Newspoll, Galaxy and ReachTEL: 52-48 to LNP; Galaxy: 55-45 to Labor in Ashgrove

An epic Queensland election day overview encompassing late polling, seat result modelling, seats to watch (i.e. most of them), and a big colourful map.

The last three statewide polls of the Queensland election campaign have spoken with marvellous unanimity, and they are joined by an Ashgrove poll from Galaxy that emphatically confirms the impression to emerge from ReachTEL on Tuesday that Campbell Newman is headed for defeat at the hands of Labor’s Kate Jones. First the state polls:

• The Newspoll survey for The Australian reached 1682 respondents between Tuesday and Thursday, offering a refrain with which you will shortly become familiar: a lead to the Liberal National Party of 52-48 on two-party preferred, with the LNP on 41% of the primary vote and Labor on 37%. For the minor parties, the Greens were on 6%, Katter’s Australian Party was on 2%, and Palmer United was as usual rolled into “others” – a bit unfortunately, given that PUP is fielding candidates in 50 seats and KAP is doing so in only 11. Campbell Newman’s approval rating of 35% was down six points on the survey Newspoll conducted at the start of the campaign, while his disapproval was up seven to 58%. Annastacia Palaszczuk’s ratings were little changed, with approval steady on 38% and disapproval up two to 40%. Newman’s modest 42-38 lead from the earlier poll as preferred premier was all but erased, the latest resulting putting it at 43-42.

• The Galaxy poll for the Courier-Mail was likewise conducted between Tuesday and Thursday, though with a much more modest sample of 800. Nonetheless, the result was exactly identical to Newspoll on two-party preferred and both major parties’ primary votes. The Greens were slightly higher at 8%, Katter’s Australian Party the same at 2%, and a result was offered for Palmer United, that being 4%. Preferred premier too was all but identical to Newspoll, except that the one-point lead was in favour of Palaszczuk, who had gone from a 45-40 deficit in the Galaxy poll at the start of the campaign to a lead of 45-44. She also had a slight 44-41 edge on the question of who had performed better during the campaign.

• Were ReachTEL in the business of rounding its results to whole numbers, it too might have come in the same as Newspoll and Galaxy for the major parties on both two-party and primary measures. The automated phone poll was conducted on Thursday night from a sample of 1560, and had the LNP on 41.5% of the primary vote, Labor on 37.2%, the Greens on 7.5% and Palmer United on 4.4%. On the question of who would win, there was a clean 60-40 split in favour of the LNP. There were also further questions on leader approval which you can read about in the link.

I have plugged all that into my poll tracker model, the output of which you can see in the sidebar. On every measure, the three polls have made next to no difference to the result that came out last week when the previous statewide ReachTEL poll was added to the model. The LNP is still credited with a modest absolute majority of 52 seats out of 89, and Labor with a total of 34 which, although being nearly five times what it was able to manage in 2012, still leaves it well out of contention for victory.

There are as always a few caveats that need to be added here. The modest allocation of three seats to “others” is based simply on an assumption that minor party and independent candidates elected in 2012 who are recontesting this time – namely Mount Isa MP Rob Katter and Dalrymple MP Shane Knuth of Katter’s Australian Party, and independent Peter Wellington in Nicklin – will win re-election, and that all other seats will divide between the LNP and Labor. While such results are extremely difficult to predict, it seems there are plausible prospects for independents in Maryborough, Burdekin and Gaven, which the model allocates to the LNP, and also in Mackay and Gladstone, which go to Labor. That said, it is by no means certain that the aforementioned three incumbents will win election. Nonetheless, if the evidently sour mood towards the LNP was to cause independents to poach traditionally conservative seats, the projected LNP majority would look that little more precarious.

Then there is the issue of preferences, which pollsters generally are assuming will behave as they did in 2012. This is problematic, since 11% of the vote in 2012 was for Katter’s Australian Party, which this time is contesting only 11 seats, most of them conservative rural strongholds. There is also a strong case to be made that Left hostility towards the Newman government, stimulated by a “put the LNP last” messages being waged by the union movement which appears to have gained a certain traction on social media, will substantially reverse a trend that saw the just-vote-one rate among Greens voters steadily ascend from 23.6% at the 1995 election to a peak of 50.1% in 2012. My poll tracker attempts to account for this by using a model to determine the preference distribution, but its assumptions are conservative and its result not dramatically different from those produced by the pollsters. The impact of all this should not be overestimated, but it’s certainly plausible that this brace of 52-48 results is really more like 51-49, which would chip away a little more at that LNP seat tally.

If these two factors are added together, and the swing is distributed in a sufficiently inopportune fashion, it certainly could be that the LNP is unable to make it to the magic number of 45 out of 89. However, there are quite a few stars that need to align in order for that to happen, and it would seem that far the most likely outcome is that the LNP makes it over the line – minus one Premier. For the other poll to report today is a survey of Ashgrove from Galaxy, which finds Campbell Newman with a devastating 55-45 deficit against Kate Jones (although I’m unable to locate a sample size). The primary votes are 48% for Jones, 42% for Newman and 8% for the Greens, all of which sits very comfortably with the poll conducted on Tuesday evening by ReachTEL, the result of which was 46.5% for Jones, 42.3% for Newman, 8.2% for the Greens and a two-party Labor lead of 54-46. Possum Comitatus posted the following insight into Newman’s fortunes in Ashgrove, derived from union polling over the past term:

Today’s papers offer the following:

• According to Steven Wardill of the Courier-Mail, “insiders last night expected Labor to win Cairns, Cook, Townsville and Thuringowa but fall short in Barron River and Mundingburra”. Whitsunday and Mirani “remain tight races while Keppel was expected to swing to Labor”. The Gold Coast seats of Burleigh and Broadwater are “vulnerable”, apparently thanks to Mermaid Beach MP Ray Stevens. In Brisbane, “the LNP faces significant swings against it but may cling on in Sunnybank, Stretton, Ferny Grove and Murrumba but lose a swag of others, including Bulimba, Waterford, Lytton, Greenslopes, Sandgate and Nudgee”. As for Ashgrove, insiders from both camps reportedly expect it will be “tighter than the polls are predicting”.

• Elsewhere in the Courier-Mail, Paul Williams of Griffith University says “the early feedback was Mackay’s former mayor Julie Boyd was a threat, but I’ve heard she has fizzled”.

• In The Australian, Michael McKenna reports that “insiders from both major parties say their tracking shows that the swings are patchy, and some traditional Labor seats – which fell to the LNP for the first time in decades in 2012 – are inflating statewide polling”. A Labor source is quoting saying they expect to gain only 20 to 25 seats, but offers that “our support was falling last week but as come back in the past few days”.

To help guide you through an extremely complex election, I offer you the colour-coded map at the bottom of the post, which being embedded in Google Maps can be zoomed in and out of and navigated around at well, and the following region-by-region review. The colours of the boundary outlines shown in the map correspond with the ten regions detailed below. The filled colouring for each electorate works as follows. There are three shades of blue, of which the deepest indicates a safe seat for the LNP, the middle shade is a seat that could go either way, and the light shade means an anticipated Labor gain. I’ve played this by ear a little, but generally speaking a seat is rated a certain Labor gain if the margin is less than about 6%, and a certain LNP retain if upwards of 13%. Red indicates a seat Labor won in 2012; the tint is lighter in the case of Mackay, to signify that it might fall to an independent. If a seat is held by an independent or the KAP and seems to have any chance of staying that way, it’s in grey.

Taking all that together, and to give you an idea of how difficult this election is to read, I’ve got 33 seats which I’m confident will be won by the LNP, 21 ditto for Labor, 25 designated seats-to-watch, and 10 which are complicated by an independent or the KAP. Of that 10, there are three that might be won by Labor (Mackay, Gladstone and Mount Isa), or four if you want to be generous and throw in Gaven. Condamine, Dalrymple, Nicklin, Burdekin and Nanango will be won by the LNP if they’re not won by an independent or the KAP. Mount Isa, Maryborough or (just maybe) Gaven could be counted as three-cornered contests.

Inner Brisbane (LNP 9, Labor 1)

In what would ordinarily be perhaps Labor’s strongest area, its only win in 2012 was Anna Bligh’s seat of South Brisbane. Labor unconvincingly retained South Brisbane at a by-election when Bligh quit shortly afterwards, and emphatically gained Stafford at a by-election in July last year. Labor should have little trouble recovering Brisbane Central, Mount Coot-tha, Bulimba, Greenslopes and Yeerongpilly. Greenslopes was corroborated by a Galaxy poll a fortnight ago which had Labor with a lead of 59-41. Yeerongpilly is held by Carl Judge, who won the seat for the LNP in 2012 but later parted company with the party, and now seeks to retain it as an independent. Labor’s by-election win in Stafford should stand it in good stead there, but the 7.1% margin from the 2014 election means I’m not giving it away. Then there is Ashgrove, scene of the election’s million dollar question. There is now voluminous evidence that it will go Labor’s way, but under the circumstances I’m erring on the side of caution.

