BludgerTrack: 52.1-47.9 to Labor

The one new federal poll for this week confirms rather than alters the recent shift back to the Coalition, as recorded by the BludgerTrack aggregate.

ReachTEL’s swing to the Coalition hasn’t shifted BludgerTrack, which had already priced it in based on recent Newspoll results. The Coalition makes a fractional gain on two-party preferred, which translates into a gain of one on the seat projection, that being in New South Wales. Nothing new on the leadership trends this week (I don’t use the ReachTEL numbers for this, because they structure their response options for leadership rating questions differently to other pollsters). Full results from the link below:

Methodological note: As explained on the BludgerTrack methodology page, a pollster’s bias adjustments are based on their historic performance, where there are enough pre-election polls from the pollster to base it on; or, where it isn’t, by comparing their results this term with a trend measure of pollsters in the first category. I have moved ReachTEL from the first category to the second, because it had lately been getting “corrected” for a pro-Coalition bias that its recent results have consistently failed to exhibit.

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

1,099 thoughts on “BludgerTrack: 52.1-47.9 to Labor”

Comments Page 2 of 22
1 2 3 22
  1. Vic:

    I’ m inclined to think he genuinely set out to get ahead of the media but served only to make a mess of it.

  2. This gave me a good chuckle

    Ale Retweeted
    Sez Me
    Sez Me
    @HoffmanHopes
    ·
    19h
    Replying to @RealMuckmaker
    An ER nurse told me they’ve stopped asking patients who the president is — as one of the questions they ask to judge whether the patient is disoriented — because too many people simply refused to say his name. Or got too agitated at being asked

  3. Fess

    It does look that way. Although, I still strongly believe Guiliani is acting in his own best interests and not that of Trump.

  4. The article by Paul Bongiorno (posted by BK) suggests that SloMo could pull the business tax cuts in the budget, causing a big problem for Labor who would lose a major issue on which to attack the government.

    It is too late for them to pull that policy. The cat is already well and truly out of the bag on that one. Labor will simply argue that you can’t trust the Liberals after they have so passionately promoted the policy as the solution to all our economic woes – more jobs, growth and higher wages etc. It won’t be hard to dig up plenty of corroborating TV footage to mount some very effective attack ads.

  5. One of the key changes Turnbull and O’Dwyer are trying push through the Senate is to remove workers reps (who are actual members of the funds) from Industry Super boards & replace them with people from the finance industry!

    Well they do have to find somewhere for the disgraced banksters can go.

  6. Meanwhile my local leader paper continues to report anything Andrews Govt does with a negative slant.
    So freakin annoying.
    A level crossing was removed on my line as well as a new tunnel and duplication of tracks and replaced station where level crossing removed.
    Line shut down for time specified. But a few extra days was needed to sort out signalling.
    Well you can guess what reporting focussed on
    Sheesh!

  7. Darn @ #46 Saturday, May 5th, 2018 – 9:34 am

    I am a little concerned that the ACTU has thrown in its lot with the BCA over immigration. Not because their position is necessarily wrong, but because it’s not a sensible thing to do politically IMO with an election quite possibly only a few months away.

    Immigration is a hot button issue at the moment with many people expressing concern about the increasing over crowding of our major cities and I would be very concerned if Labor just follows the ACTU lead on the matter. Hopefully Bill Shorten will be a lot more measured in his comments about it.

    Darn

    I agree

    It has to be one of the most ideologically driven but politically stupid thing the ACTU has done. Especially in Qld. No better way than to drive those one nation voters away.

  8. @vanbadham
    15 minutes ago

    Hey, everyone who’s done student politics – remember how Liberal students ALWAYS run a “free beer” ticket or promise to lower beer prices at the uni bar? Not interested in governance, just getting elected. Wonder why i’m thinking of that right now. #auspol

  9. This joke brings to mind any number of claimed ‘achievements’ by the Coalition.

    ……..old Soviet joke about Radio Yerevan: a listener asks: “Is it true that Rabinovitch won a new car in the lottery?”, and the radio presenter answers: “In principle yes, it’s true, only it wasn’t a new car but an old bicycle, and he didn’t win it but it was stolen from him.”

  10. a r says:
    Saturday, May 5, 2018 at 9:39 am
    Ray (UK) @ #2 Saturday, May 5th, 2018 – 6:17 am

    The BBC have done a forecast of the National vote share and forecasted the House of Commons on those numbers:

    Lab 283 (+21)
    Con 280 (-38)
    SNP 43 (+8)
    LDem 22 (+10)
    Others 22 (-1)

    Ah, so Labour is positioned to win the next UK election.

    Shush. Don’t tell Boerwar or Briefly. It could completely ruin their whole weekend.

  11. Not helpful, and you have to question this judge’s motivation. Surely the legal fraternity would want the investigation to play out until the end?

    A federal judge in Virginia on Friday sharply questioned the motivations of special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s fraud prosecution of President Trump’s former campaign manager, saying it was aimed at getting him to provide evidence against the president.

    Judge T.S. Ellis III’s comments came during a hearing in Alexandria federal court, where attorneys for Paul Manafort argued that bank- and tax-fraud charges against him are outside the scope of the special counsel’s authority. While the judge has yet to rule and indicated that he may well decide in favor of prosecutors, his scrutiny of their approach quickly became a rallying cry for supporters of the president.

    “You don’t really care about Mr. Manafort’s bank fraud,” said Ellis, who is known for being combative with attorneys in his courtroom. “You really care about getting information Mr. Manafort can give you that would reflect on Mr. Trump and lead to his prosecution or impeachment.”

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/public-safety/manafort-to-appear-in-virginia-court-in-bid-to-have-fraud-charges-dismissed/2018/05/03/c3b0acb0-4ca2-11e8-b725-92c89fe3ca4c_story.html?utm_term=.fb9bb1adfaf1

  12. Ah for the good old days.

    In the summer of 1991, the Bank of England took the unprecedented step of shutting down one of the world’s largest banks, the Bank of Credit and Commerce International. Soon afterwards, the District Attorney of Manhattan, Robert Morgenthau, handed down criminal indictments against top officials of the bank. Soon, the popular media were filled with tales of drug-money laundering, bankrolling of Middle East terrorists, underwriting of Saddam Hussein’s quest for a nuclear bomb, etc. BCCI was linked to some of the Persian Gulf’s wealthiest sheiks, and was described as a secret slush fund for the Central Intelligence Agency. Time magazine even quoted CIA head Robert Gates, referring to BCCI as the “Bank of Crooks and Criminals International.”

    The oft mentioned in these pages “BCA”
    would then become ❓

  13. Confessions

    The key bit is ..

    Ellis added: “I don’t see what relationship this indictment has with anything the special counsel is authorised to investigate.

    “We don’t want anyone in this country with unfettered power. It’s unlikely you’re going to persuade me the special prosecutor has power to do anything he or she wants. The American people feel pretty strongly that no one has unfettered power.”

  14. Yesterday Corbyn’s fanbois were claiming that Corbyn had no impact on the local elections.
    Now they are crowing.
    The dance of the seven C0rbyn veils continues.

  15. “I have moved ReachTEL from the first category to the second, because it had lately been getting “corrected” for a pro-Coalition bias that its recent results have consistently failed to exhibit.”

    Pro-Coalition bias can manifest itself in two ways: a) The Coalition being consistently favoured over the ALP; or b) the differential between the Coalition and the ALP 2PP being consistently smaller (when the ALP is ahead) than that of the other pollsters.


  16. Boerwar says:
    Saturday, May 5, 2018 at 10:16 am

    Yesterday Corbyn’s fanbois were claiming that Corbyn had no impact of the local elections.
    Now they are crowing.
    The dance of the seven C0rbyn veils continues.

    I think they are pointing out how stupid your comments were. If you care about politics might pay to look at why Corbyn is successful instead of trying to create an alternative reality.

  17. Boerwar @ #64 Saturday, May 5th, 2018 – 7:16 am

    Yesterday Corbyn’s fanbois were claiming that Corbyn had no impact on the local elections.
    Now they are crowing.
    The dance of the seven C0rbyn veils continues.

    And you were claiming he was having a negative impact!

    Just saying, you were all wrong. 🙂

  18. AMP appoints former CBA boss David Murray as new chairman.

    Colour me purple, me hearties.

    Mr. Murray does not look well. I trust he has the best of medical and family support. (Seriously).

  19. Barney

    I stand by my comments. I think Corbyn is a poor campaigner. I think its the policies that are winning.

    People get it when a sledgehammer is hitting their ability to live life which is what neo liberalism is.

    Edit: To put it in a pop culture context. Malcolm Turnbull is King John and Morrison is the Sherrif of Nottingham with Dutton the Sherrif’s henchman.

  20. poroti:

    The judge is not involved in the investigation and likely has no clue as to what information prosecutors have and on whom outside of what he’s read in the media.

