Today’s Courier-Mail brings a Galaxy poll on federal voting intention in Queensland, which finds a dramatic reversal since the last such poll, which was conducted on Tony Abbott’s watch in late August. The Coalition is up nine on the primary vote to 50%, with Labor down eight to 29%. A 51-49 lead to Labor on two-party preferred has transformed into a 58-42 to the Coalition. The poll also finds 61% believe Malcolm Turnbull has the “best plan for Queensland”, compared with 14% for Bill Shorten. The poll was conducted by phone on Tuesday and Wednesday, from a sample of 800 respondents. It will presumably be followed shortly by a result on state voting intention from the same sample.
Galaxy: 58-42 to federal Coalition in Queensland
A new Queensland-only poll of federal voting finds a nine-point reversal since Malcolm Turnbull deposed Tony Abbott.
Howard’s battlers is a misnomer, in many cases it was the effective local MP that carried the seat, we saw this in Dunkley in 1998, Bruce Billson ran a strong local campaign which helped to get him re-elected, the same applied in several other seats and in some cases were helped by the ALP running poor candidates.
MB
People often fail to live up to their ideals. I don’t think that is a particular failing of those on the left. For example I think Ayn Rand was happy to take social security late in her life.
bemused
They have bought into the neo-liberal framing that wealth brings happiness.
DN
I would say if you fit in the top 10% then yes you could be classed as being rich, my issue is more to do with calling income earners who after going to university or tafe, earn a good income and am able to purchase a nice house and hold an investment portfolio as being the rich.
Most of the top 10% would have inherited it thus haven really earned it.
JW
Yes the great hypocrite Ayn Rand, I’ve never understood the right’s liking of her views.
Pegasus
Having money sure beats not having money
JW,
Double standards is all the go for some classes of people.
Theoretically I would be classed in the top 10% income earners but am certainly not rich. Comfortable yes but not rich. We have always been a single income earner family so haven’t managed to accumulate more than a modest amount of assets.
Class in Australia is an interesting area, its different to the class structure of the UK and Europe, its more fragmented and is easier to move around.
Pegasus@53
Or at least makes your misery very comfortable.
There is plenty of evidence that people with more money are happier but once you reach about the median wealth, you don’t get happier with more money.
I wonder if we will get a full federal Galaxy tonight?
Surely Abetz can take the hint that it might be time for him to retire, or doesn’t he know how to apply for any other kind of work
mb
Abetz isnt going anywhere
Groan hoped he would retire.
And increasingly.
The Hard Right Nutjob would actually not go down well in Queensland. The long ‘rural socialist’ tradition of the National Party with all its emphasis on intervention does not gel with the economic scorched earthism of the hard right.
Except to the nether regions of political irrelevance…
I guess if the ALP win the next election then maybe Abetz might come to the realisation that he is a dud and passed it.
Unfortunately he has not come to this realisation already – neither of course has Tony Abbott nor Kevin Andrews nor Bronwyn Bishop.
Diogenes,
Yes, research does confirm that.
However there are many people like me who fall well below the median wealth.
Despite all my challenges, I lead a blessed, fulfilling and happy.
life.
What makes me happy has little to do, for example, flying off overseas for an annual holiday or owning a 50 square two storey Mcmansion.
So many people believe they are deprived if they are missing these material things. Heaven forbid that each child does not have a bedroom of their own with an ensuite!
Envy and material greed are soul-destroying.
Oh come on… you were one of those dolts who was probably posting about Abbott eating an onion by Fairfax and the ABC was Prime Time news.
Bit late to complain about Operation Get Abbott now.
Then we had the Knights and Dames thing… who was hurt by it? Was anyones life destroyed? Were there people put out of house and home because of it?
Oh but it’s gone lets all celebrate like it’s news or that it matters… because the left need these things to navel gaze over because apparantly they have nothing better to comment on
At some point, heads will be removed from sand, revelations will be beheld: Shorten is hopeless. It’s that simple.
Put in Tanya Plibersek. She likely won’t win this upcoming election but she’ll get much-needed grounding in the role and will give Turnbull a much better run for his money.
And crucially, Plibersek will sound credible on foreign policy/ national security stuff.
Shorten on these topics sounds forced, fake, anxiously trying to remember scripted lines; anxiously trying to remember which word in the much-rehearsed sentence he’s supposed to put the emphasis on.
Result: A dog’s breakfast, and the people simply are not listening.
blackburnpseph
They’re not known as “agrarian socialists” for nothing!
As usual double standards apply – it’s okay for us, but for them.
Tony Abbott!!
It was just politically damn stupid – and lots of politically damn stupid add up to a death spiral for any PM – just ask Julia Gillard.
Pegasus
That is what Dio is saying, having money that enables you too do the things you want does bring happiness, but on its own it doesn’t do a great deal such as in cases where the family is dysfunctional.
oops.. As usual double standards apply – it’s okay for us, but not for others.
Methinks Tanya Plibersek is in a particular category of potential leadership aspirant…
Could she do the job? Yes
Would she do well in the job? Yes
Does she understand 100% what the job entails? Yes
Does she want the job? Based on the answer to Q3 – quite possibly not.
Mexican B
It has a lot to do with “keeping up with the Joneses”, with status gained through conspicuous consumption.
Isn’t happiness a combination of health, diet and good genes?
Pegasus
That is different to saying that money buys happiness, it is better to have money than not have any, particularly at this time of year although having money allows you to do the things you want, poor people lack many of those opportunities.
I had a very sad conversation once with a woman who had a stellar career.
She said she always thought the next promotion would make her happy, but it never did. On one level she recognised this; on the other, she still thought the next promotion would be the One.
The eloquent George Monbiot:
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/03/society-consumerism-support
Abetz isn’t the only Liberal MP who should go for the sake of getting new talent. Andrews is another, as is Abbott.
Well paid journalist like George Monbiot have little cred when it comes to talking about the poor, I dealt he would ever have experienced disadvantage.
Its a bit like the story I read about the ABC where people would be viewed as being pretty progressive yet when the cleaner comes into the room they all would go quiet.
I think its all fine to complain about selfishness but I just don’t buy well paid journalist making out that they have any real connection with what they clearly don’t as if they did then they would understand why no one actively seeks to be poor unless they are so inclined politically.
Mexican B,
It’s obvious we have totally different world views.
Nevertheless, there are moments when I agree with a point you make.
Time for me to depart {smile}
Bad news .
https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/wa/a/30156476/one-of-three-wa-fires-still-a-watch-act/
And from the Gibson footy club president.
Pegasus@88
MexicanB has a word view unlike any other.
Bemused
Good, just as it should be
Bemused
Well I could be like you
The right seem to gravitate towards hypocrites like moths to a flame.
mexicanbeemer@93
Well you could if you learnt to be consistent rather than all over the shop.
…many on the left are good at talking about being compassionate but when they are faced with someone in real disadvantage, what do they do, in many cases they look the other way.
Those on the right almost without exception think we should spend more on defence, ‘border protection’ and ‘security’, paid for by others’ taxes. They want their private choices in health and education subsidised by other peoples’ taxes.
Bemused
How am I not consistent?
If anything I am more of a broken record around here although there have been times when my views have evolved.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-11-21/firb-urged-to-consider-national-security-in-bid-for-transgrid/6961370
Steve777
That isn’t relevant to what I wrote.
If anything the right such as Hockey put on an act when in opposition during the Malaysian solution debate.
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-11-21/firb-urged-to-consider-national-security-in-bid-for-transgrid/6961370