The arrival of the fortnightly Newspoll this week, together with the usual Essential Research, makes for two new additions to the poll aggregate, but they have had next to no impact on voting intention, outside of a modest bump for the Greens, and none at all on the seat projection. Both polls provided new leadership ratings, which took some of the edge off the net approval for both leaders, and slightly widened Malcolm Turnbull’s lead on preferred prime minister.
BludgerTrack: 52.1-47.9 to Labor
Two new polls this week have made no difference to Labor’s modest lead in the BludgerTrack poll aggregate.
This has been a blue on blue exchange over gun control.
QT is going to be a doozy 😆
Also, Lleyonhjelm looks like even more of an ineffective idiot than usual over this.
Making a ridiculous demand that he knew Turnbull could never accept is not a good tactical move.
If he accepts the ABCC now, then he becomes the Senator most likely to actually do what Turnbull wants, even more than the Liberal senators. He permanently loses all bargaining power.
If he doesn’t accept the ABCC, he just wedged himself.
Matt
“And that’s precisely why Clinton should go for Texas. With 36 House seats, it’s the second-biggest prize in the Union for control of the House – even with all the gerrymandered R+8-R+10 seats, in a Democratic wave year, those could be toppled.”
For gains in the House, there’s MUCH easier pickings elsewhere in the country (with increased prospects of holding them in future elections). Texas is not worth the effort (or money).
When I say Texas is gerrymandered, you have to look at the electoral map to comprehend just how rigged (yep, that’s the right word) the Texas electoral system is against the Dems. $1.5 million isn’t worth the effort.
Plus, in 2 years time any gains in Texas would be lost anyway in the mid-term elections. Better for the Dem campaign to focus on House and (especially) Senate seats in blue and swing states.
Kakaru
This year Alaska Arizona Utah are swing states. Texas could very well be moving into that territory. I have not seen recent polling on that though.
AB11
LOL
‘Cause it seems apt: Ratatat – Neckbrace with muchos parrots for just for Boerwar.
Josie Ensor from the Daily Telegraph (UK) is providing good coverage from the attack on Mosul including the presence of foreign special forces
[Josie Ensor
14h14 hours ago
Josie Ensor @Josiensor
Peshmerga decided that seconds after a car bomb was the perfect time for a group shot #Khazir #Mosul ]
Scott Bales
“They might be doing this for the impact on Texas, they might be doing it to generate headlines outside of Texas or they might have made a mistake. ”
My suspicion is that spending $1.5 mill on ad buys in Texas is simply to throw the GOP off their game. (Though I don’t know what the GOP “game” actually is at this stage.) The Dem’s Texas “campaign” won’t lead to any gains in that state. $1.5 million spread over the state is barely $1.50 per Texas voter. All hat, no cattle.
Senator Leyenjholm presser live ow
Heard this on The World today and have to agree.
It would be particularly nice to have that infestation of lawyers in Parliament culled. After all, they already have a monopoly on the Judiciary.
Sorry Leyonhjelm
guytaur @ #1262 Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 1:34 pm
Yep, we are all hung up on your spelling of Leyonhjelm.
Leyonhjelm really sticking the boot in.
So ALP and LNP equal on primaries. Who would have thought that it all could turn so badly, so quickly for Mal and his spineless spivs?
Leleyholm is not a happy chappy. You gotta laugh
Leyonhjelm is dumping on Keenan, Dutton, Abbott, on past deals
A
The ALP is well ahead of the Liberals on primaries.
Guytaur
“This year Alaska Arizona Utah are swing states. Texas could very well be moving into that territory. I have not seen recent polling on that though.”
Arizona, Georgia, and Alaska are certainly swing states this year. Demographic changes mean that Arizona and Georgia are slowly trending Democrat. The same trends have seen New Mexico, Nevada, Colorado, Virginia and N.Carolina (all former solid red states) become swing states or blue states.
Utah is complicated because this year it’s a 4-way race, and Mormons seem to despise Trump. So Utah as a swing state is probably a one-off.
Texas is a prospect this time round, because this is a weird election. But any demographic shift that turns Texas into a swing state (or even a blue state – the Holy Grail for the Dem party) is a generation away.
Elections do produce surprises. In 2008, Obama carried Indiana – a huge upset. 2012 was more predictable in terms of the electoral college.
Kakaru
However the money being spent to get out the vote in Texas this year is worth it because the demographics have changed and the Supreme Court is at stake in the Senate.
Lol!
Michael Danby MP
4m4 minutes ago
Michael Danby MP @MichaelDanbyMP
Never in my life did I imagine I would be retweeting Toney Abbott. The games afoot. #Warringah stricter gun laws than #Wentworth? @AlboMP https://twitter.com/TonyAbbottMHR/
Leyonhjolm going all ‘vengeance’ on the Govt …
BernardKeane: It takes a particularly tone deaf politician to let Tony Abbott successfully outflank them on the left. Turnbull is that politician.
Scot Bales
“I’d love to see this evidence that you readily declare exists about white people in Texas becoming more conservative, and show that the increase is correlated to an increasing Latino population.”
It’s a ‘white flight’ phenomenon. I can’t recall the article (I read it a while ago). But the article/analysis was an antidote to the prevailing belief that Texas is on an inevitable course to becoming a swing state. It may not happen for decades, if it happens at all.
BernardKeane: Labor’s lead blows out to six in Essential – and voters narrowly endorse Baird’s greyhound backflip bit.ly/2epql7l ($/free trial)
ABC 24 wuzz not playing the joke 😆
‘The ALP is well ahead of the Liberals on primaries.’
I said LNP:
Total Liberal/National 37% 38% 40% 37% 42.0%
Labor 37% 36% 36% 37% 34.7%
Guytaur
“However the money being spent to get out the vote in Texas this year is worth it because the demographics have changed and the Supreme Court is at stake in the Senate.”
I agree wholeheartedly with both your statements: Texas demographics have changed; and the Supreme Court is at stake in the Senate. But I don’t see how bringing out the vote in Texas helps either cause. The Dem campaign dosh would be better spent in a whole bunch of eminently more winnable House and Senate races.
Maybe the Dems have money to burn? So spending $1.5 mill in Texas is purely for shits and giggles.
Sorry about the formatting – the first column is primary, and the others are previous polls.
Full poll now up, see the PDF for the other questions.
Essential TPP ALP 53 (+1) L/NP 47 (-1)
Primary ALP 37(+1) L/NP 37(-1) GRN 11(+1) NXT 3(0) ON 5(-1) OTH 6(-1)
http://www.essentialvision.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Essential-Report_161018_FINAL.pdf
Leroy Lynch
Thanks.
Kakaru
Here is a recent poll result. This is why money is worth spending.
https://www.texastribune.org/2016/10/17/clinton-campaign-going-air-texas/
Guytaur
“The ad buy comes as polls continue to show the presidential race in Texas closer than usual. A WFAA/SurveyUSA poll released Thursday found Trump leading by only 4 points, much less than Mitt Romney’s 16-point margin in 2012 and John McCain’s 12-point margin in 2008.”
I’m not saying that Texas isn’t winnable for Clinton. I’m saying that a Texas win won’t achieve anything substantive.
lanesainty: New #essential poll – 55% of Australians want a parli vote on SSM, 30% think gov should stick with plebiscite until after next election.
Kakaru
Good turnout in Texas will mean likely Dems gain Senate majority. Thus the Supreme Court appointment approvals. Thats your substantive result.
They shouldn’t be surprised. He did warn them.
Likes
Tweets
Sky News Australia
2m2 minutes ago
Sky News Australia @SkyNewsAust
.@DavidLeyonhjelm says he will continue talks with the government on ABCC but things are ‘pretty awkward’ #auspol http://snpy.tv/2dnI0dD
guytaur @ #1285 Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 2:06 pm
Sorry. There is no Texas senator up for election this cycle. It is possible that there might be one or two winnable HoR seats in Texas, in which case a targetted $1.5 million could be a good spend.
To its credit, the ABC has been called ‘an embarrassment to journalism’ by the Nauru government, in a press release that was probably provided by Dutton’s office.
TPOF
Oh. Oops wrong on the Senate.
I agree with your point. Basically as was pointed out Democratic strategists are not stupid. Especially shown with the Obama era social media reach out that Labor emulated at the Federal election.
Gytaur
“Good turnout in Texas will mean likely Dems gain Senate majority. ”
I don’t see why. Explain how.
Good turnout in other states (where Dem candidates are at least competitive) could deliver the Senate to the Dems. But this doesn’t apply to Texas. Cruz is up for Senate election this year, and Cornyn is up in 4 years. Not that the Dems have a chance of winning a Senate seat from Texas…
Leonjhelm claims he’s a libertarian. Libertarians only believe in binding agreements in relation to property. So why is he sooking because the government broke its word. Suck it up, Davy, the Government was just exercising its inalienable liberty to screw you. Stop being a princess.
I think the 1.5 million the Dems are spending in Texas has to be seen in the light of Repugs pulling money out of marginal states. If it encourages Repugs to spend less elswhere because they are propping up Red states it is a big win for the Dems.
David Feeney
1m1 minute ago
David Feeney @Feeney4Batman
Senator @DavidLeyonhjelm has released this email, confirming horse-trading between him and Turnbull on gun laws #auspol #guncontrol
Embedded image
https://mobile.twitter.com/Feeney4Batman/status/788216477794996224
Senator McKim could not even get off the ground a dixer to Professor Triggs about post sentence detention.
ON 5(-1)
Jeez, that’s some surge! : )
So, Abbott horse trades with Leyonhjeim on immigration in return for a relaxation on importing Adler guns, and then has the gall to damn Turnbull for seeking to enforce the horse trade, which Turnbull is then forced to abandon because of Abbott & Co’s outrage over said horse trading.
I never thought anything could sink lower than Abbott’s prime ministership. I don’t care how many people tell me Turnbull is a genius; he’s a thoroughly terrible politician.
Lyndal Curtis @lyndalcurtis
@Feeney4Batman @DavidLeyonhjelm email is from Aug 2015.
Correction, Cruz is not up for election this year. Not for the Senate, anyway.
But the Dems would never win a Senate spot from Texas. One or two House seats… maybe. If the money was specifically targeted at those seats.
c@t
Oops i just posted same above.