The Guardian reports the first result from Essential Research in three weeks has Labor’s two-party lead at 52-48, down from 53-47 last time. The changes on the primary vote are slight, with the Coalition up a point to 38% and Labor steady on 36% (CORRECTION: the Coalition is steady, and Labor down two). The Guardian report notes that Essential has changed the provider of the online panel from which its respondents are drawn from YourSource to Qualtrics, without changing the underlying methodology. Perhaps relatedly, the sample size is identified as 1652, where in the past it has been a little over 1000. The Guardian provides no further findings from attitudinal questions – we’ll see if the release of the main report later today provides anything on that front, along with the minor party primary votes.
UPDATE: Full report here. No change for the minor parties, with the Greens on 10% and One Nation on 7%. The poll was conducted between January 23 and January 31 – I’m not sure if this was a contingency for the long weekend, but in the past Essential’s field work dates have been Thursday to Sunday. Other findings:
• When presented with a number of explanations for a lack of gender parity in politics, the most favoured responses relate to the failures of political parties, and the least favoured relates to “experience and skills”. Gender quotas for parties have 46% support and 40% opposition, with age interestingly more determinative of attitudes here than gender.
• There are a number of questions on Australia Day, the most useful of which is a finding that 52% support a separate national day to recognise indigenous Australians, including 15% who want that day to replace Australia Day, with 40% opposed.
• Respondents were presented with various groups and asked who they felt they would prefer to see win the election. The most interesting findings are that the media was perceived as favouring the Coalition by 32% and 25%; that despite all the recent talk, pensioners were perceived to favour Labor by a margin of 42% to 28%; and that families with young children were perceived as favouring Labor by 50% to 21%.
UPDATE 2: It turns out that both the longer field work period and the larger sample were a one-off, to it will be back to Thursday to Sunday and samples of a bit over 1000 in future polls.
electionblogger2019.simplesite.com @ #38 Tuesday, February 5th, 2019 – 8:00 am
I think Corangamite will easily go ALP as will Forde, Robertson and Petrie. it is hard to know what effect high profile candidate will have in Gilmore, Banks and Dickson. Capricornia is in NQ and is totally unpredictable. Herbert could be an LNP or Katter win. Flynn is also complex and although an ALP win is probable it is not a certainty. I do not know enough about grey to comment.
I think as usual Hasluck will buck the trend and page might because the guy is nominally independent. You cannot make predictions about Dawson, leichardt because again NQ. There seems to be a swing on in WA so I guess there is a good chance Pearce and Swan and I am guessing also Casey and Latrobe, Bonner may be a step too far in Qld
Fess
There are barely any sitting days before budget time which coincides with election timeline.
If Labor is elected at the next election and implements its policy of abolishing franking credits our annual income suddenly drops to $61,519 (almost 30 per cent)
For a start, it is not abolishing franking credits, just ceasing to refund tax to people who didn’t pay tax.
This guy’s income dropped ‘almost 30%’ to about $61k, which suggests that this amount comprises nearly all dividends. Assuming a healthy rate of return, say 5%, this guy has about $1,200,000 in shares. So don’t bother with the sad violins.
By the way, having all his assets in shares is a bloody stupid investment strategy, especially if he was relying on franking credits to maintain his lifestyle. He should consider sueing his financial planner.
jenauthor @ #39 Tuesday, February 5th, 2019 – 9:04 am
Bowen has made a meal of defending his franking credit reform.
Well said Steve
Confessions @ #41 Tuesday, February 5th, 2019 – 9:10 am
The latest polling suggests a minority govt is more possible now.
Independents could well have the balance of power.
And when people do tune in, many will get their news from commercial radio and the Murdoch press. The Libs have confidence (somewhat misplaced) they can pick up a couple of points in a campaign where it is fought on friendly turf.
So Essential Report has a new provider. Does that mean a whole new panel as well?
zoomster @ #50 Tuesday, February 5th, 2019 – 9:19 am
People want competent, genuine and decent politicians who aren’t as self-centred as ScoMo and Shorten.
Burgey says:
Tuesday, February 5, 2019 at 9:12 am
Unpopular government in getting a bounce over the holidays when they aren’t visible shocker.
_____________________________________
Or, rather, when ordinary people (rather than tragics like us) are not paying attention.
Rex Douglas says:
The latest polling suggests a minority govt is more possible now.
Independents could well have the balance of power-
Antony Green would disagree with you Rex’
Antony Green. Independents won’t matter as much as you think at the next election. ABC online. January 16 2019. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-01-16/independents-wont-matter-as-much-as-you-think-next-election/10716834?section=politics
Political donations
https://www.crikey.com.au/2019/02/04/big-four-accounting-firms-emerge-as-major-political-donors/
What happened to this hack?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dWkjVvoXIS0
Imagine if he rose to be a senior GOP figure. Ha. Imagine.