Northern Brisbane (LNP 12, Labor 0)

Brisbane’s suburbs are a mother lode of seats that could go either way. I’ve identified Nudgee, Sandgate and Morayfield as seats Labor should win easily, and their task in Redcliffe should be greatly assisted by the fact that it’s now held for them by Yvette D’Ath following her big win in the by-election of last February. Apart than that, apart from two safe LNP seats, everything is rated as up for grabs: Everton (13.2%), Ferny Grove (9.5%), Kallangur (12.4%), Pine Rivers (13.7%), Murrumba (9.5%), Redcliffe (10.1%) and Pumicestone (12.1%). I’m told Labor is expecting big swings in Kallangur and Pine Rivers, which despite their present formidable margins were in Labor hands before 2012, and the LNP’s behaviour tells us it is very worried about Murrumba. However, a Galaxy poll of Pumicestone a fortnight ago had the LNP leading 52-48.

Southern Brisbane (LNP 13, Labor 2)

I’ve identified Lytton, Capalaba, Waterford and Logan as certain Labor gains. I observe that Possum‘s localised polling map doesn’t look great for Labor in Capalaba, but he advises that this should not be taken too literally, and it seems hard to believe Labor would be unable to knock over a margin of 3.7%. In the balance are Algester (9.1%), Stretton (9.6%), Sunnybank (10.2%) and Mansfield (11.1%). The strength of the LNP margins in Stretton and Sunnybank is something of a puzzle to me, given how multicultural they are. Mansfield is one of the state’s most reliable bellwethers, as traditionally has been Springwood, but such is its 15.4% margin that I’m leaving it in the LNP column. Worth keeping an eye on though.

Ipswich (LNP 2, Labor 1)

Labor did very badly to lose the seat of Ipswich (margin 4.2%) in 2012, and only to a slightly lesser extent Ipswich West (7.2%), while retaining the seat of Bundamba. I’ve got Ipswich down as a done deal, but Ipswich West will be that little bit harder.

Gold Coast (LNP 10, Labor 0)

Despite Labor’s success here in the Beattie years, the Gold Coast traditionally votes conservative, its three federal seats all being safe for the LNP. I’ve identified Albert (11.9%), Broadwater (11.3%) and Burleigh (11.0%) as seats where Labor might be a show, but I wouldn’t have my money on them. Certainly a poll conducted by ReachTEL this week for the Gold Coast Bulletin (see at bottom of post) suggests swings will be in the high single figures, and not double as required. The other big point of interest here is Gaven, which LNP dissident Alex Douglas is seeking to defend as an independent. This may emerge as a seat where the LNP’s just-vote-one mantra doesn’t do them any favours, as conservative vote-splitting might create an opening for Labor. However, I’m hearing an LNP win is the most likely result.

Sunshine Coast (LNP 6, Independent 1, Labor 0)

Labor aren’t seriously competitive here, so the only point of interest is whether Peter Wellington gets re-elected as an independent in Nicklin.

Central Coast (LNP 9, Labor 2, Independent 1)

Perhaps demonstrating the advantage of long-term incumbency in regional seats, Labor managed to retain Rockhampton and Mackay here in 2012. They also got cleaned up in a number of seats which are traditionally marginal at state level, and good enough for Labor federally to win them the seat of Capricornia a lot more often than not. That leaves a three seats in the vicinity of Rockhampton and Mackay which are on the Labor watch list, namely Keppel (6.4%), Whitsunday (10.7%) and Mirani (11.2%). Mirani stayed conservative through the Beattie years, but Labor was strengthened when the 2009 redistribution merged the electorate with the abolished Labor-held seat of Fitzroy. Veteran LNP member Ted Malone is retiring, and long-serving former Fitzroy MP Jim Pearce is contesting the seat for Labor. Three seats in the area are identified as being vulnerable to independents. Two of these are held by the LNP, namely Maryborough and Burdekin, which are respectively facing highly rated challenges from Chris Foley, who held the seat from 2003 until his very narrow defeat in 2012, and BJ Davison. In Mackay, the retirement of Labor member Tim Mulherin is coinciding with a strong run from former local mayor Julie Boyd. NB: My graphic overlay for Gympie doesn’t seem to be working: if it was, it would be down as safe LNP.

