Click here for full display of South Australian election results.
Some very general observations on the result before diving into specifics. As expected, Labor appears to have won every seat in Adelaide except Bragg, where Liberal member Jack Batty achieved a surprisingly normal-looking result. That involved unseating the Liberals in Colton, Hartley and Morialta, which Labor had held at various points during its previous time in government, together with Morphett and Unley, which it hadn’t. In a great many other seats in Adelaide, the Liberals have been reduced to minor party status, in many places running fourth and in one place even fifth. My system is calling four seats for the Liberals and has them leading in a fifth, making them likely but not certain to retain opposition status ahead of One Nation, who are being called in three and ahead in a fourth.
Labor may not be entirely spared the One Nation lash though, which needless to say has been the other big story of the election. My own preference estimates suggest a knife-edge result in Light, which the long-serving and highly popular incumbent Tony Piccolo abandoned for an unsuccessful run in Ngadjuri, presumably to help Labor win both seats but in fact putting them at the risk of winning neither. The ABC’s preference estimates give Labor a slightly more comfortable margin of 2.0%, but we really won’t know until we get a fresh two-candidate count, which hopefully ECSA will conduct over the coming days. Also in northern Adelaide, Elizabeth and Taylor have also gone from being safe Labor seats against Liberal to marginal ones against One Nation.
My system is calling three and very nearly four regional seats for One Nation, though none are being given away by the ABC. However, it’s difficult to see the Liberals closing their substantial primary vote deficits in MacKillop and Narungga, and in neither case is the independent incumbent competitive. I’m a little less confident about my system’s call of Ngadjuri for One Nation, but Liberal incumbent Penny Pratt will undoubtedly have a difficult time overcoming Labor to make the final count, as she’s effectively tied with them on the primary vote at present and the minor parties whose preferences will decide the issue are mostly of the left. If she can’t manage it, my system is undoubtedly correct in projecting that her preferences will give the seat to One Nation over Labor.
I am just about giving Hammond to One Nation, where Liberal member Adrian Pederick has fallen to a fairly distant third, with his preferences set to decide the result for One Nation over Labor, each of whom have about 27% on the primary vote. Neither my system nor the ABC’s are writing off One Nation’s chances of deposing independent Geoff Brock in Stuart, where we’re both estimating margins for Brock of 4.5% and applying very conservative error margins due to the complications involved in projecting an independent-held seat that has gained territory in a redistribution. Brock would have to be rated a pretty clear favourite though.
There are two other seats that my system rates as in doubt. Heysen is rated a three-way contest between Liberal, Labor and the Greens: the latter would have to close a small deficit against Labor to make the final count, but my system gives them a solid chance mostly by giving them more preferences than Labor from One Nation, based on observation of preference distributions from the federal election. It’s a close run thing though, and should they fall short, ECSA’s notional two-candidate count shows Labor leading Liberal in two-candidate terms by all of two votes, although late counting will presumably favour the Liberals.
Kavel looks fiendishly complicated, with no candidate polling higher than 23.9%. That candidate is Labor’s, who my system is rating the favourite, but its preference assumptions wouldn’t need to be too far wrong to overturn this. ECSA’s two-candidate count shows independent Matt Schultz will win if he faces off against Labor in the final count, but to do that he will have to get ahead of One Nation, who he slightly leads on the primary vote. However, my system assumes Liberal will drop out before all of the above, which I think very likely, and has more of their preferences going to One Nation than to Schultz, which is little more than a guess.
Those who were following my results late last night may notice some changes to the projections, which are due not to late counting but my reconfigurations of who the last three candidates are likely to be and changes to preference estimates. The system has been dealing with combinations of candidates that hadn’t previously been encountered, and in some cases was splitting preferences evenly where it had no defaults to fall back on. I haven’t been keeping score, but I believe my system had been calling Kavel to Matt Schultz on this basis, and I’m certain it wasn’t calling Finniss for independent Lou Nicholson, as it’s now doing. It’s more than possible that I’ll unearth another anomaly or two when I review the matter in the morning, or more likely afternoon.
I’m not exactly sure what can be expected today in the way of counting, but around half of the early voting centres were evidently unable to complete their primary vote counts by the end of last night, and only a few reported two-candidate numbers. There has been a fair bit of talk about the impact of South Australia’s unique savings provisions that cause ballots that have not been fully numbered to be deemed to conform with preference tickets pre-registered by the parties in question. This is of particular interest due to One Nation how-to-vote cards that show only a number one for the One Nation box and advise voters to fill out the rest in order of preference, which some may have misinterpreted as meaning a single number constituted a valid vote for One Nation.
However, the effect of this in late counting will be minor. One Nation lodged multiple registered tickets with the effect that its saved preferences will divide evenly between Labor and Liberal. Only in the four seats where it was included in the notional two-candidate count (Chaffey, Giles, Schubert and Wright) are its own soon-to-be-saved votes currently withheld from a published count, and none of these are in doubt. Furthermore, the differences in the number of votes reported on the primary vote and two-candidate counts is not all that dramatic, so the number of votes should in any case not be over-estimated.
Before I finally turn in for the evening, my first look at the Legislative Council result. Only 219,769 first preference votes have been counted, which is barely a third of the lower house count total, so this must be considered highly preliminary. It currently looks very much like Labor four, One Nation three, Liberal two and Greens one, with one more seat in doubt. With Labor on 4.4 quotas and the Greens on 1.4, one would think their collective surplus of 0.8 quotas would mean a further seat for one or the other. That would add up to nine or ten seats for Labor in the new parliament along with two or three for the Greens, for a combined total of 12 out of 22. The Liberals would have six, and One Nation’s new cohort of three would be supplemented by former party member Sarah Game, whose Fair Go for Australians party was one of a number of right-of-centre concerns that accomplished very little at this election.
One nation did well in Elizabeth etc ,nats going to run there?
Yougov poll last one has one nation ahead of labor federally in the outer subs of Australia.Thats mortgage belt and multicultural.Interest rate rises as well more coming under labor.
” For the Liberals, the political difference between allowing Labor to gain an extra seat or two compared with gifting Opposition status to ON is enormous. Its another sign of a party that is in disarray.”
This is why I look a bit askance at the people praising Ashton Hurn and suggesting she did as well as a Lib could have in the situation she inherited. Preferencing One Nation and continuing Dutton’s mistake of normalising them to your own wavering voters could be the difference between the Libs remaining the official opposition and losing that status to One Nation.
@Godless Heathen
“Quite surprisingly this has turned out to be the Greens’ best SA state election result by quite a considerable margin; albeit their previous best result was 9% last time but still, they’d be fairly well pleased with the spine-bracer after a year of bad results. ”
Malinauskas, if not quite as much as Minns, trends uncomfortably right on some issues plus his government is not remotely in danger of minority, there ought to be plenty of room for the Greens to get votes from disgruntled Labor left people, so this does not surprise me.
Overall it appears Labor lost no votes to ON. With Labor’s drop of 1.8% accounted for exactly by the increase in both Greens and Animal Justice vote. While ON gained around 16.3% from the Liberals with the other 2.7% from Family First, Nationals and probably other minor right wing parties and independents.
My comment about ON was very specific to the outer northern seats ie, Taylor and Light.
It would not have been such a close situation for Labor in Light if Piccolo had stayed on, but 12 months ago the idea that ON would poll above 30% was not on anyone’s radar.
What doesn’t seem to be “on your radar” is the fact that the ALP has increased their seat count by seven seats, without losing any. That is called getting ‘hammered’.
While the vote is in and many results are in, it aint over yet. Regional seats are in the balance, Liberal Josh Teague may yet hold on to his seat of Heysen etc.
As a South Aussie I predicted on another blog that the MPs of safe Labor seats like Taylor and Ramsay which are in the northern outer suburbs might get a shock and it came although not to hand the seat to One Nation. I also thought that One Nation might capture one regional seat which still is possible.
There were also Labor nail biters for a while in the Port Adelaide and Elizabeth seats, Labor heartlands with battlers and the economically marginalised who can`t afford the tickets to the list of expensive parties, sporting and other events that Labor prioritises as One Nation proceeded to grab first preferences
Zoe Bettison from Ramsay, not Taylor as I mistakenly wrote in a blog comment elsewhere had One Nation run her close on first preferences. Bettison is the Tourism Minister, somebody who just gets on with her job and lives like a local.
Taylor has Nick Champion whose office is in one of lowest income areas in SA while he lives in a very affluent area far from it and likes to insult South Australians who concern themselves with environmental and heritage issues. One Nation gathered significant first preferences in Taylor as well, in polling booths with battlers/economically marginalised voters.
Labor has had its margins cut in some seats but the Premier Mali Factor was always going to see it over the line in an outstanding win.
Covid was a disaster for the Liberals despite Premier Marshall`s decent handling of it including re-opening a hospital closed by Labor, with far more respect shown to South Aussies by his Govt unlike those in other states.
His resignation from Norwood to go to the US was another disaster as Labor picked up that seat in the by-election and the Liberal candidate did well then but ran again this time and was always going to be behind the 8ball by not being the sitting member. Her first preferences were down this time.
The Liberals have lost voters by not being clear about their values and not adjusting to demographic shifts in the electorate. The party used to accommodate right conservatives and the liberal Liberals fairly well but that`s fallen by the wayside.
What hurt them particularly was the irresponsible and accountability-evading ex leader David Spiers who when arrested on cocaine dealing charges as leader in 2024, wouldn`t own up to them and had the gall to run as an Independent in his former seat of Black yesterday.
In the Black by-election after he resigned, the Liberal vote went down the drain despite all the talk of how `sympathetic` the electorate was to him etc. The swing to Labor proved otherwise and again in this state election, it proved impossible for the Liberals to dislodge a new sitting member in their former seat.
Instability is a big turn-off and the leader after Spiers, Vincent Tarzia, didn`t last although the choice of Ashton Hurn was a fair enough one and will prove to be the correct one.
She had such little time to promote her party and herself that even the 8 seats the Liberals might get in the House of Reps sounds successful compared to the dire pre-election predictions.
Tarzia has lost his seat of Hartley, being objective this is is not the way he should have gone out, being an active and reliable MP and all-round good person.
Regardless of who you favour as a voter, it is not healthy in a democracy for the opposition to be so inept. All governments need to be kept in check and the dark side of this Labor Govt has been an unwillingness to face up to the fact that sport and parties do not and should not come ahead of more pressing issues, including the environmental damage that has occurred on Premier Mali`s watch and more is yet to come to make way for more sport.
Beerfests and circuses should take a back seat to ensuring South Australians don`t die in ramped ambulances and on the floors of the hospitals. And the million bucks of taxpayer money given to get Katy Perry here for those who can afford to pay for her tickets is nothing if not elitist.
And the Minister for Health Chis Picton had a swing against him in his safe Labor seat partly due to leaking a private email from a South Australian to `prove` a point after a partner and family were traumatised by the death of their loved one in which the inadequacies of the SA health system played their part.
The `arrogance` that a Labor MP warned against after this big win has always been there in the Mali Govt – and it`s one of the reasons One Nation received the support it has. A number of candidates also said they did not share Hanson`s views on Muslims, that was interesting.
But there is still a way to go on the results.
Labor needs to hammer ON.. “where is your policy … how would you implement it”… the problem with being the “ opposition “ is you expose yourself to scrutiny & ridicule.
Labor shouldn’t pander to their lost voters… write them off.. but be sympathetic about it.. we are here for etc..
Entropy I don’t think that holds water if you drill down to the seat level in the northern and southern suburbs for instance. Labor picked up a lot of votes in the inner suburbs too, I think
Edit: snap
ON will hammer themselves. They are a party with only one policy in their platform; whingeing.
Outsidersays:
Sunday, March 22, 2026 at 11:03 am
My comment about ON was very specific to the outer northern seats ie, Taylor and Light.
==========================================
Yep, overall the vote flow from Labor to LNP/ON (or V.V.) was probably about neutral. It would obviously vary between electorates though.
I’d love to see a state poll for Queensland. Given how regionalised Qld is I would presume both the LNP and Labor vote will be being ravaged by One Nation. If ON can get over 20% in SA who knows what they might score in QLD- maybe not Brisbane itself but everywhere else. The Labor Party is as lost as the SA Liberals in North Queensland so I suspect Labor may be at less than 10%! If so they may never win a state seat north of the Sunshine Coast! I am no fan of ON but listening in to extended family and friends our MAGA moment may be just around the corner. Who’d have thought it possible when anti Trump sentiment sent Federal Labor to its best ever majority on a two party preferred vote. Migration and housing costs together with interest rates and every party including Labor telling us daily about how bad cost of living is the populace believe they are living in terrible times. I’d rather be in Australia than anywhere else! I believe Federal Labor are not good at selling a positive narrative! That Labor / LNP coalition someone referred to on this site may be our only hope of blocking a ON takeover. How quickly things can change these days. These are weird times.
When does the remaining counting start again?
Frankly, it’s fkn weird that some people are still trying to spin this as bad for the ALP. Seven seats gained without losing any. “And this is why that’s bad for the ALP”. It was a generational belting, and the only question is whether the NLP is going to survive at all.
WB says the votes counted is 51.8%. He then breakdown the number of booths primaries and 2PP are counted respectively.
I am not sure whether any prepoll votes and postal votes are counted. Can someone clarify that.
Why is SAEC count the vote so slowly?
” I am no fan of ON but listening in to extended family and friends our MAGA moment may be just around the corner. Who’d have thought it possible when anti Trump sentiment sent Federal Labor to its best ever majority on a two party preferred vote. ”
======================================
Trump is making himself less popular with Australian’s not more. The current oil and inflation crisis is on his head. In the long run it is not a good idea for an Australian party to be strongly associated with Trump like ON is.
I agree they only thing that could have gone better for Labor would be a ON official opposition.
The total vote count just increased by 0.1%, so that suggests some counting has restarted.
@pi – 11.26 – it is just that the right are louder. That’s all.
They are screaming in the streets about how good the result was(!?)for those opposed to the ALP. The LNP lost 10 seats (at this stage) and yet they want to call it a draw. They had their remaining arms and legs chopped off by their ideological allies to boot!
This was a kathumping of biblical proportions yet all we hear is how well the right did, to win any seats at all. They. Are. Deluded.
No policies One Nation is a problem but we have the holy trinity on our side: compulsory voting, preferential voting and an independent electoral commission.
Meanwhile the racists are out of the closet and running around wearing orange t-shirts. They were always hiding in plain sight.
Congratulations Mali on your thumping win. I would have liked a few green seats, but the main game is the fascists have 10 seats between them in a 47 seat parliament. A good day. Perspective my friends. Perspective .
Heysen also got a thread last night as a reward for fast counting https://kevinbonham.blogspot.com/2026/03/sa-2026-postcount-heysen.html
——————————
I heard the whips were out and they are feeling it this morning.
Prepoll voting centre voters are slowly being added.
I think it is a slow count because many seats have a much higher number of candidates than usual.
20+% of the voting population are prepared to vote for a thrown together ensemble of wannabe politicians, with an assortment of ideas masquerading as policy, living in a bygone era and influenced by jealousy and discrimination.
“where coming” is based on hot air and hate!
The right media, particularly SKY are finding it easy to manipulate with delusional claptrap and outright falsehoods.
The voters most probably need to familiarise ourselves with ON’s existence and disruption.
Ultimately new technology and wealth accumulation will render ON irrelevant.
ON don’t have the personnel to manage a wealthy modern economy within a diverse nation in a changing world.
The Liberals and Nationals are experiencing the feeling of being discarded without any refunds!
“Migration and housing costs together with interest rates”
It’s not clear that migration is a cause of angst or a lightning rod for people’s economic disaffection.
Anyone claiming this was a poor result for Labor is at best delusional. This was an outstanding result for Labor.
It’s more what it means for (South) Australia as a whole that’s concerning – the institutionalised centre right party being annihilated to bring in reactionary nativist stability wrecking bomb throwers is unlikely to work out well for anyone not holding a Molotov.
Coalition pollies must be starting to panic a bit after last night I reckon, if they weren’t already. Libs copped an absolute hammering!
Good to see a nice swing away from Labor to the Greens.
If Alex Antic defects to One Nation and brings along the Pentacostal/Evangelic branch stack with him that could be the official end of the SA Liberals.
Macca RBsays:
Sunday, March 22, 2026 at 8:28 am
OOh, what a wonderful result for South Australia.
_______________________
More ramping and toxic beaches doesn’t sound wonderful to me.
Am thinking about cancelling my planned surf/fish/camp trip to Cactus in May.
Just too risky at this time.
“Malinauskis has had a great result but he would want to know why Labor didn’t do better in northern Adelaide.”
He said the same but I don’t think he needs to try to accommodate them given he’s won by this much. He hardly wants to go even further to the right. He’s almost Centre Right as it is.
“ Entropy says:
Sunday, March 22, 2026 at 11:02 am
Overall it appears Labor lost no votes to ON. With Labor’s drop of 1.8% accounted for exactly by the increase in both Greens and Animal Justice vote. While ON gained around 16.3% from the Liberals with the other 2.7% from Family First, Nationals and probably other minor right wing parties and independents.”
________
Too early to say definitively, BUT I’d suggest that Labor DID lose some primary votes to ON – maybe 2-3%, but also picked up about the number number from disaffected Liberals who could not stomach their party chasing ON down the white nativist rabbit hole, and for whom animal justice, the greens etc are just too left wing to consider. Lacking a teal like Indi in their particular seat they probably held their noses and voted for the old enemy. I’d also say that labor did also shave a couple of points from their primaries on ‘progressive’ totem issues like gay whales and Palestine etc.
There absolutely is a lesson for Labor in regards to its Northern suburbs red wall (and other similar areas around the country.)
However, I fear the take away will be less “We have got to stop treating low income and working class people as already in the bag and their struggles as politically irrelevant” and more “We’ve gotta be more racist to keep those ferals loyal”
“ Malinauskis has had a great result but he would want to know why Labor didn’t do better in northern Adelaide.”
________
I’d suggest these seats reflect a point I was tam print to make in my last post: there ARE some remaining ‘traditional Labor voters’ who are willing to buy into the white nativist messaging at play here. Unfortunately for the right (and former centre right) there are probably not enough of them positioned in the ‘right seats’ to have much of an impact federally anywhere other than Queensland. I could see federal labor receiving a 6+ seat haircut at the next election because of this, but that is simply not enough to move the dial sufficiently to provide either ON, the LNP or some sort of grand cooker coalition a realistic pathway to government.
TM: “Am thinking about cancelling my planned surf/fish/camp trip to Cactus in May.
Just too risky at this time.”
you wont be missed
The biggest millstone around Mali’s neck last term was his promise to fix ramping, which basically doubled. And cost a bomb.
He didn’t say he’d fix it at any stage and didn’t even say he’d improve it. He just said he’d try.
So my question is: does the promise to fix ramping still stand or was that only for the last term?
To say that there weren’t people who voted last time for Labor who have this time voted for One Nation is silly. But people switch sides all the time. There was even probably someone who voted Labor last time and voted Liberal this time (there must be at least a dozen voters who did that).
But that is why Net Vote change is used because it is what can be measured with any true confidence.
So all I can really say is the Liberals were shellacked and One Nation seemed to fill the void on the Right side of politics.
ShowsOn says:
Sunday, March 22, 2026 at 12:03 pm
Coalition pollies must be starting to panic a bit after last night I reckon, if they weren’t already. Libs copped an absolute hammering!
If Alex Antic defects to One Nation and brings along the Pentacostal/Evangelic branch stack with him that could be the official end of the SA Liberals.
__________________
Au Contraire!
That is exactly what the liberals need!
If the numbnuts head off into the gloaming the centrists and moderates will return. At the moment the Liberal Party, across Australia is unelectable and they will remain so until the antics of the Antics cease and desist and HIS ilk leave.
Splitting is the only thing that will save them. Sometimes you need to embrace short term pain to make long term gain.
https://kevinbonham.blogspot.com/2026/03/south-australia-postcount-2026-kavel.html
South Australia Postcount 2026: Kavel
The current count reminds me of Rockhampton 2017
Andrew_Earlwood
That makes sense, adding to the fact they wouldn’t swing to the Liberals out of seeing them as the traditional class enemy, and this is the danger the Liberals face in chasing PHON in outer suburban working class areas.
Good commentary external to SA, from the SMH:
https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/the-hanson-paradox-how-a-populist-surge-became-labor-s-best-friend-20260322-p5rmey.html
With respect to the comments above questioning the relevance to Queensland, on the limited polling we’ve seen to date, the ON surge seems much more limited in Queensland, at least at the moment. ON is fundamentally a party of grievance, that just wants to blow government up. I don’t think the right side of politics is in that headspace at the moment in Queensland, they’ll give the LNP a few more years to fix stuff. If stuff doesn’t get fixed, they’ll switch to “burn the place down”.
I’ve just gone through the progress of the counting on the ABC site, and counted 17 seats where at the opening of counting on Sunday morning there was less than 40% counted, in other words no prepolls counted yet. There are in addition multiple seats where not all the prepoll counting is yet included. Seats where no prepoll is yet counted (as at midday on Sunday) include the in doubt seats of Finniss, Hammond, Kavel, Morphett, Mount Gambier and Stuart. With so many seats in doubt, we have to wait to get a clearer picture and the first stage of that waiting is for the prepolls to be included.
“When Fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross”…..what’s the Australian version of this I wonder?
The interesting factor not analysed is where these Seats are where Hanson is receiving the majority of her vote
So outer suburban
Where, in regards Melbourne, their absolutely huge schools and places of worship are
Look at where their schools are
And project that they reside where they pray and educate
And if you do not abide, their constant badgering that “God makes babies and that you are going to hell to burn if not a believer” sees anyone not so aligned moving residence – and Pentecostals replacing them (at cheap prices!)
This is where same sex relationships are attacked, science is attacked (encompassing lockdowns during the pandemic and injection to vaccinate) etc etc
So no education outside what they preach and no tolerance for other views
Plus they market to immigrants with no family and friendship groups – so this is their social circle, jumping up and down to their “maker”
Some reside in adjoining suburbs – and it is a matter of who squeezes who out
Leaving the above aside, how many Seats in Adelaide have the Liberal Party primary vote in single digits, with no prospect of recovery?
The results of elections have been what they have been and despite a rabid anti Labor media (including the ABC)
The address of the SA Premier at Memorial Drive last night should be obligatory reading for ALL Australians
I’ve always been confident in the pool bludger algorithm but some of the ON gain predictions are baffling. Primary vote for ON not high enough for some to be predicted.
Dio
Can ramping be fixed? Or are there factors such as not enough nursing home beds that will make it very hard. And of course there is the shortage of trained medical and nursing staff.
I say this partly because my mother has just been approved for an aged care, stay at home package. The assessor wanted to put mum on a residential care track, but she refused completely to countenance it.
Privately the assessor said to us that if mum was hospitalised due deteriorating health (likely) then we would after three weeks have enormous pressure bought to bear on us to take her home.
I am actually not worried. We have a large self contained group room (.i.e our bedroom and study) earmarked for her, and there are three of us adults who can provide care. The package seems to be very good with special beds etc. and help with showering.
We have just watched my cousins care from my aunt for 3.5 years after a massive stroke, so we know what is entailed. However, most families would not have the resources or knowledge to do this.
Also, I hope that if mum does have a massive stroke, she does not linger for so long, and she hopes the same. But, it does happen.
The Albonator @ #89 Sunday, March 22nd, 2026 – 12:10 pm
The exact same, as it is everywhere else (except maybe swapping the cross for another more regionally appropriate religious icon.)
It’s not really that profound of a line. Fascism is always identitarian and traditionalist in nature. When it arrived in Europe in the early 20th century, it was also “wrapped in the flag, carrying a cross”
Labor being hammered in South Australia:
https://i5.walmartimages.com/seo/Squeaky-Hammer-Toy-For-Kids-Sensory-Toy-Fun-Play-Shaker-Hammer-Toy_b7bacbc8-6ce1-4884-b86b-de3a7dfe518a.b7e032db5e5e10466f50795285f5277d.jpeg?odnHeight=580&odnWidth=580&odnBg=FFFFFF
Liberals being hammered in South Australia:
Can anyone spot the difference?
Ramping has a dozen causes- and Labor is tackling them all from increased Ambo officers and stations, stepdown facilities for aged care and NDIS patients, heavy recruitment, hospital expansions and rebuilds, new models-of-care etc….
It just takes a lot of time and money. I imagine when its all done SA will lead the country.
Arky @10.55 am:
Re the preference allocation to One Nation:
I wonder if this decision was made by Hurn or by the state executive of the Liberals in which I suspect Antic and his cohort have the major say.
Taylormade says:
Sunday, March 22, 2026 at 12:05 pm
Macca RBsays:
Sunday, March 22, 2026 at 8:28 am
OOh, what a wonderful result for South Australia.
_______________________
More ramping and toxic beaches doesn’t sound wonderful to me.
Am thinking about cancelling my planned surf/fish/camp trip to Cactus in May.
Just too risky at this time.
–—————————————————
Lol Taylormade
Kavel is hilarious. I hope the pre-polls are just as confusing and ECSA declines an indicative count, instead deferring to distribution and declaration in a week.
The Sloan zone is not pretending Labor should be scared.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cX8p5KfzfUk