Two days out from the one we’ve all been waiting for, Fairfax has cutely interjected with an Ipsos poll – conducted on this most special of occasions from Tuesday to Thursday for publication on Friday night, and not from Thursday to Saturday for publication on Sunday night as standard. The sample is 1166, somewhat lower than the usual 1400 from Ipsos.
The headline two-party result of 52-48 to Labor, as determined using 2016 election preference flows, is only slightly above the Coalition’s usual form – but Malcolm Turnbull is given a very useful straw to grasp with a tied result using respondent-allocated preferences. This is something the Coalition hasn’t achieved on either kind of two-party measure in any poll since September 2016, except for the quirky and apparently short-lived YouGov series for Fifty Acres. The previous Ipsos poll in early December had Labor leading 53-47 on previous election preferences and 52-48 on respondent allocation. On the primary vote, the Coalition is up two to 36%, Labor is up a point to 34%, and the Greens are down a point to 12% (high results for the Greens being a consistent features of Ipsos polls).
The good news for Malcolm Turnbull doesn’t end there: the poll finds only 28% in favour of the Liberals removing him as leader, compared with 62% who think he should remain, and his approval rating bounces five points to 47%, with disapproval down six to 43%. This is the first time since April last year that Turnbull has recorded net favourable personal ratings – the previous instance being another Ipsos poll, which is no coincidence, since the series consistently records high approval and low undecided ratings for both leaders. Bill Shorten is steady on 38% approval and up one on disapproval to 53%. The poll also finds 49% support for company tax cuts, with the number opposed not provided. This is dramatically more favourable than ReachTEL’s finding of 29% in favour and 56% opposed, although recent Essential Research polls have had slight net favourable results.
We have also had Roy Morgan publish results of its face-to-face polling for the second fortnight a row, which the pollster has hitherto been reserving for its massively expensive subscriber service since the 2016 election campaign. I’m not sure if this portends a regular return to publication, or if it will be appearing on an ad hoc basis, as the release a fortnight ago seemed to suggest. Whatever it is, the result is likewise on the high side for the Coalition, with Labor holding a steady 51-49 lead on two-party preferred. This is in contrast to the form of the Morgan face-to-face series of old, which was notorious for its skew to Labor.
However, as with Ipsos, it’s respondent allocation that’s making the difference – if previous election preferences were applied, Labor’s lead would be up from 51-49 to 53-47. The primary votes are Coalition 38.5%, down from 40% a fortnight ago; Labor 37.5%, up from 35%; Greens 11%, down from 12%; and One Nation on an unusually weak 3%, down from 3.5%. The Morgan release has two-party breakdowns by state and income category. The poll was conducted over the past two weekends from a combined sample of 1477.
Sacred building???
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-04-07/underground-war-memorial-expansion-tipped-to-top-500-million/9627910
Baby Boomers and this generation:
Josh Butler
Verified account @JoshButler
17m17 minutes ago
This @SatPaper article brings some important numbers to the boomers v young people debate, outlining the perks for “the most privileged generation this country has ever seen” https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/news/politics/2018/04/07/turnbull-and-the-boomer-racket/15230232006058 …
The only good thing about the Katharine Murphy article today is the comments section. Mostly she attempts to isolate Turnbull from the horror that is his government. She also claims the government is centre-right and Newspoll 30 is no big deal. The comments point out, however, that there is nothing centre about Turnbull’s government (it is purely right-wing) and NP30 is a big deal because Turnbull made it so.
That I agree with. But I don’t want to concede him ANY positive polls, especially this one.
NRDC
Verified account @NRDC
52s52 seconds ago
“The Trump administration’s decision will take America backward by jeopardizing successful safeguards that are working to clean our air, save drivers money at the pump, and drive technological innovation that creates jobs.” – @NRDC’s Luke Tonachel
Same Same as the Fibs and the Tories.
I dont think the papers jumping on any positive news for Turnbull does him any good.The papers are just seen as more and more biased everytime which leads to more and more rejection of him and his party.
PM Dutton ready for action:
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/apr/07/peter-dutton-liberal-party-home-affairs-minister
Sohar and others
I just don’t get the same messages as you do in the Murphy pieces.
Fossil Fibs won’t like this…
AGL chief determined to turn Liddell into renewables hub:
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/apr/06/agl-chief-determined-to-turn-liddell-into-renewables-hub
A boost in the polls as Sky news is saying.Id love Newspoll to be 54-46 less than 2 days later.Let them spin that one.
Zoidlord
Its nothing to do with the Libs what happens to Liddell.If AGL does not want to sell it doesnt have to.Simple.They just need to tell Malcolm to piss off and mind his own business.I didnt realise the Libs are now the new communist party.
I guess the boost in the polls means that the likes of Dutton and Abbott will give Turnbull flowers hearts and kisses. Lol!
Please tell me the half a billion War Memorial rebuild is a joke. On top of 200 million on a Western Front Museum, and half a billion on the ANZAC centenary….there was also designs for a WW1 and WW2 memorial on Lake Burley Griffin…That’s more than 1.3 billion on war celebration, infinitely more than any other nation spends.
This is just crazy militarism. Sydney our premier city doesn’t even hae a decent Art Gallery….
David P Gelles @gelles
The parody front page from The Boston Globe. Published 2 years ago with headlines like “Deportations to Begin” and “Markets Sink as Trade War Looms”. https://twitter.com/gelles/status/982407333908307968/photo/1
Tories go further right:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/04/dhs-defends-media-monitoring-database-calls-critics-conspiracy-theorists/
UK taking new excuses for the nerve agent:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/04/british-intelligence-nerve-agent-used-on-spy-came-from-russian-military-lab/
FCC has been turned into a political circus:
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/04/fcc-wont-reveal-the-secrets-behind-ajit-pais-anti-net-neutrality-dance-video/
Irrespective of latest two polls (Morgan+IPSOS), i dont see any hope of LNP retaining government in its own right.
There is an extra seat, so now 152, take the speaker out and there has to be a majority or tied on the floor so the speaker can cast the tiebreaker, so the government needs 77 (assuming they cant/wont give speaker away)
Assume 5 independent/green again, and Labor need 71 seats to spoil the LNP party, they currently have 69, so they need 2 more. They notionally have two more with the new seats of Fraser and Bean, and another two with Cox (Corangamite) and Dunkly taking ALP to 73 notionally. Leaving LNP with 74.
Complications include the SA redistribution on Monday changing things again, and perhaps there might only be 4 independents if Sharkey doesnt hold onto to her seat due to NXT implosion.
Another way to look at it, is to count 77 up on bludgertrack probably LNP seats and LNP need to win upto and including Adelaide, which is an estimated probability of 1% or current projection of 44.8% 2PP.
Sure things can change, and Turnbull is getting a nice sympathy vote right now (because people are terrified of the alternative), but voters wont think like that when an election is close. e.g. lets see a PPM between Shorten and Dutton
Of course that all ignores policy, which will also become more of an influence on election day, and i think its pretty well accepted ALP are leading LNP with popular policies.
Joe ScarboroughVerified account@JoeNBC
42m42 minutes ago
Yet another federal judge finds that AR-15s are not protected by the 2nd Amendment and Heller. This is consistent with the 4th Circuit’s reasoning regarding Maryland’s ban as well as rulings from all other circuits.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/judge-upholds-massachusetts-ban-on-ar-15s-other-military-style-weapons-1523056971
Close Manus & Nauru @I_stand_for
@lenoretaylor Error in this article: Julian Burnside did not photoshop Peter Dutton photo. He retweeted my tweet which said you’re dead to me in response to Duttons crazy lefties being dead to him comment – I used an old photo that has been circulating on social media for years.
Confessions says: Saturday, April 7, 2018 at 9:53 am
phoenixRed:
Real Time is back today!!
*******************************************
THANKS Confessions !!! …… made my Saturday seem much brighter !
If Newspoll was miraculously 50/50 or better for the LNP – the entire nation would laugh and ask how much money Turnbull parted with to achieve that result.
He bought his position within the party. People will assume he bought the poll.
Ex-federal prosecutor smacks down Trump’s new lawyer with an epic comparison to a foot doctor
Amid news that President Donald Trump has begun informally preparing for a face-to-face meeting with special counsel Robert Mueller, legal experts warned that his one-man legal team in the Russia investigation may not be sufficient to protect him from perjuring himself.
“‘Mueller hasn’t hesitated to [charge] people for lying on some pretty tangential stuff,’” Wisenberg’s quote, read by Burnett, said. “How big of a concern should that be, perjury charges be, for the president?”
“The president should be very concerned about being charged with false statement,” former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti said
Sekulow, the ex-prosecutor noted, “is totally out of his element” defending a client under investigation by a government-appointed special counsel.
“Having Jay Sekulow handle this is like having a podiatrist do your heart surgery,” Mariotti quipped.
https://www.rawstory.com/2018/04/ex-federal-prosecutor-smacks-trumps-new-lawyer-epic-comparison-foot-doctor/
New York Times WorldVerified account@nytimesworld
26m26 minutes ago
A Ukrainian lawmaker tried to investigate Paul Manafort’s former office manager in Kiev for ties to Russian intelligence agencies because of his studies at a military language school. “They produce professional spies,” he said.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/06/world/europe/robert-mueller-kilimnik-ukraine-russia-manafort.html?smid=tw-nytimesworld&smtyp=cur
“And former Prime Minister John Howard told ABC’s 7.30 that evening: “My exultation to all Liberals is to just remember that you are carrying the hopes and aspirations of millions of supporters around the country and they want you to work together.”
I didn’t see (couldn’t bring myself to witness, to be more accurate) the above show.
Isn’t it exhortation (not exultation)? Has he become a gibberer?
Unlike Murphy, Probyn is more scathing of Trumble, the first par.
Such is Malcolm Turnbull’s magnificent, monolithic self-confidence he would never, ever have entertained matching Tony Abbott’s sorry record of 30 consecutive negative Newspolls.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-04-07/analysis-malcolm-turnbull-awaits-30th-newspoll-loss/9626492
Some great quotes
No leader is perfect and menace is often afoot in politics. But, an old-timer Liberal opined, political judgment aids the escape as much as it helps avoiding trouble in the first place.
“Higher primates learn when they make mistakes, lower primates don’t learn,” was Arthur Sinodinos’s description of a good leader when he was John Howard’s formidable chief of staff.
A good article.
Confessions @ #74 Saturday, April 7th, 2018 – 10:18 am
I t’s a bit like when people correlate every extreme weather event with being proof that climate change is occurring or about to occur. Sometimes a storm is just a storm!
Murphy’s article does go on to talk about the NEG, and says this
When they secured party room agreement for the national energy guarantee in principle last October, Turnbull and the energy minister, Josh Frydenberg, had the advantage of stealth – they tasked bureaucrats with cooking up the policy quickly and quietly while Abbott warbled on incessantly in the cosy coal conversation corner furnished by 2GB, and Sky News at night.
The policy was dropped on the party room and pushed through with only a minimum of resistance because Abbott and the coal crew had been lulled into thinking they had won round one.
The NEG was designed last year solely on the purpose to get something, an announcible through the party room.
(Guess what, my spell checker doesn’t recognize announcible).
If you want to understand just how desperate the tories are to win the next election, and how low they will sink to do so, then you should read this article …
https://www.thesaturdaypaper.com.au/news/politics/2018/04/07/turnbull-and-the-boomer-racket/15230232006058
In both Britain and Australia, if the tories don’t win the next election, they may never win another.
About the only thing you can guarantee is that things are going to get nasty!
That’s a good article P1 – I was just about to ‘reminder repost’ … you beat me to it.
Real Time live
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OKqJJFjGXRM
Torchbearer
On the memorials, I agree. For example, support services for ex-soldiers would be more useful.
Occupational churn, a measure of the rate at which technology replaces human workers, is at record lows. Labour productivity growth is also at record lows. If vast labour-displacing effects of automation were imminent, they would be showing up in those two statistics. They aren’t.
Automation has three types of impact on human workers. 1. Labour displacement. 2. Labour augmentation (increasing the productivity and accuracy of human workers). 3. Job creation by increasing people’s productivity and spending power.
It is amateur hour to rave about effect 1 and neglect the other two.
“The NEG was designed last year solely on the purpose to get something, an announcible through the party room.”
The NEG wasn’t really designed at all it was just a vague brainfart without any details, or support really.
Psyclaw says:
Saturday, April 7, 2018 at 10:17 am
Darn
Hanrahan!
Don
“A good friend of mine was a PhD. He said that anyone of reasonable intelligence could get one, all they needed was a steady source of income and persistence.”
Don’t tell me. Your friend’s PhD thesis was was titled The Art and Origins of Gross Oversimplification and Inaccurate Generalisations.
It was a scholarly and useful work on the birds of New Guinea.
The NEG wasn’t really designed at all it was just a vague brainfart without any details, or support really.
True,
that should read as:
“The NEG was
designeddevised last year solely on the purpose to get something, an announcible through the party room.”I wonder if the likely skew of this poll is explained by its timing. Not done over a weekend like most others are. Might have made certain groups less likely to respond.
lizzie @ #109 Saturday, April 7th, 2018 – 8:05 am
Your “problem” is you read them with an open mind! 🙂
possibly Wayfarer, though Occam’s razor would suggest that it is just a bounce within the MoE.
Of razors, proposed is
Trump’s Razor
When seeking an explanation for the behavior of Presidential “candidate” Donald J. Trump, always choose the stupidest possible explanation.
https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=Trump%27s%20Razor
LNP and Greens can piss off.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2018-04-07/australian-tax-office-accused-of-misusing-draconian-powers/9613808?smid=Page:%20ABC%20News-Facebook_Organic&WT.tsrc=Facebook_Organic&sf186446310=1
It is South Australia post election and nothing is happening with Premier Whatisname in charge. Some complaints about what he has inherited from Labor, but I just say. ‘shut up, you wanted it, you got it, its your problem now.’
Stupid bloody SA voters.
Don
I’m pretty sure your friends theory does not apply to the physical sciences and maths.
Sniffer dogs to be used in South Australian high schools, in law and order crackdown
First Whatshisname policy.
steve davis @ #144 Saturday, April 7th, 2018 – 10:26 am
What have they got against teachers? 🙂
Libs claim to be the friend of small business yet over 600 BIG companies pay no tax
steve davis @ #146 Saturday, April 7th, 2018 – 10:30 am
You can have more than one friend!
Better to say they are the friend of all businesses that donate to them! 🙂
Jolyon Wagg says:
Saturday, April 7, 2018 at 1:18 pm
Don
A good friend of mine was a PhD. He said that anyone of reasonable intelligence could get one, all they needed was a steady source of income and persistence.
I’m pretty sure your friends theory does not apply to the physical sciences and maths.
_______________________
I quite agree, for the hard sciences, mathematics, physics, engineering, chemistry, outstanding ability is required, that is certain.
If your doctorate is in the study of turbulent flow, you are higher still in the spectrum of intelligence and ability.
According to an apocryphal story, Werner Heisenberg was asked what he would ask God, given the opportunity. His reply was: “When I meet God, I am going to ask him two questions: Why relativity? And why turbulence? I really believe he will have an answer for the first.”
I have heard this story attributed to others, and one said that he would not ask about turbulence, since he did not want to embarrass God.
Barney in Go Dau @ #146 Saturday, April 7th, 2018 – 1:34 pm
As used to be said about the Queensland police – they’re the best that money can buy…
Tom.
This is an old article, but I can’t believe that Dutton supports the permanent separation of families. Doesn’t the thickhead realise that family separation is one of the causes of stress and ‘bad’ behaviour? (A lesson not learned by the separation of Aboriginal children from their families, apparently.) 😡
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2017/dec/07/peter-dutton-defends-nauru-policy-after-refugees-told-to-separate-from-family?CMP=share_btn_tw