Northern Coast (LNP 7, Labor 1)

Encompassing Cairns and Townsville, which are both more-or-less home to three electorates, along with rural Hinchinbrook and the Top End electorate of Cook, Labor has very high hopes here. Galaxy helped light the way here a fortnight ago by targeting all the Cairns and Townsville seats with automated phone polls, showing Labor ahead in all three Townsville seats – by 58-42 in Townsville (margin 4.8%), 52-48 in Thuringowa (no margin as Labor came third in 2012) and 51-49 in Mundingburra (10.2%) – and two of the three Cairns seats, by 53-47 in Cairns (8.9%) and 61-39 in Mulgrave, the one seat in the region it currently holds. In the other Cairns seat, Barron River (9.5%), the result was 50-50. Of those six, I’ve got Townsville and Mulgrave down for Labor and the others on the watch list, and it also seems generally presumed that Labor will win Cook.

Urban Hinterland (LNP 5, Labor 0)

Labor’s only show here is Toowoomba North, where former Attorney-General Kerry Shine was defeated in 2012 and is now seeking to win the seat back. Nanango is down on the watch list because Condamine MP Ray Hopper is running here in a bid to extend the empires of his own family and Katter’s Australian Party (see under Interior below), but it’s hard to believe he can knock off Deb Frecklington.

Interior (LNP 5, KAP 2, Labor 0)

Three seats here are held by Katter’s Australian Party, including two that were won at the 2012 election – Mount Isa by Rob Katter, and Dalrymple by Shane Knuth – plus Condamine, which was won for the LNP by Ray Hopper, who jumped ship for the KAP over the course of the term. Hopper, who entered parliament in 2001 as an independent but shortly joined the Nationals, is now seeking to poach Nanango from the LNP, leaving Condamine to be contested by his son, Ben Hopper (see under Urban Hinterland above). It seems unlikely that either Hopper gambit will pay off, and such is the KAP’s parlous state that even Katter and Knuth can’t take anything for granted, although both would probably be slightly favoured.

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

469 comments on “Newspoll, Galaxy and ReachTEL: 52-48 to LNP; Galaxy: 55-45 to Labor in Ashgrove”

Comments Page 1 of 10
1 2 10
  1. @danielhurstbne: ReachTEL on Thursday night: LNP leads Labor statewide 52-48% after prefs (primaries 41.5 LNP, 37.2 Labor, 7.5 Greens), says Seven #qldvotes

  2. Hmmmmm. That’s got me looking for a jug of sanguine.

    And I will be tuning into a QLD election night for the first time in about 23 years.

  3. 52/48 is heart attack country for the LNP, given the weighting towards ALP seats in Qld.

    A test for the grassroots campaigning of ALP vs big promising LNP.

  4. Looks like it’s going to come down to exhaustion of preferences. If Labor can get the Green vote coming through 20% more strongly than in 2012, and the LNP don’t get any help from the minors, they might be in with a slight chance.

    Still make LNP favourites.

  5. [
    Newman has zero hope in Ashgrove if it comes in 52/48. Will get beat by 3-4%]

    And no idea who the most likely Premier is the night before. Who would Anna ring to concede defeat!

  6. Those on the fence who feel the state is not ready for a change of Government may be more inclined to lodge a protest vote if they see a 52/48 figure the day before the election, thinking the LNP is home and hosed.

  7. A great way to start a concession speech ‘a fish rots from the head and although tonight the LNP fish has slithered to a narrow victory a great ALP contest has cut the fish’s head of at the finish line.

  8. agree Newman is toast in Ashgrove. But it is interesting that a 52/48 result would be the same as the recent Victorian Election which wasn’t seen as close……strange how the perspective seems to be different for QLD….I guess due to the size of the swing which really just reflects how bad ALP was last time….

  9. [agree Newman is toast in Ashgrove. But it is interesting that a 52/48 result would be the same as the recent Victorian Election which wasn’t seen as close……strange how the perspective seems to be different for QLD….I guess due to the size of the swing which really just reflects how bad ALP was last time….]

    Well I would argue it is more of a function of how poorly voters judged last time. Still a lot of stupid qld’ers quite happy with the very poor governance these LNP clowns have delivered.

  10. You’d think 52 would be safe, but using last election prefs and no indication of regional swings it could be real interesting. Long night ahead tomorrow I suspect.

    C’mon Qld, give us 44 seats max for the LNP and Can Do an appointment with Centrelink on Monday. Maximum chaos.

  11. Desperately close stuff! Assuming the ALP picks up net 30% from the greens that leaves the LNP about 2 points in front before distribution of the the minors/inds. Geography and correction in areas of massive swing last time (Pine Rivers? Kallangur, Albert) favours the ALP but sitting member effect could save some critical LNP seats..