Simon² Katich® @ #18 Tuesday, February 5th, 2019 – 9:32 am
From William’s notes.
The Guardian report notes that Essential has changed the provider of the online panel from which its respondents are drawn from YourSource to Qualtrics, without changing the underlying methodology. Perhaps relatedly, the sample size is identified as 1652, where in the past it has been a little over 1000. ☮
Working poor, homelessness and the pipe-dream of stability
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-02-05/employed-and-homeless-people-seeking-assistance-rises/10773692
Essential, meh. Its primary vote for Labor has always been suspiciously low.
This letter from the big banks helped shape the royal commission
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-02-05/big-banks-ask-government-to-call-short-royal-commission-letter/10778928
Way to go Sohar!
PB Essential-Poll 2019-02-05
Actual: ALP 52 to 48 LNP
PB mean: ALP 56.6 to 43.4 LNP
PB median: ALP 54.0 to 46.0 LNP
No. Of PB Respondents: 18
ALP / LNP
56 / 44 bilko
54 / 46 BK
54 / 46 Confessions
99 / 1 Dan Gulberry
53 / 47 Frednk *permanent
55 / 45 Fulvio Sammut
57 / 43 Gecko
53 / 47 Grumps
53 / 47 guytaur
54 / 46 Late Riser
54 / 46 Mr Ed
53 / 47 pica
57 / 43 Puffytmd
54 / 46 sonar
55 / 45 Socrates
52 / 48 Sohar
53 / 47 Upnorth
53 / 47 Zoidlord
KJ
Right. So safe to assume a new panel. Do we have any info about the Qualtrics panel? Sourced from The Australian subscribers database?
For a sample size of 1652, the margin of error is about 2.5%.
lizzie @ #7 Tuesday, February 5th, 2019 – 7:44 am
Absolutely. Very disturbing, but brilliantly written …
Good Morning.
I hope the LNP enjoyed the polls today. They are going to go down down for them as the LNP is on record as protecting the Bastard Banks. Be in no doubt the Morrison voted 26 times against a Banking Royal Commission will be front and centre in the negative advertising of Labor campaig adverts.
Weak and ineffectual as the banks tried to make it Hayne really exposed the banking industry. Now Labor has the evidence for its top end of town sloganeering as it fights against inequality
Thanks Peg. Once the banks knew they had to give in, they arranged things to their own benefit. I remember that.
KayJay says: Tuesday, February 5, 2019 at 9:40 am
************************************
Apologies to others but KayJay/anyone can you please post the method of posting a pic from my hard drive to here ( imggmi is not working at the moment )
Yeah. If it is a new panel then any small movement from last one is especially pinch of salt stuff. Unless they tried to baseline the two. Which I doubt.
My mum in Hobart tells me people talk openly of their fear of being burnt out “Every breath we take at the moment is smoke-laden”
Meanwhile our idiot PM dances around parliament with a lump of coal like a donkey.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/feb/05/tasmania-is-burning-the-climate-disaster-future-has-arrived-while-those-in-power-laugh-at-us
electionblogger2019.simplesite.com @ #60 Tuesday, February 5th, 2019 – 8:37 am
Electionblogger
I am not especially impressed by Antony Green’s piece because it is a bit too “historical”. The thing is that party loyalty has declined sharply and I am not sure you can make too many predictions based on the past.
it also predates announcements by Zali Steggal and Julia Banks.
Certainly regional independents will do better, but when there is a protest vote on in safe Lib seats there is risk too.
SK:
Rubio will forever be known as the man who said Trump has small hands and all that that infers.
The Greens have been calling for structural reform, the elephant in the room that was not addressed – vertical integration.
https://theconversation.com/haynes-failure-to-tackle-bank-structure-means-that-in-a-decade-or-so-another-treasurer-will-have-to-call-another-royal-commission-110437
DaretoTread @ #76 Tuesday, February 5th, 2019 – 9:50 am
So, on what basis would you make them?
Simon² Katich® @ #29 Tuesday, February 5th, 2019 – 9:44 am
I am clueless and rely on information from William Antony Green and others wot know stuff.
Information from The Australian, The Daily Telegraph and The Sydney Morning Herald exist (in my mind) simply as data point plotting an intricate pattern of ludicrosity©.
Toodles. 웃 (recent potrait of myself).
Player One @ #79 Tuesday, February 5th, 2019 – 9:54 am
the current mood
Hung parliaments are a lot more likely now than, say, thirty or forty years ago, but that’s not saying much. Thirty years ago the chances were tiny, now they’re a slightly larger version of tiny.
If the long term drift away from the major parties continues (and it’s showing no sign of turning around at this stage), minority governments may become commonplace twenty years from now. But it’s extremely unlikely we’ll have one after the next election.
Anyway, what people are actually scared of is fires, flood and climate change.
I hope to see Labor nail ScoFo over having zero climate policy: dancing around parliament with a lump of coal while the country burns.
Rex Douglas @ #81 Tuesday, February 5th, 2019 – 9:55 am
The idiocy displayed here on PB is sometimes hard to fathom. Both you and DTT should sit back and think about what you said for a few minutes 🙁
Peter Brent on independents
https://insidestory.org.au/lets-not-get-ahead-of-ourselves/
PS how do you add a pic to a PB post? I see people doing it
Re Flannagan on the G, yes. well written. I was recently walking around in those amazing swamp gum forests and the alpine heath. It hurts this nature loving heart of mine.
The Right havent just been dog-whistling to the fears of their base; they have been actively cultivating those fears and divisions to the point we now have a virulent anti-environment tribe – where the environment and those trying to protect it is something to hate. They simply do not care if rare ecosystems are destroyed, some rejoice in it. What might cut through to the masses more is the research on the ice melt in the Himalaya. This will effect the water supply, power and irrigation of over a billion people. Climate induced global insecurity would pose a direct threat to humans that is easier for these tribal peeps to understand. It isnt hard to see how disrupting the water supply of a billion people can lead to world wars.
Rex
And how do we judge the current mood?
If we use polling, then, according to Bludgertrack (see above), indies gain one seat and Labor is emphatically in government.
Our alternative is making shit up.
“Late last week, crossbenchers in the House of Representatives started to be contacted by journalists who had been briefed by the Government that the latest House of Representatives practice — effectively the rule book which governs how parliament runs — suggested that if the Government were to lose any motion on any substantive policy issue, it would represent a vote of no confidence and thus could prompt an early snap election.
…
The public service is convinced the Prime Minister may call an election during the parliamentary sittings to avoid a vote the Government would lose.” – Laura Tingle
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-02-04/signs-government-panicking-over-possibility-of-early-election/10777314
Rex Douglas @ #54 Tuesday, February 5th, 2019 – 9:28 am
Bollocks.
“Frankly, I find it perverse that we send cheques to people with big share portfolios that amount to more than we provide a pensioner with no assets and no other income source,” he said.
What you mean, Rex Douglas, is that you want to make it seem like Chris Bowen has messed up. However, the above is a very powerful argument.
Or, don’t you agree because YOU want things to stay the way they are in order to protect YOUR investments and income stream?
Don’t worry, I don’t expect an honest answer from you. Just another trite one-liner.
On election predictions we have a yardstick or benchmark. Poll and election results.
What did polls say and what were the results for the Victorian election?
I for one was surprised that Hawthorn fell. Polling did not give us the full picture of the bloodbath coming in advance. It was rather like now. With the Federal polling.
We just don’t know how “soft” those figures are.
Combine with margin of error and we could still see a bloodbath for the LNP.
That’s on today’s figures and of course there is plenty of time for the polls to change.
I think the primary vote falling is LNP voters considering Independentent alternatives. As we saw with Sharkey in Mayo given a credible conservative choice voters will pick that alternative.
Basically the polling is telling us the LNP will lose government. The only question is by how much?
There are dozens of tiny spiders running around. Cute as… until I realised what they are.
Baby huntsmen.
I detect the current mood of PB Labor partisans is rather tetchy with this narrowing
Simon² Katich® @ #72 Tuesday, February 5th, 2019 – 5:49 am
The new panel has been used for both polls this year. 🙂
Lefty e,
Right click image and select ‘copy image location/address’. Paste link in comment box where you want the picture to appear. When posted it appears as an image.
Simon K
I like Huntsmen spiders. They eat insects and don’t make sticky webs.
P1,
Never stand in the way of an idiot proving it publicly.
Something I have also been guilty of myself on the odd occasion. 🙂
phoenixRED @ #34 Tuesday, February 5th, 2019 – 9:48 am
Certainly Señor.
I place the desired picture on my desktop (I am using Windows 10 and Firefox – Chrome works just the same).
I then goto
Postimage.org
and log on – this is not absolutely necessary but is required if you want to reaqcquire yopur masterpiece.
You will be presented with the following:-
You will then click on Choose Images
and follow the bouncing ball to select the photo of your choice
after which
You will see something like
You can then copy the link as indicated and paste it into you comment box.
I think I need more coffee. See how you go. 🤞
.
.
Sohar @ #96 Tuesday, February 5th, 2019 – 10:10 am
IF it starts with https and ends in .jpg or .png or .gif