Gippsland by-election post-mortem

This entry will shortly be expanded with a considered analysis of the result, the general thrust of which will be that the surprisingly large swing to the Nationals indeed sounds warning bells for the Rudd government, however keen Labor partisans might be to mark it down to local factors. Below is a localised breakdown of the two-party preferred result, grouped into the three municipalities covered by the electorate.

NAT ALP Swing to NAT
# % # % 2008 2007
Latrobe City 12,470 56.4 9,634 43.6 10.3 -2.7
Traralgon 7,025 61.3 4,442 38.7 11.0 -3.4
Morwell 2,073 45.9 2,444 54.1 8.4 -2.7
Churchill 836 44.0 1,063 56.0 8.5 -0.6
Rural 2,536 60.1 1,685 39.9 8.1 -1.7
Wellington Shire 12,554 67.7 5,987 32.3 5.3 -2.6
Sale 3,588 65.0 1,929 35.0 3.6 -3.8
Maffra 1,545 67.6 741 32.4 8.0 -3.7
Rural 7,411 69.1 3,317 30.9 5.4 -1.7
East Gippsland Shire 12,796 66.6 6,429 33.4 4.4 -0.8
Bairnsdale 4,230 66.0 2,175 34.0 2.3 0.6
Lakes Entrance 2,399 69.2 1,068 30.8 9.6 -1.3
Paynesville 1,125 67.6 539 32.4 5.8 -1
Orbost 1,042 69.1 467 30.9 2.3 -2.4
Rural 4,000 64.7 2,180 35.3 3.6 -1.4
TOTAL 71,630 63.2 41,920 36.8 6.6 -1.8

Episode one: Perspective. Labor has suffered a sobering 9.3 per cent slump on the primary vote and a two-party swing comparable to that of the September 1973 Parramatta by-election, which rebuffed the Whitlam government and brought Philip Ruddock to parliament. What’s more, Antony Green notes that Labor entered that campaign burdened by the Whitlam government’s proposed second airport at Galston. The Hawke government faced six by-elections in its truncated first term, picking up a 0.5 per cent swing in Richmond and suffering swings ranging from 1.2 per cent to 5.0 per cent in the other five. There are also state precedents such as Labor’s wins in Burwood and Benalla in the wake of the Kennett government’s defeat which suggest governments should be able to convert honeymoon opinion poll leads into votes at by-elections. As the above table demonstrates, most of the damage to Labor was done in the Latrobe Valley – hypotheses to follow shortly.

Episode two: Nationals versus Liberal. The by-election was the first time the Liberals contested the seat since 1987, so yardsticks for the Coalition parties’ relative performance are hard to come by. The best one available is the state upper house election in 2006, the only recent race involving the three parties competing separately without significant sitting member factors in play. In the equivalent booths, the Nationals and Liberals were evenly matched, with 25.4 per cent and 25.3 per cent respectively. The by-election by contrast has seen the Nationals almost double the Liberal vote, 40.4 per cent to 20.7 per cent. The combined Coalition vote is up a remarkable 12.2 per cent, giving merger opponents in the Victorian Nationals still more to work with. Labor scored 33.7 per cent for the 2006 state upper house, against 27.0 per cent at the by-election.

Episode three: West versus east. The corollary of Labor doing especially badly in the western part of the electorate is that they did less badly in the east, outside of localised outbreaks at Lakes Entrance (Chester’s home town) and Maffra. This is easy to explain: East Gippsland has a high concentration of older voters (21.0 per cent over 65 compared with a national 13.3 per cent), a sure predictor of low electoral volatility. By contrast, Latrobe’s age profile is almost perfectly consistent with the national average. It might nonetheless have been expected that discontent over the failure of the budget to increase the base level of the pension would have generated a backlash here, which may indeed have occurred to some degree.

Episode four: Climate change. In opposition, climate change worked for Labor as a symbol of Rudd’s modernity and Howard’s obsolescence. In government, it is becoming increasingly evident that Labor faces a stern political challenge in matching deeds to words against the backdrop of an eerily familiar oil shock. Nowhere is this more evident than in the Latrobe Valley, whose brown coal power stations provide Victoria with 85 per cent of its electricity. The 10 per cent swing here is a reminder that voters in low-income areas do not take kindly to bearing the sharp end of visionary government reform programs, as the Pauline Hanson phenomenon demonstrated last decade. Interestingly, the Liberals hit Labor hard on the issue in their television advertising, but the Nationals don’t seem to have mentioned it. It is likely the Liberals succeeded in driving Latrobe Valley voters away from Labor with this attack on Darren McCubbin, who had mused that local droughts might have been linked to coal-fired power, but that Darren Chester was as much the beneficiary as Rohan Fitzgerald.

Episode five: State factors. Talk of a sharp anti-Labor swing in the Latrobe Valley should sound a familiar note for election watchers. This is because the area proved the sting in the tail of Labor’s state election night triumph in November 2006, which was marred by the surprise loss of Morwell to the Nationals and Narracan (mostly in the neighbouring federal seat of McMillan, which significantly failed to swing at last November’s election) to the Liberals after respective swings of 7.0 per cent and 9.5 per cent. Local discontent over water issues was seen to be to blame: defeated Narracan MP Ian Maxfield complained that “the Liberal and National parties ran an incredibly effective scare campaign by claiming that we were sending sewage to Gippsland and taking fresh water into Melbourne”. Sure enough, the Liberals returned to the theme during the by-election campaign with television ads that prominently featured an image of John Brumby.

Episode six: Labor versus Labor. Another reason given for Labor’s poor state election performance in Morwell was dissent in the local party, leading many prominent members to quit in protest against an MP said by one to have surrounded himself with a “Left clique”. There was further talk of disunity ahead of the by-election, with 2007 Gippsland candidate Jane Rowe seen to have been elbowed aside in favour of Darren McCubbin. Given that neither appeared a match-winner in their own right, Labor would have done better to have stuck with Rowe who could at least have built upon her existing work in last year’s election campaign.

Episode seven: Night of the living Nationals. The big winners are unquestionably the state Nationals and especially their leader Peter Ryan, who holds the seat of Gippsland South and until recently employed Darren Chester as his chief-of-staff. So far on Ryan’s watch, the Nationals have held their own at the 2002 state election (while the Liberals lost 22 seats and 8.3 per cent of the primary vote), and defied predictions to retain party status in 2006 after winning two extra seats in the lower house (cancelling out losses caused by electoral reform in the upper house). Ryan was the only party leader at state or federal level who was anywhere to be seen in the parties’ television ads (UPDATE: Okay, not quite – there was one Kevin Rudd read-to-camera), where he presented a local face unencumbered by association with unpopular actions of current or recently deposed governments. The Liberals by contrast had Peter Costello campaigning in the electorate, which might not have been such a good idea.

Episode eight: Night of the dying Coalition merger. There was talk going into the by-election of the Nationals and Liberals running a joint candidate to push the Victorian parties down the same merger road being followed in Queensland. The result has surely vindicated the state party’s decision to follow its own course. There are now a number of reasons to suppose that what’s good for the Queensland goose might be less good for the Victorian gander. Firstly, the by-election result gives force to the idea that competing Nationals and Liberal candidates can maximise the total Coalition vote where there is compulsory preferential voting and thus little preference leakage – which is crucially the case at Victorian state level, but not in Queensland. Secondly, the near-parity of strength among the two Coalition parties in Queensland has rendered them unmarketable at state elections due to confusion as to who their candidate for premier is. As this doesn’t apply in Victoria, the Nationals can serve the broader Coalition cause by absorbing protest votes in rural and regional areas.

Episode nine: Local factors. Those of us watching at a safe distance were bemused by the focus on the parish pump issue of Traralgon’s post offices, but that town indeed swung savagely against Labor even by Latrobe Valley standards.

UPDATE: Reading back, I note that apart from one “oil shock” reference, I have spent little time here discussing the decisive issue of petrol prices – mostly because I can only offer statements of the obvious. It should also be noted that Peter McGauran might not have taken much of a personal vote into retirement, with complaints heard he was spending too much time in Melbourne. Meanwhile, Andrew Landeryou hears the Coalition ran an unsustainably expensive campaign, as suggested by the remarkable number of Nationals and Liberal television ads floating around.

Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

229 comments on “Gippsland by-election post-mortem”

Comments Page 5 of 5
1 4 5
  1. Marky,

    Oh wise one with your incisive repartee.

    Petrol prices are what drove the Nats. Truss came out a week before the election and said 20 cents a litre discount is what is required.

    You know why he said that? Because he thought it might work. Great harlots are the Opposition. All influence, but no reponsibility.

  2. judy barnes @ 192 –

    I think the Libs will bolt in. Not sure if it’ll be by a bigger or smaller margin, there are arguments either way, but IMHO, Labor should save its money, or maybe slip some of it to a good independent candidate should one stand.

    I do feel for the poor people of Cyprus. They’ve suffered enough already!!! 🙁

    Lunchalot would have to be the most incompetent blowhard that has ever graced Australian diplomacy. He buggered up badly on East Timor which ended up destroying a nation, was a leading player in what most believe has been the greatest foreign policy debacle in modern history all but destroying another nation in the process, and ignored (I’m being generous) bribery of a murderous despot who he claimed was trying to build biological/chemical/nuclear weapons that may have been used against us.

    That the UN would employ a war criminal as a peace envoy just beggars belief!

  3. MayoFeral, now that description of the good lord L certainly strikes home BUT i’m surprised you held back so much, lol, a good independant, as you said, might just do the trick, i KNOW labor wouldnt have a snowflakes chance in hell, latte sipping is too modern for the landed gentry, if an independent was given under the lap aid by labor then there might just be a modicum of sympathy for the labor agenda. a well known local identity would be the ideal candidate.

  4. By elections are by elections, these people protest a vote because they think that politicians are to blame for their troubles where in the end many of their probs are a result of their own doing. In by elections we let out our frustrations so to get our politicians to do something about them, petrol prices are not a result of the government but people in Gippsland thought otherwise, put simply this result is an aberration.

  5. MayoFeral

    “That the UN would employ a war criminal as a peace envoy just beggars belief!”

    Dolly’s just the type of d!ckhead they would employ. They made Kofi Annan Secretary-General after all. He’s lucky not to be up in front of the War Crimes Tribunal for his role in stopping the UN from intervening in the Rwandan Genocide.

  6. does anyone know if newspoll results will be published tonight, this is nearly as bad as waiting every fortnight for the polls before the election.

  7. Mayo Feral their are war criminals everywhere doing as they please. Tony Blair he is now some ambassador for some justice group, pathetic.
    Kissinger gets a noble peace prize for bombing the stuffening out of Vietnam and Cambodia with Agent Orange. America supports the overthrow of government in Chile with a despotic dictator who jails and oppresses his countrypeople….
    Mugabe travels the world and represents Zimbabwe and the world allows it.
    I could go on on on on on on with this pathetic individuals they are everywhere.
    Downer is a small fish compared to this lot…

  8. Just watchd world leaders allow Mugabe to be at a conference in a couple of weeks with them and allow him to speak. Mugabe should be arrested as soon as he sets foot in another country outside Africa.

  9. Turnbull should either jump of a cliff or hang himself, these figures ruin his short term leadership aspirations.
    If the government is going to do anything about petrol it should look at transport costs, thus people who are owner drivers, it is these people who are hurting badly.
    Their costs have risen sharply and these people perhaps need help.

  10. In a very difficult economic environment the government still has a landslide lead. Amazing stuff. Of course it won’t be reported that way but still we know its true.

  11. The end of the thousand mile salad is upon us.

    Talk to your parents and grandpaents. In the good old days you only ate fruit and vegetables in season.

  12. Agree nothing to panic about. However if petrol prices go to 2.20 and beyond by December and the government does not have an alternative strategy in place such as looking at Gas, or Electric vehicles than it may be serious trouble long term.
    Nonetheless it has one postive- Brendan Nelson because he is unelectable, and will be in 2010, just looking at him will turn people off.

  13. Marky, the Liberals will also need a strategy at the next election. They won’t get a free run as they did in this by election.

  14. Apart from the last Newspoll, which is more and more looking like an outlier, the opposition have recorded a primary vote of around 37%. This time it is 39%. Labor has been getting 46% and this time it’s 44%. Does the term MOE mean anything here?

  15. GG @ 219 –

    I hope the 12,000 mile bottled water joins it.

    Over the weekend had someone chewing my ear about the high cost of petrol. Which might have been fair enough except the drongo was sipping on a tiny bottle of a well known French mineral water that probably cost twice as much as a litre of unleaded.

    Okay, I don’t drink the tap water here either, its officially the worst tasting in the country, but there’s plenty of local spring water that is cheaper and hasn’t been transported half way around the world.

  16. mayoferal,

    Maybe your right. Perhaps bottled water in places like Australia is the “jump the shark” indulgence that our modern society can’t sustain.

  17. Tony Jones got Turnbull good on Lateline tonight. He virtually admitted 5c a litre is just a political “sham”. Not good shadow treasurer material

  18. 221 “Marky, the Liberals will also need a strategy at the next election.”

    The Liberals will also need a strategy for the next fortnight. The only thing that has substantially changed is that their bid of a five cent petrol price cut has been trumped by the Nationals to a twenty cent cut.

    The next fortnight won’t have parliament sitting for them to grandstand. It won’t have state Newspolls coming out on a daily basis setting the news agenda each morning. Tax cuts come in from tomorrow and who is to say that when the Greenhouse Gas Emissions report comes out on Friday that there won’t be huge positive announcements of excise cuts accompanying it?

Comments Page 5 of 5
1 4 5

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *