This week’s BludgerTrack poll aggregate, which avails itself of new results from Newspoll, Essential Research and Morgan, provides further evidence against the notion that the Coalition might have turned the corner following its post-budget slump. Labor is up 0.3% on two-party preferred, enough to boost it by three on the seat projection with gains in Queensland, South Australia and Tasmania. The main change on the primary vote is a lift for Palmer United, which might reflect its publicity surge in the wake of the Senate changeover, although you would want to see that corroborated by a few more results before taking it to the bank. Newspoll as always provides new numbers on leadership approval, but they have once again failed to disturb a picture that has been set in place for at least the past few weeks a slight decline for Bill Shorten off a post-budget spike, and reliably poor ratings for Tony Abbott.
BludgerTrack: 53.5-46.5 to Labor
Three new polls paint a consistent picture of weakness for the Coalition, and offer some indication of Palmer United enjoying a dividend from its recent publicity.
Senato Wong giving a cracking speech now
Murdoch’s Fox is worth the same today it was 16 years ago…. another brilliant Australian businessman.
Reminds me of the story re Kerry Packer , if he had left his inheritance from dad in the bank savings account he would have been worth twice as much when he carked it .
Maybe Rupert should get Time warner … he will go broke faster.
Senator even.
My latest tweet I am sharing despite not normally doing so.
“@guytaur: .So @CliveFPalmer Minister not able to say saving of $550 being passed on. Sounds like you are being conned while this not being answered”
guytaur@51
Or filibuster and rant, according to Senator Macdonald.
“@SenatorWong: Govt threatens to move gag on carbon debate, refuses to answer qns re Palmer amendmt, now one of its own senators is taking up time.Farcical”
Sounds like pocket change for these guys.
Won’t be surprised if they asked, “So, how much for a weekend pass?”
“@Simon_Cullen: The Senate is now debating a Greens amendment. They’re concerned people who have solar panels could be caught up in reporting requirements”
“@Simon_Cullen: Earlier this morning, the Senate voted down a Labor amendment which would’ve converted the carbon tax to a floating carbon price.”
Yep PUP being conned these amendments make clear
“@Simon_Cullen: The Senate has rejected the Greens amendment. Now moving on to some more Labor amendments. #carbontax”
Labor Amendment to save steel industry
poroti
Totally agree with you on Israel the arrogance of Netanyahu et al is just appalling.
I know the think they are the chosen people but really how many do they have to kill to prove their point.
Disgusting!
senate should be voting on the repeal bills shortly
Labor motion on ARENA
Votes will be interesting
@ClimateReality: The U.K. is turning coal mines into solar farms. #ThisWillSpread
http://t.co/yVMwTV3aAD http://t.co/RDML97tBti
All pretty predictable. Right back in Slater & Gordon days with Wilson, Blewitt and Theiss, it was pretty plain that Theiss didn’t want any rocks being looked under.
They paid their money. They got industrial peace. I read somewhere that the bridge in question was built under budget, ahead of schedule with few if any serious PH&S issues.
The cheques were made out clearly to Wilson’s association, not to the Union, and Theiss got what they wanted: a successful project.
I can’t see how (as Latham argues) this is “a clear case of embezzlement” by Wilson/Blewitt of the Union at all. The funds were never the Union’s. The Union in fact arranged for them to be given back to Theiss.
Whether there were any kick-backs to Theiss management in the back alley behind the office afterwards, we can only speculate. Whatever the case, Theiss has, apparently, never complained.
Wilson was a good witness. He may be “uneducated” (I’m only guessing there), but he’s a sharp as a stiletto. Counsel Assisting didn’t put anything over him, and never once succeeded in getting him to say something he didn’t want to say.
Blewitt, on the other hand was hopeless: contradictory, confused and suffering from “selective amnesia”. It was funny to hear him complain, fair go mate, that he was being asked about things “which happened 20 years ago”, book-ended before and after by photographic recollections of who said what, to whom and when in perfect detail.
His depiction of himself as an innocent and fearful dupe of Wilson was laughable.
In any other court or commission of review he would be regarded as an unreliable witness.
His seeming total immunity from prosecution – if there is all this clear evidence, plus a confession, why not prosecute? – is also a worry, as Latham points out.
The Victorian Police have disgraced themselves in this matter (and also in the Thomson matter).
Far, far worse things have gone on in unions and crooked corporations since this cosy little deal was done back in 1993. The very existence of a Royal Commission into it (as a specific term of reference) is dodgy and pollutes our notions of convention and decency, no matter how they dress it up as a “proper” hearing.
I think the government losing this one. Not sure though
Huh? Cormann is fixated on Labor.
It passed.
