The latest Morgan face-to-face poll, conducted entirely over last weekend, has Labor’s lead at 56.5-43.5, down from 57.5-42.5 the week before and back where it was a fortnight earlier. Labor is down two points on the primary vote to 45 per cent, the Coalition is up half a point to 37.5 per cent and the Greens are steady on 9 per cent.
UPDATE (28/2): Sydney’s Sun Herald newspaper has published a Taverner poll of 609 NSW voters with a remarkable headline figure of 50-50 on two-party preferred. However, Labor’s primary vote lead of 42 per cent to 39 per cent makes clear this figure is askew. Clearly Taverner have derived it by asking minor supporters where their preferences will go, which from the small sample of such respondents (about 115) has produced a non-credible flow of 58-42 to the Coalition. Using the more reliable method of extrapolating the preference flow from the last election (62-38 to Labor) produces an entirely plausible two-party split of 54-46 to Labor, representing no change on the 2007 election result (53.7-46.3).
Squiggle:
To quote Der Spiegel:
http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/0,1518,679764,00.html
Smart move to give Combet responsibility for the home insulation program. He will not only smack the opposition around in QT on that issue but his attack on CC deniers in the opposition has been very strong. The more questions they ask him the more bruises they’ll suffer.
If Labor got over it, why did they cry about the Pacific Solution for years despite it being highly successful and then scrap it, even though they voted for it?
I would fully support a Labor government bringing back the measures immediately. Nauru probably just needs a dust off and it’ll be back to business!
We need to consider the possibility that Garrett asked to be excused responsibility for the next installation program.
I remember hearing comments (maybe it was George M on Insiders) as to why Peter Garrett would want to continue suffering the attacks in the media and from opposition. The personal cost to Garrett must have been huge and its quite possible he didn’t want to go around again.
My view all along is that he has done OK, all things considered.
The real attack should be on the decision makers who chose to burn through the insulation industry in order to provide stimulus to the Australian economy.
copy and paste and send to the abc
well i hope the ladies of the drum read this
TheTruthHurts
i have ever bothered to comment to you before. but ree
Morgan then the truth may hurt
ore Combet trivia:
http://www.aph.gov.au/house/members/firstspeech.asp?id=YW6
The role of Combet was played by Daniel Frederiksen in the 2007 Australian Broadcasting Corporation television series Bastard Boys, dramatising the 1998 Australian waterfront dispute. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Combet
TTH said
So what’s your point? That Labor was hypocritical? If that’s the case what does that make today’s Liberal party? At least Labor has moved on whereas the Liberals are still sliding around in the gutter.
Comment?
Truthy,
With unemployment at 5.3% and apparently declining, you’ll find they are out working to make a better Australia for us all. Just like the blocs of immigrants from earlier generations.
He’s also an ex-union man who most voters associate with the Your Rights At Work campaign. Having him as the face of the scheme now deadens the opposition’s industrial manslaughter attack.
VG point confessions
I feeling really good about this appointment.
We need to consider the possibility that Garrett asked to be excused responsibility for the next installation program.
now i hope they tel the story about Mr.Garrett and his tragic story when a boy
Thansk Stephen D, hadn’t seen that before ( what is a speigal by the way)
But it seems like it is Der Speigel that is outraged, whereas the politicians quoted are more measured.
For example, this from Gordon Brown on Feb 17 from another source
the prime minister told London’s LBC radio station: “We are looking at this at this very moment. …The evidence has got to be assembled ….and it is necessary for us to accumulate that evidence before we can make statements.”
I wish for similarly measured statements from Rudd and Smith
Now they will have an engeneer to deal with ion qt they will not have clue
I think Rudd has done the right thing. Combet is excellent and will nullify the issue.
Ron
My opinion is basically worthless on Arab-Israeli stuff.
Greg Combet is a very impressive politician who will expose the Liberals hypocrisy regarding industrial safety. Great move Mr. Rudd
i suggested him ona site weeks ago i went through all the ministers and outer ministers
history. and found he was an engineer Not saying any one would take notice of me and they would not.
it makes sense to me to give a person a job that fits his qualifications.
so i feel a little O well thats great.
if i could stand it i would look at thier c.v but i feel ill when i go there.
i have valed from today never ever to go to an abc site again so i can stay sain
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/western-australia-suffers-biggest-cut-in-gst-revenue/story-e6frg6nf-1225834838383
Ooops poor Buswell – he really needs that pork-for-regions money now. Guess the budget surplus was a really non-core promise.
BH
Have a look at Kev with Kristina playing basketball
He looks at home reading with the kids too 😉
Not looking like he’s under too much pressure to me!
http://www.abc.net.au/news/video/2010/02/26/2831540.htm
How long before the opposition attack Combet for being an ex union man who is now over regulating the home insulation industry? They’ll consider safety to be an impediment to small business’ maximising profit.
I suspect Opposition questions to Greg Combet will be very few & far between. If the Howard government feared anyone more than Greg Combet, I’ve yet to hear about it. He’s up there with Julia Gillard as the MP local Libs & Nats are most terrified will succeed Rudd. Just the “scalps” he took in the campaigns mentioned below are a good indication why (& one of them’s still on the Oppo Front Bench)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greg_Combet
Then they’ll be hypocrites given the fuss they’ve made over the deaths. Personally I’d love to see Combet mess with their heads by musing about tighter regulatory safeguards. LOL.
Adelaide doesn’t even rate a mention.:(
Finally, NSW is getting a bigger slice of the GST pie. Now, if only the NSW govt (this one, and the next) could do something useful with it.
Surplus? The Liberal Treasurer smells debt on the horizon …
Daily Telegraph, 19 December 2008 :
http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,24822262-5014099,00.html
Not too many comments on the Morgan, I see. Quite a good result for the Govt. considering the installation and “Stokesgate” media feeding frenzies the past fortnight.
Excellent decision to get Garrett out of any areas within which he didn’t already have extensive experience prior to his political career, let alone any program involving such massive funds being spent in a cowboy dominated industry.
If the installation program was, as many have insisted, doomed from it’s conception due to an egregiously unethical and inefficient private sector, then it’s better that Garrett took one for the team.
StephenD
Posted Friday, February 26, 2010 at 4:03 pm | Permalink
“I think that’s a poor decision. It pretty much gives the MSM the scalp they’ve been after, never mind the Opposition.”
think you 1/10 rite and 90/10 wRONG
You realize I know this WHOLE Garrett affair had legs only because of 4 deaths
Because a Minister can not be over sholder of every trady in oz checking there Safety standards comply , and it IS employers responsible then it was always a sleezy Abbott pushed Media beatup
There was never going to be an end to th MSN attacks , seeing 4 people had died
So Rudd properly takes responsible for th Insulation Program meaning NO ONE was going to accuse Rudd for th deaths , AND has to defer Program to stop beatup going on
Then hypocritcaly MSN started ‘running’ th result of closing Program , workers victims losing there jobs There was no end to those hypocritical pretend care for workers storys either !! ,
Except by Rudd killin all hypocrits sleezy avenues all up , one by taking th persanel responsible , deferring th Program , and then corect acting to ‘demote’ Peter Garett
Now IF Kevin rudd had NOT done demoted Peter Garrett , after personel taking responsible and also admiting there were some thingys ( but not th deaths) that could be done better like poor qual insulation suppliers , that non demotion decision would be equal to NOT taking responsible , geez
Remember , had either Abbotts or MSN case had credibilitys , then Garrett wuld have been sacked He was NOT
demotion is price for th poor quals insulation outcome , not for deaths , not for fires
Its called a value sentense fitting th a function performed , not that th biased would see that
Diogenes,
Having sojourned in Adelaide several times, I reckon it’s the best kept secret in Australia. If I lived there, I’d want it to stay a secret and not be “rooned” by massive hordes of East Australians moving there.
According to Rudd, Garrett definitely didn’t ask to be relieved of his duties. It was Rudd’s decision to dump him.
I did comment idiot.
I said if they got over it, why did they cry about it for years. Christ they were the ones who voted for it, i’ve never seen such a whine against something they supported and WORKED!
Lib MP’s are no longer under silverspoon Turnbull, so they should be free to speak their minds on this issue, especially since Rudd’s policy on boatpeople is a failed one. This will be a big negative at the next election for Rudd as we watch another 6000 boatpeople sail in on the public tit.
Sorry, deadlink in previous post.
The Australian, 18 December 2008
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/nation/bang-goes-the-wests-boom/story-e6frg6pf-1111118361311
Mr Squiggle
Der Speigel is a weekly news magazine, like a German version of Time or Newsweek. It is the largest circulation magazine in Germany; over one million copies per week.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Der_Spiegel
I’d say Sydney is a nice place to visit, but I wouldn’t want to vote there.
Have a good weekend all.
Dio, who’s Adelaide?
Cuppa
I was talking about the election promise theat the WA Libs would keep the budget in surplus.
The place between somewhere important… and Perth I believe.
Wasn’t she a Queen, who’s pic now appears on crud plonk?
Vera,
Thanks for the link to Rudd and Keneally opening the Nat’l Indigenous Centre.
When Obama visits us, I hope that he’ll reserve some of his time to teach Rudd how to shoot a basketball. 🙂
Garrett is a joke and the fact Rudd hasnt sacked him will benefit the Libs more as they can show Rudd thinks Peter G is a first class minister yet demotes him.
Ever since Tone became leader the focus has been on the government and its failings. Three cheers for Tone!
If we take away the Morgan pro-Labor bias of 5% we end up with:
51.5% Labor
48.5% Coalition
Pretty good result for the Coalition if they can keep improving.
Glen.
In less than a year you will be speaking German again. 😉
That’s a relief. I thought that she may have been someone allegedly having an affair with a certain Premier of a certain state.
Are you on the slops already?
So what’s the answer to these two questions:
1. Did the Liberal party oppose the changes to policy in the parliament?
2. If they didn’t object doesn’t that make them hypocrites to now be complaining about the changes?
BTW, I’m not interested in comments about a change of leader enabling changes to of party opinion. I’m asking you about the party’s considered opinion rather than short term political opportunity.
Adelaide is the intellectual and cultural capital of Australia; the Athens of the Southern Hemisphere.
Although Athens is a shambolic barbarian dive now so I don’t know that whoever coined that phrase was doing us any favours.
Our gun laws are somewhat stricter than those in the States.
Scarpat @47
ROTFL 🙂
Ru that is your opinion.
Anyway we’ll have TAS maybe even SA by then in the bag!
Tone will probably limit the losses and pick up a few here and there 😀
Two and counting… it is beer o’clock afterall.
I believe silver spoon Turnbull was in charge.
NO. Becuase the policy is a failed one. You don’t continue on with a failed policy, you change it.
A 1600% increase in boatpeople is a FAILED boatpeople policy. Bring back the old laws that actually WORKED.