Two big new polls:
In The Australian, Newspoll repeats its surprisingly strong result from the Coalition at its previous poll three weeks ago, with Labor’s two-party lead steady at 51-49. Primary votes are 41% for the Coalition (steady), 36% for Labor (down one) and 11% for the Greens (steady). Tony Abbott’s personal ratings continue to rise from their low base, with approval up four to 33% and disapproval down two to 59%, while Bill Shorten gets his worst figures to date with approval down three to 33% and disapproval up four to 54%. Abbott all but closes the gap on prime minister, now at 41-40 compared with 41-36 last time. The poll was as always conducted from Friday to Sunday, the sample being 1172.
By stark contrast, the latest Ipsos poll for the Fairfax papers belies the pollster’s previous form as a leaner to the Coalition in giving Labor two-party leads of 54-46 on previous election preferences and 55-45 on respondent-allocated preferences. This represents a three-point shift to Labor from the previous Ipsos poll in late February on both measures. Labor’s primary vote is up two to 38%, the Coalition is down three to 39% and the Greens are up one to 13%. Reflecting the trend elsewhere, Tony Abbott’s approval rating is up two to 34% with disapproval down two to 60%, while Bill Shorten is down one to 42% and up one to 44%. Shorten’s lead as preferred prime minister has widened slightly from 44-39 to 46-38. The poll also finds 37% support for an increase in the goods and services tax with 59% opposed a relatively favourable result. The poll was conducted Thursday to Sunday from a sample of 1404.
You mean Liberal?
Oh, see you’ve corrected it William. 🙂
Rummel.
Well done on getting all your vax renewed. I will do the same.
http://www.theage.com.au/national/more-australians-support-an-increase-in-the-gst-20150412-1mje7u.html
Puff, the Magic Dragon.@3
Good on you Puffy!
Frednk
This tweet from finnigans earlier today was on the money
Yes, good on you Puff.
LL
Wonder if this would change if tax avoidance by mulitnationals garners more attention
I wonder how much of this derives from a preference for a GST hike over reforms that would see the govt delving deeper into balancing out things like access to the seniors health care card or limiting access to the pension among other things.
Had any media outlet or politician even raised the issue of where Abbot’s daughter lives or whether she pays board or rent?
What were his boosters of choice thinking?
I daresay the news that Ms Abbott is paying $250 a week board at Kiribilli has Joe hockey jumping for joy.
budget emergency? what emergency?
Hilary Clinton announcing tonight. Will make for a fascinating 18 months stateside.
Mari …. Were u in Croatia last year? Any islands you’d particularly recommend…. Heading in that direction in June…
Newspoll
51-49 2PP to Labor
Primaries: Coalition 41, Labor 36, Greens 11
Abbott: Satisfied 33, Dissatisfied 59
Shorten: Satisfied 33, Dissatisfied 51
Better PM: Abbott: 40, Shorten 41
1172 sample, April 10-12
Newspoll already?
Looks like The Battle If The Polls, with News Copr full of hubris that the fight back is paying dividends, and Fairfax gloomsayers predicting imminent political oblivion for Abbott.
Serves ’em all right.
Kevin will be liking this bounciness 🙂
Newspoll was 51/49 last time as well
This is just the preview article, main one up at midnight.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/newspoll-bill-shorten-posts-worst-ratings-as-tony-abbott-claws-back-ground/story-fn59niix-1227300811648
News poll out early to neutralise Ipsos?
Of course.
Hilarious. One up, the other one static, contradicting each other, yet each with their own spin on their individual results.
Australian headline “Bill Shorten has posted his worst ratings as Labor leader, with more than half of voters dissatisfied with his performance as Tony Abbott continues to claw back ground.”
‘More than half’ = 51%. More than half are dissatisfied with Abbott, 59%.
Newspoll only has a sample of 1,172. Margin of error is 2.9%.
For example
#Newspoll Preferred PM: Abbott 40 (+4) Shorten 41 (0) #auspol
#Ipsos Poll Preferred PM: Abbott 38 (-1) Shorten 46 (+2) #auspol
Stephen spencer on twitter
In fact both Ispos and Newspoll are consistent with a Labor 2PP of 52-53, as have been practically all recent polls.
Vic, i think that the ALP has a real chance here to spike to Tories on the GST with other issues like that on the table.
They can quite legitimately take the position that yes, lets talk about GST as possibly, sometime, part of the mix for changes. But….there is a lot of other stuff that can be considered and implemented, that ISN’T regressive, before we need touch the GST in terms of rate and application.
I think the Libs are, at the behest of their business backers, setting them selves up for another round of argument where they take the position that their way is the only way and bipartisanship means agreeing with whatever they declare is truth. Rather than actually getting ready to negotiate on something controversial.
doGs, but there is some meat out there for the ALP to hunt down this year. 🙂
imacca
Agreed
Poll as reported in fairfax
http://www.theage.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/abbott-and-hockey-lead-coalition-poll-dive-20150412-1mjcff.html
On twitter
victoria – The respondant allocated TPP is in there. 55-45, wich is less of a difference from the last election TPP prefs than some Ipsos polls.
Wow, so the anti-vaxxers aren’t the only conspiracy theorists having a cry on the internet tonight.
LL
thanks
yes…and even then, only 1/10000 will be thinking of changing their vote…
I’m still not convinced that the ALP pv is as low as 36%.
Nor do I believe there is any reason for Shorten to have a 51% disapproval rating.
Darn,
Exactly. Take newspoll with a pinch of salt. Just like everything Murdoch it’s propaganda.
Mark the Graph’s take on the polls
https://twitter.com/Mark_Graph/status/587241473415884800
http://marktheballot.blogspot.com.au/2015/04/aggregated-polling-update.html
What is absolutely bizarre is not the conflicting polls, which would meet in the centre if the margin of error in each case was applied to bring them closer, but the sureness with which the relevant journalists are reporting the poll results as though they were significant.
The polls themselves are like someone asking two days into a five day test who is going to win. And the analysis, especially from the Australian is like making a big thing about England scoring a penalty goal five minutes into the second half to bring them within 20 points of the All Blacks.
In other words, political momentum is in a holding pattern until the budget, when the shape of the year ahead for the Government has to be disclosed. And having absolutely trashed the narrative of the last year, what can they come up with that will satisfy their stakeholders, successfully demonstrate a fair approach and still appear like there is some sort of coherence?
People have actually stopped listening to this government, but are holding judgement until they have to deliver it closer to polling day.
Given Ipsos has tended to lean Coalition in it’s early incarnations while Newspoll is locked in 51-49, I’d say probably a slightly shift toward the Coalition, with the Ipsos being a bit noisy this week.
Say 52-48 in a bit of a slow period for actual politics. Shorten will have his chance at the Budget to shift people back to him; Abbott will have his chance to show his spots really are stripes now.
Should be a fun few weeks to come.
You can tell the Oz is running scared because their analysis has the Labor numbers first before every set of Coalition numbers. Who’s the government again?
Mark the Ballot’s Bayesian model is giving Labor a 0.9% better result than his LOESS model – LOESS being what BludgerTrack uses. He notes that “the end-points in the LOESS regression are very volatile, and the technique is overly sensitive to endpoints and outliers … However, my experience is that the LOESS model usually comes into line with the Bayesian model as more data points are added.”
http://marktheballot.blogspot.com.au/2015/04/aggregated-polling-update.html
Agreed.
Their difficulty is that if they satisfy those they consider to be their stakeholders they piss off enough voter to lose in 2016, which means their stakeholders press harder to get their looly NOW which….. = death spiral.
Possible…… IF they have the full support of the media to spin it, but difficult. The long term solid behindedness of their polling indicates that punters are not as stupid as they thought and would like them to be.
Lol! They gave away any chance of that a few weeks ago.
The panic in Coalition ranks will be a joy to watch if this years Budget isn’t a standout success. It wont be a matter of giving Abbott and Hockey more time, it will be:
” oh my doG how stupid were we to not dump them in Sept 2014 please people we have listened and learned and look at our shiny new team and would you like a slice of Tony’s sauteed liver with that cigar sir??? “
Crackdown on egregious tax avoidance schemes by multinationals and very wealthy individuals to fix the budget versus a rise in the GST. Maybe we have a contest.
There isn’t that much money in the ‘crackdown’ it is mostly illusory.
William,
My first impression of Mark the Ballot’s site is that his graphs, though unintelligible to a normal human being, are much funkier than yours.
My unscientific analysis is that Abbott will probably narrowly win the next election.
Sorry. And Goodnight.
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/general-election-2105-david-camerons-main-hopeis-the-return-of-the-shy-tories-10169967.html
and which do we think will be reported most?
Morning all
Hilary announces her run for President in this short video
http://youtu.be/0uY7gLZDmn4