Newspoll: Labor 30, One Nation 31, Coalition 18 (open thread)

Another pollster finds One Nation surging to a primary vote lead, and Anthony Albanese’s personal ratings continuing to sag.

Newspoll in The Australian becomes the latest pollster to have One Nation leading on the primary vote, recording a four-point surge to 31% with Labor down one to 30%, the Coalition down two to 18% and the Greens down one to 11%. Anthony Albanese records his worst net leadership rating to date, with approval down four to 36% and disapproval up three to 60%, while Angus Taylor is down one on approval to 35% and down three on disapproval to 45%. Albanese’s lead on preferred prime minister is in from 46-38 to 44-38. The poll was conducted Monday to Thursday from a sample of 1240.

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

1,010 thoughts on “Newspoll: Labor 30, One Nation 31, Coalition 18 (open thread)”

Comments Page 21 of 21
1 20 21
  1. Cartoons Europe

    Morten Morland

    Pete Songi

    Matt

    Chapatte

    Patrick Blower

    on #Trump buying the #ChagosIslands

    Ella Baron

    Ben Jennings

    Banx #nowak
    (Some background: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cjwg387040wo)

    Del Rosso

    Le Monde Cartooning for peace: Amorim, Brazil

    Guy Venables
    One of my cartoons for Wed’s Metro (about a dog being rescued in the middle of the North Sea in a kayak. But you knew that.)

    Jonsey

  2. Dr Doolittle says:
    Wednesday, June 10, 2026 at 9:43 am

    Tricot on Tuesday at 8.42 pm

    Boerwar votes Labor, with the odd exception of 2013 when he reportedly followed the Langer line. Albert Langer was an ageing Maoist who gave his name to the High Court case affirming that preferential voting in Australia can’t be undone by trickery.

    Labor remain more popular in the ACT than anywhere east of Adelaide. It is currently inconceivable that the preferences of Labor voters in the ACT will matter one iota.

    Few Labor voters are at risk of being so upside-down as to follow the Langer line, particularly in the ACT.

    I once sold a copy of a journal critical of the old USSR to Langer, before he became notorious as a promoter of the withdrawal method of voting, which the High Court found invalid.

    There was a possibly scurrilous rumour doing the rounds that Alby used to arrive at Monash (when we were fellow students) in his mum’s Roller. It was during this time that it was reported that Bolte would be arriving at the ovals by helicopter at such and such a time. We duly arrived at the appointed hour and the appointed place. Sure enough a chopper approached. It was going to be fun
    It was fun all right. The chopper hovered overhead while bucket loads of chum, rotten fruit and other nasty liquids rained down upon us righteous ones.

    We had been suckered good and proper.

    In terms of the practicalities of a voting person in the ACT, you are right. The discussion is an in-principle discussion. It is primarily intended to get the Greens to do some very serious self-reflection on their defence and national security policies in a time when their global order assumptions are falling over very quickly indeed.

  3. Thanks, D&M.
    The Badenoch toons reminded me of the spirited Bludger discussions about appropriate tooning of Williams back in the day.

  4. I once sold a copy of a journal critical of the old USSR to Langer, before he became notorious as a promoter of the withdrawal method of voting, which the High Court found invalid.

    Dr Doolittle the court held that Langer votes were legit af and it was dealt with by the parliament.

  5. North American Cartoons

    Nick Anderson

    Clay Jones

    Joel Pett

    Bok

    Heller

    Cagle

    S Kelley

    Weyant

    Matson

    Wuerker

    Bagley

    Moudakis

    Luckovich

    The New Yorker

  6. The Trumps made $500 million – investors lost 93% of their money

    https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2026/6/9/800052639/community/the-trumps-made-500-million-investors-lost-93-of-their-money/

    Take the investors in AI Financial Corp. They have lost upward of 93% of their money. However, not all is red ink. The Trump family has walked away with millions.

    It all started with enthusiasm. Last August, Don Jr. and Eric Trump swanned up to the Nasdaq stock exchange in New York to celebrate a new business partnership with a little-known publicly traded company called Alt5 Sigma. In the deal, World Liberty Financial, the Trump cryptocurrency concern, sold $750 million worth of tokens to Alt5.

    Investors in Alt5 believed that the Trump brand would increase the tokens’ value. And, as a result, everyone would be rolling in it – or at least realize a worthwhile return. The Trumps did fine. Their end of the deal was worth $500 million, payable on the barrelhead.

    However, the value of Trump coins has declined from $45.46 to $1.66. And investors saw their equity evaporate as Alt5’s stock price declined from almost $10 to 66¢.

  7. A significant test for One Nation happens on the 17th of June when Hanson is supposed to be fronting up at the National Press Club. Don’t diarise that at this early stage because I wouldn’t be a least bit surprised if she finds a reason to back out of that commitment.

    If she does turn up, expect an incoherent mish mash of bullshit, but the real test, providing the journalists are genuine, will be when the questions are asked.

    Will we find out how much they will spend on defence and where the money will come from? I doubt it.
    Will we find out how their housing policy will affect non citizens? I doubt it.
    Will they ban abortion? Will they support wage increases? What will happen if an ABC journalist asks a difficult question?


  8. Why do they always have the board sideways?
    At least the King and Queen are on the correct colour squares.
    However, the choice of defence from black is questionable…

  9. A good contribution from Robert Reich today, which he is keen to see shared.

    It sheds quite a bit of light on what has gone wrong there, and where it may be heading.

    You’ve heard me talk about this, but I wanted to present it in a way that would be absolutely clear.

    The wealth of the richest Americans has exploded. I’m not even talking about the top 1 percent. I’m talking about the richest 0.1 percent — the top one-tenth of 1 percent.

    In the 1990s, most Americans’ wealth grew at about the same pace. But after 2010, the top 0.1 percent pulled ahead of the rest of the 1 percent, and everyone else.

    2010. Remember that year, because I want to come back to it.

    After 2018, in part because of Trump’s tax cuts for the rich that went into effect at the start of that year, America’s richest 0.1 percent are now worth more than the entire GDP of China.

    What do they do with all this money? Well, when they’re not just shooting rockets into space or building hideous trucks, they’re spending it on politics.

    Billionaire political spending in presidential elections is exploding.

    After the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United ruling, it took off.

    In the last presidential election, just 300 billionaire families spent roughly $3 billion. Those families gave an average of $10 million each — roughly 100,000 times what an average donor gave.

    And the super-rich are getting a big return on their “investment.” They’re getting more tax cuts, more deregulation, and a government that lets them get away with busting unions, exploiting workers, and monopolizing their markets while poisoning the environment.

    All so they can get even richer and accumulate even more power. So they can get even richer and accumulate even more power. And so on.

    But this vicious cycle is unsustainable, both politically and economically.

    When so much of our economy is in relatively few hands, we will inevitably get to the point where consumers cannot buy all the goods and services the economy is capable of producing. This puts the entire economy at risk.

    It’s also politically unstable because it’s inherently divisive — pitting losers against winners and laying the groundwork for an authoritarian state — where no one’s future is secure, including the super-rich.

    So we ALL have a stake in stopping this vicious cycle.

    To do this, we need to raise taxes on the rich — not to punish them but to ensure that the system works for everyone. This means raising their income taxes and taxing their wealth.

    And we need public financing for federal elections — matching public dollars to small-dollar donations in order to balance the power of super-rich and corporate donors. Many states and cities are already doing this — and it works.

    Finally, we’ve got to undo Citizens United. One way to do that is for states to follow what Montana hopes to do and what Hawaii has already done: take away the power of corporations to make political contributions in the first place.

    Look, it’s time to get big money out of politics — for all our sakes.

    Please share!

    https://robertreich.substack.com/p/inequality-isnt-just-unfair-its-dangerous?isFreemail=true&post_id=201220655&publication_id=365422&r=4m89gm&triedRedirect=true&triggerShare=true

  10. The Australian Labor Government is taking the correct stance here:

    “Australia joins sanctions against ‘extremist settlers'”
    https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2026/jun/10/australia-news-live-penny-wong-sanctions-west-bank-settlers-australian-politics-high-court-israel-palestine-settlers-immigration-ntwnfb?page=with%3Ablock-679b43ab8f08d7cb6f3007fa#block-679b43ab8f08d7cb6f3007fa

    Australia has joined the UK and other western allies in introducing sanctions against “extremist settlers” accountable for the “horrific levels of settler violence against Palestinian civilians”.

    A statement released by DFAT said:

    “In response to the deteriorating situation in the West Bank, we the Foreign Ministers of Australia, Canada, France, Norway and the United Kingdom, have taken coordinated action to introduce sanctions and other measures to hold extremist settlers accountable for the horrific levels of settler violence against Palestinian civilians.

    “Extremist violent settlers, with the backing of their supporters, continue to attack Palestinians and abuse their human rights. They use violence to displace Palestinians, destroy property and perpetuate the illegal settlement enterprise, undermining the viability of the State of Palestine and the prospects for peaceful coexistence.

    “For too long, violent settlers have been able to act with near impunity, and settlement expansion and creation of outposts continue with the support and facilitation of the Government of Israel…”

Comments Page 21 of 21
1 20 21

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *