Seat of the week: Denison

Andrew Wilkie provided the biggest surprise of election night 2010 in nabbing the Hobart seat of Denison with scarcely more than a fifth of the primary vote. The contest looks no less complicated this time around.

Covering the greater part of Hobart, Denison produced one of the most significant results of the 2010 election, sending one of five cross-bench members to the first hung parliament since World War II. Andrew Wilkie achieved his win with just 21.2% of the primary vote, giving him a crucial lead over the Greens who polled 19.0%. The distribution of Greens preferences put Wilkie well clear of the Liberal candidate, who polled 22.6% of the primary vote, and Liberal preferences in turn favoured Wilkie over Labor by a factor of nearly four to one. Wilkie emerged at the final count with a 1.2% lead over Labor, which had lost the personal vote of its long-term sitting member Duncan Kerr.

Like all of the state’s electorates, Denison has been little changed since Tasmania was divided into single-member electorates in 1903, with the state’s representation at all times set at the constitutional minimum of five electorates per state. It encompasses the western shore of Hobart’s Derwent River and hinterland beyond, with the eastern shore suburbs and the southern outskirts township of Kingston accommodated by the seat of Franklin. It is one of the strongest electorates in the country for the Greens, who managed to increase their vote slightly from 18.6% to 19.0% despite the formidable competition offered by Wilkie. Booth results show a clear north-south divide in the electorate, with Greens support concentrated around the town centre and its immediate surrounds in the south and Labor continuing to hold sway in the working class northern suburbs.

Labor’s first win in Denison came with their first parliamentary majority at the 1910 election, but the 1917 split cost them the seat with incumbent William Laird Smith joining Billy Hughes in the Nationalist Party. The seat was fiercely contested over subsequent decades, changing hands in 1922, 1925, 1928, 1931, 1934, 1940 and 1943. It thereafter went with the winning party until 1983, changing hands in 1949, 1972 and 1975. The 1983 election saw Tasmania buck the national trend, the Franklin dam issue helping the Liberals return their full complement of five sitting members with increased majorities. Hodgman’s margin wore away over the next two elections, and he was defeated by Labor’s Duncan Kerr in 1987, later to return for a long stretch in state parliament (he is the father of Will Hodgman, the state’s Liberal Opposition Leader). The drift to Labor evident in 1984 and 1987 was maintained during Kerr’s tenure in the job, giving him consistent double-digit margins after 1993 (substantially assisted by Greens preferences).

Kerr bowed out in 2010 after a career that included a four-week stint as Attorney-General after the 1993 election when it appeared uncertain that incumbent Michael Lavarch had retained his seat, and a rather longer spell as Keating government Justice Minister. The ensuing Labor preselection kept the seat in the Left faction fold with the endorsement of Jonathan Jackson, a chartered accountant and the son of former state attorney-general Judy Jackson. What was presumed to be a safe passage to parliament for Jackson was instead thwarted by Andrew Wilkie, a former Office of National Assessments officer who came to national attention in 2003 when he resigned in protest over the Iraq war. Wilkie ran against John Howard as the Greens candidate for Bennelong in 2004, and as the second candidate on the Greens’ Tasmanian Senate ticket in 2007. He then broke ranks with the party to run as an independent in Denison at the 2010 election, falling narrowly short of winning one of the five seats with 9.0% of the vote.

Placed in the centre of the maelstrom by his surprise win at the 2010 election, Wilkie declared himself open to negotiation with both parties as they sought to piece together a majority. The Liberals took this seriously enough to offer $1 billion for the rebuilding of Royal Hobart Hospital. In becoming the first of the independents to declare his hand for Labor, Wilkie criticised the promise as “almost reckless”, prompting suggestions his approach to the Liberals had been less than sincere. Wilkie’s deal with Labor included $340 million for the hospital and what proved to be a politically troublesome promise to legislate for mandatory pre-commitment for poker machines. This met fierce resistance from the powerful clubs industry, and the government retreated from it after Peter Slipper’s move to the Speaker’s chair appeared to free it from dependence on Wilkie’s vote. Wilkie withdraw his formal support for the government in response, but it has never appeared likely that he would use his vote to bring it down.

Labor’s candidate for the coming election is Jane Austin, a policy officer with Tasmania’s Mental Health Services, who emerged as the preferred candidate of the still dominant Left. The Greens candidate is Anne Reynolds, an adviser to Christine Milne. The Liberals are yet to choose a candidate, prompting Labor to claim the party proposes to play dead in order to boost Wilkie. A ReachTEL poll of 644 respondents in mid-2012 had Wilkie well placed with 40% of the primary vote to 28% for the Liberals, 17% for Labor and 14% for the Greens.

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

816 comments on “Seat of the week: Denison”

  1. Boerwar @760

    Was it Gough who asked Margaret whether the earth moved for her too, dear during a big earthquake in China?

    Gough said no such thing. The quote comes from a cartoon in one of our major dailies (the Australian?) immediately after the event in 1976. I don’t remember who the cartoonist was. It was criticised (quite rightly) at the time for its very poor taste in the face of what was even from first reports an enormous disaster.

  2. Good morning Dawn Patrollers.
    What a waste of time! We will have copper undere] Abbott.
    http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-05-27/jake-sturmer-yarn-for-monday/4713788
    And much, much further than Abbott’s thought bubble.
    http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/political-news/ofarrell-out-to-trump-pm-on-sports-betting-20130526-2n5e4.html
    Ross Gittins has a crack at Hockey. Just check out the last sentence.
    http://www.smh.com.au/business/hockey-fails-his-own-honesty-test-20130526-2n54o.html
    Today is Pell day at the inquiry. Bring it on!
    http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/pell-camp-offensive-in-letter-reply-20130526-2n5ar.html
    A rather sombre contribution from Alan Moir.
    http://www.smh.com.au/photogallery/opinion/cartoons/alan-moir-20090907-fdxk.html
    Pat Campbell on the possible 12000 APS jobs to go under Abbott.
    http://www.smh.com.au/photogallery/opinion/cartoons/pat-campbell-20120213-1t21q.html
    David Rowe has PMJG as a steward at the races. There must be some significance to the detail in the bum of Abbott’s horse!
    http://www.afr.com/p/national/cartoon_gallery_david_rowe_1g8WHy9urgOIQrWQ0IrkdO

  3. And from the Land of the Free –

    Some cartoons on Apple’s taxation “arrangements”.
    http://thepoliticalcarnival.net/2013/05/26/cartoons-of-the-day-apple-taxes/
    MUST READ! Paul Krugman on the closed mindedness of conservatives. Totally apposite for Australia.
    http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/25/the-closing-of-the-conservative-mind/
    Repug public spiritedness.
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/26/tom-coburn-disaster-relief_n_3339498.html
    Adam Goodes made the Huffington Post.
    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/26/adam-goodes-racism_n_3339704.html

  4. sreve777

    i wouldnt worry too much about the newsltd polling

    we are heading for newspoll weekend

    they will need to talk up the struggling incompetent coalition

  5. BK

    You missed the best article of the day, by Andrew McLeod.
    [The old ”worker versus boss” divide that historically characterised the two parties no longer seems to be the divide on the social issues of the day.
    It is not just asylum where this can be seen. Take gay marriage. Under a liberalist philosophical tradition there would be sympathy for gay marriage. Under a conservative political tradition there would not. So what of the Liberal Party?
    The current conservative-leaning leadership has the Liberal Party objecting to gay marriage, even though many so-called ”wets” from a liberal philosophical tradition would like to support the change.
    The Liberal Party is split along a conservative versus progressive divide. Same in the Labor Party.
    Many in the religious right of the Labor Party – especially from the Catholic union base – oppose gay marriage. On the other hand, many from a social justice but non-union background in the Labor Party support gay marriage.]
    http://www.smh.com.au/opinion/politics/why-i-quit-the-alp-20130526-2n50x.html#ixzz2URJZnJEV

  6. Another story worth reading, on the companies not being good corporate citizens.
    [Almost two-thirds of Australia’s top 100 companies listed on the stock exchange have subsidiaries in tax havens or low-tax jurisdictions, a new report shows.
    Thirteen of the top 20 companies, including two of the big four banks, have entities in well-known tax havens such as the Cayman Islands, Luxembourg, the British Virgin Islands and Bermuda.

    News Corporation, Westfield and the Goodman Group were among the worst offenders, the group said, holding more than 50 entities in low-tax jurisdictions each. ]
    http://www.smh.com.au/business/top-firms-tax-haven-links-revealed-20130524-2k719.html#ixzz2URKVpRh1

  7. Good morning Socrates
    Yes, a very interesting article from Andrew McCloud. It really shows that there is an underground political dichotomy. I don’t like it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *