Fairfax-Ipsos: 52-48 to Labor

The second poll from Ipsos gives the Coalition relatively respectable readings on voting intention, although Tony Abbott gets another hammering on his personal ratings.

The second federal poll conducted for the Fairfax papers by Ipsos is somewhat less bad than what they’ve been accustomed to recently, while still giving Labor a lead of 52-48 according to preference flows from the 2013 election (up from 51-49 in last month’s poll) and 53-47 on respondent-allocation (steady). The primary votes are 40% for the Coalition (down two), 37% for Labor (steady), 12% for the Greens (steady) and 2% for Palmer United (down one). Ipsos was also about two points below trend on the Coalition primary vote last time, and landed a little high for them in its last poll before the Victorian election.

However, the poll corroborates other recent polling in having Tony Abbott’s personal ratings slumping, with approval down four to 38% and disapproval up eight to 57%. Bill Shorten is up three on approval to 46% and one on disapproval to 41%, and he now leads 47-39 as preferred prime minister after a 41-all result last time. The poll was conducted Thursday to Saturday from a sample of 1400.

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

914 comments on “Fairfax-Ipsos: 52-48 to Labor”

Comments Page 18 of 19
1 17 18 19
  1. [ MTBW
    Posted Tuesday, December 9, 2014 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

    I am actually starting to feel sorry for Abbott – the poor bastard doesn’t have a clue. ]

    Don’t waste your effort – he has earnt all that he is getting and more.

    He talked the talk and thats about all he has.

  2. [ KEVIN-ONE-SEVEN
    Posted Tuesday, December 9, 2014 at 4:01 pm | Permalink

    The new plan is still idiotic. It puts totally unfair pressure on the doctors who will be forced to bill patients. So basically, if you are now a 100 percent bulk-biller you will have to start charging patients. ]

    Real smart move – dumping/ announcing it to voters at Christmas.

  3. IW – if they play around with regulations the Senate will have a chance to disallow it, but that process has a 1 vote advantage for the government (assuming everyone is present, 38 votes would block legislation, but 39 votes would be needed to disallow regulation), and with the Senate as it is at the moment, 1 vote could easily be the difference between getting it up and not.

    If Palmer is doing his tired routine of seeing some bogus movement from the government as a “win” so he can support the government now, the numbers are probably going to be close. Day and Leyonhjelm could well be supportive. X who knows. Muir who knows. Madigan maybe not. Lambie maybe not. I guess we’ll see how it all unfolds on the day.

    And then there’s PUP itself … Lazarus seems to have decided he has a voice of his own. Could he be the next to depart the PUP umbrella?

  4. The other issue that IF this happens, with PUP etc support… then there will be more than one group with a giant target on their backs in 2016.

  5. 850
    briefly
    [Posted Tuesday, December 9, 2014 at 4:28 pm | PERMALINK
    policy mayhem…situation normal…bring on The Spill]

    But JBishop has gone to Lima?!

  6. I suspect that Abbott’s “A good government getting better and better” will be about as convincing as Julia Gillard’s “A good government that lost its way”.

  7. A government is immortal, an individual’s life is finite.

    A government’s debt is held by vast numbers of bondholders who see the bonds as a safe, liquid way of parking money, and who are willing to just take the interest payment at maturity and roll over the principal time and time again. As long as the country’s productive capabilities are good and the political system is stable, a government can get its debt rolled over forever. An individual’s mortage debt is held by one bank or one non-bank mortgage provider who will not roll over your principal indefinitely.

    A government can increase its income (tax revenues) at any time. An individual cannot raise his or her income just by choosing to.

    A government issues a currency and influences inflation. If the debt it owes is denominated in its own currency, its position is much stronger than an individual debt holder’s. A government can impose a one-off tax on capital to pay down a significant amount of its debt. Another option is to use macroeconomic policy to bump up inflation and erode the real value of the debt over time. Individuals don’t have those options.

  8. You’re welcome IW,

    I doubt the changes will shift the public opinion and the senate will have no problem blocking it.

    [I should have used block quote for the ABC snip -test]

  9. 858

    A regulation standing in the event of a tied disallowance vote could well be subjected to a successful High Court challenge on the grounds that a disallowance motion failing is not passing in the negative.

  10. Shorter Abbott:
    “Huh… huh… ha ha… I is so clever! I changed it from $7 to $5 see? It’s a completely different number! That’ll fool everybody! And now, instead of the guv’mint taxing the poor, sick and defenseless directly, we’re going after the doctors instead. See, I is really smart cus’ everybody hates doctors!”

    Geez, what a f*ckwit.

  11. [860
    victoria

    850
    briefly

    policy mayhem…situation normal…bring on The Spill

    But JBishop has gone to Lima?!]

    There must be at least one person in the Liberal Party who can count. I think there will be a common New Year’s resolution in the LNP – a new leader and a new start!

  12. [“@latikambourke: A wise coalition peep said to me a few weeks ago ‘what you will soon see is poll panic and backflip after backflip.’”]

    Forever telling us what has happened but never what will happen. Hopeless.

  13. “And what we want to do by legislation is enable them to directly claim the rebate, provided the co-payment they charge for that particular class of patients is $5 or less.”

    Ok. This all makes even less sense. This is basically the exact same proposal as they put initially, except that concession card holders don’t pay the copayment (probably?). There is still a thing that is a copayment, although it is “optional” – except it was always going to be “optional” if the GPs and support workers were willing to wear the loss of $7 – now $5.

    If they want to facilitate doctors “bulk-billing” but charging the copayment, then they definitely need legislation. I suspect if that faces defeat they’ll just use regulation to drop the rebate, and that they’ve been to-ing and fro-ing over that.

    But saying that:

    Prime Minister Tony Abbott announces Federal Government has dumped $7 GP co-payment

    Seems entirely misleading. So it’s $5 instead of $7 – with that extra $2 coming from what the GPs were going to receive in the initial proposal and now will not receive…

    It’s just a mess, and as others have said here the doctors are going to be furious and rightly so. Maybe this is payback for the AMA coming out against the original proposal. A Nelson Muntz Hah hah!

  14. victoria @856

    From the article:

    Mr Hockey claims that, as a result of the articles published on May 5, he has been “greatly injured, shunned and avoided and his reputation has been and will be brought into disrepute, odium, ridicule and contempt”.

    Due to his bullying arrogance and risible failure to sell a nasty and vengeful budget, Hockey is inflicting upon himself these reputational injuries far more effectively than an two-bit newspaper heading ever could.

  15. Inner Westie

    [Due to his bullying arrogance and risible failure to sell a nasty and vengeful budget, Hockey is inflicting upon himself these reputational injuries far more effectively than an two-bit newspaper heading ever could.]

    Perhaps fairfax should include this in their Defence. 😀

  16. Not only is this Government hopeless, but moves like this open them up to being called mean and tricky. Weren’t they the labels Howard tried to run away from in 2001?

  17. Ta Jackol

    I wonder if there’s any danger for the government in serially circumventing* proper legislative process to get their reforms enacted?

    Or at least appearing to be doing this as a matter of strategy.

  18. JACKOL – Maybe they want to go the legislation route because they’re hoping that the senate will knocked off this plan as well. Otherwise, before the next election, a lot of people are going to have to start forking over money to a doctor.

  19. INNER WESTIE – Don’t hold your breath thinking that Sweaty Joe will get into the witness box. That means he won’t be able to claim for pain and hurt, but he can still claim damages for defamation.

  20. [ MTBW
    Posted Tuesday, December 9, 2014 at 4:34 pm | Permalink

    dave

    I am sure you knew I was being facetious.]

    You would be wrong then.

  21. This from Bernard keane

    [Nice test for the media, this – if they describe it as “dumping” the co-payment, they haven’t paid attention to what was announced.]

  22. Mathematics abviously not the Daily Telegraph’s strength –

    “TONY Abbott today bowed to more than 600 days of savage reaction from voters and his own MPs and dumped the proposed $7 GP copayment.”

    http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/national/tony-abbott-announces-changes-to-7-medicare-co-payment/story-fni0xqrc-1227150112844

    600 days before today is April 13, 2013. As Abbott was still denying the GP tax before the Griffith by-election in February 2014, they are really clueless.

  23. [“@latikambourke: A wise coalition peep said to me a few weeks ago ‘what you will soon see is poll panic and backflip after backflip.’”]

    Coalition peep very wise indeed, to tell Latika. She’ll keep it to herself, and reveal only when everyone already knows.

  24. [Inner Westie

    Victoria

    [Due to his bullying arrogance and risible failure to sell a nasty and vengeful budget, Hockey is inflicting upon himself these reputational injuries far more effectively than an two-bit newspaper heading ever could.

    Perhaps fairfax should include this in their Defence.]

    A media organisation once ran a defence to a defamation action by Greg Chappell along the lines he had no reputation to damage (presumably because of underarm bowling).

  25. victoria
    [Nice test for the media, this – if they describe it as “dumping” the co-payment, they haven’t paid attention to what was announced.]

    Just five minutes after you posted that someone posted the Toilet’s Fail.

    [“TONY Abbott today bowed to more than 600 days of savage reaction from voters and his own MPs and dumped the proposed $7 GP copayment.”]

Comments Page 18 of 19
1 17 18 19

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *