There probably won’t be any polls this week, with the fortnightly Essential Research and tri-weekly Newspoll having dropped last week. But there will of course be a Northern Territory election on Saturday, which is the subject of its own thread here.
Other news:
• Sue Bailey of the Launceston Examiner reports that Eric Abetz is expected to retain the top position on the Tasmanian Liberals’ Senate ticket at the next election, contrary to earlier reports that Jonathan Duniam was planning to topple him, after the two “kissed and made up”. However, the report further says that “another senior Liberal” is doing the numbers for the third candidate who will be seeking re-election, Wendy Askew, who filled the Senate vacancy created last year when her brother, David Bushby, took up a diplomatic post in the United States. Also: “It is believed Prime Minister Scott Morrison wants the pre-selection delayed until next year so as not to be a distraction during the COVID-19 pandemic.”
• Michael Koziol of the Age/Herald has a story on the willing Liberal preselection contest in Warringah, which Tony Abbott lost to independent Zali Steggall at last year’s election. Abbott loyalists are said to be advancing the claim of Sacha Grebe, a former Scott Morrison staffer and employee of lobbying firm DPG Advisory, whose principal is David Gazard, a Morrison ally and candidate for Eden-Monaro in 2010. Grebe backer and local party activist Walter Villatora is engaged in a seemingly forlorn bid to have the preselection held as soon as possible. Others said to be in the hunt are “state MP Natalie Ward, state executive member Alex Dore and Menzies Research Centre manager Tim James”.
• There has been a change in the party balance of the Senate with Rex Patrick’s resignation from the Centre Alliance to sit as an independent. The Advertiser ($) has also reported the party’s two remaining members, Stirling Griff in the Senate and Mayo MP Rebekha Sharkie, are the subject of approaches from Liberals to defect to the party, although the notion is meeting bitter resistance from conservatives.
• The results of Tasmania’s recent upper house elections have been finalised, and as expected have resulted in the election of Labor’s Bastian Seidel in the seat of Huon south of Hobart, and of Liberal candidate Jo Palmer in Rosevears. The former was achieved over independent incumbent Robert Armstrong by the comfortable margin of 7.3% at the final count (12,284 votes to 9,152), but the latter proved a close run thing, with Jo Palmer landing 260 votes clear of independent candidate Janie Finlay, 11,492 votes (50.6%) or 11,232 (49.4%).
Bonza
Political party labels don’t apply to supporting issues like gay marriage because i know someone that was all upset Liberals were going to sink gay marriage and i warned him not to get ahead of the result and sure enough they went strongly yes.
Welcome back Nath. Your humour has been missed.
And we wont go into why the US didnt get a more progressive president in 2000.
Nicholas, firstly, Clinton significantly reduced poverty in the US during his term. Secondly, I posted earlier about a lecture given by Reich where he answered questions for ages afterwards. The focus was on the Clinton administration and why they did what they did.
Mistakes were made. Decisions were made that had delayed adverse consequences. Compromises, many compromises were considered necessary purely to right the myth that the left were bad economic managers. They believed it essential, after 12 years of Republican rule (20 of the previous 24 years?), that the Democrat party improve its standing in this area. I am not going to defend all their policies. But if you tie progressive policy with legislative achievement… then Clinton is probably the most successful in living memory and his economic achievements during his term have increased the Democrats electability in a generally very conservative and very capitalist nation.
GG
Well, the Dems think he can influence the vote in their favour.
All Kasich does is give rusted on Republicans the green light to vote for Biden.
Which means he is worth his weight in gold (if not more).
Spray @ #1452 Tuesday, August 18th, 2020 – 6:57 pm
Fuck him and the camel he rode in on!
Wholly bejebus batman! When you get the opportunity to have an elder statesman of the GOP offer to come to the DNC conference and back the Democrat candidate you give the man as much time as you can.
But yes. More AOC would be good.
Maude Lynne @ #1454 Tuesday, August 18th, 2020 – 7:00 pm
Don’t know . What’s your point?
Greensborough Growler @ #1455 Tuesday, August 18th, 2020 – 7:01 pm
Can’t fault the balance here!
poroti:
Tuesday, August 18, 2020 at 3:44 pm
Mavis
[‘I take it Sean and Tucker think the US is in danger of having extreme left-communist-socialist-stalinist policies inflicted upon the nation should those Democrats win .’]
You’re on the money.
_________________________________________________________
I’m pleased that WB has allowed nath back albeit with supervision.
__________________________________________________________
Cat:
I’d like to see you back posting too.
Dan Andrews will be breathing a sigh of relief tonight.
Not only has there been an infection of a security guard in NSW but he also worked at… drumroll… Flemington Markets, which has had its own cases.
Greensborough Growler @ #1450 Tuesday, August 18th, 2020 – 4:56 pm
In theory, yes. The fact that the Republican Party has morphed from the party of Lincoln to the party of Reagan to the party of Trump may well undo that theory.
Lincoln Republicans would already be doing just that or staying at home.
Reagan Republicans (the never Trumpers, Lincoln Project, et al) may be swayed. Or not.
Trump Republicans will continue to vote for “their” guy, and may well show up in record numbers.
There’s no point in looking at polls showing a decisive Biden victory as they may well be as accurate as they were in 2016.
Since Trump has turned American politics on its head, I’d be very cautious about making any predictions about any US election from here on.
BB
I’m looking forward to Gladys fronting hostile pressers. Well, I can dream…
nath has risen!
LVT is wetting himself but he could be Nath anyway. Who would know?
Lars Von Trier @ #1463 Tuesday, August 18th, 2020 – 7:12 pm
A sockpuppet is not that big a promotion.
Well steve davis – most people disappear without a trace on PB but nath was being talked about non stop on PB for days and weeks since the unfortunate events of that Saturday.
Its a measure of nath’s high impact contribution.
Now that Nath is being allowed back I’m leaving.
Pity…
William you need to get control of your blog. You are skating on very thin legal ice my friend.
C@t you should come back too! Turn away from your craven embrace of the elder bully boy BB and come back towards the light!
In William’s PB house there are many rooms!
Grant @ #1467 Tuesday, August 18th, 2020 – 5:22 pm
He mentioned earlier that he was off to the pub. By the time he gets back to read that he’ll either be half-bladdered or will miss it altogether.
So Grant what is the thin legal ice? Do tell?
Thought so – no substance whatsoever,
LVT
Sounds like self promotion of a sockpuppet. I have thought your both the same person for a long time.
No steve davis I am from Sydney and nath is from Melbourne.
“nath has risen!”
***
There you go WB.
A cesspit of your own creation.
Cheers.
LVT
Throwing insults at C@t is very unlikely to entice her back. Why should she bother?
I don’t think Grant’s going to be joining Yabba at his friendly neighbourhood Mensa meeting any time soon.
Danama Papers
Thanks for the Sanders link. Really good speech.
It was disappointing that he couldn’t go the extra mile for Hillary. We ended up with Trump.
Lizzie says:
Tuesday, August 18, 2020 at 7:29 pm
LVT
Throwing insults at C@t is very unlikely to entice her back. Why should she bother?
______________________
How exactly was my comment an insult to c@t? She made a poor judgement call allying herself with BB. I was encouraging her to return and ditch the bully boy connection.
Lizzie @ #1575 Tuesday, August 18th, 2020 – 5:29 pm
What happened to C@t?
Thanks very much Lars, Mavis, Spray and Firefox. I missed you guys.
We went from Clinton to Nath. Now that is some jump.
If you think “craven embrace” is polite…
The frasmotic pericombobulations last night was bad enough.
A sock puppet convention is too much; catch you on the flip side.
Oh well it was good to have Zoomster back while it lasted.
Lars
Your comment was an insult, was intended as an insult and your denial it was an insult only shows it was.
Same for most of your comments.
Fess WB made a comment to C@t that she took offense to and has either left or is having a break.
Confessions
C@t was hauled over the coals by William for “moronic” posts.
This is very sad. Some very pleasant posters surfaced.
well lizzie and mike hilliard read the posts at the end of last night.
I think the point was c@t chose to defend the indefensible in BB.
She made a bad call and it was craven. But we can all forgive and forget.
Or are you actually going to argue BB’s derogatory comments are ok?
Danama Papers:
[‘There’s no point in looking at polls showing a decisive Biden victory as they may well be as accurate as they were in 2016.’]
While a Biden victory’s not set in cement, the first day of the DNC went exceptionally well. The slight problem, however, may come in the four presidential debates, both protagonists exhibiting cognitive decline. On Biden’s side is his political experience, but it only takes one major mistake to stuff it up for either candidate – here I’m thinking of the Reagan’s -v- Mondale’s exchange when the latter referred to Old Ronnie’s age:
[“Reagan responded: “Not at all, Mr. Trehwitt, and I want you to know that also I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit, for political purposes, my opponent’s youth, and inexperience. If I still have time, I might add, Mr. Trehwitt, I might add that it was Seneca, or it was Cicero, I don’t know which, that said, ‘If it was not for the elders correcting the mistakes of the young, there would be no state.”]
Reagan was a B-grade actor, but with dear Nancy’s encouragement (a fellow B-grade actor), she instinctively knew of the importance of a punch-line. The rest is history.
To clarify, Nath isn’t back because he was never gone in the first place. He’s been in moderation all along. Early indications are that his clearance rate will be pretty low.
davidwh:
Wow the things you miss when you go to work!
BH @ #1477 Tuesday, August 18th, 2020 – 5:30 pm
Au contraire. He did campaign for Clinton back then, and appeared at a few of her rallies. Too little, too late perhaps, but he was there.
I can’t see Nath. Maybe he will become the ghost that posts.
I’m looking forward to The Australian publishing rants about Gladys’ failures to contain the virus similar to those they have done on Andrews.
This one by John Ferguson could serve as a template:
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/hotel-quarantine-fallout-will-shape-victorian-politics-for-years/news-story/c93025087a9ecd5c7622e369933dde7f
And the rant continues for 8 more single-sentence paragraphs.
It is followed by over 400 comments, mostly calling for Dan’s downfall.
But I know she will be gently supported by kindly journalists full of understanding.
Pass me the bucket.
Fess I don’t think it was one of PB’s high points so working was probably more enjoyable for you. 🙂
DP
I stand corrected then. He certainly made an impression for Biden today.
nath’s back eh. I’m thinkin’ 🙂
Test
Ah, nath became Herr Schrödinger’s cat.