  12. Off of those primaries, I really think that 52-48 is rather generous to the LNP, thanks to the preference flows at the last election being extremely unusual.

    Supposing that the ALP gets 80% of Greens voters’ preferences and 50% of non LNP/GRN/ALP voters’ preferences, that gets them to 50% 2PP by my figuring.

  13. Trawler

    Yes it seems so, the difference presumably being the 5 seats going to others…..unless I am wrong 4 of the 5 seats would be conservative leaning.

    So the LNP ends up with the same problem of the conservatives everywhere and that is right leaning independants or parties such as KAP.

    I wonder who these 5 extra seats would support? Have we seen any comments from KAP etc??

  14. If 52/48 holds tomorrow for the LNP after prefs it could drop to 51/49.

    SE Qld could see LNP on 50/50 ALP picks up 27 seats in SE Qld.
    Rest of State could see LNP on 54/46 ALP picks up 7 more seats.

    A Green calculator with over-rides for Gaven, Maryborough and Gladstone would see LNP 40, ALP 45, KAP 2 and Ind 2.
    That’s how close these figures can make it.
    Try it yourself if you don’t believe me.

  15. what do we think the exhaust rate will be for Labor to take preferences from Greens and others? doesn’t it make it harder for them to make up the difference??

  16. It’s been a busy week, many of my friends have been in Ashgrove urging a just vote 1 for the Greens strategy. Apparently has been very effective.

  17. @ J341983, 29

    Standard procedure would be to base it off of previous-election preference flows unless otherwise stated (ie. Morgan’s respondent-allocated figures).

    Normally, it’s a reasonable assumption, but it is almost certainly not in this case.

  18. @32 – Oh, I’m aware, but considering the rather unusual circumstances from 2012, if they were asking about their preference allocations.

  19. Election prediction time

    – The LNP to be returned
    – LNP to lose pretty much every seat under 10% (potentially up to 27 seats)but I think the ALP will gain between 20-25 seats
    – Kate Jones to win Ashgrove easily
    – LNP to blame Tone and unions

  20. [It’s been a busy week, many of my friends have been in Ashgrove urging a just vote 1 for the Greens strategy. Apparently has been very effective.]
    Wow Newman must be totally farqued

  21. Well the well prepared bird catches the early voting worm my friends. I hope the black ops election people didn’t leave court of electoral returns fingerprints!

  22. Re: ESJ @ 31

    [It’s been a busy week, many of my friends have been in Ashgrove urging a just vote 1 for the Greens strategy. Apparently has been very effective.]

    Spot the deliberate falsehood in the above sentence. Hint: it’s the 9th and 10th words.

  23. Line ball it is then?

    If the LNP don’t win that’s the end of Tony. He definitely won’t survive if QLD falls to Labor.

    Can’t wait…

  24. esj

    back to your “Bourne Identity” movies. You are so clever.

    Hope you front up here tomorrow night and don’t forget the white flag!

  25. Did Labor really only get 40% of Green preferences in 2012? They should double that tomorrow

    I’ve had $20 on Labor at $8.20 for an interest, I’d probably get better tomorrow but that will do. I think I’ll get a run for my money

  26. Womble

    Nice bet, I suspect the market is making the mistake of forgetting that Queensland unlike Victoria, can be a big swinging state which is why you might be on the money.

  27. I think some on this thread are counting their Australorps too soon.

    OPV surely has to favour the incumbents, and “vote 1 Green” is a great way to get the LNP back in a few marginals, isn’t it? Vast respect for Antony Green – I think he goes on walking tours of polling stations on his days off – but does the pendulum allow for 75-80% of votes being “just 1”.

    What does 2PP even mean nothing if everyone just votes 1? Or, to put it another way, what is the sound of one vote clapping?

    And what does it say about Queenslanders if we/they aren’t even trusted to count to two?

  28. womble – preferences tend to exhaust at high rates in Queensland elections, which is why the Green flow is low.

    It’s improbable that 80% of Green voters will even allocate preferences, let alone universally allocate them to Labor.

  29. Which is why I think the ALP may come up short, if we look at the Victorian election, the ALP won half a dozen seats of the back of Green preferences, with OPV two or three of them may have gone Liberal.

  30. @46 – doesn’t that depend on the dynamics of each election? You’d think the Greens would be more interested in a change of Government than maintaining the status quo?

  31. Vote 1 Green an excellent way to lodge a protest vote against both parties. Watch for well dressed youth with conservative haircuts handing out ” vote for clean water and trees, vote only 1 GREENS”

Comments Page 1 of 10
1 2 10

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *