Canning by-election: September 19

A progressively updated post reporting on the campaign for the Canning by-election. LATEST UPDATE (15/9): In the last hours of Tony Abbott’s leadership, ReachTEL recorded a 57-43 lead to the Liberals under a then-hypothetical Malcolm Turnbull prime ministership.

Saturday, September 19

The West Australian produces one final poll for the campaign, being the only one conducted since the leadership coup. The poll, once again, was from ReachTEL, conducted on Thursday night from a sample of 1130. It suggests a movement of over 3% in favour of the Liberals, who record a primary vote of 48.4% compared with 32.9% for Labor and 7.6% for the Greens. Respondent-allocated preferences come out at 57-43, which is no different from previous election preferences. Here then is the final and definitive list of polling for the by-election:

Tuesday, September 15

A ReachTEL poll conducted in the electorate as the action unfolded last night found the Liberal lead at its usual 52-48, but that this would blow out to 57-43 if Malcolm Turnbull was leader. Under the assumption of Tony Abbott’s leadership, Andrew Hastie had 45.3% of the primary vote, Matt Keogh 36.4%, and the Greens 7.4%. Three earlier ReachTEL polls had Hastie between 46.5% and 47.3%, Keogh between 33.0% and 35.5%, and the Greens between 8.0% and 9.6%. The respondent-allocated two-party preferred result is 52-48 to Hastie, suggesting a preference share of a bit under 40% – quite a bit higher than the 25% or so of earlier ReachTEL polls, but still below the 2013 result of 48%.

Sunday, September 13

Two new polls, together with an updated table of all Canning polling a little further below:

• Tomorrow’s Fairfax papers have an Ipsos poll that is particularly interesting for its big sample size (around 1400), and the fact that both respondent-allocated and previous-election two-party results are provided. The respective results are 53-47 and 52-48 in favour of the Liberals – suggesting a preference flow to the Liberals of over 40%, compared with a little below 25% in the last two ReachTEL polls. The primary votes are Liberal 45%, Labor 36%, Greens 9% and Palmer United 2%. The poll also has Tony Abbott with 39% approval and 54% disapproval, Bill Shorten on 34% and 50%, and Abbott leading 42-36 as preferred prime minister.

• This morning’s News Corp tabloids had a Galaxy robopoll of 557 respondents, conducted on Thursday night, crediting Andrew Hastie with 44% of the primary vote and a two-party preferred lead of 52-48, with Matt Keogh on 36%, the Greens on 9%, Palmer United and Australian Christians on 3%, and all others on 5%. Tony Abbott led Bill Shorten as preferred prime minister by 41-38.

Saturday, September 12

We haven’t had any new polling on voting intention for a while, but watch this space tomorrow evening. All there has been is a second tranche of the earlier Essential Research poll for GetUp!, which found 59% of “swinging voters” (probably a pretty small sample overall then) were less likely to vote Liberal because of “ongoing government handouts to big mining companies”, and 66% of them said health and education cuts made them less likely to do so.

Andrew Burrell of The Australian reports that a Liberal source saying the party is “anticipating a narrow victory in Canning by a margin of 3-5 per cent, down from the current margin of 11.8 per cent”. The Mandurah Coastal Times observes that SportsBets odds for Andrew Hastie have come in from $1.45 to $1.22 over the course of the campaign, while Matt Keogh is out from $2.75 to $4.

• The Liberal Democrats are directing preferences to Labor ahead of the Liberals, in retaliation against the latter’s action through the Administrative Appeals Tribunal to force the party to change its name. Minor-party how-to-vote cards mostly follow predictable lines, with the Greens, Animal Justice and Pirate Party favouring Labor over Liberal, while Family First and Australian Christians go the other way, and Sustainable Population advises voters to work it out for themselves. The Palmer United how-to-vote card features an “example” consisting of a simple donkey vote, as their candidate has drawn top position on the ballot paper. Those who follow the example – and it takes fairly careful reading of the card not to conclude that it is the party’s active recommendation – will end up delivering their votes to sixth-placed Andrew Hastie ahead of eighth-placed Matt Keogh. The cards can be viewed on Antony Green’s Canning by-election page.

• Relatedly, Antony Green reviews the past behaviour of preferences in Canning, and notes that the Liberals’ share of Australian Christians preferences in the electorate has consistently been about 10% above par – or around 85%, compared with around 75%. “Either the Australian Christians are very good at handing out how-to-votes in Canning”, he concludes, “or they have tapped into local church networks, alerting supporters to how they should direct preferences”. No such party was evident with Family First preferences.

• Independent candidate Teresa van Lieshout, who made a splash in her run for the Vasse state by-election by appearing in a campaign video wearing a bikini, has made an even bigger one this time around by having a warrant issued for her arrest, after failing to appear in appear Fremantle Magistrates Court on a number of charges which appear to relate to her refusal to pay fines. She also took to Facebook to describe the Mandurah Mail newspaper as “evil cowardly lying slanderous violent pro liberal/labor govt fascist Nazi stealing, torturing, murdering dogs”.

• State Labor has used the occasion of the by-election campaign to reboot its Metronet policy from the 2013 state election, which promised a dramatic expansion of Perth’s rail network. Opposition Leader Mark McGowan this week promised that a new station would be built on the Mandurah line at Karnup if his party wins election in 2017.

Monday, September 7

Michael Gordon of The Age reports that polling of 400 respondents in Canning, conducted for Labor by UMR Strategic Research, found “34 per cent of voters agreeing that Abbott was doing a good job for Western Australia”, with “50 per cent of voters agreeing he was doing a bad job and 16 per cent unsure”. It’s instructive to compare this with the national result from the latest Newspoll, which has his approval rating at 30% and disapproval at 63%. Laurie Oakes sums up the general perception of the press corps when he writes that “optimism is growing among Liberals they will hold the seat by a reasonable margin”. In other news, Andrew Hastie has continued to dominate headlines from the campaign, having intervened during a doorstop interview to protect Tony Abbott from a question about leadership speculation, and been similarly forceful in heading off questions about his father’s and wife’s apparently conservative religious views.

Thursday, September 3

Later. Here’s a chart showing results of all five Canning polls, including ReachTEL’s numbers after forced responses from the undecided. ReachTEL and Essential did automated phone polls, the former targeting both landlines and mobiles, the latter just landlines. I believe the Newspoll was the same mode as the ReachTEL, but I await confirmation on that. The Liberal 2PP columns successively show preferences as based on the 2013 result (calculated myself for the ReachTEL polls) and, where available (i.e. only for the ReachTEL polls), respondent-allocated results and Liberals’ implied share of minor party and independent preferences.

Click on the image for a clearer view.

Earlier. However ambiguous the political situation may be, one clear winner from the by-election has been ReachTEL, which has been doing a roaring trade in automated phone polling of the electorate for private clients who have then been making the results available to the media. The latest clients are GetUp! and a coalition of environment groups, both of whose polls show the Liberals leading 51-49, as reported by The Guardian (UPDATE: Correction – the GetUp! poll was conducted by Essential Research, and it used previous election preferences, so the result is particularly worrying for the Liberals. See table above for full results.) However, those who have been following this thread will be aware that ReachTEL’s two-party totals have been reached through surprising Labor-friendly numbers on respondent-allocated preferences, such that you would want to see primary vote numbers before analysing them too carefully – and so far, no such numbers are available.

Saturday, August 29

The latest outfit to commission a ReachTEL poll of the electorate is Australian Marriage Equality, and its figures look rather a lot like those for the recent United Voice poll. After excluding 6.5% undecided, the primary votes are Liberal 47.7%, Labor 33.8% and Greens 8.0%. However, there may have been a forced preference on the undecided if the United Voice poll is anything to go by, and if the undecided had responded as they did in that poll, the Liberals would be about a point lower and Labor and the Greens little changed. Either way, the two-party result of 51-49 in favour of the Liberals credits Labor with a seemingly implausible share of preferences – this time 80%. The poll also found 46.9% supportive of legalising same-sex marriage with 40.8% opposed, and had Malcolm Turnbull favoured over Tony Abbott as Liberal leader by 38.2% to 25.8%, with Julie Bishop on 24.3% and Scott Morrison on 11.7%. The sample for the poll was 782.

Meanwhile, Andrew Hastie has said he will not vote in the by-election after a mix-up over his enrolment, which he has blamed on “ambiguous” Australian Electoral Commission paperwork. Shortly before the closure of the roll, Andrew Hastie changed his enrolment to his new rental address in Dudley Park. However, the Electoral Act requires that a person live at an address for over a month before they are eligible to do so. A statement by Hastie says he explained his circumstances to the returning officer in full, who directed him to complete the form and told him the application would be processed.

In fairness to both Hastie and the AEC, the Electoral Act itself is fairly ambiguous, with section 99(1) providing that one is only entitled to enrol at an address after one month of residence, but section 99(5) prohibiting the questioning of a person’s enrolment on that basis. Were Hastie to vote, he would be making a purely technical breach of the former section. But since he is not going to vote, he will be sent a letter from the AEC asking that he explain his failure to do so, to be followed by the formality of it accepting his explanation. The matter will also be investigated by the AEC’s Electoral Integrity Unit, which was established recently in response to the Abbott government’s push to hype “voting fraud”. Matt Keogh will also not be voting at the by-election as he remains enrolled at his old address in Mount Lawley, having moved into the electorate at Kelmscott less than a month ago.

Friday, August 28

With today’s declaration of nominations, it emerged that there will be 12 candidates standing at the by-election, with the ballot paper order as follows:

Vimal Kumar Sharma (Palmer United)
Connor Whittle (Liberal Democrats)
Michelle Allen (Pirate Party)
Greg Smith (Australian Defence Veterans Party)
Katrina Love (Animal Justice)
Andrew Hastie (Liberal)
Teresa van Lieshout (Independent)
Matt Keogh (Labor)
Vanessa Rauland (Greens)
Jim McCourt (Family First)
Jamie van Burgel (Australian Christians)
Angela Smith (Sustainable Population Party)

I had a paywalled article on the by-election in Crikey today, which did a bit of reading between the lines (not always a good idea) to observe that Tony Abbott seems to be more optimistic about the result than Bill Shorten. The article also noted that historical observation of by-elections over the past 25 years suggests that the roughly 7% swing shown against the Coalition by opinion poll aggregates suggests the by-election swing will be around 12%, or exactly equal to the existing margin. The scatterplot below shows how this was determined. Each point represents one federal or state by-election since 1990, with the most recent available opinion poll swing shown on the x-axis (based on my own poll aggregations where possible, or the most recent Newspoll where not, which was rather more often), and the swing recorded at the by-election on the y-axis. The linear equation tells us we should multiply the minus 7% opinion poll swing by 1.3717 and then subtract a further 2.26%, which gets us to 11.86%, compared with a Liberal margin of 11.81%. The r-squared tells us the model only explains 45.73% of the variation across the 45 results, so there is plenty of scope for the actual result to land on either side of the prediction.

Thursday, August 27

Latest developments:

Phillip Coorey of the Financial Review reports that Malcolm Turnbull, Julie Bishop and Scott Morrison will all campaign in the electorate over the next 10 days. However, “Prime Minister Tony Abbott, who is in Northern Australia for the rest of this week, would not say on Tuesday if he would make another appearance”. When confronted about the matter by Mark Riley of Seven News, Andrew Hastie gave a clear impression that he didn’t have any lines rehearsed.

• Further candidates to add to the previously noted Andrew Hastie (Liberal), Matt Keogh (Labor), Vanessa Rauland (Greens) and Vimal Sharma (Palmer United): Jamie van Burgel of Australian Christians, whose multiple runs for election in the past included a bid for Canning in 2010; Greg Smith, a former army major, for the Australian Defence Veterans Party; Michelle Allen, a software development manager, for the Pirate Party; and Teresa van Lieshout, a teacher and serial election candidate (most recently seen donning a bikini to promote her run at last year’s state by-election in Vasse) who once ran for One Nation and is now under the banner of the unregistered Voters Rights Party. Nominations close at noon today, with the ballot paper draw to follow tomorrow.

• With the electoral roll having closed on Monday evening, the Australian Electoral Commission relates there are 112,809 people enrolled to vote at the by-election. A breakdown by age can be found here.

Wednesday, August 26

The West Australian reports a ReachTEL poll has Liberal candidate Andrew Hastie on 44.4%, Labor’s Matt Keogh on 30.2%, Vanessa Rauland of the Greens on 8.6% and Vimal Sharma of Palmer United on 2.3%, which compares with 2013 election results of 51.1%, 26.6%, 7.4% and 6.9%. However, it’s not clear if the 14.5% remainder includes those who opted for a response of “undecided”. My guess is that it does, since otherwise the two-party result would pan out to 57-43 in favour of the Liberals based on 2013 preferences, whereas the report states that Labor leads 50.1-49.9. Even so, it’s clear enough that this must be based on respondent-allocated preferences, and that the flow credited to Labor is substantially stronger than what they achieved in 2013. There is a slight further complication in that the report refers to a “Coalition” primary vote, when the Nationals fielded a separate candidate in 2013 but are not doing so again this time. The Nationals only scored 1.9% of the vote in 2013, but this delivered a remarkably weak 67.5% share of preferences to Don Randall over Labor. The ReachTEL poll was conducted for the United Voice union, and had a sample of 768.

UPDATE: The primary vote numbers cited above include 5.9% others and 8.6% undecided, adding up to the “14.5% remainder”. The undecided were then asked to indicate who they were leaning towards, after which the result was Liberal 47.3%, Labor 33.0%, Greens 9.6%, Palmer United 2.7% and others 7.5%. The 50.1-49.9 two-party preferred is based on respondent-allocated preferences, and implies a remarkable 85-15 split in favour of Labor. The poll question did not identify the candidates, and the prompt was for the Liberal Party rather than the Coalition, with no mention of the Nationals.

Monday, August 24

Noteworthy occurrences of the first week of the campaign:

• Whoever emerges the winner of the by-election will have their political future coloured by the redistribution currently in progress, draft boundaries for which were published last week. About a third of the voters currently in Canning, in the south-eastern Perth suburbs area encompassing Armadale, Forrestdale and Kelmscott, are set to be transferred to the new electorate of Burt, which further extends north to Canning Vale, Thornlie and Gosnells. It is proposed that Canning be compensated for the loss by gaining the northern part of Mandurah, which is currently in Brand. Should Matt Keogh win the seat for Labor, he will presumably be keen on a transfer to Burt, which has a notional Liberal margin of about 5%, and encompasses his old stamping grounds of Armadale and Kelmscott. But if Andrew Hastie retains the seat for the Liberals, the redistribution will make the seat about 1% more favourable for him, the Armadale area in particular being relatively strong for Labor. More on the redistribution here.

• The first weekend of the official campaign has been dominated by a Fairfax report’s revelation that Andrew Hastie was the officer in command of a troop of around 30 soldiers which is being investigated for “chopping the hands off dead Taliban fighters in Afghanistan”, which were “believed to have been removed for the purposes of identifying them by fingerprinting”. The Defence Department has declined to say if Hastie himself was being investigated, but Hastie says he had been in a helicopter overhead at the time, and that all but one soldier from the troop has been cleared.

• The subsequent outbreak of dubious jokes from Labor partisans on social media has made headlines after two entries in the field were retweeted by state Labor MPs Chris Tallentire and Darren West. Julie Bishop described the tweets as “simply appalling”, and the MPs have been admonished by state Labor leader Mark McGowan (“completely unacceptable”) and federal front-bencher Brendan O’Connor (“distasteful … no one should be seeking to reflect adversely on a soldier who’s defended this nation”).

• The other theme of the early part of the campaign has been one-upmanship regarding the major party candidates’ local credentials. Andrew Hastie is preparing to move into a rental property in the Mandurah suburb of Dudley Park, but he was born in Victoria and has spent most of his life in New South Wales, and currently lives in Defence Force housing in the inner Perth suburb of Shenton Park. Matt Keogh grew up in Kelmscott and Armadale, but now lives in the bohemian inner-city suburb of Mount Lawley, prompting Julie Bishop to label him a “hipster lawyer”.

• The Greens have preselected Vanessa Rauland, a lecturer in sustainability and climate policy at Curtin University and co-director of SimplyCarbon, “a boutique sustainability and carbon consultancy that assists businesses to become leaders in sustainability”.

• The Palmer United candidate is Vimal Sharma, managing director of Clive Palmer’s Mineralogy company, who ran for the party in the seat of Cowan at the 2013 election. Sharma was not present at the press conference Clive Palmer held on Friday to announce his candidacy.

Friday, August 21

A report in The West Australian yesterday related that a ReachTEL poll of 734 respondents conducted for the Australian Workers Union on July 29, eight days after Randall’s death, had Labor leading 50.8-49.2.

Thursday, August 20

This post started life recounting the Newspoll result you can see immediately below, but it shall henceforth provide a rolling account of by-election news as it emerges. It was announced this week that the date for the by-election would be September 19 – evidently a little earlier than Labor expected, given their as-yet-unresolved preselection process – with the roll to close on Monday, nominations to close next Thursday, and the ballot paper draw to be conducted on Friday. The by-election looms as a contest between Liberal candidate Andrew Hastie, an SAS officer who has served three tours in Afghanistan, and Labor’s Matt Keogh, a commercial lawyer and president of the WA Law Society.

Hastie won a preselection vote last week from a field which, as described by Colin Bettles of Fairfax, included “company director Daniel Nikolic, local school teacher Ashley King, and small business owners Marisa Hislop, Steve Marshall and Lance Scott”, as well as Pierrette Kelly, electorate officer to Senator Chris Back. The vote involved mostly delegates from local branches, and is set to be signed off today by the party’s state council. A vote of local Labor members will be held on Sunday, but this appears to be a one-horse race following the withdrawal yesterday of Kelly McManus, a staffer to state Mandurah MP David Templeman currently, and formerly to Kim Beazley. Nathan Hondros of the Mandurah Mail reports it is “understood” that McManus withdrew to give Keogh a clear run. The by-election seems to have restored some of Clive Palmer’s vigour, with his party set to unveil its candidate tomorrow.

Monday, August 17

The Australian has published results from a Newspoll survey in Canning, for which the date was set today at September 19. The poll finds the Liberals grimly hanging on with a two-party preferred lead of 51-49, suggesting a swing of around 11% since the 2013 election. The primary votes are 41% for the Liberals (down 10.1%), 36% for Labor (up 9.4%), a 11% for the Greens (up 3.6%). The poll also finds Tony Abbott favoured over Bill Shorten in the electorate as preferred prime minister by 36-32, and 78% opting for a “people’s vote” option on same-sex marriage over 20% for “vote by politicians”. The poll was conducted over the weekend from a fairly small sample of 508 respondents, with a self-ascribed error margin of 4.3%.

I’ll flesh this post out into a proper by-election overview when I get time, but for the time being, here’s a 2013 booth results map for the electorate:


Author: William Bowe

William Bowe is a Perth-based election analyst and occasional teacher of political science. His blog, The Poll Bludger, has existed in one form or another since 2004, and is one of the most heavily trafficked websites on Australian politics.

324 comments on “Canning by-election: September 19”

Comments Page 2 of 7
1 2 3 7
  1. Labor is pretty close in a safe LNP seat without actually having announced the candidate?

    I hope they choose a well regarded local. It might get them over the line.

  2. [I hope they choose a well regarded local. It might get them over the line.]

    I don’t think labor do that, it is seen as a weakness …

  3. I don’t know if WA Labor have forgiven themselves for Bullock yet…

    I think it’s going to be tough for Labor to put someone up who can match a “decorated war hero”, given the make up of this seat. If there’s any polls between now and the election, I would expect them to be stronger for the Liberals as people get to grips with the candidates. Barring any catastrophic captain’s picks in the meantime, naturally…

  4. TrueBlueAussie@48

    We all remember Labors “winning!” in Western Australia last time… lost an extra Senate Seat to the Homophobe at the expense of the Gay candidate.

    Anyways bring on the by-election

    To be fair, I think that contest was already lost at pre-selection, and Pratt was a bit more complicated than just “the gay candidate” but I’m not going to go there….

  5. When the trend is against you even some high order/named candidates do not make it.

    We have seen plenty come into politics with “names” and “public reputations” to see them leave just as quickly.