As I’ve said several times, for all Labor’s compensation and legislation, Tony Abbott was unwittingly the Greatest Friend that green energy ever had:
, flooding at the Yallourn power station and increased hydro output,” a spokesman for Mr Hunt said.
However, the ANU paper takes those factors into account in estimating the carbon price impact, Professor Jotzo said.
Rather, the impact of the carbon price is probably understated. The highly politicised debate preceded its implementation by about a year, prompting energy consumers to focus more on electricity costs – and presumably to begin making savings – well before the tax began.
“We would expect politically motivated talk … may well have had a large impact on people’s power usage patterns,” Professor Jotzo said.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/carbon-price-helped-curb-emissions-anu-study-finds-20140717-ztuf6.html#ixzz37gLmcIQ5 ]
No idea what these ones are about
guytaur
Brilliant. While our Coal govt is turning the Barrier Reef into a dead outcrop.
“@Simon_Cullen: The carbon tax repeal legislation is now out of ‘committee’ stage. Getting closer to a final vote.”
Observations made by someone of the latest hearing of the RC.
He said the bills passed “without amendment”. Confused.
Josh Taylor @joshgnosis 1m
Data retention ‘neither necessary nor proportionate’: UNHRC http://zd.net/1qgDFxY
“@PaulBongiorno: Standby the senate is sleepwalking the nation backwards.”
Bruce Hawker:
So, saving families and pensioners is a “short term” thing, while voting to crush them is in their best interests?
Two years of whingeing from Labor about Budget measures THEY voted for would go down like a lead balloon.
Waving the Budget through and then giving Abbott the chance to spin the “benefits” any way he can over two years (with the aid of the Murdoch media and all the rest of them carping about how “hypocritical” Labor is to complain about things they waved through) always has to be the wrong thing to do. In the meantime, while Labor is carping and whingeing, real people suffer real damage.
Re RC into unions.
It is now becoming crystal clear what the LNP strategy is.
In their first term – nobble the unions.
In their second term – reintroduce Work Choices, or worse.
@Dan/82
It’s been that way since I knew about Tony Abbott and the whisleblower, it’s bringing back workchoices.
“@eleanorbloom: “This will be a short-lived victory for the govt today” Cos people want action on climate change; want renewables. — Milne.”
Labor is more closely associated (publicly) with the activities of unions than the Coalition is with the activities of business. In terms of political fallout, I doubt the Coalition are too worried about a few employers being caught out – unless they happen to be personally chummy with someone involved. They would still want to keep investigations as narrow as possible to avoid diluting any consequences for unions and Labor.
Macdonald cites cold Brisbane weather in closing speech on 3rd reading!
Yep this country is going backwards at a rate of knots. How depressment
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/climate-change/australias-renewable-energy-industry-grinds-to-a-halt-20140716-ztio2.html#ixzz37gOCPbs7
LOL.
Stephen Koukoulas @TheKouk 1m
Six months ago it was cold in the northern hemisphere; now it’s cold in the southern hemisphere – see, global warming is crap.
This is liberals.
Retweeted by Greens
Christine Milne @senatormilne 3m
Tony Abbott has said to the Australian people: you must pay for the costs of global warming – the big polluters will get off scot free.
Indeed, another hidden tax.
Re quote from Bruce Hawker in BB@81: However, we will spend every day up to the election reminding you of the the impact of these measures”?
Something like that worked for ‘boats’ and the ‘carbon tax’ in the last Parliament. However, I think that would only work now if the nation’s major media organisations got on board and worked as Labor’s propaganda service. As it is, the Government would be given an easy ride while the opposition’s ‘reminders’ would be minimised or ignored, Better to block the Budget as far as possible to maximise exposure and minimise the damage it does.
Abbott the snivelling toady.
http://www.smh.com.au/comment/tony-abbotts-praise-of-japanese-submariners-delivers-a-blow-to-nations-psyche-20140716-zti06.html
Imagine if a Labor PM has uttered this pathetic drivel. The GG would be on the warpath,the RSL up in arms.
I really hate this country’s d*ckhead overlords.
Well there goes Mr Abbott’s carbon tax propaganda.
What dixer’s is he going to ask today?
That’s it. 🙁
“@senatormilne: This is a tragic day for Australia and the planet but the Greens will lead the campaign to make the big polluters pay for global warming”
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/16/journalists-face-jail-leaks-security-laws
3 points:
Does this mean Andrew Wilke would have faced jail for his interviews and public comments about the Iraq war?
Can operation sovereign borders, or any aspect of it be considered a special intelligence operation?
and
Frack you Clive Palmer you fecken frackhead.
(That last point was just a general one.)