  21. Yes poroti, and the judge can’t possibly know what information the investigation has that would take it to Manafort’s Ukraine and other dealings. The terms of reference are pretty broad after all, so I think it’s rather premature for someone not involved with the Special Counsel to be offering opinions about where the investigation is going.

  22. Barney

    I should point out May is the UK’s King John and Trump is the US version.

    All have in common the neo liberal dream of establishing the corptocracy and thus entrenched inequality of incomes.

    Doing the opposite of China. Driving people to poverty to benefit themselves.

  23. Briefly last night: ‘Labour headed into oblivion, Tories win’
    Boerwar last night : ‘results are unequivocally good for May and bad for Corbyn’

    All results in and Prof. Curtice says Corbyn in Downing Street based on these elections

    Boerwar now: ‘Corbyn fanbois are crowing’

    You really are a pathetic specimen, you give an ‘analysis’ that is hopelessly wrong but instead of addressing it all you can do is slather and squirm and throw in some dishonest goalpost-moving

    You are about as partial and honest on Corbyn as Sean Hannity was on Obama

    Clueless, utterly clueless

  24. kevjohnno says:
    Saturday, May 5, 2018 at 10:20 am
    You’ve got to admit to doing a fair dance yourself Boerwar.

    When Boerwar finds a dance that he really likes he dances longer and harder than anyone else here. Just think Greens, Sanders, Corbyn, Bulldogs beating the Swans in 2016 and so on. Magnificent performances all of them. Such commitment and staying power.

  25. Re Bongiorno’s suggestion that could axe business tax cuts in the budget to undermine Labor.

    The BCA is putting a lot of effort and $$$ into pushing the business tax cuts. What would be their reaction if SloMo double crossed them and axed the tax? Would they still campaign against Labor or would they direct their venom at the LNP?

  26. An email to Manafort’s lawyers contains a copy of a letter from Rosenstein to Mueller confirming the scope of his investigation. In relation to Manafort, this letter contains the following clauses: investigate ….
    “a crime or crimes by colluding with Russian government officials with respect to the Russian government’s efforts to interfere with the 2016 election for president of the United States, in violation of United States law.”
    “crime or crimes arising out of payments (Manafort) received from the Ukrainian government before and during the tenure of President Viktor Yanukovych”

    Certainly broad enough to cover the crimes Manafort has been charged with.

    See https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/mueller-authorized-investigate-manafort-campaign-collusion-russians-documents-show-n862326

  27. Ray (UK) says:
    Saturday, May 5, 2018 at 10:45 am

    …”You really are a pathetic specimen”…


    Never a truer word spoken.

    He would much prefer a weak and fairly conservative Labor government which does little to alter the status quo for several terms and then hands back power to the Tories, whereby they continue with their long term goal of smashing the foundations of our great social democracy.

    He has so much in common with the Green’s he constantly rails against, it is nauseating.

  28. Darn says:
    Saturday, May 5, 2018 at 10:02 am

    a r says:
    Saturday, May 5, 2018 at 9:39 am
    Ray (UK) @ #2 Saturday, May 5th, 2018 – 6:17 am

    The BBC have done a forecast of the National vote share and forecasted the House of Commons on those numbers:

    Lab 283 (+21)
    Con 280 (-38)
    SNP 43 (+8)
    LDem 22 (+10)
    Others 22 (-1)

    Ah, so Labour is positioned to win the next UK election.

    Shush. Don’t tell Boerwar or Briefly. It could completely ruin their whole weekend.

    Yeah. If all goes well, Labour would win a minority of seats in a general election. Practically the entire political cosmos in the UK is campaigning for Labour – the Tories certainly are – and the best they could do was to win seats in their London strongholds.

    Polling-wise, Labour have lost the lead they held through the second half of last year. These elections, where the turnout was 1/3, confirm the polls.

  29. Last word on the UK Locals numbers (I promise)

    The BBC seem to have turned off their running tally without the last result, so anybody keeping a running total needs to add the Tower Hamlets figures which was Labour’s best council of the night

    Tower Hamlets : Lab 41 (+19), Con 2 (-3), Other 2 (-16)

    Labour end the night on 2,351 (+78) and Cons on 1,332 (-34)

  30. Democratic politics is about drawing people together, about enlarging the ranks. In the UK, three things are happening that diminish the capacity to swell the Labour-positive ranks.

    First, the party itself is shrinking its compass by deliberately seeking to exile its own moderates.
    Second, the Tories have claimed the xenophobic vote and have excised part of the old-time Labour plurality.
    Third, Labour has failed to appeal to the contra-xenophobes, to Remain-voters.

    Labour is currently a party that is looking to the past, just like the Tories.

  31. Yabba88 says: Saturday, May 5, 2018 at 11:12 am

    An email to Manafort’s lawyers contains a copy of a letter from Rosenstein to Mueller confirming the scope of his investigation. In relation to Manafort, this letter contains the following clauses: investigate ….
    “a crime or crimes by colluding with Russian government officials with respect to the Russian government’s efforts to interfere with the 2016 election for president of the United States, in violation of United States law.”
    “crime or crimes arising out of payments (Manafort) received from the Ukrainian government before and during the tenure of President Viktor Yanukovych”

    Certainly broad enough to cover the crimes Manafort has been charged with.

    See https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politics-news/mueller-authorized-investigate-manafort-campaign-collusion-russians-documents-show-n862326

    **************************************************

    Thanks Yabba88 – I was sure that Rod Rosenstein had given such authority to Robert Mueller – and the prosecutor in this action – Michael Dreeben – while no one is 100% infallible – and reputed to be one of the sharpest legal brains in the US

    Manafort has already lost a civil suit on similar complaint

    Manafort is charged in Virginia with financial violations related to his lobbying work in Ukraine prior to joining Trump’s 2016 campaign. Dreeben said they had to “follow the money” and find Manafort’s contacts with Russians through the Ukrainian work and his financial dealings as part of their investigation.

    He lost a civil suit making similar complaints about the special counsel’s investigation last week. Manafort had filed a lawsuit in Washington claiming Rosenstein and Mueller exceeded their authority in charging him with alleged crimes he said had nothing to do with the 2016 campaign.

    DC District Judge Amy Berman Jackson dismissed that lawsuit, saying a civil case was “not the appropriate vehicle” for objecting to either past or future actions by a prosecutor.

    Manafort faces five charges in the case brought by Mueller’s prosecutors in DC federal court, including money laundering and foreign lobbying violations.

  32. Michael Cohen is paid to settle ‘nefarious acts’ Trump doesn’t want to get out: Watergate veteran Carl Bernstein

    Immediately after the Wall Street Journal broke news that the president’s longtime personal attorney Michael Cohen made nearly three-quarters of a million dollars in 2016 from his work for Donald Trump, veteran Watergate journalist Carl Bernstein offered his take on the revelation.

    “The key to Watergate that really broke everything open was the discovery of a slush fund that was used for nefarious purposes that was meant to be hidden,” the journalist who broke the story of President Nixon’s wiretap and subsequent cover-up told CNN’s Anderson Cooper.

    “I don’t wanna speculate on where this is gonna go or what it means,” Bernstein continued, “but it is all part of a pattern that we are seeing in this investigation and why from the beginning Michael Cohen has been key to everything having to do with nefarious activities in the Trump campaign and also figures in the Russia investigation.”

    https://www.rawstory.com/2018/05/michael-cohen-paid-settle-nefarious-acts-trump-doesnt-want-get-watergate-veteran-carl-bernstein/

  33. Hi Victoria

    Glad you enjoyed the killers

    We took the whole family to see them in Sydney last Saturday night only problem is they come on the stage at 10 PM when my nightly cocoa is normally doing its job.

    Plus Mrs ShellBell is now following Brandon Flowers on Instagram

  34. Revisionist political expression is not unique to Britain, of course. It is clearly evident in the US (Trump) and in many parts of Europe. Its underlying moments are bitter, racist, jealous, nationalist, vindictive, romantic and reactionary.

    The 21st century is too much for too many, who have succumbed to a post-millenial malaise.

  35. Confessions @ #61 Saturday, May 5th, 2018 – 10:05 am

    Not helpful, and you have to question this judge’s motivation. Surely the legal fraternity would want the investigation to play out until the end?

    The judge is factually wrong (about Mueller’s mandate, at least, if not about his motivations).

    Mueller has the authority to investigate “any matters that

    arise directly from the investigation”, and also to prosecute “federal crimes arising from the investigation of these matters” whenever Mueller “believes it is necessary and appropriate” to do so.

    If Manafort’s defense is “I’m not Trump and the money I laundered isn’t Russia”, he’s not going to get very far.

    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/05/17/us/politics/document-Robert-Mueller-Special-Counsel-Russia.html

  36. Confessions says: Saturday, May 5, 2018 at 11:42 am

    phoenixRed:

    Bernstein makes some very good points there.

    ***********************************************************

    Confessions I think ???? ….. you posted something late last night that the Cohen/Trump connection was the key to all this circus – and it looks like Carl Bernstein is thinking the same thing. Hopefully the FBI access to Cohen’s files, tapes, emails etc etc will bear fruit ….

    Just went back a cog and found it :

    Confessions says: Friday, May 4, 2018 at 8:02 pm

    Laurence TribeVerified account@tribelaw
    5h5 hours ago
    If true — and I’ll bet it is — this shows Trump conspired with Cohen to rig the presidential election. Looks like a backup to Plan A, the plan relying on Putin and Wikileaks and Cambridge Analytica and Facebook.

    https://twitter.com/TheLastWord/status/992233888016732160

  37. Shellbell

    Killers started playing around 9pm here in Melbourne.
    Brandon flowers is an unusual guy but an absolutely brilliant singer.

  38. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/local-elections-british-politics-deadlocked-conservatives-labour-gains-expectations-councils-a8337061.html

    Strikingly, a projected share of the national vote by the BBC, if all of Britain had gone to the polls, put both the Tories and Labour on 35 per cent – suggesting a nation still starkly divided.

    The Tories supply the worst government since George III, and they can still break even with Corbyn-led Labour.

    It is amazing that Labour set its sights on trying to win in Chelsea and Barnet but absolutely failed to represent the pro-Remain constituencies in the districts lying outside the capital.

  39. ‘Trump knew’ about Stormy Daniels hush money ‘months before he denied any knowledge of it’: NYT

    What Donald Trump knew about hush money payments to former adult movie performer Stormy Daniels — and when he knew it — are in further question after a Friday evening report in The New York Times.

    Citing two sources, The Times reports, “President Trump knew about a six-figure payment that Michael D. Cohen, his personal lawyer, made to a pornographic film actress several months before he denied any knowledge of it to reporters aboard Air Force One in April.”

    The report noted that “three people close to the matter said that Mr. Trump knew that Mr. Cohen had succeeded in keeping the allegations from becoming public at the time the president denied it.”

    Trump Organization chief financial officer Allen Weisselberg also reportedly knew about the Cohen reimbursement situation, which could lead to further investigations into the Trump family business.

    “There’s no question it opens up another avenue of inquiry into the depths of the involvement of the Trump Organization,” Daniels’ attorney, Michael Avenatti, told The Times.

    https://www.rawstory.com/2018/05/trump-knew-stormy-daniels-hush-money-months-denied-knowledge-nyt/

  40. guytaur says:
    Saturday, May 5, 2018 at 11:11 am

    This chart would be a whole lot more interesting if it showed GDP per capita. We would be struggling to keep up with Japan, where the absolute economy is slowly growing, while in per capita terms things are better, and in terms of the size of the workforce, things are really quite impressive.

  41. His aggression carried risks. Besides revealing that the president had reimbursed Mr. Cohen, Mr. Giuliani appeared to admit that the payment to Ms. Clifford just before Election Day in 2016 was made because of concerns about the coming vote. That could be used to argue that it was an illegal campaign contribution.

    “Imagine if that came out on October 15, 2016, in the middle of the, you know, last debate with Hillary Clinton,” Mr. Giuliani said on the Fox News program “Fox & Friends.” “Cohen didn’t even ask. Cohen made it go away. He did his job.”

    Violating campaign finance laws can be serious. John Edwards, a former Democratic senator and presidential hopeful, was charged with corruption for his role in trying to hide details of his affair with a videographer during his 2008 bid for the White House.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/03/us/politics/giuliani-trump-michael-cohen-stormy-daniels.html?rref=collection%2Fsectioncollection%2Fpolitics&action=click&contentCollection=politics&region=rank&module=package&version=highlights&contentPlacement=2&pgtype=sectionfront

  42. phoenixRed:

    Yep. You have to wonder what else Cohen has ‘fixed’ for Trump.

    Mr. Giuliani’s comments also raised fresh questions about the president’s relationship with Mr. Cohen. As Mr. Giuliani told it, Mr. Cohen entered into a legal agreement with Ms. Clifford and paid her without Mr. Trump’s knowledge. Mr. Giuliani described that as commonplace, saying he performed similar services for his own clients. But legal ethics experts said such an arrangement was highly unusual and would only expose Mr. Cohen to new questions.

    Lawyers are required to keep their clients fully informed of their activities and are generally prohibited from advancing money to or on behalf of their clients, said Deborah L. Rhode, a scholar on legal ethics at Stanford Law School. “This is a guy who says he’ll take a bullet for the president,” she said. “And what they’re giving him is the legal ethics equivalent of a bullet.”

Comments Page 2 of 22
1 2 3 22

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *