Courtesy of The Australian comes the quarterly Newspoll breakdowns for July-September, providing big-sample results state-by-state and my gender and metropolitan/non-metropolitan. This suggests Labor’s recent Newspoll recovery has been driven entirely by Queensland, where the Coalition’s lead shrunk to 58-42 from 65-35 in April-June. Elsewhere, the position is stable at 56-44 in New South Wales, Labor is up a point in both Victoria and South Australia to respectively lead 52-48 and trail 52-48, and they have actually gone backwards in Western Australia to 58-42, from what was probably an overly generous 55-45 last time. In aggregate, the result shows the Coalition’s lead down to 54-46 from 56-44 in the previous quarter, with little change in the leaders’ personal ratings, the survey period having mostly preceded the recent improvement in Julia Gillard’s ratings and decline in Tony Abbott’s. The results show the standing of each essentially stable across all demographics.
UPDATE (8/10/12): Cathy Alexander at Crikey reports Essential Research has Labor gaining a further point on the primary vote to 37%, with the Coalition steady at 47%. Essential has shown Labor gaining five points on the primary vote over six weeks, to reach a level not seen since March last year. The Coalition’s two-party preferred lead is unchanged at 53-47. Essential has smartly chosen this week to repeat an exercise from a year ago concerning trust in media personalities, finding Alan Jones among the most famous but least trusted (22% trust against 67% do not trust). The others best recognised were Laurie Oakes and George Negus, with the former slightly edging out the latter on trust (72% compared with 69%). Only 17% registered support for funding cuts to the ABC, with around a third each wanting funding maintained or increased. Opinion on government regulation of the media was fairly evenly spread between wanting more, less and the same.
UPDATE (6/10/12): The table below compares quarterly state-level figures for both Newspoll and Nielsen for both the July-September and April-June quarters. In the case of Newspoll, sample sizes range from 700 for South Australia to 1700 for NSW, while Nielsen’s range from about 1300 for NSW to fewer than 400 for Western Australia and South Australia/Northern Territory. The two pollsters agree in showing Labor recovering by six or seven points in Queensland, which is corroborated by Galaxy their polls conducted in Queensland roughly in the middle of the two polling periods had the Coalition lead shrinking from 64-36 to 57-43. Both Newspoll and Nielsen have produced steady results of around 50-50 in Victoria, but a disparity emerges in the case of NSW, where Labor shot from 40% to 46% in Nielsen while remaining steady on 44% in Newspoll. Caution should be taken in comparing the smaller states given Nielsen’s small samples.
Newspoll Nielsen Newspoll Nielsen Jul-Sep Jul-Sep Apr-Jun Apr-Jun Total 46 46 44 42 NSW 44 46 44 40 Victoria 52 49 51 50 Queensland 42 40 35 34 SA/NT 48 50 47 47 WA 42 42 45 39
UPDATE 2 (7/10/12): Not forgetting …
Seat of the week: O’Connor
Covering rural and remote areas in the south of Western Australia, O’Connor delivered the WA Nationals a House of Representatives seat at the last election for the first time since 1974, with their candidate Tony Crook unseating Liberal veteran Wilson Tuckey. Crook’s win followed a redistribution which fundamentally rearranged the state’s remote areas, abolishing the vast seat of Kalgoorlie and dividing its territory between O’Connor and the new seat of Durack. This saw O’Connor absorb a vast swathe of the state’s south-east, including Esperance and the Goldfields. Whereas the whole of the state’s Wheatbelt had previously been in O’Connor, a transfer of 38,000 voters in its northern half (including Merredin) to Durack was required to balance its gains elsewhere. O’Connor continued to encompass Albany, the southern Wheatbelt towns of Narrogin, Wagin and Katanning, and the South West region forestry towns of Bridgetown and Manjimup.
O’Connor was created at the 1980 election, its territory having previously been covered by Moore and Canning. It was gained for the Liberals in 1980 by parliamentary newcomer Wilson Tuckey, who owed his Ironbar nickname to an assault conviction over a 1967 incident involving a length of steel cable and an Aboriginal patron of his Carnarvon hotel. Tuckey’s win was assisted by a schism in the state National Party, which resulted in two separate organisations fielding rival candidates. Emnity with the Nationals was to emerge as a theme of Tuckey’s career, with the Nationals repeatedly placing him behind various minor candidates in their preference recommendations. The Nationals caused Tuckey little trouble electorally over the years, consistently finishing third behind Labor on occasions when they fielded a candidate. That nearly changed in 2007, but Tuckey’s primary vote remained strong enough that he would have comfortably prevailed even if the Nationals had managed to edge ahead of Labor and absorb their preferences.
Tuckey was 75 at the time of the 2010 election, and regarded in Canberra as an increasingly erratic presence. While the redistribution had in one sense done him a good turn by dividing the Nationals heartland between two electorates, this was largely negated by the Nationals’ successful 2008 state election strategy of appealing more broadly to regional areas. Among the areas where inroads were made for for the first time was the Goldfields, which Tuckey had never represented. It was in the Goldfields that Tuckey suffered the most damage, the Kalgoorlie-Boulder booths collectively going against him 63-37. However, he was also outpolled in Albany, and the split elsewhere was roughly even. Crook had no trouble overtaking the Labor candidate, with the Nationals vote up 19.7% to 28.9% and Labor down 9.2% to 17.1%. Tuckey easily led on the primary vote with 38.4%, down 10.4% on 2007, but an 80% share of Labor and Greens preferences saw Crook prevail at the final count with a margin of 3.6%.
Tuckey reacted to his defeat by saying he did not intend to be gracious at all, and proclaimed Crook to be a nobody. Crook had in fact been the chairman of the Royal Flying Doctor Service, and was the state election candidate for Kalgoorlie in 2008. His status as a nobody was addressed soon enough by the circumstances of the election result, which placed him as a non-aligned member in a hung parliament, the WA Nationals having campaigned as an independent party that would not report, answer and take direction from Warren Truss. However, few were surprised when Crook, after a fortnight of prevarication, announced he would support a Coalition government on confidence and supply. He nonetheless sat on the cross-benches until May 2012, when he joined the Nationals party room while remaining absent from joint Coalition meetings.
The complexities of rural politics in Western Australia have come to the fore recently as a result of the federal government’s move to wind up the Wheat Export Authority, the culmination of a process of wheat exporting deregulation which began after the Cole Royal Commission into wheat sales to Iraq. The more protectionist eastern states Nationals, who had split from the Liberals to vote against deregulation of the industry in 2006, persuaded Tony Abbott to back an amendment to sustain the authority for a further two years, incurring the intense displeasure of agricultural interests in Western Australia. The state party organisation was very keen that its members should cross the floor over the issue, and it took the exercise of Julie Bishop’s authority to determine their support for Abbott’s position. As the Liberal members had feared, they were duly snookered when Crook announced that he would split from his party colleagues to vote down any such amendment.
There had been hope in the Liberal camp that Crook might be tarred at the next election by the brush of Tony Windsor and Rob Oakeshott, but this has presumably been negated by the wheat export issue. Their candidate is Katanning farmer Rick Wilson, who won an April 2011 preselection vote over Cranbrook Shire president Doug Forrest and Kalgoorlie pastoralist Ross Wood.
This is really a MUST watch – The Stewart–O’Reilly Debate: a Seriously Hilarious Rumble – http://entertainment.time.com/2012/10/07/the-stewart-oreilly-debate-an-inside-view-of-a-seriously-hilarious-rumble/#ixzz28hXRMR7e … full episode on YouTube
No word from James J yet?
Sky News Paul Murray. Mark Latham when indroduced says “Celebrating 100 days of the carbon tax without the sky falling”. Nice work Mark.
shellbell,
If he is claiming he is a publisher he could hardly claim exclusion.
Dario,
Early days yet. You have any grass that needs watching?
Is James J around, he wasn’t going to be around last weekend? If he is usually leaks about an hour before Troy B , who is going to release at 11pm, not sure what to make of its a “cracker” comment?
Francesca is pronounced Francheska, Chris. Multicultural OK with you?
Well, maybe a good outcome of the GFC and the rolling global debt and liquidity crisis is that the West is more likely to avoid choosing war.
Media Watch picking over the bones of Mr Jones’ speech and apologia.
Dario – a big reversal would be a “cracker”, but even only a one pt lead to the Govt would be a “cracker” too, given how long its been since there was one. Change the whole mood. But stuff it, what do we know, could mean anything.
Graeme:
My reply to you was eaten by Crikey.
Suffice to say my response was along the lines of Assange is posturing, and won’t stand, much less win.
He has a new life ahead of him in Ecuador, and for his own sake should focus on that rather than lamenting what might have been in Australia, as he’s been doing.
[You have any grass that needs watching?]
Sadly it’s too dark outside 🙂
Assange has to be here to run his claim because he will need to prove the measure of the damage to his reputation. That can only be done by attending court, giving evidence under oath or affirmation and being cross-examined.
While video link is part and parcel of modern litigation it is rarely allowed for contentious matters and certainly not when the credit of the witness is contentious.
[even only a one pt lead to the Govt would be a “cracker” too
True, so either 53+ to the Libs or 51+ to the govt then?
Paul Murray trying hard to sweep Abbott being hated by women under a rug of ‘there’s no evidence via verbal statements, written words etc that abbott is a mysogynist’.
Latham doing his best to correct the record, but struggling under the groupthink echo chamber.
shellbell
[Assange has to be here to run his claim because he will need to prove the measure of the damage to his reputation.]
He was talking about Gillard’s comments making it harder for Wikileaks to raise funds from donations. That’s why I got the impression Wikileaks would be the litigant.
Ooooh, Latham outs Abbott for “spreading smut” about Kernot.
I suppose a 55/45 in the Governments favour, thus causing eye popping, spluttering, gasping, dribble inducing apoplexy in Mr Ackerman on Lateline would be asking to much?
Can’t watch Paul Murray anymore. What agenda-driven rot.
I think it will be 50/50 or 51/49 either way.
That would be a “cracker” because many people were saying the last Newspoll was a rogue; way too good for Labor.
If this poll is anything near the last one then it proves it wasn’t a rogue and that the narrowing is definitely on.
Then … it’s popcorn time! 😀
Ian:
Totally off the planet. Won’t happen.
confessions
[Latham doing his best to correct the record, but struggling under the groupthink echo chamber.]
I think Latham did done damn fine.
There was an earlier mention of polling today in the ACT. Previously the Canberra Times has published the results of a poll by a firm that is neither Neilsen nor Newspoll. They may be doing it again at the moment (although Fairfax’s financial woes might limit the sample size?)
There was also mention that the ACT has always had Labor members of the HoR. One short exception was Brendan Smyth (Liberal) who was elected in the seat of Canberra at a by-election in February 1995 following the resignation of Ros Kelly (Labor) and remained until the next general election. Smyth has been in ACT politics since then and was an ACT minister in a Liberal led government (with sundry like minded independents). He is standing again at this ACT election. Assuming the Liberals remain in opposition this time, he may at some stage be considering his future prior to the following election.
confessions
I gave up on Mr Murray long ago. It has not hurt a bit.
I have to say, since his very public dummy spit at the last election, Latham seems to have come a long way back towards supporting the govt, at least on some things.
Dio
If Wikileaks is the Plaintiff, it will have to pay substantial monies up front to run the claim especially if it is an overseas organisation.
Imagine proving a causal link between whatvever the PM said and reduced donations. Good luck with that one when the Yanks were going inpretty hard and have a wee more influence with Mastercard etc.
Boerwar
[confessions
I gave up on Mr Murray long ago. It has not hurt a bit.]
Every now and again a bit of dumpster diving does one the world of good.
poroti
Yeah. You always have the good moment when you crawl out of the dumpster, once again sadder but wiser and also smelling a bit of the dumpster’s fragrance du jour.
Confessions,
[Paul Murray trying hard to sweep Abbott being hated by women under a rug of ‘there’s no evidence via verbal statements, written words etc that abbott is a mysogynist’.]
Do you get the impression that there are some very lumpy rugs in certain coalition-supporting households?
Must be time for bed. Up in the wee hours for some more survey work tomorrow.
I do hope you all have a very pleasant cracker of a night. Good night all.
It’s a cracker because its the parrot issue poll- polly!
Holmes, on Media Watch, does a lot of conflating.
I’m minded of Lib politics.
shellbell
In a literal sense, Gillard defamed Wikileaks rather than Assange as she didn’t specify that it was Assange who placed the material on the Wiki site.
Looks like a stunt to me.
Good night, Boerwar. Have fun tomorrow.
Boer, you’re crazy. Stay up 🙂
They took the $3.58 today with thew bookies 😎
It could be a cracker alright.
Isn’t it funny how in 2004/5 Mark Latham was persona non grata in the media? Now everyone wants him on their show. 🙂
Kate Ellis now filleting the disgusting Piers Akerman.
Good evening all….can’t wait for the Newspoll… seems like forever since the last one!
The Minister for Walking To The Dispatch Box, despatches Pies early.
Now despatches Pyne.
Graeme # 4162: your analysis doenst stack up. not meaning to be nasty but here I go, where did you study?
Ellis to Pyne “Do you know how Facebook works?”
Boerwar:
I’m not usually home in time to hear Paul Murray, even less so with daylight savings in the east. But a rare day off has shown me how much I haven’t missed him these last months.
something tells me tonight’s Q & A is going to go off, right off
My prediction: Coalition 54/55 Labor 45/46.
The last newspoll was a rogue, and this one will definitively show that it was out of line.
I also think that the whole Alan Jones episode has not helped Labor, it’s been a constant witch hunt against Alan Jones and 2GB. Also the feeble attacks on Tony Abbott by the government have no substance. While Abbott may not be popular with women, on the other hand men absolutely loathe Dullard (myself included). And she’s no prom queen amongst the ladies either.
Time for a bit of a reality check.
Kate Ellis is looking ready for a fight. She is about to get one.
There has been absolutely nothing in this fortnight that gives the coalition a bounce. Interest rates went down,the opposition was the issue-real tony the tony i know,and they starting blaming a “left wing” media. I have a hat ready to eat here if I’m proved wrong.
Labor are not using the Alan Jones incident for their own benefit, they are defending the Prime Minister!
Pyne has just thrown his skirt over his tightly coiffed head.