    That a sitting PM can lose both an election and his seat shows anything is possible in an 2 horse race.

  6. Did anyone catch PvO desperately trying to suggest that if the TPP result at the by-election was better for the Government than the Newspoll result, then it was a sign the Government recovered during the month…

    He really isn’t that stupid.
    a) electorate-level polling is very unreliable
    b) early polling before the candidates are known is POINTLESS

    Ugh – trying to set the Government up for a win, any win.

  7. teh_drewsli
    I think it’s going to be tough for Labor to put someone up who can match a “decorated war hero”, given the make up of this seat. If there’s any polls between now and the election, I would expect them to be stronger for the Liberals as people get to grips with the candidates. Barring any catastrophic captain’s picks in the meantime, naturally…

    Although Abbott would like it to be this is not a “kaki election”. The Liberal Candidate is young, a family man and a deorated war hero but whilst he is these things as a soldier he has had no political activity such as links to community organisations dealing with the main issues such as health and education. At some stage he is going to have to talk about these and his inexperience and lack of any previous public profile may count against him.

    In addition he lives in the yuppy western suburb of Shenton Park and that may not go down well with significant parts of the less gentrified electorate of Canning.

  8. It seems Clive intends to make a big impact on Canning:

    [CLIVE Palmer has challenged Prime Minister Tony Abbott to a doorknocking competition during the Canning by-election campaign.

    THE Palmer United Party will announce its candidate in Perth on Friday for the West Australian seat, left vacant after the death of long-serving Liberal MP Don Randall.

    Mr Palmer told reporters in Canberra on Wednesday he intends to spend at least six figures on the PUP campaign.]

    http://www.news.com.au/national/breaking-news/palmer-challenges-pm-to-doorknocking-comp/story-e6frfku9-1227489796483

  9. Clive’s measure of success would probably be to do enough in this byelection to put Abbott’s leadership back in play. The huge resources he put into the Qld election to end up with no seats didn’t seem to worry him

    He could only get at most a few percent of the vote to direct preferences from, surely

  10. Jimmy @ 29

    If Canning does swing big, and if Labor does pick it up, then not only will Hasluck and Swan in play, but also Cowan and Stirling.

    Also Pearce, as that’s currently got a margin lower than Canning – only 8.1%, almost marginal by WA Lib held seat standards. Though it won’t have the personal vote of Randall. It’s ever increasing mortgage belt nature also strips away more and more of the Libs rural vote each time. I’d guess it’s one of the seats that flips currently on the Bludgertrack with it’s 9.4% change for WA (Hasluck, Swan, Cowan, Pearce).

    Stirling (10.3%) is similar to Canning in it’s margin, and that it used to be a marginal seat. If Canning can fall to the ALP, then Stirling could as well (as a resident of Stirling, I’d like it to be marginal again). And if we’re talking the seats in this range, I wonder if the threat of CSG might even have an impact on the Liberal vote in Forrest (12.3%) – though I’d doubt enough to bring it anywhere near marginal.

    Of course, when we’re talking about the next election, the elephant in the room is the redistribution – which will dramatically change a few seats anyway.

  11. FalconWA – I think you’re erring if you think decorated veterans only have appeal to the electorate in “khaki” elections.

    And while he may be an inner city suburban with limited appeal to the rural parts of the election, I have a hard time believing anyone who is put off by his urbanity is going to vote for a lawyer instead.

  12. This article mentions a Reachtel taken a week after Randall’s death for the AWU. 50.8-49.2 to Coalition, 738 respondents

    Has this been mentioned anywhere else?

  13. I hope the voters of Canning realise what a spectacular opportunity they have to get rid of Abbott; all the commentators are agreeing that a Liberal loss means he’s gone. Do it for your country!

  14. [Of course, when we’re talking about the next election, the elephant in the room is the redistribution – which will dramatically change a few seats anyway.]

    Isn’t the draft WA redistribution due out today?

  15. trand@69

    This article mentions a Reachtel taken a week after Randall’s death for the AWU. 50.8-49.2 to Coalition, 738 respondents

    Has this been mentioned anywhere else?

    I had never seen mention of that one until today. It’s old rope now and at this stage full details are not available (plus it is commissioned) but still of some interest.

  16. Betting odds!

    William Hill Coalition 1.57 Labor 2.35 Other 21

    Ignoring Other, that’s an implied 60% chance of a Coalition victory.

  17. http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/andrew-hastie-liberal-byelection-candidate-led-troop-probed-for-chopping-hands-off-taliban-20150821-gj52lj.html
    [Andrew Hastie, Liberal byelection candidate, was in charge of troop probed for chopping hands off Taliban
    August 22, 2015 – 12:15AM
    David Wroe
    National security correspondent

    The former SAS soldier standing as the Liberal Party’s prize recruit in a key federal by-election was the officer in command of a troop being investigated for chopping the hands off dead Taliban fighters in Afghanistan.

    Fairfax Media has learnt that the 2013 incident was carried out by one or more soldiers who were under the command of Captain Andrew Hastie, 32, who has been pre-selected as the Liberal candidate for the byelection in the West Australian seat of Canning.

    The hands of three Taliban fighters who had been killed in combat by the SAS soldiers were believed to have been removed for the purposes of identifying them by fingerprinting, sparking a defence investigation that has lasted more than two years and is still going on.

    There are differing views on whether this constituted a breach of the rules of war, which forbid despoiling or mutilating corpses.

    Several well-informed sources have confirmed to Fairfax Media that the incident took place within the troop of about 30 soldiers whom Captain Hastie commanded. However, it is understood he was not present at the time of the incident but was rather elsewhere on the battlefield.

    Defence declined in a statement to say whether Captain Hastie himself was being investigated.]

    http://www.news.com.au/national/western-australia/bill-shorten-pushes-canning-candidate-matt-keoghs-local-credentials/story-fnii5thn-1227493336649
    [Bill Shorten pushes Canning candidate Matt Keogh’s local credentials
    August 21, 2015 3:35PM
    KATE CAMPBELL
    PerthNow

    WINNING the Canning by-election will be a hard challenge on paper, federal opposition leader Bill Shorten concedes but Labor is pushing hard the local credentials of its lawyer candidate to win votes.

    Labor’s big hope for an upset win is commercial lawyer Matt Keogh, who launched his campaign on Friday at his parents’ Kelmscott home flanked by Mr Shorten and Perth MP Alannah MacTiernan.]

  18. https://medium.com/@ketanj0/canning-s-solar-rooftops-and-abbott-s-unstable-perch-de600496e98e
    [Ketan Joshi
    1 day ago 5 min read
    Canning’s solar rooftops and Abbott’s unstable perch

    …………

    Canning has been earmarked as a key electorate by the Solar Council, Australia’s foremost group representing small and big solar owners. John Grimes, CEO of the Solar council, told news outlets that:

    “This is a golden opportunity to give Tony Abbott the kicks that he deserves. He is leading the Liberal Party and Australia in the wrong direction. He needs to embrace good solar policy”

    It’s part of a broader campaign, being spearheaded by the Solar Council, to target marginal seats and turn some focus back on a government that has launched a multi-pronged attack on the renewable energy industry over the past few years.

    There’s a surprising amount of detail out there about Canning’s population, and solar installations within the electorate (thanks to the Clean Energy Regulator’s great book-keeping around new solar). Let’s compare Canning’s total household count to the current number of solar installations: ]

  19. Andrew Hastie is described as a church going ex army officer. Queensland tried one of them as premier (Newman) That did not go too well at all. The voters in Canning should be wary of the ‘do not question me, I am on officer’ attitude.

  20. “Hi all – can we please keep this thread on topic vis-a-vis Canning, and keep the general discussion rolling here: [link]”

    Will, most of the general discussion for the last two pages seems to have been about Canning. All those hand and finger jokes – quite unfair if Hastie, as he says, immediately reported it up the chain of command, but they still crack me up!

  21. How did Randall do so well in Armadale and surrounds? I’d have pegged Armadale as a place more likely to vote Labor – did Randall do anything particularly unusual?

  22. “The seat’s got a lot of what we over here call bogans,” said one eastern states Liberal who was unsure whether the term was used in the west.

    & Randall was ecstatic that Abott’s xenophobic & decisive policies prior to last election were as if designed especially for his constituents.

    That’s the problem Labor faces, battling the racists ever since Howard lifted that particular rock.

  23. sceptic, you don’t qualify as a genuine sceptic when it comes to analysing the article or the Posts it ‘inspired’; but you’re certainly in a clear majority on this thread.

  24. Keogh will probably be very happy with the creation of Burt and his chances there should he lose in Canning. He might even prefer to lose a tough one, then get an easier run at a more naturally Labor seat.

  25. The best thing that can happen for Labor is to lose Canning but not by very much at all. It means that Keogh can stand for Burt without being portrayed as dumping Canning. Meanwhile the people of Canning get Hastie -good luck to them with that.

  26. Kevin Bonham @65:

    [ http://kevinbonham.blogspot.com.au/2015/08/canning-by-election-prospects-and-polls.html
    Canning By-Election: Prospects and Polls

    …in which I look at what can be objectively gleaned from the history of by-elections and end up agreeing that the mainline expectation of a narrow-ish Liberal win is probably about right at this stage.]

    I do have one minor bone to pick with your article – you correctly note that the polling’s showing a particularly large swing against the Federal Coalition in WA, but that’s off a *very* high base – the Coalition won nearly 60% of the TPP vote in 2013 in WA, compared to 53.5% nationwide.

    Do I think that Labor could swoop in and snatch Canning? …Plausibly, but they’re fighting uphill to do so – if Abbott weren’t so much on the nose as he is, this wouldn’t even be a contest.

  27. Actually cog, that may or may not be correct.

    First, she does not need to resign on being announced as a candidate. In law nobody is a candidate until they lodge their nomination

    Since the judgment in Sykes v Cleary, most acts governing employment in jobs that fall under the s44 provision have been re-written. In most public sector employment these days, if you nominate for parliament you are immediately deemed as resigning from your position.

    This came up in relation to George Newhouse, the Labor candidate for Wentworth in 2007. He held a part time post on a credit tribunal which was a clear office for profit. He forgot about it and didn’t resign, but the wording of the act meant that in nominating for parliament he automatically resigned the position.

    All candidate should lodge their own resignation, but the fact they don’t no longer means they clash with Section 44. It depends on the circumstances.

  28. Thanks Antony. Interesting. I wonder if Curtin Uni have been proactive enough to put that in to their employment contracts. Universities don’t always keep in step with trends in other parts of the public sector.

    When are the nominations due to be lodged officially?

  29. Cog (And Antony Green), there may be another problem with the contention that – as a Curtin academic – Rauland can’t stand unless she resigns. Universities are separate public entities from the Government of the Commonwealth (or of the State, for that matter) – does employment with them count as “an office of profit” the way a job in, say, the Department of Education would?

  30. Who knows. The simple answer is the candidate must resign before the close of nominations if there is any doubt and that is the advice Labor, Liberal and the Greens will give their candidates. The automatic resignation provisions have been introduced to get around candidates who don’t do what the instructions on the nomination form tell them to do.

    As we saw with the bankrupt Palmer United candidate in Queensland though, an ineligible candidate does not automatically invalidate the election.

  31. cog, Antony and others – a university lecturer, Professor, etc does *not* hold an “office of profit under the Crown”. Unis may be funded by the Commonwealth and increasingly controlled by it, but they are separate corporations and the staff are *not* public servants, or in Bri’ish terminology, Crown servants. There’s a ruling of a Judge sitting as an industrial commissioner somewhere that confirms that but, more importantly, it’s obviously correct

  32. Wow.. the unions are so desperate to take the heat off Billy Boy Shorten that they are willing to rig polls now in a desperate attempt to shut down the RC into their corruption.

    44.4% Libs Primary vs 30.2% Primary for Labor is nothing to call home about, certainly going to need those preferences.

  33. [“That’s the problem Labor faces, battling the racists ever since Howard lifted that particular rock.”]

    Yeah if you are losing it’s because of… racists.

    Oh yes… also. Misogyny.

    Will the lefties ever stop trying to lecture others on how “smart” they are and how little everyone else knows?

Comments Page 2 of 7
1 2 3 7

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *