what they will :P.

  27. Off to pay for my new 4WD.

    First time I have ever been able to afford a brand new car, and I can pay cash…..

    feeling very chuffed with myself

  28. Diogs,

    RE Hird:

    Essendon have won nothing. It cost $1.5mill to buy out Matthew Knights contract when he came on board, they have copped a fine of $2.5 mill, they have lost draft picks so will be uncompetitive. Now Hird has been paid another $1mill by Essendon to sit on the sidelines for 12 months.

    BTW, rumours are that Essendon’s Membership is about half of what would normally be expected at this time of year so there goes another few million dollars of revenue.

    Of course, as John Fahey has announced that Essendon are on the cusp of players and officials being charged with drug cheating charges.

    Any more victories and they’ll be shipped off to Indonesia and become the Bali Bombers.

Comments Page 35 of 47
1 34 35 36 47

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *