I had a paywalled article in Crikey on the conclusion of the Senate election result, which among other things had this to say:
The Coalition went into the election with 31 senators out of 76 and comes out with 35 — and may be about to go one better if there is anything behind suggestions that Cory Bernardi is set to rejoin the Liberal Party. That would leave the government needing the support of only three crossbenchers to win contested votes.
That could be achieved with the two votes of the Centre Alliance plus that of Jacqui Lambie, who is newly restored to the Senate after falling victim to the Section 44 imbroglio in late 2017. Lambie appears to be co-operating closely with the Centre Alliance, having long enjoyed a warm relationship with the party’s founder Nick Xenophon.
Such a voting bloc would relieve the Morrison government of the need to dirty its hands in dealing with One Nation — though it could certainly do that any time the Centre Alliance members felt inspired to take liberal positions on such issues as asylum seekers and expansion of the national security state.
Since then, talk of Cory Bernardi rejoining the Liberal Party has moved on to suggestions he will leave parliament altogether, creating a casual vacancy that would stand to be filled by the Liberal Party. Bernardi announced he would deregister his Australian Conservatives party on Thursday following its failure to make an impression at the election, and told Sky News the next day that it “might be best for me to leave parliament in the next six months”, although he also said he was “unresolved”. Paul Starick of The Advertiser reports that sources on both sides of the SA Liberal Party’s factional divide say the front-runner would be Georgina Downer, daughter of the former Foreign Minister and twice-unsuccessful lower house candidate for Mayo. The party’s Senate tickets usually pair moderate and Right faction members in the top two positions, and Downer would take a place for the Right that was filled in 2016 by Bernardi, with the other incumbent up for re-election in 2022 being moderate-aligned Simon Birmingham.
In other news, Simon Jackman and Luke Mansillo of the University of Sydney have posted slides from a detailed conference presentation on the great opinion poll failure. Once you get past the technical detail on the first few slides, this shows trend measures that attempt to ascertain the true underlying position throughout the parliamentary term, based on both polling and the actual results from both 2016 and 2019. This suggests the Coalition had its nose in front in Malcolm Turnbull’s last months, and that Labor only led by around 51-49 after he was dumped. An improving trend for the Coalition began in December and accelerated during the April-May campaign period. Also included is an analysis of pollster herding effects, which were particularly pronounced for the Coalition primary vote during the campaign period. Labor and Greens primary vote readings were more dispersed, in large part due to Ipsos’s pecularity of having low primary votes for Labor (accurately, as it turned out) and high ones for the Greens (rather less so).
Confessions @ #247 Sunday, June 23rd, 2019 – 4:19 pm
But have they? THAT is the question.
Loved seeing the seals at play off Cape Bridgewater
“So now Psyclaw admits Setka did denigrate/ abuse Rose Batty…….”
Seriously C@t, you do need help from a Remedial Reading teacher, or some course on comprehension of the written word.
I made no such admission. There is no evidence that he did so.
Please stop posting your wish fulfilment dreams. They are not real life, you know.
How many posts with totally wrong info have you now posted here in the last fortnight. Must be up to 7 or 8 now.
Simon² Katich® @ #242 Sunday, June 23rd, 2019 – 4:00 pm
‘A paralysed Govt led by a shonky salesman.’
That type of simple messaging should be on every Labor politicians lips when in front of a camera and all over social media every week again and again for three years.
UK ‘toon………………
I’m sitting in Jakarta airport, looking out the window at the smoggiest sky I’ve ever seen.
A plane just took off and it disappeared in a few seconds.
How can you live here?
C@t
Psyclaw says:
Sunday, June 23, 2019 at 12:27 pm
Victoria
Yes, I too have info on good authority.
A friend whose cousin lives in Melbourne has told me that the cousin was talking to his best mate’s mother who is a cleaner at the building next door to the CFMMEU office. A fellow cleaner who actually cleans the CFMMEU office reports that a clerical person in the office told her that she reckons Setka did bad mouth Ms Batty.
You now the pack drill …… no names, no numbers …… nod nod, wink wink.
You know what happens when people only read the headlines……….. They get egg on face.
Perhaps you might now re-read my “Setka dun it” post. Let me know if you want to know the CFMMEU cleaner’s name, or the names of any of my cousins etc
briefly,
I am surprised you finished reading the article after this:
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/jun/23/culture-shock-politics-upended-in-era-of-identity
Just peeked in and PB’s own Eeyore is still calling doom, flooding the place with gloom.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/jun/23/labors-jim-chalmers-says-workers-on-200000-a-year-are-not-the-top-end-of-town
The “top end of town” can be whatever you want it to be to rationalise your world view as the ‘party of the workers’.
ALP – the party of the workers – not really.
well the ‘top end of town’ wouldn’t really show up on income statistics. What tax they do pay is likely to be Capital Gains Tax.
If you’re on $200k + you don’t need an $11,000 tax cut and you don’t need any Government assistance.
Socialist Alliance statement National Executive released this statement on June 17:
Defend the CFMMEU — but Setka should resign
https://www.greenleft.org.au/content/defend-cfmmeu-setka-should-resign
You really are a piece of work, psyclaw. Hmm, so do tell me how I am supposed to comprehend this statement from you:
Psyclaw @ #1364 Saturday, June 22nd, 2019 – 9:18 pm
And how that correlates with this:
Do tell how my inadequate powers of comprehension have failed me here?
Or are you just continuing to be a spiteful piece of work towards me? 🙂
Pegasus @ #263 Sunday, June 23rd, 2019 – 6:17 pm
Well, that’s just bullshit. No wonder no one takes the Socialist Alliance seriously. Or is this just The Greens, via their stooges in the Socialist Alliance, preparing the ground to accept the CFFMEU’s money?
Paddy Manning:
Labor frays on tax – The Opposition risks becoming a rabble
https://www.themonthly.com.au/today/paddy-manning/2019/21/2019/1561093641/labor-frays-tax
Nicholas
Whether a budget surplus is good or bad isn’t the point that I was getting at but I was pointing out that we have a government that has made achieving a surplus this year as an article of faith despite there being question marks with the economic assumption used to support that surplus.
It is more complicated that just pressing key strokes, as I’ve previously pointed Bill Mitchell doesn’t appear to have the qualifications or experience to fully understand how governments are funded, he clearly has limited understanding of the bond market if he really believes governments can just eliminate those bond payments and overlooks that governments use bonds as a source of income and the 10 year yield is used across a number of financial calculations and it ignores the fact that people need to buy things in other currencies.
I wonder about the election result had we been aware of the real polling!
Labor – the stooges of the “top end of town”.
The Coalition = “the top end of town”.
Pegasus @ #269 Sunday, June 23rd, 2019 – 6:25 pm
Thanks to Shorten/Bowen ineptitude.
It’s Albanese’s task now to try and repair the immense damage.
To do that, he must engage the public first.
Give the Govt enough rope……. then hammer home with simple messaging – ‘A paralysed Govt led by a shonky salesman’.
Pegasus says:
Sunday, June 23, 2019 at 6:25 pm
Labor – the stooges of the “top end of town”.
The Coalition = “the top end of town”.
—————————
If we want to know who the top end of town is, we don’t look at payslips, we look at the Melbourne club membership list or the Scotch Collage alumni or at certain surnames. These people may be on high income jobs but many of them earn the bulk of their income from investments. A person on $200k is clearly financially well off but they are not necessarily the top end of town.
A sound decision by Judge Taylor:
https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/a-most-invasive-power-without-the-slightest-justification-20190622-p52090.html
I mean to say, strip searches in the absence of any justification is the pits!
Michael Rowland has responded to criticism of that question he put to Chalmers re ‘politics of envy’. Cassidy has only been gone for 2 weeks but it feels he retired months ago.
Confessions @ #273 Sunday, June 23rd, 2019 – 6:57 pm
So…Matthias Cormann feeds Michael Rowland the lines and Rowland duly and dutifully follows them up with Labor?
!!!
This has been going on for months, making a mockery of those claiming McManus and co have only recently latched onto trying to force Setka out. And incidentally this article was retweeted by George Megalogenis with the tag of it being “a terrific piece of old school journalism from one of the very best reporters at the Oz”.
https://www.theaustralian.com.au/nation/politics/disaster-of-sopranos-proportions-the-setka-tipping-point-for-actu/news-story/dc279da1d864b52ad7ee0fa3e8b05acc
C@t:
As I said earlier, I think Rowland’s time on breakfast TV hasn’t helped his journalistic skill.
Martin Iles, currently the boss of ACL, was just now The Project trying to justify Folau’s cash grab on Go Fund Me.
He didn’t sound very convincing.
C@tmomma @ #274 Sunday, June 23rd, 2019 – 7:01 pm
Ease up and look at it from another angle ie. proper journalism. Rowland was simply giving Chalmers the opportunity to shoot down Cormanns comments.
If you want to be critical of Insiders then perhaps call them out on their failure to attend to Angus Taylor/Josh Frydenberg reported shenanigans last week in the Guardian.
Ease up and look at it from another angle ie. proper journalism. Rowland was simply giving Chalmers the opportunity to shoot down Cormanns comments.
_____
Then he should have asked, “Mathias Cormann has just said that . . . .
BK @ #280 Sunday, June 23rd, 2019 – 7:50 pm
They had a clip of Cormann leading into it.
Chalmers should be welcoming those questions because it gives him a chance to put forward an alternative, this tax cut is a desperate attempt to save the economy and this government’s economic credibility.
The national anthem being sung largely through the artist’s nose at the SoO.
Rex
Yes there was but Rowland framed his question on Labor’s politics of envy being a fact.
This is why I think Karvelas is the best. Gives all sides the opportunity to shoot down their opponents.
C@tmomma says:
Sunday, June 23, 2019 at 5:02 pm
Confessions @ #247 Sunday, June 23rd, 2019 – 4:19 pm
Only Nimbin?!
Sky News AustraliaVerified account@SkyNewsAust
46m46 minutes ago
.@PeterDutton_MP on the Medevac legislation: Two doctors from Nimbin can bring a case to the government, and the law requires for that person to come here.
MORE: https://bit.ly/2BuFqi1 #WeekendLive
But have they? THAT is the question.
————————–
I strongly doubt that there are two doctors in Nimbin. It is a very small town.
BK @ #284 Sunday, June 23rd, 2019 – 7:54 pm
…to give Chalmers the opportunity to shoot it down.
Not everything is a conspiracy against Labor.
Rex
In this case I’d say it was ineptitude.
Yes the statement of fact that Labor was playing the politics of envy was simply ridiculous. How is it politics of envy to want to bring an end to unsustainable and wholly unjustifiable tax concessions to wealthy and/or asset rich Australians?
There were other things that Rowland missed, letting Chalmers off the hook, as Crabb did the week before with whomever it was she was interviewing. I said before that he’s obviously spent too long in breakfast TV mode, which has blunted his ability to think on his feet.
And then there was the Angus Taylor revelations that weren’t even touched on, as Lenore Taylor mentioned. Corruption is this government’s achilles heel, and the media is doing taxpayers and voters no favour by choosing to gloss over these revelations that continue to add up.
BK @ #288 Sunday, June 23rd, 2019 – 7:58 pm
Save that word for Sky after dark.
Here to report that I have wasted an entire day, but no matter how hard I try, I am incapable of tickling my “prostrate” gland with my tongue.
It just doesn’t quite reach.
Should I perhaps attempt the manoeuvre whilst lying in a prone position?
The current RW obsession with “protecting free speech” in Australia is apparently also evident in the UK.
I am not sure what Not Sure is on about and I don’t think I want to know.
The Greens, the Liberals, the CPG all out to attack Labor, nothing changes.
Steve777 says:
Sunday, June 23, 2019 at 8:25 pm
…”I am not sure what Not Sure is on about and I don’t think I want to know”…
You should ask Poll Bludger’s resident GP.
Although, if the bloke can’t even spell the word, I would advise against permitting him to stick a semi-lubricated digit up there to check of everything is ok.
And Dutton is still full of shit; the Greens have a lot to be proud off.
Pegasus says:
Sunday, June 23, 2019 at 6:02 pm
briefly,
I am surprised you finished reading the article after this:
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2019/jun/23/culture-shock-politics-upended-in-era-of-identity
If Labor is to build a constituency based on socially and environmentally progressive ideas then it has to aim to win government not by splitting the difference between culturally backward-looking voters in regional Queensland and forward-looking voters in the cities, but by winning progressive voters in traditional Liberal party seats.
That means no longer buying into the demonisation of the Greens, who are its natural allies in building a progressive future. After all, the Greens’ platform shows stronger commitment to social justice than Labor’s does, and Labor’s climate change policy is now (at last) based on the science and therefore close to the Greens’ one.
The author’s analysis is not adequate in several respects. I don’t have time to unpick it. I posted it because it’s interesting and well-written, not because I agree with it in every particular.
The author is naive when it comes to the Greens. He thinks they’re well-intentioned and trustworthy possible partners for Labor. He’s mistaken. The Greens detest Labor. They hope for
Labor’s political obliteration.
Briefly
I respect your passion but I think you are wrong to say the ALP are stuffed, sure they lost an election they were strongly expected to win but they were in a far deeper hole in the 1990s when they looked finished in Victoria, South Australia and Western Australia but the ALP was able to turn that around and they did that by focusing on the issues that matter. Federal elections are fought on federal issues, not state issues so the ALP needs to focus on federal issues and they can be competitive.
This is on the front page of this week’s free local paper here.
https://thewest.com.au/news/albany-advertiser/seven-votes-the-difference-ng-b881235928z
The Greens suffered a 2% swing against the party, and their candidate here blamed himself for their failure.
I see that Nimbin has plumbed new sordid depths.
The latest is a sinister plot by the entire Nimbin corrupt, nefarious and stoned medical profession to perforate Straya’s borders by abusing the so-called Medevac humanitarian legislation in order to let in Ruandan axe murderers.