The first Newspoll result in three weeks, courtesy of The Australian, has Labor’s two-party preferred lead unchanged at 53-47, from primary votes of Coalition 36% (steady), Labor 37% (up one), Greens 9% (down one) and One Nation 11% (up two). The two leaders have recorded identical personal ratings of 32% approval and 55% disapproval, which in Malcolm Turnbull’s case means a three point drop on approval and a one point increase on disapproval, while Bill Shorten is respectively down one and up two. Turnbull’s lead as preferred prime minister is at 44-31, compared with 45-33 last time. The poll was conducted Thursday to Sunday from a sample of 1786.
Newspoll: 53-47 to Labor
Newspoll comes in at 53-47 for the third time in a row, with both leaders down slightly on their net approval ratings.
sohar @ #104 Monday, June 19, 2017 at 7:20 am
Gillard had a bried period of improved ratings from Sep 2012-Jan 2013, reaching a best netsat of -11. This all ended at the start of February 2013 with a disastrous week when she announced the September election date and Wayne Swan admitted they weren’t getting the budget back to surplus.
Question @12:20
Thank you for the interesting, if somewhat incoherent article re murder rates eg that women’s murder(ed) rate at 99 is 79%! 79% of what? ! (~ 125 going by the numbers, but 125 represents what?)
The 9.2 per million for the UK seems to exclude the Midsomer area. I have made it a rule to avoid going to parish fetes in Midsomer. The rates of homicidal frenzy among clergymen there seems to approach the rates of paedophilia among their brethren of the cloth in Ballaarat.
Ta, Kevin.
“..September election date and Wayne Swan admitted they weren’t getting the budget back to surplus”
Now the Hockey-Morrison mega-deficit is not a big media issue for some reason. Why can that be, I wonder?
Morning
zoomster
I agree with you on the bullying. A bit of respect for other people is a good thing and stops some damn ugly outcomes.
jaketapper: URGENT: London vehicle hits pedestrians, police say ‘number of casualties’ cnn.com/2017/06/18/eur…
lukehgomes: .@HumanHeadline tells he wants ‘scandalising the court’ removed from contempt laws #auspol
Tricot
‘Quaint’.
Just stupid.
Gippslander
🙂
http://www.themercury.com.au/news/opinion/federal-government-on-the-path-to-dismantling-democratic-values/news-story/d29cbd7b86781ded5aceff93e5e57c14
I look forward to their reporting = the Budget’s ‘negative surplus’.
Indigocathy: Important to support fellow independent Andrew @WilkieMP’s bill to make sure people aren’t charged extra to get a paper bill. #indiacts
Poroti,
I look forward to their reporting = the Budget’s ‘negative surplus’.
You mean, ‘AT’? 😉
shane25873: It seems it was a white man, so no need to do a full day of TV, somehow they’re always mentally unstable, if Christian!
@morningshowon7
I think McGowan has got it the wrong way around*: people are being rewarded for opting out of paper. If it saves the company money, then it’s only reasonable that those benefits should be passed on.
*Yeah, I know. I probably would anyway. But consider my argument on its merits…
Cathy McGowan should support retaining Sunday penalty rates. Then her constituents could afford the little extra for a paper Electricity Bill!
Zoomster
Yes. Plus getting the bill electronically eliminates identity theft of people going through your mailbox.
Pauline Hanson is a munt! Look at what she wants in exchange for PHONy votes for Gonski 2.0:
🙄
Oh shit, just when you think that peak stupid has been reached…
Aha!
Christian Zahra is a former federal Labor MP. Also there are a few former Catholic teachers in Labor’s ranks at present.
She will want the ‘cuts’ aka 6 of the best brought back next..
Sadistic teachers were in heaven back in the the 60’s and 70’s from my hand memory!
Pauline Hanson wouldn’t be averse to bringing back the cane either, I bet!
On those criteria, Hanson would still be in about Year 8…
Bazinga C@T
trog sorrenson @ #124 Monday, June 19, 2017 at 8:33 am
That makes about as much sense as saying an audit is not independent, just because the auditor relied on information provided by the client. This does not affect the independence of the audit, and this is a fairly standard disclaimer.
As I pointed out weeks ago, the most interesting thing is the parts of the Jacobs Report that Finkel chose not to use. Still, I’m glad to see you are finally moving beyond simply reposting RenewEconomy propaganda.
According to some online sites, the latest attack on pedestrians in London took place outside a major London mosque. Perhaps it was an anti-Muslim attack: time will tell.
Baba
I am happy there is no wall to wall coverage today. I agree with the tweet though. If it was an identified muslim driving the van the whole terror edifice would be up and running with wall to wall coverage tragedy porn.
This is what I want to know.
…so the current msm meme seems to be that if Shorten doesn’t reflexively agree with every utterance Malcolm makes (a higher bar than that set for his party room) this means that Shorten is Just Like Abbott.
I notice the simile doesn’t extend to calling Shorten The Best Opposition Leader Ever.
guytaur @ #176 Monday, June 19, 2017 at 11:05 am
Let’s wait and see. Reports are only starting to come through now and some are saying that Muslims leaving the Finsbury Park mosque were targetted. If so, then by any definition of terrorism, if it was deliberate, it was terrorism.
As someone who cares about good policy more than which side wins the political argument du jour, I’m sad about the Gonski 2.0 debate. Given the current state of the government’s finances, it’s a pretty good package. It was put together by the apolitical bureaucrats of the Education Department and I reckon it would have looked much the same if Shorten had won the last election: promises once made by Gillard and Swan about billions of dollars in the never-never notwithstanding.
Fact is, a bit like the SSM referendum bill last year, Gonski 2.0 is currently the only game in town. If Labor and others vote it down, the schools won’t get the illusory billions of dollars promised by Gillard and Swan, we’ll just be stuck with the status quo.
And, despite the fact that Labor seems to be riding high in the polls right now, it is a long time until the next election and a lot can happen. If things suddenly go the way of Turnbull (or even a replacement PM), it might be a very long time until Labor next forms government.
Beazley in the 1998-2001 period adopted a similar approach of promising to get rid of all the nasties and ladle out milk and honey all around, and not worrying a jot about the budget bottom line. For a while in late 2000-2001, you could hardly get set on him becoming PM, so short were his odds. And then Tampa and 9/11 happened in quick succession, and he was cooked.
If you care about public education, Gonski 2.o is a bird in the hand: just like the referendum was for people who care about SSM.
Don’t worry, I don’t expect many of you to agree with me.
Good morning all,
Gonski 2.0 will, at the very best, end up as a mad dogs breakfast of deals negotiated on the run with internal government opponents and the cross bench. Cash will be thrown here, taken away from there and funds offered to individual states and sectors on a ad hoc basis with no real central policy direction or proper scrutiny. So much for doing away with the unwieldy individual deals negotiated under labor !
As well, so much for Gonski 2.0 being the real gold plated deal lauded by Turnbull, Birmingham and David Gonski. If it was so good why the need for change ? It will be simply a political fix held together by band aids and as such will blow apart very quickly. However, that ” optimistic” scenario is only applicable if the legislation passes. It still has to get past the government backbench. What it looks like today may be completely different by Wednesday. How, in good faith, can any serious decisions be made by the cross bench if the government has no idea where this will land and in what shape ?
I wonder how much of the detail Birmingham kept to himself given the blow back from the backbench ? It would not surprise me if Turnbull and Birmingham have attempted to treat the back bench like mushrooms and push this through hoping ” no one would notice ” If that is the case then the release to the week end MSM of the detail relating to the money that was going to be ripped off the Catholics takes on a whole new perspective. Who leaked it and why ? It does not seem to be doing Birmingham too much good today.
Cheers.
guytaur: “I am happy there is no wall to wall coverage today. I agree with the tweet though. If it was an identified muslim driving the van the whole terror edifice would be up and running with wall to wall coverage tragedy porn.”
Ironically, the first website I came across to suggest that it was most likely an attack on Muslims leaving the mosque after a Ramadan event was Breitbart!
TPOF
Yes. However no wall to wall coverage. No tragedy Porn today. Its the media I am talking about not if it was a terror attack or not. Worshippers leaving a place of worship were mown down by a van.
zoomster @ #172 Monday, June 19, 2017 at 11:01 am
As opposed to a system which allows anyone to progress through the system no matter how little they have learnt?
Is that what you favour?
Doyley – according to the Guardian, Kevin Andrews has said that if the Catholic sector is disadvantaged, he will cross the floor!
Doyley: “Gonski 2.0 will, at the very best, end up as a mad dogs breakfast of deals negotiated on the run with internal government opponents and the cross bench. Cash will be thrown here, taken away from there and funds offered to individual states and sectors on a ad hoc basis with no real central policy direction or proper scrutiny. So much for doing away with the unwieldy individual deals negotiated under labor !”
If Labor wasn’t opposing it, then none of this would be necessary.
And, any compromises to get the thing through will almost inevitably mean extra money for the elite private schools. And, let’s face it, how many politicians of any stripe send their kids to any other sort of school nowadays?
I’ve have a sneaking suspicion that one motivation for RDN in derailing SHY’s initial strong support for Gonski 2.o was to play to the Greens’ supporter base: an overwhelming proportion of whom – being a bunch of chardonnay lefties – would probably send their kids to private schools. (“We have always strongly believed in the public system, but we found that the public school just wasn’t right for our dear little Atticus.”)
It’s just part of life living in a big city.
Anyway, more people die from bee stings than terror attacks.
We can’t let the terrorists win.
We need to just go on with ‘business as usual’
I’m going to go light a candle in memory of the victims.
Love trumps hate.
Not all non-muslims are terrorists.
Let’s not forget the Ottoman Empire.
I’ve got an english friend and he isn’t a terrorist.
So there really is no problem.
Baba
Brietbart is consistent in its ramping up of division and fear. So not ironic. Just business as usual. It does highlight the hypocrisy of the rest of the media.
You read Brietbart?
meher baba @ #180 Monday, June 19, 2017 at 11:27 am
I am getting a clearer picture of you when you make statements like:
You meet Oscar Wilde’s definition of a cynic: “A man who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.”
We should look at what our Educational, Health etc needs are and then work out how to fund them rather than say we can’t afford it, which really means we are not prepared to raise sufficient tax revenue.
meher baba @ #182 Monday, June 19, 2017 at 11:28 am
With approval?
guytaur @ #187 Monday, June 19, 2017 at 11:35 am
Maybe he writes for it. Tasmanian correspondent perhaps?
“Brietbart is consistent in its ramping up of division and fear. So not ironic. Just business as usual. It does highlight the hypocrisy of the rest of the media. You read Brietbart?”
I read a broad spectrum of views across the internet. Perhaps you will be surprised to hear that – no mater how right-wing I might appear to be – the Guardian is far and away my favourite news and opinion site: for the simple reason that it’s the best. But I do sometimes read some of the right-wing sites as well: Guido Fawkes (who is an anarchist rather than a conservative) is probably my favourite among these. Breitbart – dominated as it is by delcons/ inane climate change deniers like Delingpole – is not much chop, especially since they dumped their only entertaining writer (Milo Y: who, like Latham, is often laugh out loud funny, whatever you might think of his views). But Breitbart is less restrained than MSM sites in putting up unconfirmed reports about major events, and so it proved on this occasion.
Variety is the spice of life, I find.
Labor doesn’t have to oppose gonski, the LNP backbenchers will.
P1
Finkel used modelling prepared by Jacobs using Finkel’s assumptions, as well as it’s own data, which is a crock of shit. e.g. Outdated capital costs for renewables – something which should be easy to check – unless you want rewind the whole cost scenario back 12 mths to fit the political objectives of your client.
Gippslander, and what is even more baffling is that the crime continues unabated with 100% of cases solved!
Hmmmm interesting news from NSW…
Fresh from the Qld Health Fiasco and losing the VicPol contract.
Good luck NSW!
bemused: “Maybe he writes for it. Tasmanian correspondent perhaps?”
Oh dear, outed at last! 🙂
Perhaps unfortunately for me (and perhaps for you folks on Poll Bludger), I can never find a home on the alt right for the simple reason that I understand science and don’t consider climate change to be a global left-wing conspiracy. Also, I can’t stand Donald Trump or Tony Abbott and I believe in public health and education and a range of similar things that are anathema to what passes as the right-wing commentariat in this country and abroad. It’s this sort of nonsense that continues to drive me away from sites like Catallaxy Files, so I’m afraid you’re stuck with me for now.
Meher,
Labor is opposing the legislation because it is bullshit. It is not Gonski simply a political fix branded as such.
I do not know your experience or area (s) of expertise but hopefully you have dug deeply into the actual legislation instead of just accepting the spin.
Teachers and principals from across the public and Catholic, Jewish etc systems have been very vocal in their opposition. The core arguments have centred around lack of any consultation and the reduction in real money over the next two years with any real funding back ended out to the never never. The education sectors own ” valley of death “.
I would take the opinion of those with actual skin in the game over the government and its MSM supporters.
It is a bit like the recent tragic London high rise fire. Who would you believe ? Engineers and others with actual hands on experience or the Tories ? I think thst answer is simple.
Labor will not and should not support crap policy.
Cheers.
Baba
If you accept evidence as science does. It won’t be long before you become centrist left.
After all the evidence is in Neo Liberalism small government low taxes mantra has failed. Most spectacularly with the Grenfell tower incident. Trickle down just does not work
Keane today is another one proclaiming Malcolm would be a good leader if only his enemies would let him. Sigh!