Super Tuesday live

5.00pm. Missouri now being called for McCain, who leads Huckabee and Romney 33.1 per cent to 31.8 per cent and 29.3 per cent. Democratic contest still too close to call in Missouri, but Obama holds a slight lead and the trend has been favouring him for some time.

4.44pm. Fox calls Alaska for Obama. Slow progress in New Mexico.

4.36pm. Everyone now calling Arizona for Clinton.

4.25pm. Fox and ABC call Colorado for Romney.

4.23pm. CBS, Fox and ABC (though not CNN) calling McCain for California.

4.21pm. Obama has hit the lead in Missouri, 49.3 per cent to 48.7 per cent with 98 per cent reporting, after a number of outlets earlier called it for Clinton. Given that Democratic delegates are allocated proportionately, this is mostly of academic interest. Not so the state’s Republican race, a winner-takes-all contest in which McCain leads Huckabee and Romney 33.3 per cent to 32.0 per cent and 29.5 per cent, also with 98 per cent reporting. Fox and ABC are calling it for McCain, but not CNN.

4.13pm. NBC and Fox are both calling California for Clinton.

4.12pm. CBS calls Montana for Romney.

3.56pm. CNN now calling Utah for Obama: he leads 53-41 with 37 per cent reporting.

3.50pm. No significant results yet from Los Angeles, San Francisco, San Diego or Sacramento.

3.38pm. Clinton leads 55-33 in California with 10 per cent counted, but pronounced regional variations can presumably be expected from a state that boasts both Malibu and Compton.

3.37pm. CNN calling Minnesota for Romney.

3.32pm. Fox’s call of Utah for Obama might also have been premature (I heard it on Fox News Radio; not sure it ever appeared as called on the website). Only 13 per cent reporting and Obama leads 45-44. Presumably the Fox call was based on an exit poll.

3.29pm. Clinton leads 51-40 in Arizona with 48 per cent reporting, but nobody’s calling it.

3.25pm. Fox’s call of Tennessee for Huckabee may have been premature (they’re still saying it on Fox News Radio, but not on the website). He leads McCain 34.1 per cent to 32.4 per cent with 83 per cent of precincts reporting.

3.20pm. McCain gaining on Huckabee in Missouri: now 33-32-29, compared with 35-32-27 half an hour ago.

3.15pm. Fox calls Idaho for Obama and Missouri for Clinton.

3.15pm. Fox calls Colorado for Obama.

3.10pm. Fox says Clinton wins American Samoa, and Romney wins Montana.

3.03pm. Fox News Radio reports McCain doing better than Romney in California from absent votes, but Romney doing better in normal votes. Clinton just ahead of Obama.

3.00pm. Also not sure why nobody giving Romney North Dakota, where he leads McCain, Paul and Huckabee 36-23-21-20.

2.58pm. Not sure why nobody calling Montana for Romney: he leads McCain, Paul and Huckabee 36-24-23-17 with 89 per cent of precincts reporting.

2.53pm. Nobody calling Missouri Democratic either, but Clinton leads 53-44 with 68 per cent of precincts reporting.

2.48pm. No one is calling the Missouri Republican race: Huckabee leads McCain and Romney 35-32-27 with 66 per cent precincts reporting.

2.46pm. A couple of outlets calling Georgia for Huckabee.

2.38pm. Fox calls Arizona for McCain and Tennessee for Huckabee.

2.29pm. Fox calls Utah for Obama.

2.25pm. Minnesota being called for Obama, who seems to be picking up a lot of the smaller states. Expectations he would perform well in caucuses have apparently been confirmed, boding well for him in Colorado and Idaho.

2.21pm. Fox News Radio and CNN call Connecticut for Obama.

2.15pm. Huckabee giving a speech, and not sounding of a mind to withdraw.

2.14pm. ABC calls Kansas for Obama.

2.08pm. Fox calls Oklahoma for McCain.

2.06pm. ABC also calling Utah for Romney; no surprise of course that he should carry the Mormon state.

2.03pm. Fox News projects Obama as winner of North Dakota, giving him seven states to Clinton’s six, and Utah to Romney.

1.44pm. Romney coming third behind Huckabee in many more places than expected. Almost time to call the nomination for McCain, pending one or two larger states.

1.31pm. CNN, ABC and Fox News Radio say Obama has won Alabama, which was lineball in late polling.

1.21pm. Fox calls Alabama for Huckabee.

1.18pm. Chap on Fox News Radio says McCain has won New York.

1.09pm. Fox calls Delaware for Obama.

1.07pm. CNN calls New York for Clinton, which is no surprise.

12.55pm. Fox calls Massachusetts for Clinton.

12.54pm. Chat on Fox News Radio indicates McCain is looking very good overall.

12.50pm. Winner-takes-all Republican contest for Delaware called for McCain, which was considered likely but not certain.

12.44pm. Arkansas being called for Huckabee, who is clearly doing better than expected.

12.36pm. Tennessee also called for Clinton, which was expected.

12.35pm. CNN calls Arizona for Clinton and Huckabee. The latter would be a big surprise if accurate; polls had Clinton with only a narrow lead.

12.29pm. The Times on Democratic exit polls:

The AP survey’s findings, leaked to The Times tonight before polls closed, should be treated with caution because they have been wrong before. But the early findings showed Mr Obama winning Georgia by 74 points to 25, Alabama by 59 to 37, Illinois by 69 to 29 and Delaware by 55 to 42. He also had narrower leads, possibly within the margin of error, in New Jersey, Connecticut, Massachusetts and Missouri. The poll indicated Mrs Clinton was leading by seven points in New York – less than expected – and Tennessee where she had an 11 point advantage, according to the poll. In Oklahoma and Arkansas she was shown as more than 30 points ahead. In California, she is shown just ahead, by perhaps as little as three percentage points.

12.13pm. CNN is also calling Illinois for Obama and Oklahoma for Clinton on the basis of exit polling, though these of course are not winner-takes-all contests. On the Republican side, Illinois (district-level PR), Connecticut (winner takes all) and New Jersey (winner takes all) are being called for McCain, and Massachusetts (two-tier PR) for Romney. All of this is consistent with pre-poll expectations.

11.33am. Further to the previous entry: The Raw Story tells us “Geraghty’s leaks of exit poll data have not always proved accurate. For instance, his information before New Hampshire polls closed showed Senator Barack Obama defeating Senator Hillary Clinton.”

11.23am. More on exit polls from Jim Geraghty at the National Review:

The early wave in California: McCain 40 percent, Romney 36 percent, Huckabee 10 percent. Fascinating and fun as it is, I remind my readers that this doesn’t tell us that much, as we don’t know what the district-by-district breakdown is. Also, there are three million absentee votes that I’m pretty sure are not included in this. So while these numbers are nice to hear for McCain fans, I take them with even more caution, skepticism and grains of salt than usual. Missouri: Romney 34 percent, McCain 32 percent, Huckabee 25 percent. Winner take all. If these numbers hold – and these are early voters, the later waves may change the final a bit — it’s a big, big win for Romney. Georgia: Huckabee 34 percent, Romney 31 percent, McCain 30 percent. Now on to the NYC-metro-area states: New York: McCain 46, Romney 35, Huckabee 10 percent. New Jersey: McCain 48 percent, Romney 35, Huckabee 9 percent. Connecticut: McCain 50 percent, Romney 32 percent, Huckabee 7 percent. More or less what we expected. Now the big Mitt states: The early wave in Utah: Romney 91 percent, McCain 5 percent, Huckabee 1 percent. I think I’m ready to call that one. Massachusetts: Romney 54, McCain 35. But in McCain’s home state… Arizona: McCain 44, Romney 39, Huckabee 8. That’s a heck of a lot closer than I had expected. On to the South, where the numbers at this point look good for Huckabee… Alabama: Huckabee 42 percent, McCain 33 percent, Romney 20 percent. Tennessee: Huckabee 34, McCain 28, Romney 23. Arkansas: Huckabee 33, McCain 21, Romney 19. Oklahoma: McCain 34, Huckabee 32, Romney 27. A barnburner! Delaware: Romney 43, McCain 34, Huckabee 18. Not a big state, but it’s winner take all, so I’m sure Team Romney would take it. Illinois: McCain 47, Romney 31, Huckabee 15.

11.14am. Various media outlets calling Georgia for Obama purely on the basis of exit polls.

11.10am. Jason Zengerle at New Republic on exit polls:

The perils of posting these are obvious (President Kerry and all that), but the exit poll results that I’ve seen show: Obama trouncing Hillary in Georgia, Alabama, and Illinois; Hillary trouncing Obama in Arkansas and Oklahoma; Hillary with leads in New York and Tennessee; and Obama with leads in Delaware and Utah (although there’s only one wave of exit polls for Utah). Everywhere else–including Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Jersey, Arizona, and California–is extremely close.

8.20am (Eastern Australian daylight time). This post will be used to cover today’s Super Tuesday developments, though I don’t promise that my coverage will be greatly timely or comprehensive. We’ll see how we go. The action will begin in earnest when polls in most of the eastern states close at 8pm US eastern time – noon eastern Australian daylight time. Polls in all-important California close three hours later. The one conspicuous exception is West Virginia, which uniquely held a state presidential convention today rather than a primary or caucuses. This has already wrapped up, resulting in Mick Huckabee securing the 18 delegates under the winner-takes-all vote. Huckabee won on the second round of voting after trailing Mitt Romney at the first by 464 votes (41 per cent) to 375 (33 per cent), with John McCain on 176 (16 per cent) and Ron Paul on 118 (10 per cent). Paul was then excluded, and at this point McCain’s supporters were reportedly instructed to throw their weight behind Huckabee to thwart Romney. This delivered victory to Huckabee with 567 (51.5 per cent) to Romney’s 521 (47.4 per cent).

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

1,182 comments on “Super Tuesday live”

Comments Page 24 of 24
1 23 24
  1. Jen , I have been forbidden by the ships crew to mention opening what is in the fridge at the risk of mutiny, but need some more ice

  2. it certainly seems as if the momemtum is with Obama. I dont quite get all the hatred/vitriol toward Clinton though? Where is it coming from?

  3. Yes, whilst I don’t mind people celebrating, why is it necessary to refer to Hillary as ‘alien’ ‘drooling’ ‘monster’ etc.
    Surely Obama supporters should be spending their time praising him rather than bagging his opponent?
    It’s not a good look.

  4. I agree Zoom – an alien drooling monster is not a good look. Now lighten up! We do sometimes just get a bit frivolous on here for the fun of it. The Billary Express has been derailed by that Barak bandit, but she could still get herself back in the running with Texas and Ohio. Outrageous outbreaks of democracy can be arrested – and usually are.

  5. If Clinton needed Florida and Michigan to win or Obama would be seen as compromised by their absence, then the DNC would hold caucuses there sometime after March, even if it had to pay for them. There is a precedent – I believe Clinton and Gore didn’t campaign somewhere and it was reheld (anyone?).

  6. I really don’t give a flying rats who wins, as long as it’s a Democrat.
    I’m just surprised at the venom – even JWH didn’t attract this level of nastiness.
    It isn’t frivolous or fun, it’s offensive…unless you have good reasons for it, but I am yet to hear that any of you have been in any way personally hurt by HRC.
    Keep it for McCain.

  7. Repeat after me zoom….”mmmm…meaning!”

    There….now tell me why it’s offensive to be frivolous with Hillary but not with McCain?

  8. Andrew@1154 – from Republican ranks, the predictables who resent a liberal woman. From the Democratic ranks, disappointment about the ‘Obama/fairytale’ line, the ‘hope is no good’ line, the LBJ not Martin Luther King is the civil rights leader line, the Bill antics, and the shiftiness about Florida and Michigan. Overall I think the sense of entitlement, the perception of constant gaming of the system, and strong-arming the new guy put a lot of people off.

  9. Well, I haven’t been frivolous with either, but I’m for the Democrats.
    I think there’s far more reason (valid, verifiable, factual) to be nasty to Repubs than Dems of any hue.
    However, I accept that I might be being hypocritical there, and therefore apologise mentally to McCain and withdraw the comment.
    Attack people’s policies all you like, demolish their arguments, critique their style, that’s all fine with me.
    Venom for the sake of venom is just nasty. (And in the long run, the person being venomous suffers, because they’ve lowered themselves).
    Play nicely, people.

  10. Hiya zoom –
    I partly agree. I have no great love for Hillary, nor do I feel the kind of antipathy that the former Libs engendered, not to mention the ire at George Supreme Idiot Bush. However, I think Obama inspires an unusual kind of fervour, born more out of a psychological reaction to the whole story rather than just the politics.
    And Hillary does represent that priveleged entitled WASP that I think causes a reaction of extreme dislike in many people fed up with tthe whole ethos of politics and western culture as a whole. The ‘Obama is different thing’ is potent for those of us who aspire to see real change, and Hillary represents the old order.

  11. Glen, I think to win back the base McCain will need a very conservative figure as his VP. I don’t think Rice, Jindal or Powell could do that… maybe Petraeus though.

  12. I’m hoping the republicans go as conservative as possible and get thrashed.
    Its the end of the era for the conservatives and it couldn’t come soon enough.
    Now we just have to deal with their legacy of a ruined economy and their warmongering policies.

  13. 1173
    Too awful, and possible, to contemplate. It sits in he back of the mind like some ominous shadow tempering any real hope that anything could really change.

  14. Glen @ 1163

    Powell – either the lead liar for the Iraq debacle, or the lead patsy

    Rice – the female Alexander Downer, lazy and incompetent. Has achieved nothing as Sec. of State or as National Security Advisor (other than making bin Laden’s life easier!).

    Petraeus – a Rummy/Bush yes-man who likes peddling ‘good news’ on Iraq. Most noted for making outrageous claims about his successes in training Iraqi security forces. Wonder what happened to the 125 battalions that were ‘standing up’ back in 2006? We know much of their equipment leaked to the insurgency while he was in charge. Is a believer in ‘war without end’

    Jindal – The only half way reasonable choice, but what would an Hindu-Catholic convert bring to the team other than Limbaugh likes him?

Comments are closed.

Comments Page 24 of 24
1 23 24