A summary of what remains to be resolved of election counting:
• The button is yet to be pressed on five of the eight Senate counts, with Tasmania, the Australian Capital Territory and Northern Territory completed and fully published. More on the Tasmanian result below.
• The Coalition-versus-Labor two-party preferred preference count for Farrer is 54% complete, with the remainder presumably to be knocked over today. Only then will we have a definitive total for the national two-party preferred, but the remaining uncertainty is relevant only to the second decimal place: to the first, the Coalition will finish with 51.5%, a swing of either 1.1% or 1.2%.
• Preference distributions for lower house seats are yet to be published, though in some cases they have assuredly been conducted. As noted previously, only with the distribution could the theoretical (though not practical) possibility of One Nation winning Hunter from Labor be ruled out.
I will be taking a deep dive into each Senate result as they are reported. As discussed here, none of the results are seriously in doubt, with the highly arguable exception of Queensland.
The chart below shows how the late stages of the preference distribution for Tasmania proceeded, after the election of the first three candidates and the elimination of lower order candidates and parties (the latter included independent Craig Garland, who managed a disappointing 3475 votes, compared with the 6633 he polled at last year’s Braddon by-election). The first three were the top two on the Liberal ticket, Richard Colbeck and Claire Chandler, and the first on Labor’s, Carol Brown. Both Liberal and Labor polled clear of two quotas (the primary vote totals can be found here), but owing to Tasmania’s high rate of below-the-line voting (28% in this case), neither scored over two quotas on above-the-line votes alone. However, Chandler was promptly elected after Colbeck as most of his below-the-line votes proceeded straight down the Liberal ticket.
The situation for Labor was more complicated owing to Lisa Singh, who again had to campaign for below-the-line votes to retain her seat after the party placed her fourth on the ticket. This she was able to accomplish at the 2016 double dissolution, when she won Labor’s fifth seat from number six on the ticket. This time though she had the effectively impossible task of winning one of two Labor seats from number four. Singh scored 5.68% of the first preference vote, slightly down on her 6.12% in 2016. This meant she remained in the count longer than the candidate one place above her, who on both occasions was John Short, but she was well behind the second candidate on the Labor ticket, Catryna Bilyk, who received all the above-the-line votes remaining after the election of Brown.
As the chart demonstrates, the race for the last three seats was not close – Labor was always going to win a second seat; Liberal and Labor were both only slightly in excess of two quotas; and the respective vote shares of 12.57% for the Greens and 8.92% for the Jacqui Lambie Network guaranteed them both a seat. Nick McKim of the Greens edged over the line to take the fourth seat after the preferences of various minor parties were distributed. Bilyk and Lambie were both pushed over a quota at the point where Singh was excluded, very slightly behind One Nation candidate Matthew Stephen, although it would have made no difference if Stephen had gone out first. The result was thus clear-cut enough that all elected candidates achieved quotas in their own right, which is not guaranteed under the new Senate electoral system under which some votes can exhaust.
The table below records “four-party preferred” preference splits for those parties that failed to win seats (including Craig Garland as “Group O”).
zoomster
says:
Monday, June 17, 2019 at 5:11 pm
nath
That sounds highly unlikely. I don’t know of any school which didn’t score either a science building or a school hall. I’ve got lists of funding for schools in Indi – none of them missed out, and that was in the time Mirabella was the MP.
__________________________________
Didn’t they start counting the COLA’s as school halls at one stage. What can I say, my local primary has the same old buildings plus demountables and a COLA. Unless they are hiding an underground facility there somewhere.
Was speaking to people today in the food suppliers sector relating to deli type stuff.
They say it has been so very quiet over past few weeks. Retailers have said that they are attributing down turn to end of financial year.
Why would people be spending less on food stuff based on financial year. Found that observation very odd
Unsubstantiated right-wing propaganda!
nath
I find it hard to believe.
Dutton used all his evil arts (and lots of money) to retain his seat.
https://www.themonthly.com.au/today/paddy-manning/2019/17/2019/1560749238/dutton-concedes-nothing
All Greens and Liberals and Nationals wannabe cancer patients and people with rotting teeth might enjoy buyer’s remorse some time over the next three years.
You said that all the schools in Indi were rebuilt but now say that it was just a science building or a school hall. That’s not a rebuild.
zoomster @ #248 Monday, June 17th, 2019 – 5:13 pm
https://www.premier.vic.gov.au/28-new-schools-for-growing-school-communities/
..our own local primary was substantially upgraded but, due to the heritage value of the building, you don’t see it from the outside. It was basically gutted and refitted.
nath
No, I said that the feds supplied the money for the science building/school hall, and the Victorian government provided the money for the rest. Do learn to read.
‘a r says:
Monday, June 17, 2019 at 5:15 pm
if Iran keeps hitting tankers
Unsubstantiated right-wing propaganda!’
Good pick up.
meher baba @ 3.49
Your point about the lack of affinity of Labor leaders with ‘surburbanites’ is a good one and certainly Anthony Albanese has not moved within a radius of a couple of kilometres in his life from his inner city domain.
However whilst it appears de riguer for the maiden speech of most freshly minted Labor politicians to have a (Pythonesque ?) component of how tough their upbringing was, in the Albanese case there is considerable truth to the claim. The back streets of Newtown in the 60’s, 70’s and 80’s are a world away from what the suburb became in later years and I have no doubt that it strongly influenced the views and the person he became – remembering that his mentor (Tom Uren) was himself no stranger to tough times.
Boerwar
I don’t trust John Bolton or Pompeo at all.
Of course, and Trump who has been telling all and sundry since before he became dear leader, not to trust the intelligence community.
So now the doubts about the info they are trying to spin, is also not being swallowed.
Karma is a bitch.
Rex
Yep, needing 12 new schools means there are an awful lot of demountables being used whilst waiting for those schools to be built. When people move into new areas, they need educational facilities provided nearby; so schools start up with demountables whilst waiting for building to get underway.
I feel you just keep engaging me to find an area to disagree with. As I have seen you do on here many times with others. Just badgering away until you find something. have fun, but I’m off to walk the dog before it gets too dark.
So, if we put in $600 million worth of lies, an MSM dominated by one of the richest foreigners on the planet, vested interest groups, 750,000 abused foreign workers who do not get a vote, a wealthy well-educated inner suburban dilettante vote, a significant proportion of the Underclass who either will not or cannot vote, and you are starting to see some structural reasons why government by the rich for the rich mostly obtains in the tattered remains of Australian democracy.
‘Victoria says:
Monday, June 17, 2019 at 5:18 pm
Boerwar
Of course, and Trump who has been telling all and sundry since before he became dear leader, not to trust the intelligence community.’
Excellent point.
‘Preference whisperer’ Druery has a book coming out soon:
https://www.theage.com.au/national/preference-whisperer-glenn-druery-opens-up-about-getting-minor-parties-elected-20190617-p51yjc.html
Alison Pennington is an Australian economist who wrote this article about the future of the Australian union movement. She argues that today’s unions need to be focused on the critical issue of under-employment, which is the main vulnerability that employers exploit these days, and that unions probably need to broaden their role by linking up with other social movements that promote economic and social justice.
https://www.jacobinmag.com/2019/06/australia-labor-party-election-unions-economy
There is nothing wrong with demountables. They are built to code.
nath
You’re the one who tried to start an argument on the basis of not reading what I’d written.
Boerwar
You’ve reminded me of the time when squatters ruled the land. No democracy then. 🙂
‘Bucephalus says:
Monday, June 17, 2019 at 5:24 pm
There is nothing wrong with demountables. ‘
Indeed. The wealthiest private schools in the nation are littered with demountables.
Well, my sister worked at a disadvantaged school that had demountables and was generally pretty run-down, requiring lots of maintenance. During the BER the school got an outside basketball court instead of much desired air conditioning. There was a lot of unhappy staff, students and parents.
Peg
Because air conditioning is a state, not federal responsibility. It wasn’t covered by the BER.
zoomster says:
Monday, June 17, 2019 at 5:11 pm
Depended on the school. Some got a COLA, some a canteen, some a library. Others got car parks and covered walk ways. There was variation from state to state on what was allowed.
Bucephalus
Yes, that’s true. I can only talk about the ones I’ve seen, or were on my Indi list.
I had a lovely couple of days (as a candidate at the time) wandering around the electorate to attend school building openings.
Boerwar says:
Monday, June 17, 2019 at 5:14 pm
What do you make of the video clearly showing a mine being removed from a tanker?
I put little faith in this flying object claim. Eye witnesses are often completely wrong. Anti-ship missiles make much bigger bangs than what has happened to those carriers.
I also discounted the claims of a torpedo hit because the damage is far to light – this is what a modern torpedo does – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYAWrkvyYdc
Bucephalus says:
Monday, June 17, 2019 at 4:07 pm
All the largest cities have Democratic Governments. All the largest population states have Democratic Governments.
This is just not the case.
But even to the extent that it is, Democratic Governments are considerably less anti-social than Republican Governments.
The US is an example of a highly dysfunctional system. It generates extraordinary hardship for many millions, incredible tax-privileged luxury for a few. The political system – the legislatures, judiciaries and executive branches – is routinely gamed by the stunningly wealthy. Very few initiatives with an egalitarian purpose are allowed to survive in the US. They are extinguished wherever they gain a hold.
There is considerably less inter-generational social mobility in the US than in comparator countries. It really is a State in which wealth, power, social status and opportunity are inherited. The US is no longer a meritocracy. It is a quasi aristocracy.
a r
Who else apart from Iran would be hitting the tankers and why?
Who do you think were on the boat on the video?
Bucephalus @ #280 Monday, June 17th, 2019 – 5:41 pm
Tell me that you’re really not that stupid.
Here’s the latest goss about who may replace Arthur Seenodonors in the Senate for NSW (the Hughes-Turnbull clan are interested):
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-17/lumholtzs-tree-kangaroo-blindness-mystifies-malanda-scientist/11195758
‘Bucephalus says:
Monday, June 17, 2019 at 5:41 pm
a r
Who else apart from Iran would be hitting the tankers and why?
Who do you think were on the boat on the video?’
You may mean those wicked Iranians who were removing a limpet mine from a crippled tanker in their national waters?
The Iranians reckon the attacks were false flag operation. There are numerous players with an interest in such a false flag operation: the US, Israel, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, about half the Yemenis, Turkey… etc, etc, etc.
The only certain thing for distant observers is that there is no certain thing.
adrian,
Perhaps you can educate us with your theories on who is blowing holes in tankers and why. No? Tin Foil hat too tight to type?
There was, of course, one Labor leader who built his political identity very much around being from the outer suburbs – Mark Latham. That didn’t seem to help Labor very much in connecting with people from outer suburbs (outer suburbs were amongst their worst-performing areas, swing-wise, in the 2004 election).
Boerwar,
You really believe that a False Flag attack is able to be arranged in the Straits of Hormuz?
Go on – say it – you think the Trumpster is doing this, don’t you.
The Iranian patrol boat class initially reported by the US has now been changed to another (much smaller) class of patrol boat. And that is not counting the following:
Trump, ‘You saw the boat.’
Actually, nobody seems to have seen ‘the’ boat; nor the source of the missiles.
Amanda on The Drum defending Dutton. Of course.
‘Bucephalus says:
Monday, June 17, 2019 at 6:02 pm
Boerwar,
You really believe that a False Flag attack is able to be arranged in the Straits of Hormuz?
Go on – say it – you think the Trumpster is doing this, don’t you.’
1. It might have been the Israelis using Australian passports. They are sophisticated enough to deliver on this.
2. It might have been the US itself. It would not be the first time the US has fired on itself or on friendlies and blamed the bad guys. Not by a very, very long shot.
3. It might have been out-of-control or state proxy elements on the far shore.
4. It might have been renegade Iranians acting in cahoots with the US.
5. It might have been Saudis.
6. It might have been Iranian state operatives.
There are plenty of options. This is, after all, the Middle East.
The techniques used are extremely basic -despite US claims that they were ‘sophisticated’.
I have no reason to think that Trump knows what he is doing or that he is setting up US false flag ops in the Gulf. I do have large doubts that he is fully in control of US black ops.
Apart from that I will repeat what I have said many times before: I don’t know what happened or who was accountable.
I’ve just purged the thread of another outbreak of tediousness. Lars started it, if that matters to anyone.
The same people who scared up some satellite photos of irrigation pipe lying around in Iraq and used them to convince the rest of the world that they were proof of a WMD program. To
justifycreate an excuse for going to war with Iraq (the second time).Basically the same reason. Except now Iraq is spelled Iran. And instead of plumbing parts we have grainy video of people supposedly taking mines off of a vessel they supposedly want to attack. And people who were actually there disputing the US narrative.
Trump has been looking for any excuse to start something with Iran since before he was president. And his National Security chief is even more hawkish.
Completely unsurprising that after years of desperately hoping for any excuse to attack Iran they now
have oneclaim to have one.I see that Bucephalus has retreated to rhetorical overreach, presumably learned on the metaphorical lap of Daddy Trump.
Boerwar,
Here is the video:
https://www.theguardian.com/global/video/2019/jun/14/footage-us-military-claims-shows-iranian-patrol-boat-removing-limpet-mine-from-tanker-video
The great legacy of Trump’s post-truth White House and administration is that for the first time in my life I have absolutely no faith in the truth or reliability of anything that comes out of the US administration now. Nixon and Johnson had more reliability and integrity than the current lot.
It could be anyone, including the Iranians, the Israelis, the Japanese or the Solomon Islanders. But nothing provided by the USA has any more starting credibility now than something posted by Putin.
A R
So, the Iraqi Kurds were never gassed and the Halabja massacre never happened?
And the UN Weapons inspectors were given full and unfettered access where ever they wanted to go?
Bucephalus
Robert Fisk knows his way around the Middle East. how does he rate the evidence so far ?
https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/gulf-oman-iran-us-trump-evidence-jeremy-hunt-a8960711.html
TPOF – because the Obama administration never spun things for their own purposes? Never claimed that the murder of their Ambassador and his security team in Bhenghazi was caused by a youtube video? Never said Chemical Weapons use in Syria was a Red Line that couldn’t be crossed – but it was and they did nothing.
Fisk?
He has less credibility than Trump.
“Depended on the school. Some got a COLA, some a canteen, some a library. Others got car parks and covered walk ways. There was variation from state to state on what was allowed.”
Having been a primary school dad at the time of the “School Halls” program i can say it was received by the dads who are tradies with great relief. Quite a few of them were scared and worried and said to me that program kept them AND their suppliers solvent and able to pay their mortgages and wages. Which is what it was designed to do.
Schools pretty much got what they asked for in terms of buildings and it was structured so that work could get underway fast…to get the $ into the economy as quickly as poss with minimal state / planning delays and state level skimming. Huge, well designed and well delivered.
Was a major part of the success of the ALP response to the GFC to support jobs and something the economic illiterates in the Coalition would NEVER have done.